<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7708264185409642550</id><updated>2012-02-16T17:25:13.408-08:00</updated><title type='text'>wikiinlet</title><subtitle type='html'></subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wikiinlet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7708264185409642550/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wikiinlet.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><author><name>1U3.IN</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>2</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7708264185409642550.post-6453373325092050479</id><published>2009-06-23T16:18:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-06-23T16:20:14.563-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Websters.New.World.Websters.New.World.Hacker.Dictionary.</title><content type='html'>Hacking 148&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Cracking; Eavesdrop; Privacy; Privacy Laws.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Ishai,Y. Sahai, A. and Wagner, D. Private Circuits: Securing Hardware&lt;br /&gt;Against Probing Attacks. [Online, 2004.] University of California at Berkeley Computer Science&lt;br /&gt;Department Website. http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~daw/papers/privcirc-crypto03.pdf.&lt;br /&gt;Hardware Setup (general term): A set of parameters such as data rate, modem type, and&lt;br /&gt;port/device used as a resource to launch a host or a remote session.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Host; Modem; Port and Port Numbers.&lt;br /&gt;Hardware Vulnerabilities (general term): Generally caused by the exploitation of features having&lt;br /&gt;been put into the hardware to differentiate it from the competition or to aid in the support&lt;br /&gt;and maintenance of the hardware. Some exploitable features include terminals with memory that&lt;br /&gt;can be reread by the computer and downloadable configuration and password protection for all&lt;br /&gt;types of peripheral devices, including printers. It is the cracker’s creative misuse of these features&lt;br /&gt;that can turn a “feature” into a “vulnerability.”&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Exploit; Hardware Attacks Paper by Ishai, Sahai, and Wagner;Vulnerabilities of&lt;br /&gt;Computers.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Pipkin, D.L. Halting the Hacker: A Practical Guide to Computer Security.&lt;br /&gt;Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2003.&lt;br /&gt;Harm to Property (legal term): Can occur in nonvirtual crimes such as vandalism as well as in&lt;br /&gt;virtual crimes such as Web page defacement.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Harm.&lt;br /&gt;Hash, One-Way (general term):The output or end result value of data that has been processed&lt;br /&gt;by an algorithm, transforming messages, text, or binary data into a fixed string of numbers for&lt;br /&gt;security or data-management purposes.“One-way” suggests that it is almost impossible to figure&lt;br /&gt;out the original text or data from the numerical string.A one-way hash function is typically used&lt;br /&gt;for digital signature creation, which in turn identifies and authenticates the sender of a digital&lt;br /&gt;message or ensures the integrity of the binary data.&lt;br /&gt;On March 11, 2005, news stories reported that a month earlier, three Chinese cryptologists&lt;br /&gt;discovered how to crack a U.S. government–approved information security system called Secure&lt;br /&gt;Hash Algorithm-1, or SHA-1.The worry was that this encryption is prevalently used within the&lt;br /&gt;U.S. government, including the U.S. intelligence community and the Pentagon. SHA-1 is commonly&lt;br /&gt;used to verify the integrity of digital media and to ensure that secure email has not been&lt;br /&gt;altered during transmission.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Algorithm;Text.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Gertz, B. and Scarborough, R. Inside the Ring. [Online, March 11, 2005.]&lt;br /&gt;News World Communications, Inc. Website. http://washingtontimes.com/national/20050311-&lt;br /&gt;123922-9537r.htm; Jupitermedia Corporation.One-way Hash Function. [Online, January 8, 2002.]&lt;br /&gt;Jupitermedia Corporation Website. http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/O/one-way_hash_&lt;br /&gt;function.htm.&lt;br /&gt;Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) (legal term):&lt;br /&gt;Focused on health protection for United States employees in a number of ways, with the Centers&lt;br /&gt;149 Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA)&lt;br /&gt;for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) having the responsibility to implement various unrelated&lt;br /&gt;provisions of HIPAA.&lt;br /&gt;Title I of HIPAA maintains that health insurance coverage for individuals and their families&lt;br /&gt;will carry on when they transfer or lose employment, and Title II requires the Department of&lt;br /&gt;Health and Human Services to develop and maintain national standards for e-transactions in&lt;br /&gt;health care.Title II also speaks to the security and privacy of health data.&lt;br /&gt;The developers of HIPAA felt that such standards would improve the efficiency and effectiveness&lt;br /&gt;of the U.S. health care system by encouraging the secure and private handling of&lt;br /&gt;electronic data. For information security purposes, HIPAA requires a double-entry or doublecheck&lt;br /&gt;of data entered by personnel.&lt;br /&gt;With a deadline of April 21, 2005, all U.S. health care organizations had to meet the new&lt;br /&gt;HIPAA Security Rule regulations by taking extra measures to secure protected health information.&lt;br /&gt;The final version of the Security Rule was published on April 21, 2003.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Accountability; Privacy; Privacy Laws; Security.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services. The Health Insurance&lt;br /&gt;Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA). [Online, October 16, 2002.] Centers for&lt;br /&gt;Medicaid and Medicare Services Website. http://www.cms.hhs.gov/hipaa/; Consul. Consul&lt;br /&gt;Insight and HIPAA. [Online, August 30, 2004.] Consul Website. http://searchSecurity.com/r/&lt;br /&gt;0,,38262,00.htm?track+NL-358&amp;amp;ad=506624&amp;amp;CONSUL.&lt;br /&gt;Helsingius, Johan (person; 1962– ): During the mid-1990s, hackers around the world were&lt;br /&gt;arrested for their exploits, and the media took every opportunity to color them as criminals.&lt;br /&gt;One of the highly publicized cases was that of Johan Helsingius (a.k.a. Julf), a Finnish hacker&lt;br /&gt;who ran the most subscribed anonymous remailer, penet.fi, on a run-of-the-mill 486 computer&lt;br /&gt;with a 200-megatbyte hard drive. In July 1995, his premises were raided by the police after&lt;br /&gt;the Church of Scientology filed a complaint that a penet.fi customer was posting the Church’s&lt;br /&gt;“secrets” on the Internet. The Finnish court eventually ruled that Helsingius must reveal the&lt;br /&gt;customer’s email address. In contrast to most hackers, Johan did not have a moniker and did&lt;br /&gt;not post himself anonymously on the Web.&lt;br /&gt;On May 20, 2005, Johan’s Web page was down.A note on this Web page pointed to the cracking&lt;br /&gt;efforts of spammers and virus writers: http://www.julf.com/.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Anonymity; Anonymous Remailer; Electronic Mail or Email; Exploit; Hacker;&lt;br /&gt;Internet; Moniker.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Schell, B.H., Dodge, J.L., with S.S. Moutsatsos. The Hacking of America:&lt;br /&gt;Who’s Doing It,Why, and How.Westport, CT: Quorum Books, 2002.&lt;br /&gt;Hexadecimal (general term): Refers to the base 16 numbering system, consisting of 16 unique&lt;br /&gt;symbols—the numbers from 0 through 9 and the letters from A to F.This system is useful because&lt;br /&gt;it represents every byte (that is, 8 bits) as two consecutive hexadecimal digits, which are easier for&lt;br /&gt;people to read than binary numbers.For example, 15 is represented as “F” in the hexadecimal numbering&lt;br /&gt;system. To translate a hexadecimal value to a binary one, an individual turns every&lt;br /&gt;hexadecimal digit into its 4-bit binary counterpart, such that hexadecimal numbers have either a&lt;br /&gt;0x prefix or an h suffix. For example, the hexadecimal number 0x3F7A translates into this binary&lt;br /&gt;number: 0011 1111 0111 1010.&lt;br /&gt;Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) 150&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Bit and Bit Challenge.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Jupitermedia Corporation. Hexadecimal. [Online, March 31, 2003.]&lt;br /&gt;Jupitermedia Corporation Website. http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/H/hexadecimal.html.&lt;br /&gt;Hijacking (general term):The cutting off of an authenticated, authorized connection between&lt;br /&gt;a sender and a receiver.Through hijacking, an attacker can take over the connection,“killing” the&lt;br /&gt;information sent by the original sender and sending “attack data” instead.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Exploit.&lt;br /&gt;Himanen, Pekka (person; 1974– ): A University of Helsinki philosophy professor and previously&lt;br /&gt;a hacker. Himanen coauthored The Hacker Ethic and the Spirit of the New Economy, published&lt;br /&gt;in 2001, with Manuel Castells, a sociology professor at the University of California, and Linus&lt;br /&gt;Torvalds, the man behind Linux.The book advocated viewing a hacker primarily as an enthusiastic&lt;br /&gt;programmer—and not as some dangerous criminal—who shares his or her work with&lt;br /&gt;others. Pekka Himanen’s Web page can be found at http://www.pekkahimanen.org/.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Linux;Torvalds, Linus.&lt;br /&gt;Hoffman,Abbie and Bell, Al Team (general term): In the 1970s, the publishing partner of Al&lt;br /&gt;Bell,Yippie guru Abbie Hoffman, amended the title of The Youth International Party Line newsletter&lt;br /&gt;to TAP, or Technical Assistance Program.The premise behind the newsletter was that phreaking&lt;br /&gt;did not hurt anyone because telephone calls emanated from an unlimited reservoir. At the time,&lt;br /&gt;hackers voraciously absorbed the rather technical articles found in TAP—which encompassed&lt;br /&gt;such “hot” topics as explosives formulas, electronic sabotage blueprints, credit card fraud, and so&lt;br /&gt;on. Peculiar forms of Computer Underground writing were started in this newsletter, such as&lt;br /&gt;spelling the word “freak” as “phreak,” substituting “z” for “s,” and substituting “0” (zero) for “O”&lt;br /&gt;(the letter). These trends within the hacker community continue. The last editor of TAP was&lt;br /&gt;phreaker Cheshire Catalyst.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Cheshire Catalyst and TAP; Phreaking;TAP.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Schell, B.H., Dodge, J.L., with S.S. Moutsatsos. The Hacking of America:&lt;br /&gt;Who’s Doing It,Why, and How.Westport, CT: Quorum Books, 2002.&lt;br /&gt;Homeland Security Act of 2002 (legal term): Brought by U.S. Representative Richard&lt;br /&gt;Armey, R-TX, to the Standing Committee in the House on July 10, 2002. Amendments were&lt;br /&gt;made by the Committee on Homeland Security on July 24, 2002.The legislation was passed by&lt;br /&gt;the House and Senate as of November 25, 2002 and was signed by President George W. Bush as&lt;br /&gt;Public Law 107-296 to establish the Department of Homeland Security.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Department of Homeland Security (DHS).&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Center for Democracy and Technology. Legislation Affecting the Internet.&lt;br /&gt;[Online, July 28, 2004.] Center for Democracy and Technology Website. http://www.cdt.org/&lt;br /&gt;legislation/107th/wiretaps/.&lt;br /&gt;Homeland Security Information Sharing Act of 2002 (legal term): In 2002, U.S. Senator&lt;br /&gt;Saxby Chambliss, R-GA, and U.S. Representative Jane Harman, D-CA, suggested that the&lt;br /&gt;United States should have a Homeland Security Information Sharing Act to assist in sharing with&lt;br /&gt;state and local authorities homeland security information by federal intelligence agencies. The&lt;br /&gt;Act would also have the President direct the coordination of various intelligence agencies.The&lt;br /&gt;151 Homeland Security Information Sharing Act of 2002&lt;br /&gt;Act was referred to the Committee on Intelligence and to the Committee on the Judiciary on&lt;br /&gt;April 25, 2002. It was sent to the Subcommittee on Crime,Terrorism, and Homeland Security&lt;br /&gt;on May 6, 2002, and on June 13, 2002, it was reported with changes by the House Judiciary.&lt;br /&gt;Finally, on June 25, 2002, it was passed by the House.&lt;br /&gt;After the September 11 terrorist attacks, other nations passed similar acts for the sharing of&lt;br /&gt;homeland security information by national intelligence agencies with local authorities and for&lt;br /&gt;determining the criteria as to who should be considered a terrorist risk.The terrorist risk criteria&lt;br /&gt;question has stirred considerable controversy, with people of Arab or Muslim backgrounds in&lt;br /&gt;particular claiming unfair labeling and unfair screening and civil liberties groups arguing that bills&lt;br /&gt;authorizing “watch-list” criteria do not adequately protect people’s privacy.&lt;br /&gt;As did the United States, after September 11, 2001, the Canadian parliament enacted extraordinary&lt;br /&gt;police and security measures, and the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS),&lt;br /&gt;headed as of this writing by Jim Judd, was charged with determining terrorist risk criteria. In&lt;br /&gt;March 2005, Liberal Senator Mobina Jaffer claimed that some members of identifiable groups&lt;br /&gt;have had to cope with the negative impact of nondiscreet activities used by some CSIS officers.&lt;br /&gt;She stated the case of a professor who was not in his office when a CSIS officer telephoned&lt;br /&gt;repeatedly, leaving the message that the agency wanted to speak with him.Though these activities&lt;br /&gt;led university colleagues to suspect that he was terrorist suspect, in the end the CSIS officer&lt;br /&gt;apparently wanted only to have some information about Afghanistan.&lt;br /&gt;In June 2006 terrorist headlines were made when the RCMP and CSIS rounded up 17&lt;br /&gt;Canadian-bred terrorist suspects. Their targets allegedly included the Parliament buildings in&lt;br /&gt;Ottawa, the CBC Broadcasting Centre, CSIS offices, an unspecified military installation, the&lt;br /&gt;Toronto Stock Exchange, and the CN Tower in Toronto.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Department of Homeland Security (DHS); Intelligence; Privacy; Privacy Laws;&lt;br /&gt;Risk;Terrorism; U.S. Intelligence Community.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: CBC: Indepth:Toronto Bomb Plot. [Online, June 5, 2006.] CBC Website.&lt;br /&gt;http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/toronto-bomb-plot/index.html; Center for Democracy&lt;br /&gt;and Technology. Legislation Affecting the Internet. [Online, July 28, 2004.] Center for&lt;br /&gt;Democracy and Technology Website. http://www.cdt.org/legislation/107th/wiretaps/; Sallot, J.&lt;br /&gt;Building Terror-Watch System Slow Work, CSIS Chief Says. The Globe and Mail, March 8,&lt;br /&gt;2005, p. A4.&lt;br /&gt;Homeland Security Strategy Act of 2001 (legal term): Introduced by U.S. Representative&lt;br /&gt;Ike Skelton, D-MO, on March 29, 2001, the Homeland Security Strategy Act, also known as&lt;br /&gt;H.R.1292, if passed, required the President of the United States to design and implement a strategy&lt;br /&gt;for providing security to the homeland. On March 29, 2001, this legislation was referred to&lt;br /&gt;the Committee on the Armed Services on Transportation and Infrastructure. On April 4, 2001,&lt;br /&gt;it was sent to the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, and on April 19, 2001, it was&lt;br /&gt;sent by the Judiciary Committee to the Subcommittee on Crime. On August 10, 2001, it&lt;br /&gt;received unfavorable Executive Comment from the Department of Defense.The terrorist attacks&lt;br /&gt;of September 11, 2001, occurred one month later.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Critical Infrastructures; Critical Networks; Department of Homeland Security&lt;br /&gt;(DHS); Security; September 11, 2001;Terrorism;Terrorist Events.&lt;br /&gt;Homeland Security Information Sharing Act of 2002 152&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Center for Democracy and Technology. Legislation Affecting the Internet.&lt;br /&gt;[Online, July 28, 2004.] Center for Democracy and Technology Website. http://www.cdt.org/&lt;br /&gt;legislation/107th/wiretaps/.&lt;br /&gt;Honeypots or Honeynets (general term): A computer or computer network set up to “pretend”&lt;br /&gt;that it offers some real service, such as a Web or Email service, on the Internet.The real&lt;br /&gt;purpose of a honeypot is, in fact, to lure crackers.The computer or network is closely monitored&lt;br /&gt;by an expert to find out how a cracker breaks into the system and what he or she does to&lt;br /&gt;compromise it. Generally, honeypots contain legal warnings in their banners advising crackers to&lt;br /&gt;leave. Honeypots can also observe individuals who run botnets, a network of compromised&lt;br /&gt;machines controlled remotely by crackers.&lt;br /&gt;In March 2005, a new honeypot was said to be able to trap crackers using Google queries to&lt;br /&gt;discover vulnerable systems. These crackers would normally use search engine queries to find&lt;br /&gt;sites whose URLs contain a particular string of words or phrases indicating that the site uses vulnerable&lt;br /&gt;applications.&lt;br /&gt;Legal issues about whether honeypots infringe on crackers’ privacy rights have arisen in recent&lt;br /&gt;years and will likely continue to emerge and be resolved in court.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Bot or Robot; Crackers; Internet; Privacy; Privacy Laws.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Honeypots.net. Intrusion Detection Articles, Links and Whitepapers.&lt;br /&gt;Honeypot.net Website. http://www.honeypots.net/ids/links/; Penton Media Inc. Google&lt;br /&gt;Hacking: No Longer a Sure Thing for Intruders. [Online, March 19, 2005.] Penton Media Inc.&lt;br /&gt;Website. http://list.windowsitpro.com/t?ct1=48C6:4FB69;The Honeypot Project and Research&lt;br /&gt;Alliance. Know Your Enemy:Tracking Botnets. [Online, March 13, 2005.] The Honeynet Project&lt;br /&gt;Website. http://www.honeynet.org/papers/bots.&lt;br /&gt;Hook (general term): An area in the message-handling mechanism of a computer system in&lt;br /&gt;which an application can install a subroutine to monitor the message traffic in the system.This&lt;br /&gt;application can also process certain kinds of messages before they can reach the targeted window&lt;br /&gt;procedure. Hooks significantly slow down computer systems because they increase the amount&lt;br /&gt;of processing that the system must perform for each message; therefore, they should be installed&lt;br /&gt;only when necessary.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Message.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Microsoft Corporation. Hooks. [Online, 2004.] Microsoft Corporation&lt;br /&gt;Website. http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/enus/winui/winui/&lt;br /&gt;windowsuserinterface/windowing/hooks.asp; http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?&lt;br /&gt;url=/library/en-us/winui/WinUI/WindowsUserInterface/Windowing/Hooks/AboutHooks.asp.&lt;br /&gt;HOPE: See Hackers on Planet Earth.&lt;br /&gt;Hopper, Grace Murray (person; 1906–1992): A Rear Admiral who wrote the computer language&lt;br /&gt;Cobol and was a woman of computing fame during the 1960s. She not only was a leader&lt;br /&gt;in software development concepts but also helped to catalyze the transition from early programming&lt;br /&gt;techniques to the utilization of sophisticated compilers. Dr. Hopper received a number of&lt;br /&gt;awards for her successes, and in 1969 she was the first recipient of the Computer Sciences Manof-&lt;br /&gt;the-Year Award given by the Data Processing Management Association. She died in 1992.&lt;br /&gt;153 Hopper, Grace Murray&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Programming Languages C, C++, Perl, and Java.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Schell, B.H., Dodge, J.L., with S.S. Moutsatsos. The Hacking of America:&lt;br /&gt;Who’s Doing It,Why, and How.Westport, CT: Quorum Books, 2002.&lt;br /&gt;Host (general term): A computer that permits users to communicate with other computers on a&lt;br /&gt;network by providing a service. Individual users access these services through application programs&lt;br /&gt;such as electronic mail (email), FTP, and telnet.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Electronic Mail or Email; FTP (File Transfer Protocol); Network;Telnet.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: QUT Division of Technology, Information and Learning Support.&lt;br /&gt;Network Glossary. [Online, July 17, 2003.] QUT Division of Technology, Information and&lt;br /&gt;Learning Support Website. http://www.its.qut.edu.au/network/glossary.jsp.&lt;br /&gt;Hotspots or Drive-by Hacking (general term): A location from which wireless service is&lt;br /&gt;accessible. Although a number of service providers make wireless Internet access legal in such&lt;br /&gt;places as airline lounges, Internet cafes, and hotel lobbies, “drive-by hacking” occurs when&lt;br /&gt;crackers try to spoof mobile device credentials as they are seated in a parked car or in some&lt;br /&gt;building at a “safe” distance from some targeted company.&lt;br /&gt;In a move to curb drive-by hacking, in April 2003, Interlink Networks (a producer of wireless&lt;br /&gt;networks access control and security software) and Bluesoft (a producer of wireless security&lt;br /&gt;positioning platforms) announced a partnership.Together, they said, they would provide valueadded&lt;br /&gt;security software for Wi-Fi (IEEE 802.11) networks.&lt;br /&gt;Although Interlink Networks’ software secures access to both private and public wireless LAN&lt;br /&gt;networks (based on the standards-based 802.1x security solution that is also compliant with the&lt;br /&gt;Wi-Fi Protected Access or WPA specifications), Bluesoft’s system not only locates the mobile&lt;br /&gt;device but also has authentication information.This location-based authentication software adds a&lt;br /&gt;layer of wireless security by permitting companies to make sure that only authenticated users in&lt;br /&gt;a designated building, or on, say, a designated university campus would be allowed access to the&lt;br /&gt;network. Also, location-based policy management would be able to allow for differentiated services&lt;br /&gt;in different parts of the building or on different parts of the campus. For example, Internet&lt;br /&gt;access could be provided in the building’s lobby but denied in the remaining building areas.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Crackers; Internet;Wardriving and Warwalking;Wireless.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: BWE, Inc. Interlink Networks and Bluesoft Partner to Deliver Wi-Fi&lt;br /&gt;Location-Based Security Solutions. [Online, 2003.] BWE, Inc.Website. http://www.wifizonenews&lt;br /&gt;.com/publications/page358-492296.asp.&lt;br /&gt;HTML or HyperText Markup Language (general term):The text format for the Websites of&lt;br /&gt;the World Wide Web (WWW). HTML is a language known for its ease of authoring.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Internet;World Wide Web (WWW).&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Internet Highway, LLC. Internet Highway, LLC. Internet Terminology:&lt;br /&gt;HTML. [Online, 1999.] Internet Highway, LLC Website. http://www.ihwy.com/support/&lt;br /&gt;netterms.html.&lt;br /&gt;HTTP (HyperText Transfer Protocol) (general term): Used to transfer WWW data over the&lt;br /&gt;Internet.This is why all Website addresses begin with http://.&lt;br /&gt;Hopper, Grace Murray 154&lt;br /&gt;Whenever a user types a URL into the browser and presses the Enter key, his or her computer&lt;br /&gt;sends an HTTP request to the correct Webserver.The Webserver, developed to handle such&lt;br /&gt;requests, then sends the user the requested HTML page. Or to be entirely accurate, a Webserver&lt;br /&gt;can send HTML back to a browser dynamically and not necessarily in a page. Dynamic languages,&lt;br /&gt;such as PHP (PHP: Hypertext Processor), can generate HTML dynamically and not deal&lt;br /&gt;with it in a page.&lt;br /&gt;Some important Websites related to detecting and curbing cracking activities, cyberterrorism,&lt;br /&gt;and cybercrimes include http://www.2600.com, the Website for 2600: The Hacker Quarterly;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.antionline.com, the Website for Antionline (AO), a place where members share their&lt;br /&gt;knowledge to help others learn to identify and mitigate security issues regarding real-world&lt;br /&gt;events; and http://www.cert.org, the Website for the CERT Coordination Center (CERT/CC),&lt;br /&gt;a center of Internet security expertise located at the Software Engineering Institute at Carnegie&lt;br /&gt;Mellon University.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: HTML (HyperText Markup Language); Internet; URL or Uniformed Resource&lt;br /&gt;Locator;World Wide Web (WWW).&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Christensson, P. 2004. SharpenedNet.com: Glossary: HTTP. [Online,&lt;br /&gt;2002.] Per Christensson Website. http://www.sharpened.net/glossary/definition.php?http.&lt;br /&gt;Hughes, Eric, Gilmore, John, and May, Tim Team (general team): Thinking that a need&lt;br /&gt;existed for privacy in an open-information society, Eric Hughes started the Cypherpunks with&lt;br /&gt;John Gilmore and Tim May. Calling themselves a wandering band of cryptographers, advocates&lt;br /&gt;for privacy, and anarchists in a digital world, the Cypherpunks have a prolific email list that purportedly&lt;br /&gt;synthesizes mathematical concepts with the practical issues of a cultural revolution.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Cypherpunks.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Wired Digital Inc. Eric Hughes. [Online, July 11, 1996.] Wired Digital&lt;br /&gt;Inc.Website. http://hotwired.wired.com/talk/club/special/transcripts/96-07-11.hughes.html.&lt;br /&gt;Human Factor or Social Engineering (general term):Typically, cracking activities include not&lt;br /&gt;only some degree of technological prowess but also human factor skills, known as social engineering.&lt;br /&gt;Simply put, even at the very basic level, a cracker needs to “social engineer” a computer&lt;br /&gt;system or another human being into thinking that he or she is the system administrator or a legitimate&lt;br /&gt;user.“Human factor engineering” and “social engineering,” therefore, are general terms used&lt;br /&gt;to describe how crackers manipulate a social situation to gain access to a network for which they&lt;br /&gt;are not authorized.This access could be permanent or temporary and could even employ as part&lt;br /&gt;of the scheme an organizational “insider.” Putting on a janitor’s outfit and pretending to be allowed&lt;br /&gt;access to a computer network would be one example of a low-end “human factor” or “social engineering”&lt;br /&gt;technique.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Computer; Cracking; Social Engineering; Social Engineering Techniques.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Schell, B.H., Dodge, J.L., with S.S. Moutsatsos. The Hacking of America:&lt;br /&gt;Who’s Doing It,Why, and How.Westport, CT: Quorum Books, 2002.&lt;br /&gt;155 Human Factor or Social Engineering&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;IANA or Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (general term): One of the key bodies overseeing&lt;br /&gt;Internet networking. IANA governs top-level domains—represented by the final part of&lt;br /&gt;Web domain names, such as .com, .org, or .edu. It also governs IP address allocation and TCP&lt;br /&gt;and UDP port number assignment.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Internet; IP Address;TCP/IP or Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol;&lt;br /&gt;User Datagram Protocol (UDP).&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: About, Inc. 2004. IANA. [Online, 2004.] About, Inc. Website. http://&lt;br /&gt;compnetworking.about.com/library/glossary/bldef-iana.htm.&lt;br /&gt;ICE (Intrusion Countermeasure Electronics or IC) (general term): In the Computer&lt;br /&gt;Underground (CU),“ice” is a fictional form of anti-cracker countermeasure, often depicted as a&lt;br /&gt;wall of ice.The term first appeared in William Gibson’s book Neuromancer, in which he described&lt;br /&gt;various means of protecting systems from intrusion. In other words, IC was a software program&lt;br /&gt;on the Matrix to stop illegal access to company or government computer systems and valuable&lt;br /&gt;information stores.A number of intrusion countermeasure electronics types were available, including&lt;br /&gt;lethal Black IC—which could kill the intruder—and Probe IC, which hunted for system&lt;br /&gt;trespassers and then shot back.&lt;br /&gt;Today, real world Intrusion Detection products, such as BlackICE, are modeled after the theoretical&lt;br /&gt;concepts. Nobody is killed and the shooting back—although technically illegal—targets&lt;br /&gt;the attacker’s computer system.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Matrix; Probe.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Graham, R. Hacking Lexicon. [Online, 2001.] Robert Graham Website.&lt;br /&gt;http://www.linuxsecurity.com/resource_files/documentation/hacking-dict.html; Clutton, R.&lt;br /&gt;Welcome to the Simple Guide of Cyberpunk. [Online, June 24, 2001.] http://tip.net.au/&lt;br /&gt;~rclutton/cdict.html.&lt;br /&gt;Icebreaker (general term): A software program that cracks corporate firewalls.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Cracking; Firewall.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Clutton, R. Welcome to the Simple Guide of Cyberpunk. [Online,&lt;br /&gt;June 24, 2001.] http://tip.net.au/~rclutton/cdict.html.&lt;br /&gt;id (identity) (general term): A UNIX command that identifies the user account executing the&lt;br /&gt;command—often an early command that crackers will run on the system when cracking&lt;br /&gt;remotely. In short, the intruder will remotely compromise a service running under a root&lt;br /&gt;account, an account set up for a special service, or a user’s account. The hope of crackers is to&lt;br /&gt;achieve root access immediately. If this is not achieved, the cracker will need to run a local&lt;br /&gt;exploit to elevate his or her privileges.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Remote Attacks or Exploits or Intrusions.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Graham, R. Hacking Lexicon. [Online, 2001.] Robert Graham Website.&lt;br /&gt;http://www.linuxsecurity.com/resource_files/documentation/hacking-dict.html.&lt;br /&gt;Identd/auth (general term): A service on UNIX that can be used to identify a TCP connection&lt;br /&gt;owner.Though it was first developed to be used as an authentication mechanism, today it&lt;br /&gt;is used primarily to log who does what activities.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Authentication; Log;TCP/IP or Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol;&lt;br /&gt;UNIX.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Graham, R. Hacking Lexicon. [Online, 2001.] Robert Graham Website.&lt;br /&gt;http://www.linuxsecurity.com/resource_files/documentation/hacking-dict.html.&lt;br /&gt;Identity Theft or Masquerading (legal term):The malicious theft and consequent misuse of&lt;br /&gt;someone else’s identity to commit a crime. Identity theft often involves cracking into a system&lt;br /&gt;to obtain personal information, such as credit card numbers, birth dates, and social insurance or&lt;br /&gt;Social Security numbers of targets and then using this information in an illegal manner, such as&lt;br /&gt;buying items with the stolen identity or pretending to be someone else of higher professional&lt;br /&gt;status in order to gain special privileges. Identity theft is one of the fastest-growing crimes in the&lt;br /&gt;United States and elsewhere around the globe.&lt;br /&gt;On February 21, 2005, ChoicePoint Inc., a data warehouser having 17,000 business customers,&lt;br /&gt;had its massive database of client personal information cracked. Consequently, the company said&lt;br /&gt;that about 145,000 consumers across the United States may have been adversely impacted by the&lt;br /&gt;breach of the company’s credentialing process. The company said that the criminals who&lt;br /&gt;obtained access used stolen identities to create what seemed to be legitimate businesses wanting&lt;br /&gt;ChoicePoint accounts. The cybercriminals then opened 50 accounts and received abundant&lt;br /&gt;personal data on consumers, including their names, addresses, credit histories, and Social Security&lt;br /&gt;numbers.&lt;br /&gt;As a result of this case as well as of similar 2005 breaches at the LexisNexis Group (affecting&lt;br /&gt;310,000 clients) and at the Bank of America (affecting about 1.2 million federal employees with&lt;br /&gt;this charge card), Discount ShoeWarehouse (affecting about 1.2 million clients), and more than&lt;br /&gt;300,000 identities stolen from universities since January 2005,U.S. politicians, including two U.S.&lt;br /&gt;Senators, called for hearings and ramped-up regulations to protect consumers against identity&lt;br /&gt;theft. Moreover, the U.S. states are collectively proposing more than 150 bills to regulate online&lt;br /&gt;security standards, increased identity theft and fraud protection, increased data broker limitations,&lt;br /&gt;increased limits on data sharing or use or sales, and better security breach notification.&lt;br /&gt;On March 4, 2005,White Hat hackers surfed the Web at Seattle University with the intent of&lt;br /&gt;harvesting Social Security Numbers and credit card numbers. In less than 60 minutes, they&lt;br /&gt;found millions of names, birth dates, and Social Security and credit card numbers using just one&lt;br /&gt;Internet search engine,Google.They warned that the use of the right kind of sophisticated search&lt;br /&gt;terms could even find data deleted from company or government Websites but temporarily&lt;br /&gt;cached in Google’s extraordinarily large data warehouse.The problem did not lie with Google,&lt;br /&gt;they affirmed, but with companies allowing Google to enter into the public segment of their&lt;br /&gt;networks (called the DMZ) and index all the data contained there. Although Google does not&lt;br /&gt;need to be repaired, said the White Hats, companies and government agencies need to understand&lt;br /&gt;that they are exposing themselves and their clients by posting sensitive data in public places.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Cybercrime and Cybercriminals; Social Security Number (SSN);Theft.&lt;br /&gt;id (identity) 158&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Associated Press. Data Brokerages: LexisNexis Database Hit by ID Thieves.&lt;br /&gt;The Globe and Mail, March 10, 2005, p. B13; McAlearney, S. Privacy: How Much Regulation Is&lt;br /&gt;Too Much? [Online, May 2, 2005.] TechTarget Website. http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/&lt;br /&gt;originalContent/0,289142,sid14_gci1083916,00.html?track=NL-358&amp;amp;ad=513148; Shukovsky,&lt;br /&gt;P. Good Guys Show Just How Easy It Is to Steal ID. [Online, March 5, 2005.] Seattle Post-&lt;br /&gt;Intelligencer Website. http://seattlepi.newsource.com/local/214663_googlehack05.html;Weber,&lt;br /&gt;H.R. Criminals Access ChoicePoint’s Information Data. The Globe and Mail, February 22, 2005,&lt;br /&gt;p. B15.&lt;br /&gt;IEEE 802.11 (general term): In 1977, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers,&lt;br /&gt;known as the IEEE, ratified the 802.11 specification as the standard for Wireless Local Area&lt;br /&gt;Networks (WLANs).The specifications originally defined 1 Mbit/s and 2 Mbit/s data transmission&lt;br /&gt;rates and a set of basic signaling methods.However, those earlier data transmission rates were&lt;br /&gt;too slow to support most business requirements and were ineffective in encouraging WLAN&lt;br /&gt;adoption.&lt;br /&gt;Therefore, in 1999 the IEEE ratified the 802.11b standard (or 802.11 High Rate), which provided&lt;br /&gt;for data transmission rates up to 11 Mbit/s. In June 2003 the 802.11g standard was ratified&lt;br /&gt;to allow for data transmission rates up to 54 Mbit/s.&lt;br /&gt;The 802.11 specification defines a pair of devices: (1) a wireless station—typically a PC with&lt;br /&gt;a wireless network interface card (known as NIC); and (2) an access point (known as AP)—&lt;br /&gt;which serves as a bridge between the wired and the wireless worlds.&lt;br /&gt;An AP usually has a radio, an Ethernet interface (such as IEEE 802.3), and software meeting&lt;br /&gt;the 802.1d “bridging” standard.The AP serves as the wireless network’s base station so that many&lt;br /&gt;wireless end stations can get access to the wired network. Wireless end stations, though they&lt;br /&gt;vary, typically include 802.11 PC cards and embedded solutions in useful items such as telephone&lt;br /&gt;handsets.&lt;br /&gt;The 802.11 standard also defines two modes: the infrastructure mode and the ad hoc mode.&lt;br /&gt;In infrastructure mode, the wireless network is made up of at least one AP connected to the&lt;br /&gt;wired network infrastructure as well as a number of wireless end stations.The latter is known as&lt;br /&gt;a Basic Service Set (BSS). An Extended Service Set (ESS) has two or more Basic Service Sets&lt;br /&gt;forming a subnetwork. Because most large companies’WLANs need access to the wired LAN&lt;br /&gt;for functional services (such as file servers, Internet links, and printers), they tend to operate in&lt;br /&gt;infrastructure mode.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Internet; Local Area Network (LAN);Wireless.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: PCTechGuide.com. Wireless Networks. [Online, December 1, 2002.]&lt;br /&gt;PCTechGuide Website. http://www.pctechguide.com/29network_Wireless_networks.htm.&lt;br /&gt;IIA (general term): Stands for the Institute of Internal Auditors, an international organization&lt;br /&gt;based in Altamonte Springs, Florida. It was founded in 1941 and presently has more than 117,000&lt;br /&gt;members worldwide. Because the organization’s mission includes education, research, and technological&lt;br /&gt;guidance for the auditing profession, it is an invaluable resource for everybody involved&lt;br /&gt;in computer forensic investigations.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: The Institute of Internal Auditors. [Online,April 8, 2006.] http.theiia.org.&lt;br /&gt;159 IIA&lt;br /&gt;IIRC (general term): Chat room talk meaning “if I remember correctly.”&lt;br /&gt;ILOVEYOU virus (general term): Hit numerous computers in 2000 when it was sent as an&lt;br /&gt;attachment to an email message with the tempting text “ILOVEYOU” in the subject line.The&lt;br /&gt;virus was also altered to appear in email messages with the subject line FWD: JOKE. The&lt;br /&gt;ILOVEYOU virus came with the nice little message “kindly check the attached LOVELETTER&lt;br /&gt;coming from me,” and if the user opened the attachment in any of these messages, the malware&lt;br /&gt;was executed, sending a copy of itself to every address listed in the user’s Microsoft Outlook&lt;br /&gt;address book.&lt;br /&gt;The ILOVEYOU virus and many of its variants have been estimated to have targeted tens of&lt;br /&gt;millions of users over the life span of these viruses, costing billions of dollars in damage and service&lt;br /&gt;disruption.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Electronic Mail or Email; Malware;Virus.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Schell, B.H., Dodge, J.L., with S.S. Moutsatsos. The Hacking of America:&lt;br /&gt;Who’s Doing It,Why, and How.Westport, CT: Quorum Books, 2002;Yale University School of&lt;br /&gt;Medicine. ILOVEYOU, JOKE, and Susitikim shi vakara kavos puodokui. . .Viruses. [Online,&lt;br /&gt;March 9, 2001.] Yale University School of Medicine Website. http://its.med.yale.edu/software/&lt;br /&gt;patch/win/iloveyou/iloveyou.html.&lt;br /&gt;IMHO (general term): Chat room talk meaning “in my humble opinion.”&lt;br /&gt;Incident (general term):The U.S.Department of Homeland Security (DHS) defines a computer&lt;br /&gt;security incident as a real or potential violation of an explicit or implied policy regarding&lt;br /&gt;information.The DHS has five incident types, based on incident outcomes: (1) increased access&lt;br /&gt;beyond authorization; (2) information disclosure; (3) information corruption; (4) Denial of&lt;br /&gt;Service (DoS); and (5) resource theft.The DHS notes that actual incidents often fall into multiple&lt;br /&gt;categories. For example, a Website defacement can involve increased access beyond&lt;br /&gt;authorization and information corruption, and a system compromise can involve increased access&lt;br /&gt;beyond authorization, information disclosure, and resource theft.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Denial of Service (DoS); Department of Homeland Security (DHS); Exploit;&lt;br /&gt;Vulnerabilities of Computers.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: U.S. Department of Homeland Security. DHS Organization. [Online,&lt;br /&gt;2004.] U.S. Department of Homeland Security Website. http://www.dhs.gov/dhspublic/theme_&lt;br /&gt;home1.jsp.&lt;br /&gt;Incident Response (general term): How an organization handles a security incident. Events&lt;br /&gt;are supposed to be tracked and resolved in as expeditious a manner as possible.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Exploit; Incident;Vulnerabilities of Computers.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Symantec Security Response. Glossary. [Online, July 15, 2004.] Symantec&lt;br /&gt;Security Response Website. http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/refa.html.&lt;br /&gt;Incident Response Checklist and Cycle (general term):According to the U.S. Department of&lt;br /&gt;Homeland Security (DHS), the purpose of the Incident Response Checklist and Cycle (that is,&lt;br /&gt;the period between when an incident is identified and when it is resolved and reported) is twofold:&lt;br /&gt;to minimize damage and exposure (that is, risk mitigation) as well as to facilitate an effective recovery.&lt;br /&gt;Moreover, within the risk mitigation goal, a hierarchy of priorities is suggested, arranged from&lt;br /&gt;IIRC 160&lt;br /&gt;higher to lower priorities and including the following: human life and safety; sensitive or missioncritical&lt;br /&gt;systems and information; other systems and information; damage to systems or information;&lt;br /&gt;and disruption of access or services.&lt;br /&gt;The items on the checklist include a series of sequential, high-level steps grouped into three&lt;br /&gt;phases: (1) Detection, Assessment, and Triage (for which the objective is to limit the risk and&lt;br /&gt;damage in such a way that if the problem does escalate, investigation can proceed promptly and&lt;br /&gt;with evidence intact); (2) Containment, Evidence Collection,Analysis, and Investigation; and (3)&lt;br /&gt;Remediation, Recovery, and Post-Mortem. Based on this three-phase scheme, the Department&lt;br /&gt;of Homeland Security’s recommended steps are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;Phase 1-1. Document Everything; Phase 1-2. Contact Primary IRC (Incident Response&lt;br /&gt;Capability); Phase 1-3. Preserve Evidence; Phase 1-4.Verify the Incident; Phase 1-5. Notify&lt;br /&gt;Appropriate Personnel; Phase 1-6. Determine Incident Status; Phase 1-7. Assess Scope; Phase&lt;br /&gt;1-8. Assess Risk; Phase 1-9. Establish Goals; Phase 1-10. Evaluate Options; Phase 1-11.&lt;br /&gt;Implement Triage; Phase 1-12. Escalation and Handoff.&lt;br /&gt;Phase 2-1.Verify Containment; Phase 2-2. Revisit Scope, Risk, and Goals; Phase 2-3. Collect&lt;br /&gt;Evidence; Phase 2-4. Analyze Evidence; Phase 2-5. Build Hypotheses and Verify; Phase 2-6.&lt;br /&gt;Intermediate Mitigation.&lt;br /&gt;Phase 3-1. Finalize Analysis and Report; Phase 3-2. Archive Evidence; Phase 3-3. Implement&lt;br /&gt;Remediation; Phase 3-4. Execute Recovery; Phase 3-5. Conduct Post-Mortem.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Department of Homeland Security (DHSW); Incident Response; Risk.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Incident Handling Checklists.&lt;br /&gt;[Online, 2004.] U.S. Department of Homeland Security Website. http://www.fedcirc.gov/&lt;br /&gt;incidentResponse/IHchecklists.html.&lt;br /&gt;Incident Team (general term): A specially trained team within a business, government agency,&lt;br /&gt;or institution responsible for responding quickly to cyber attacks.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Incident Response; Risk.&lt;br /&gt;Inetd (general term): A UNIX daemon software program that responds to connection requests&lt;br /&gt;on a defined list of ports and then starts the executable program to deliver the services associated&lt;br /&gt;with those ports.This software program is sometimes known as “netd.” Inetd is a frequent target&lt;br /&gt;of crack attacks because of its capability to launch arbitrary programs listed in its configuration&lt;br /&gt;files under any desired user account, including root.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Attacks; UNIX;Vulnerabilities of Computers.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Farlex, Inc. The Free Dictionary: Inetd. [Online, 2004.] Farlex, Inc.&lt;br /&gt;Website. http://computing-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/inetd.&lt;br /&gt;Infection (general term):A description for a computer system or a program is said to be infected&lt;br /&gt;if a worm or virus has copied itself into some part of the system. Usually the goal of such an&lt;br /&gt;infection is to propagate to other systems or programs. Infection can also cause the system or program&lt;br /&gt;to expose some other unwanted behavior or secretly alter data.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Means of Infection;Virus;Worm.&lt;br /&gt;161 Infection&lt;br /&gt;Information Security Act (legal term): On October 16, 2002,U.S. Representative Christopher&lt;br /&gt;John, D-LA, introduced a public sector bill called the Information Security Act. Its purpose was&lt;br /&gt;to increase secure information sharing and communications sharing among the agencies affiliated&lt;br /&gt;with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). On October 16, 2002, the Act&lt;br /&gt;was sent to the House Committee on Government Reform. It has not been passed in this form.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Department of Homeland Security (DHS); U.S. Intelligence Community.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Center for Democracy and Technology. Legislation Affecting the Internet.&lt;br /&gt;[Online, July 28, 2004.] Center for Democracy and Technology Website. http://www.cdt.org/&lt;br /&gt;legislation/107th/wiretaps/.&lt;br /&gt;Information Warfare (general term): A modern kind of warfare whereby information and&lt;br /&gt;attacks on information and/or on the enemy’s computer network are used as a way to wage war&lt;br /&gt;against some chosen enemy.&lt;br /&gt;Information warfare may include giving the enemy special information (commonly referred&lt;br /&gt;to as “propaganda”) to persuade the enemy to surrender, or withholding from the enemy important&lt;br /&gt;information that might result in the enemy’s resistance. Information warfare may also include&lt;br /&gt;feeding “disinformation” to one’s own people, either to build support for the war effort or to&lt;br /&gt;counter the effects of the enemy’s propaganda campaign. Finally, information warfare may&lt;br /&gt;include designing a strategic plan for a multiple-stage attack against an adversary’s information&lt;br /&gt;systems while protecting one’s own information network and capitalizing on one’s own information&lt;br /&gt;“edge.”&lt;br /&gt;In contrast to traditional wars fought on soil, information warfare has no front line or boundaries.&lt;br /&gt;Potential battlefields can consist of any networked system that can be accessed. For this&lt;br /&gt;reason, the United States and other countries are concerned about information wars focusing on&lt;br /&gt;Information Technology controlling critical infrastructures targets—oil and gas pipelines, electric&lt;br /&gt;power grids, nuclear power stations, and telephone switching networks, to name a few.The vulnerability&lt;br /&gt;of networked systems is why security experts in the United States and elsewhere fear&lt;br /&gt;an impending cyber Apocalypse.&lt;br /&gt;Information warfare damage can manifest in countless ways. For example, railroad trains and&lt;br /&gt;jets could be rerouted and caused to crash; stock exchanges could be cracked and then sabotaged&lt;br /&gt;by “sniffers”—thereby corrupting international networks for funds transfer; and radio and television&lt;br /&gt;signals could be taken over and used for “misinformation” campaigns.&lt;br /&gt;Finally, recent events have confirmed that information warfare has been implemented. During&lt;br /&gt;the Gulf War, for example, Dutch crackers exploited U.S. Defense Department computers and&lt;br /&gt;seized troop-movement information.They then tried to offer, for a handsome price, the secret&lt;br /&gt;information to the Iraqis, who turned down the offer, thinking the plot was a hoax. Moreover,&lt;br /&gt;in January 1999, U.S. Air Intelligence computers were hijacked by a coordinated attack, a portion&lt;br /&gt;of which appeared to be Russian driven.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Coordinated Terror Attack Crackers;; Cyber Apocalypse; Intelligence; Sniffer&lt;br /&gt;Program or Packet Sniffer.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: A&amp;amp;E Television Networks. Science at War: Information Warfare. [Online,&lt;br /&gt;October 13, 2004.] A&amp;amp;E Television Networks Website. http://www.historychannel.com/&lt;br /&gt;exhibits/science_war/iwar.html; GNU_FDL.[Online, 2004.] Information Warfare. GNU Free&lt;br /&gt;Documentation License Website. http://www.wordiq.com/definition/Information_warfare.&lt;br /&gt;Information Security Act 162&lt;br /&gt;InfraGuard (general term): In an effort to create greater cooperation between the U.S. government&lt;br /&gt;and the private sector in protecting information of critical infrastructures and in motivating&lt;br /&gt;companies and institutions to more reliably report intrusions on their networks, after the&lt;br /&gt;September 11 attacks the FBI began to offer both identity protection and important exploit&lt;br /&gt;information to the private sector in exchange for information regarding cyber attacks and security&lt;br /&gt;breaches. The reporting, it was said, would be done under an enhanced program called&lt;br /&gt;InfraGuard. The FBI enhanced its call for cooperation from industry after the number of firms&lt;br /&gt;attending Infraguard meetings (held quarterly) tripled following the terrorist attacks. It was clear,&lt;br /&gt;said the FBI, that there was a greater willingness for the FBI, information systems security&lt;br /&gt;experts, and business leaders to communicate more freely about the security issues they were&lt;br /&gt;experiencing.&lt;br /&gt;The FBI said that the threat of a major cyber attack is not fictional, for many cyber attacks&lt;br /&gt;occur in industry daily. Also, every day new worms and viruses are reported by security firms&lt;br /&gt;such as SANS, and therefore many more solutions must be developed by those in the information&lt;br /&gt;security field to save information systems from being severely adversely impacted—or from&lt;br /&gt;being shut down altogether.&lt;br /&gt;Though more than 90% of enterprise security survey respondents have consistently reported&lt;br /&gt;having computer security breaches with substantial financial losses within the past few years,&lt;br /&gt;companies and information security experts are keen to get information about the security problems&lt;br /&gt;other companies are experiencing but seem reluctant—as the CSI/FBI survey repeatedly&lt;br /&gt;confirms—to report their own breaches. The reasons cited are that companies fear giving their&lt;br /&gt;competitors an advantage by “owning up” to the breaches, and they worry about the bad publicity&lt;br /&gt;and lack of consumer confidence that will ensue with the release of such information.&lt;br /&gt;For these reasons, the FBI is now asking companies to work with consultants in InfraGuard to&lt;br /&gt;prevent such breaches by sharing information. Trust seems to be the big key in advancing the&lt;br /&gt;information-sharing push. The basic premise, of course, is that increased information sharing&lt;br /&gt;between business enterprises and federal authorities will enhance efforts to thwart crackers. FBI&lt;br /&gt;agents have noted that the situation existing today is indeed a dynamic one, for crackers and&lt;br /&gt;cybercriminals continually improve, amend, and disguise their means of operating. So, the more&lt;br /&gt;“eyes” there are “on the scene,” so to speak, the better the security should become.The consultants&lt;br /&gt;in InfraGuard said that for the companies choosing to work with them, they will provide&lt;br /&gt;up-to-the-minute technical information on how to cope with detected and reported security&lt;br /&gt;breaches.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Crackers; CSI/FBI Survey; Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI); Intrusion;&lt;br /&gt;Security;Trust.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Bruck, M.The Key to Eradicating Viruses and Bugs. [Online, August 5,&lt;br /&gt;2002.] Entrepreneur.com Inc.Website. http://www.entrepreneur.com/article/0,4621,302155,00&lt;br /&gt;.html.&lt;br /&gt;Infrared or Electro-Optint or Laser Intelligence (general term): Intelligence derived by&lt;br /&gt;monitoring the electromagnetic spectrum from ultraviolet (0.01 micrometers) through far&lt;br /&gt;infrared (1,000 micrometers).&lt;br /&gt;Infrared intelligence was used for the 2004 Summer Olympics.The $312 million U.S. security&lt;br /&gt;system received audio and visual images from an electronic Web having greater than 1,000&lt;br /&gt;163 Infrared or Electro-Optint or Laser Intelligence&lt;br /&gt;high-resolution and infrared cameras, a sensor-equipped blimp, mobile command centers, patrol&lt;br /&gt;boats, and numerous vehicles. Cameras with speech-recognition software collected spoken-word&lt;br /&gt;information and transcribed it into text, searching for particular word patterns.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Intelligence; Laser Intelligence (LASINT).&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: About Inc.U.S. Military: electro-optical intelligence. [Online, 2004.] About&lt;br /&gt;Inc. Website. http://usmilitary.about.com/library/glossary/e/bldef02164.htm; In Brief. Security&lt;br /&gt;Rings Olympics. The Globe and Mail, August 12, 2004, p. B7.&lt;br /&gt;Infrared or IrDA Port (general term): An abbreviated form for Infrared Data Association&lt;br /&gt;(IrDA), a group of device manufacturers who have worked on the development of a standard&lt;br /&gt;device for transmitting data via infrared light waves, the IrDA port. Because of the availability of&lt;br /&gt;this device, computers and printers have increasingly come with IrDA ports, enabling users to&lt;br /&gt;transmit information from one device to another without using cables.&lt;br /&gt;For example, if both a laptop computer and a printer have IrDA ports, a user can simply put&lt;br /&gt;his or her computer in the line of sight of the printer and print a document without needing&lt;br /&gt;cable to connect the two devices. IrDA ports support transmission rates similar to those of the&lt;br /&gt;original parallel ports, except that there is a restriction on the IrDA ports. The devices simply&lt;br /&gt;need to be close enough together, and a clear line of sight is needed between the two devices.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Computer; Port and Port Numbers.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Jupitermedia Corporation. What is IrDA? [Online, October 30, 2001.]&lt;br /&gt;Jupitermedia Corporation Website. http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/I/IrDA.html.&lt;br /&gt;Infringing Intellectual Property Rights and Copyright (legal term): Can occur online and&lt;br /&gt;thus falls in the broad-based category of “cyberspace theft.” An example is copying another’s&lt;br /&gt;work, such as songs, articles,movies, or software, from an online source without being authorized&lt;br /&gt;to do so. In January 2000, one of the cases to make headlines in the United States was the&lt;br /&gt;Internet free speech and copyright civil court case involving 2600: The Hacker Quarterly,&lt;br /&gt;Universal Studios, and members of the Motion Picture Association of America. Here, legal issues&lt;br /&gt;emerged around 2600’s alleged violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act&lt;br /&gt;(DMCA) when in November 1999 the hacker publication linked to and discussed a computer&lt;br /&gt;program called DeCSS, which is DVD decryption software. The complainants objected to the&lt;br /&gt;publication of DeCSS because, they argued, it could be used as part of a process to infringe copyright&lt;br /&gt;on DVD movies. In their defense, representatives of 2600 claimed that decryption of DVD&lt;br /&gt;movies is necessary for a number of reasons, including to make “fair use” of movies. In the end,&lt;br /&gt;the hacker magazine lost the case.&lt;br /&gt;The social issue of infringing intellectual property rights and copyright has drawn considerable&lt;br /&gt;debate from those who fight for freedom of information and from those who fight against&lt;br /&gt;abuses of artists’ rights. For this reason, during the 2004 U.S. Presidential campaign, the INDUCE&lt;br /&gt;Act, or Inducing Infringement of Copyright Act of 2004,was proposed by Senator Orrin Hatch&lt;br /&gt;(R-UT). If passed, the Act could have killed the market for digital music devices such as Apple&lt;br /&gt;iPods, which copy music from users’ computers.The INDUCE Act would have criminalized digital&lt;br /&gt;music technologies because they could be viewed as inducing others to infringe copyright.&lt;br /&gt;When news about the INDUCE Act surfaced, hacktivists went to work, constructing Websites&lt;br /&gt;such as www.Savetheipod.com to motivate music lovers to send letters of opposition to&lt;br /&gt;Infrared or Electro-Optint or Laser Intelligence 164&lt;br /&gt;Congress.The electronics Industry and the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) also lobbied&lt;br /&gt;against it. The INDUCE Act met its demise in October 2004, but if it had passed, this&lt;br /&gt;far-reaching piece of legislation could have forced electronic companies and Internet services to&lt;br /&gt;get permission for each new technology developed.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA); Electronic Frontier Foundation&lt;br /&gt;(EFF); Hacker Quarterly Magazine (a.k.a. 2600).&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Dixon, G. Proposed Act Could Have Killed Digital Music Devices. The&lt;br /&gt;Globe and Mail, December 4, 2004, p. R12; Schell, B.H., Dodge, J.L., with S.S. Moutsatsos. The&lt;br /&gt;Hacking of America:Who’s Doing It,Why, and How.Westport, CT: Quorum Books, 2002; Schell,&lt;br /&gt;B.H. and Martin, C. Contemporary World Issues Series: Cybercrime: A Reference Handbook. Santa&lt;br /&gt;Barbara, CA:ABC-CLIO, 2004; www.Savetheipod.com. Save the ipod, Stop the INDUCE Act.&lt;br /&gt;[Online, May 3, 2005.] Savetheipod.com Website. http://www.savetheipod.com/index1.php.&lt;br /&gt;Initialization Vector (general term): Used in cryptography to ensure that an encryption mechanism,&lt;br /&gt;such as a stream cipher or a block cipher in a streaming mode, generates a unique stream&lt;br /&gt;that is independent of all other streams encrypted with the same key without reapplying&lt;br /&gt;the (computationally expensive) cryptographic keying process. The Initialization Vector must&lt;br /&gt;be known by the receiver and can be exchanged as part of the session setup or transmitted&lt;br /&gt;independently.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Ferguson,N, Schneier,B. Practical Cryptography.New York,NY: John Wiley&lt;br /&gt;&amp;amp; Sons, 2003.&lt;br /&gt;Input Validation, Omitting (general term): A classic programming error leading to exploits.&lt;br /&gt;Because programmers do not always verify that input data are correct, crackers can carefully create&lt;br /&gt;input that compromises the system.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Crackers; Exploit;Vulnerabilities in Computers.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Graham, R. Hacking Lexicon. [Online, 2001.] Robert Graham Website.&lt;br /&gt;http://www.linuxsecurity.com/resource_files/documentation/hacking-dict.html.&lt;br /&gt;Insider Hacker or Cracker (general term):An employee of a company who performs exploits&lt;br /&gt;within the company’s networks. Hackers are authorized to find vulnerabilities in a company’s&lt;br /&gt;networks and to fix them, whereas crackers exploit the flaws without having the authorization to&lt;br /&gt;do so—usually for some personal gain.&lt;br /&gt;Insiders who crack the system to cause damage are often angered employees who have been&lt;br /&gt;fired from their jobs and have the computer skills to cause damage.They can, for example, plant&lt;br /&gt;logic bombs that do damage after the employees leave. One of the most discussed “insider”&lt;br /&gt;crack attacks happened in 1996 at Omega Engineering, where an employee,Timothy Lloyd, sabotaged&lt;br /&gt;the company’s network with a logic bomb. He apparently did this as an act of revenge for&lt;br /&gt;being fired.That exploit cost the company $12 million in network damages and forced the eventual&lt;br /&gt;layoff of about 80 employees. Because of all the money it took to recover from this incident,&lt;br /&gt;Omega Engineering said it lost its lead in the marketplace.&lt;br /&gt;More recently, on March 11, 2005, Kaiser Permanente notified 140 patients that an angry&lt;br /&gt;former employee put on her Weblog confidential information from the firm’s electronic files.&lt;br /&gt;The ex-employee, Elisa D. Cooper, calling herself the “Diva of Disgruntled,” said in her defense&lt;br /&gt;165 Insider Hacker or Cracker&lt;br /&gt;that the company included private patient information on its Website.All she was doing, she said,&lt;br /&gt;was informing the company of its self-created problem. Under the HIPAA legislation, the Diva&lt;br /&gt;of Disgruntled, if found guilty, could be made to pay $250,000 in fines and spend 10 years behind&lt;br /&gt;bars for unauthorized disclosure of clients’ personal data.To date, a fine of $200,000 was imposed&lt;br /&gt;on the company by California State Regulators for illegally disclosing patient’s personal information&lt;br /&gt;on the Internet.The case against Cooper has not been finalized.&lt;br /&gt;Another way that insiders may take revenge on a company is not to exploit the company’s&lt;br /&gt;network but to send over the Internet proprietary information to competitors. One such example&lt;br /&gt;was reported in 2005 when Shin-Guo Tsai, a permanent resident in the United States and&lt;br /&gt;an employee of Volterra Semiconductor Corporation in San Francisco, emailed computer chip&lt;br /&gt;design data from his company’s computers to a potential rival company in Taiwan.Though Tsai&lt;br /&gt;announced to his employer that he was returning to Taiwan to get married, when FBI agents&lt;br /&gt;appeared at his door in February 2005, he admitted that he had sent proprietary information to&lt;br /&gt;CMSC, Inc., a Taiwanese start-up company involved in a business line similar to Volterra’s. If convicted&lt;br /&gt;of the charges,Tsai could find himself behind bars for 10 years. He pleaded guilty and is&lt;br /&gt;awaiting sentencing.&lt;br /&gt;Given these incidents, it is not surprising that even back in 1998, the CSI/FBI survey findings&lt;br /&gt;disclosed that the average cost of successful computer cracks by outsiders was $56,000,&lt;br /&gt;whereas the average cost of malicious acts perpetrated by insiders was $2.7 million. While the&lt;br /&gt;average cost has gone down to $24,000 in the 2005 CSI/FBI survey, the number of incidents has&lt;br /&gt;risen sharply. Three-quarters of the surveyed organizations reported a financial loss. Insider&lt;br /&gt;crackers appear to do far more damage to companies’ computers than do outsider crackers.&lt;br /&gt;So what personal traits do these damage-causing insiders have? After analyzing a pool of more&lt;br /&gt;than 100 cracking cases provided by computer crime investigators, prosecutors, and security specialists&lt;br /&gt;over the 1997–1999 time period, researchers Eric D. Shaw, Jerrold M. Post, and Kevin G.&lt;br /&gt;Ruby said that insider computer criminals tend to be:&lt;br /&gt;• Troubled by family problems in their childhoods&lt;br /&gt;• Introverted individuals who admit to being more comfortable solving cognitive problems&lt;br /&gt;than interacting with others in the workplace&lt;br /&gt;• More dependent on online interactions than on face-to-face interactions&lt;br /&gt;• Ethically flexible individuals who can easily justify ethical violations&lt;br /&gt;• Of the opinion that they are somehow special and thus deserving of special privileges&lt;br /&gt;• Lacking in empathy and thus seeming not to reflect on the impact their behaviors have on&lt;br /&gt;others or on the company&lt;br /&gt;• Less likely to seek assistance from supervisors or from workplace support groups such as&lt;br /&gt;Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs) when they have personal issues&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Crackers; CSI/FBI Survey; Exploit; Hackers; Logic Bomb; Shaw, Eric Team.&lt;br /&gt;Insider Hacker or Cracker 166&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Ostrov, B.F. 140 Kaiser Patients’ Private Data Put Online. [Online,&lt;br /&gt;March 11, 2005.] Knight Ridder Website. http://www.siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconvalley/&lt;br /&gt;11110907.htm; Rogers, M. The Insider Threat: Debunking the ‘Wagon Wheel’ Approach to&lt;br /&gt;Information Security. [Online, March 3, 2005.] TechTarget Website. http://searchsecurity&lt;br /&gt;.techtarget.com/columnItem/0,294698,sid14_gci1064080,00.html?track=NL-358&amp;amp;ad=506624;&lt;br /&gt;Schell, B.H., Dodge, J.L., with S.S. Moutsatsos. The Hacking of America:Who’s Doing It,Why, and&lt;br /&gt;How.Westport, CT: Quorum Books, 2002;Tanner, A. Man Charged with Passing Chip Design&lt;br /&gt;Information. [Online, March 1, 2005.] Reuters Website. http://www.reuters.com/audi/&lt;br /&gt;newsArticle.jhtml?type=technologyNews&amp;amp;storyID=7766193.&lt;br /&gt;Integrity (general term): Assuring accuracy and completeness, and adequately performing to&lt;br /&gt;some set of specifications.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Ethic,White Hat Hacker.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Pipkin, D.L. Halting the Hacker: A Practical Guide to Computer Security.&lt;br /&gt;Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2003.&lt;br /&gt;Intellectual Property (IP) (legal term):A legal concept that treats and protects the creative products&lt;br /&gt;of the human mind as carefully as the law would treat and protect one’s physical property,&lt;br /&gt;such as a home and the land that it sits on. In short, IP laws grant certain kinds of exclusive rights&lt;br /&gt;to the developers of creative products such as software, games, hardware, movies, books, songs, and&lt;br /&gt;so on. According to IP laws, the developers of creative products should have the first rights to the&lt;br /&gt;sale and/or distribution of these products, just as an owner of a property should have the first rights&lt;br /&gt;to the sale and/or distribution of his or her property.&lt;br /&gt;A number of cases have been publicized in recent years regarding infringements of IP, particularly&lt;br /&gt;around online song swapping and the denial of royalties to artists.An alleged crime against&lt;br /&gt;IP does not always have an artistic aspect, however. For example, on February 3, 2005, Andrew&lt;br /&gt;Mata, a government employee charged with cracking the Department of Social Services Website&lt;br /&gt;in 1999,was cleared by a jury of any wrongdoing.Though Mata was charged with illegally entering&lt;br /&gt;the computer system to upgrade his access privileges after he left the Department of Social&lt;br /&gt;Services for a job in the Department of Health and Hospitals—a crime, it was argued, against&lt;br /&gt;Intellectual Property—Mata said in his defense that he changed his access back to where he&lt;br /&gt;thought it should have been when he moved to the Department of Health and Hospitals, though&lt;br /&gt;he was supposed to have the same privilege status on both departments’ computer systems.The&lt;br /&gt;jury believed Mata. He walked away from a potential five-year jail term.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Computer; Intellectual Property Rights and Copyright Infringement; Property&lt;br /&gt;Paradigm in Cybercrime.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Schell, B.H. and Martin, C. Contemporary World Issues Series: Cybercrime:&lt;br /&gt;A Reference Handbook. Santa Barbara, CA:ABC-CLIO, 2004;The Associated Press. State Worker&lt;br /&gt;Acquitted of Hacking Government Computer. [Online, February 3, 2005.] Tuscaloosa News&lt;br /&gt;Website. http://www.tuscaloosanews.com/apps/pbcs/d11/article?AID=/20050203/APN/&lt;br /&gt;502030742.&lt;br /&gt;Intellectual Property Rights and Copyright Infringement (legal term): Protecting&lt;br /&gt;Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) from abuse is as important for companies today as is&lt;br /&gt;167 Intellectual Property Rights and Copyright Infringement&lt;br /&gt;protecting computer networks from crackers. Infringement can cost millions of dollars of lost&lt;br /&gt;revenues to entertainment companies and computer companies alike. For this reason, the Digital&lt;br /&gt;Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) was passed in October 1998 in the United States.This&lt;br /&gt;Act’s purpose was to implement global copyright laws to deal with the Intellectual Property&lt;br /&gt;Rights challenges caused by present-day digital technology.&lt;br /&gt;In particular, the DMCA provided protections against technical measures that could be used&lt;br /&gt;to disable or bypass the encryption devices used to protect copyright, thereby encouraging&lt;br /&gt;authors of copyrighted material to place their work on the Internet in a digitalized presentation.&lt;br /&gt;The DMCA penalties were to be applied to any individual who attempted to or was successful&lt;br /&gt;in disabling an encryption device that protected copyrighted material. Stated simply, Intellectual&lt;br /&gt;Property infringement is theft—the taking of something that does not belong to the perpetrator&lt;br /&gt;of the encryption bypass and thereby depriving the true copyright owners of royalties for the&lt;br /&gt;sale of their human mind products.&lt;br /&gt;Reports of a case of IPR infringement surfaced on May 22, 2005. Counterfeiters in Beijing,&lt;br /&gt;China, were selling illegally copied DVDs of the Star Wars: Episode III: Revenge of the Sith movie&lt;br /&gt;just days after the film opened in theaters in North America.The price charged for the pirated&lt;br /&gt;movies, sold from vendors wearing shoulder bags on the streets of Beijing,was a mere $3.05.The&lt;br /&gt;street sales occurred despite numerous Chinese government promises to clamp down on the&lt;br /&gt;thriving black market industry that movie companies have argued cost them billions of dollars&lt;br /&gt;in lost revenue yearly. About 9,000 cases of piracy were brought to court in China in 2004.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Copyright; Copyright Laws; Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA);&lt;br /&gt;Intellectual Property (IP).&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Associated Press. Entertainment: Counterfeiters Move Fast On Illegal Star&lt;br /&gt;Wars DVD. The Globe and Mail, May 23, 2005, p. B7; Schell, B.H. and Martin, C. Contemporary&lt;br /&gt;World Issues Series: Cybercrime: A Reference Handbook. Santa Barbara, CA:ABC-CLIO, 2004.&lt;br /&gt;Intelligence (general term): According to Jeffery T. Richelson in his tome The U.S. Intelligence&lt;br /&gt;Community, “intelligence” is the product of an information search and analysis about some foreign&lt;br /&gt;nation or about that nation’s operation areas of particular interest. In the United States, the&lt;br /&gt;Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) collects overseas intelligence, whereas the Federal Bureau of&lt;br /&gt;Investigation (FBI) collects domestic intelligence.Today, the collection of intelligence includes&lt;br /&gt;employing hacking skills to access information stored in computer systems around the world.&lt;br /&gt;Legally, the CIA cannot collect intelligence against a U.S. citizen unless the investigation began&lt;br /&gt;overseas. For these kinds of cases, the CIA communicates with and shares intelligence with&lt;br /&gt;the FBI.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: U.S. Intelligence Community.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Milnet.com. MILNET: Intelligence Defined. [Online, November 4,&lt;br /&gt;1997.] Milnet.com Website. http://www.milnet.com/definei.htm.&lt;br /&gt;Intelligence Community (general term): See U.S. Intelligence Community.&lt;br /&gt;Interactive Logon and Network Logon (general term):Modern networked operating systems,&lt;br /&gt;such as Microsoft Windows, Mac OS X, and the UNIX family of operating systems, allow users&lt;br /&gt;to log on to their machines locally by using them directly, or by connecting to a file server&lt;br /&gt;Intellectual Property Rights and Copyright Infringement 168&lt;br /&gt;remotely through a network logon. Because both logons tend to happen simultaneously after users&lt;br /&gt;enter their usernames and passwords, they do not usually perceive much of a difference between&lt;br /&gt;the two logons. Network logons can be disabled by administrators, thus preventing individuals&lt;br /&gt;from robbing passwords and remotely taking over the machine.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Administrator; Password.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Graham, R. Hacking Lexicon. [Online, 2001.] Robert Graham Website:&lt;br /&gt;http://www.linuxsecurity.com/resource_files/documentation/hacking-dict.html.&lt;br /&gt;Internal Threat (general term): A threat originating inside a company, government agency, or&lt;br /&gt;institution, and typically an exploit by a disgruntled employee denied promotion or informed&lt;br /&gt;of employment termination. Such exploits also can be launched by an attacker who has sought&lt;br /&gt;temporary employment with a target and uses social engineering skills to get on the inside.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Exploit; Insider Hacker or Cracker.&lt;br /&gt;International Data Encryption Algorithm (IDEA) (general term):Developed by Xuejia Lai&lt;br /&gt;and James Massey in 1992. A block cipher, IDEA operates on 64-bit blocks with a 128-bit key&lt;br /&gt;and is considered to be very secure. IDEA is used by Pretty Good Privacy (PGP), a very&lt;br /&gt;secure public key encryption application for MS-DOS,UNIX, and VAX/VMS. Originally written&lt;br /&gt;by Philip Zimmermann, PGP was later improved by Hal Finney, Branko Lankester, and Peter&lt;br /&gt;Gutmann.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Algorithm; Pretty Good Privacy (PGP); UNIX.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Farlex, Inc. The Free Dictionary: International Data Encryption&lt;br /&gt;Algorithm. [Online, 2004.] Farlex, Inc.Website. http://computing-dictionary.thefreedictionary&lt;br /&gt;.com/International%20Data%20Encryption%20Algorithm.&lt;br /&gt;International Telecommunications Union (ITU) (general term):Advises suppliers on technical&lt;br /&gt;recommendations for telephone and fax communication systems. Before March 1, 1993,&lt;br /&gt;the ITU was known as the CCITT, or Consultative Committee for International Telephony and&lt;br /&gt;Telegraphy. Every four years, the ITU, located in Geneva, Switzerland, convenes plenary sessions&lt;br /&gt;with the intent of adopting new telecommunications standards and communicating with other&lt;br /&gt;standards organizations to develop a global uniform standards system for communications.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Telecom.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Webster’s Dictionary. Definition of International Telecommunications&lt;br /&gt;Union. [Online, 2004.] Webster’s Dictionary Website. http://www.webster-dictionary.org/&lt;br /&gt;definition/International%20Telecommunications%20Union.&lt;br /&gt;Internet (general term):A network.Today, Internet refers to a collection of networks connected&lt;br /&gt;by routers. The Internet is the largest network in the world and comprises backbone networks&lt;br /&gt;such as MILNET, mid-level networks, and stub networks.&lt;br /&gt;The Internet had its seeds planted with ARPANET, the information-exchange platform created&lt;br /&gt;for researchers in universities around the world by the U.S. Defense Advanced Research&lt;br /&gt;Project Agency in 1969. The Internet’s major growth spurt occurred after Tim Berners-Lee&lt;br /&gt;developed the HTTP protocol in the early 1990s, allowing users to access and link information&lt;br /&gt;through a simple and intuitive user interface—the Internet browser. Technically speaking the&lt;br /&gt;169 Internet&lt;br /&gt;Internet is just the transportation medium over which data packets are transmitted. The World&lt;br /&gt;Wide Web is one of the applications using the Internet as a base infrastructure. Because of the&lt;br /&gt;overwhelming success of the World Wide Web, the term “Web” is often used to signify the&lt;br /&gt;Internet as such.&lt;br /&gt;At first, universities were the early adopters of the Internet, but before long tech wizards with&lt;br /&gt;an entrepreneurial spirit realized that a commercial application could produce millionaires and&lt;br /&gt;billionaires. By the early 2000s, there was virtually no medium- or large-sized organization without&lt;br /&gt;a presence on the Internet, with the bulk having a Website and communication connectivity&lt;br /&gt;with email. As of 2005, tumbling computer and Internet connectivity prices have made it possible&lt;br /&gt;for the majority of households in the developed world to access the Internet through&lt;br /&gt;high-bandwidth lines.&lt;br /&gt;Though currently information is generally obtained on the Internet for free, the day could&lt;br /&gt;arrive in the near future when the “free ride on the information highway” comes to a halt. In fact,&lt;br /&gt;more and more Websites are beginning to charge for access to information content.&lt;br /&gt;Developing countries around the world are also buying into the Internet craze, for technology&lt;br /&gt;can assist in leveling the economic playing field. However, not all developing nations believe&lt;br /&gt;that Internet use should be available to citizens of all ages. During October to December 2004,&lt;br /&gt;for example, China closed more than 12,575 existing Internet cafes for allegedly permitting illegal&lt;br /&gt;operations. Though the Chinese government said that it promotes active Internet use for&lt;br /&gt;business and appropriate educational purposes, the communist authorities maintained that&lt;br /&gt;Internet cafes can harm public morality by giving minors access to such undesirable information&lt;br /&gt;as violent games and sexually explicit content. For example, the Web site www.chronicle.com,&lt;br /&gt;which is a prime site for academics seeking jobs, now charges a subscription rate for access to&lt;br /&gt;administrative salary data and other special interest topics.&lt;br /&gt;In recent times, other morally questionable Internet practices have been challenged in the&lt;br /&gt;United States as well.An “interactive Internet logon” animal-killing case surfaced in the United&lt;br /&gt;States during the first week of May 2005.“Computer assisted remote hunting” is defined as the&lt;br /&gt;use of a computer or any similar device, equipment, or software to remotely control the aiming&lt;br /&gt;and discharge of archery equipment, a crossbow, or a firearm to hunt and kill an animal or bird.&lt;br /&gt;In California, the Fish and Game Commission ordered wildlife officials to create emergency laws&lt;br /&gt;to ban the practice of hunters using the Internet to shoot animals.This piece of legislation, passed&lt;br /&gt;by California’s Senate in April 2005, was in response to a Texas hunter Website that intended to&lt;br /&gt;let users fire at real animals using their computers. In particular, the legislation prevented the use&lt;br /&gt;of computer-assisted hunting sites and banned the import or export of any animal killed using&lt;br /&gt;computer-assisted hunting. Other states, such as Texas and Maine, and Congress have also then&lt;br /&gt;considered passing similar bills.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Advanced Research Projects Agency Network (ARPANET); HTTP (HyperText&lt;br /&gt;Transfer Protocol); Network.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: In Brief. China Cracks Down on Public Internet. The Globe and Mail,&lt;br /&gt;February 17, 2005, p. B10; Kapica, J. Cyberia. The Globe and Mail, February 17, 2005, p. B10; In&lt;br /&gt;Brief. No Remote Hunting, Regulators Say. The Globe and Mail, May 5, 2005, p. B25; QUT&lt;br /&gt;Division of Technology, Information and Learning Support. Network Glossary. [Online, July 17,&lt;br /&gt;2004.] QUT Division of Technology, Information and Learning Support Website. http://www&lt;br /&gt;.its.qut.edu.au/network/glossary.jsp.&lt;br /&gt;Internet 170&lt;br /&gt;Internet Browser (general term): A software application used to locate and display Web pages.&lt;br /&gt;Two popular Internet browsers are Netscape Navigator and Microsoft’s Internet Explorer. Both&lt;br /&gt;of these are classified as graphical browsers; they display both graphics and text. Internet browsers&lt;br /&gt;can also provide sound and video.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Browser;Text.&lt;br /&gt;Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP) (general term): An extension to the Internet&lt;br /&gt;Protocol (IP) permitting error messages, information messages, and test packets to be generated.&lt;br /&gt;The code types and message types are shown in Figure 9-1.&lt;br /&gt;Figure 9-1. The Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP)&lt;br /&gt;Typical messages are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;Type 3: Destination unreachable&lt;br /&gt;Code 0: Net unreachable&lt;br /&gt;Code 1: Host unreachable&lt;br /&gt;Code 2: Protocol unreachable&lt;br /&gt;Code 4: Fragmentation needed and don’t fragment flag set&lt;br /&gt;Code 5: Source route failed&lt;br /&gt;Type 11:Time exceeded message&lt;br /&gt;Code 0:Time to live exceeded in transit&lt;br /&gt;Code 1: Fragment reassembly time exceeded&lt;br /&gt;Type 5: Redirect message&lt;br /&gt;Code 0: Redirect datagrams for the network&lt;br /&gt;Code 1: Redirect datagrams for the host&lt;br /&gt;Code 2: Redirect datagrams for the Type of Service and network&lt;br /&gt;Code 3: Redirect datagrams for the Type of Service and host&lt;br /&gt;Type 8 and Type 0: Echo and echo reply&lt;br /&gt;1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3&lt;br /&gt;0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1&lt;br /&gt;Message&lt;br /&gt;Type (8 bit)&lt;br /&gt;Msg. Code&lt;br /&gt;Type (8 bit)&lt;br /&gt;Checksum (16 bit)&lt;br /&gt;Data&lt;br /&gt;(if any)&lt;br /&gt;171 Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP)&lt;br /&gt;Code 0: No code&lt;br /&gt;Type 4: Source quench&lt;br /&gt;Type 12: Parameter problem&lt;br /&gt;Type 13 and 14:Timestamp request and timestamp reply&lt;br /&gt;Type 15 and 16: Information request and information reply&lt;br /&gt;The ICMP protocol is heavily used by crackers as a reconnaissance tool to map a target’s network.&lt;br /&gt;Echo messages are sent to a computer on a network. If the host sends back an Echo Reply,&lt;br /&gt;the cracker knows not only of the computer’s existence but also that it potentially can be&lt;br /&gt;exploited. For this reason, network administrators have started blocking incoming “icmp data”&lt;br /&gt;on their network’s firewalls.&lt;br /&gt;Consequently, crackers have reacted by using other tricks. For example, an http connection to&lt;br /&gt;a target is attempted, but the TimeToLive field is set so that a destination-unreachable ICMP&lt;br /&gt;message will be triggered.Typically, outgoing ICMP messages are allowed by network administrators&lt;br /&gt;as a legitimate function of the ICMP protocol; thus, the attempted reconnaissance&lt;br /&gt;succeeds.&lt;br /&gt;Redirect messages can also be used to sabotage routing tables. Correctly used Redirect messages&lt;br /&gt;tell the routers that there are better paths through the network to a destination, and they&lt;br /&gt;do so by announcing, “Next time you try to reach the destination, use this IP address instead.”&lt;br /&gt;This feature is put to malicious use by crackers sending wrong announcements to the routers to&lt;br /&gt;disrupt traffic, redirect it to a compromised machine to gather further intelligence, or to tamper&lt;br /&gt;with the message before it is sent on.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Administrator; Internet Protocol (IP); Network.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Graham, R. Hacking Lexicon. [Online, 2001.] Robert Graham Website.&lt;br /&gt;http://www.linuxsecurity.com/resource_files/documentation/hacking-dict.html; IANA: ICMP&lt;br /&gt;Type Numbers, [Online, September 21, 2005.] http://www.iana.org/assignments/icmp-parameters;&lt;br /&gt;QUT Division of Technology, Information and Learning Support. Network Glossary. [Online,&lt;br /&gt;July 17, 2004.] QUT Division of Technology, Information and Learning Support Website.&lt;br /&gt;http://www.its.qut.edu.au/network/glossary.jsp.&lt;br /&gt;Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) (general term):&lt;br /&gt;Created in 1998 by Jon Postel in response to the U.S. Department of Commerce’s call for a private&lt;br /&gt;sector, nonprofit agency to be formed to administer the Internet name and address system&lt;br /&gt;policy. ICANN is responsible for the management of the DNS system, the administration of the&lt;br /&gt;IP address space, the management of the root servers, and the assigning of protocol parameters.&lt;br /&gt;ICANN’s board consists of 19 directors and nine at-large directors having one-year terms.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Domain Name System (DNS).&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Jupitermedia Corporation. What is ICANN? [Online, January 8, 2004.]&lt;br /&gt;Jupitermedia Website. http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/I/ICANN.html.&lt;br /&gt;Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) (general term): A global network of designers,&lt;br /&gt;operators, researchers, and vendors interested in the growth and development of the Internet,&lt;br /&gt;Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP) 172&lt;br /&gt;including its architecture and operations.Though open to anyone with such interests, the IETF’s&lt;br /&gt;technical work is conducted in work groups that are topic generated, such as routing, transport,&lt;br /&gt;and security.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Internet.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Symantec Security Response. Glossary. [Online, July 15, 2004.] Symantec&lt;br /&gt;Security Response Website. http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/refa.html.&lt;br /&gt;Internet Fraud (legal term): Encompasses a wide range of online criminal activities that deliver&lt;br /&gt;harm to the targets such as credit card fraud, online auction fraud, unsolicited email (Spam)&lt;br /&gt;fraud, and online child pornography. In the United States, the Internet Fraud Complaint&lt;br /&gt;Center (IFCC), a partnership between the FBI and the National White Collar Crime Center&lt;br /&gt;(NW3C), was created to address Internet fraud.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Child Pornography; Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI); Fraud; Spam; Spammers;&lt;br /&gt;Spamming/Scrolling.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Internet Fraud Complaint Center. IFCC 2002 Internet Fraud Report.&lt;br /&gt;[Online, 2003.] Internet Fraud Complaint Center Website. http://www1.ifccfbi.gov/strategy/&lt;br /&gt;2002_IFCCReport.pdf.&lt;br /&gt;Internet Fraud Complaint Center (IFCC) (general term):A partner of the Federal Bureau&lt;br /&gt;of Investigation (FBI) and the National White Collar Crime Center (NW3C), now referred&lt;br /&gt;to as the Internet Crime Complaint Center, or IC3.The IFCC’s role is to deal with Internetrelated&lt;br /&gt;fraud by providing a user-friendly reporting mechanism to alert law enforcement agents&lt;br /&gt;of a likely criminal or civil breach. As a service to law enforcement and regulatory bodies, the&lt;br /&gt;IFCC maintains a centralized repository for Internet fraud complaints and maintains statistics&lt;br /&gt;related to fraud trends.&lt;br /&gt;In 2002, the IFCC referred more than 43,000 complaints of online fraud to the law enforcement&lt;br /&gt;authorities, a three-fold increase over that of 2001, and the number of complaints continues&lt;br /&gt;to grow annually. For example, the total dollar loss from the 2002 referred fraud cases was $54&lt;br /&gt;million, an increase in total dollar loss from $17 million in 2001. In 2005, IC3 referred 97,076&lt;br /&gt;complaints of crime to federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies around the U.S. for further&lt;br /&gt;investigation. The majority of cases concerned fraud and resulted in financial losses for&lt;br /&gt;victims.The total fraud dollar loss from all referred cases was $183.12 million with a median dollar&lt;br /&gt;loss of $424.00 per incident.This total amount was up from $68 million in 2004.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) ; Fraud.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Internet Crime Complaint Center. IC3 2005 Internet Crime Report.&lt;br /&gt;[Online, June, 20, 2006.] IC3 Web Site. http://www.ic3.gov/media/annualreport/2005_&lt;br /&gt;IC3Report.pdf. Internet Fraud Complaint Center. IFCC 2002 Internet Fraud Report. [Online,&lt;br /&gt;2003.] Internet Fraud Complaint Center Website. http://www1.ifccfbi.gov/strategy/2002_&lt;br /&gt;IFCCReport.pdf; Internet Fraud Complaint Center.Welcome to IFCC. [Online, August 11,&lt;br /&gt;2004.] Internet Fraud Complaint Center Website. http://www1.ifccfbi.gov/index.asp.&lt;br /&gt;Internet Mail or Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) (general term): Mark Crispin&lt;br /&gt;made IMAP to be a present-day alternative to the prevalently used POP3 email-retrieval protocol.&lt;br /&gt;IMAP is an application-layer Internet protocol used for accessing email on a remote&lt;br /&gt;173 Internet Mail or Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP)&lt;br /&gt;server from a local client. IMAP and POP3 are the two most widely used Internet protocols for&lt;br /&gt;retrieving email.&lt;br /&gt;IMAP’s main advantage over POP3 is that messages can remain on the server and be accessed&lt;br /&gt;from more than one client (for example, a stationary office computer and a PDA) while keeping&lt;br /&gt;track of which messages have already been read. Both IMAP and POP3 are supported by&lt;br /&gt;modern email clients and servers.The present version of IMAP, known as IMAP version 4, revision&lt;br /&gt;1 (IMAP4rev1), is defined by RFC 3501.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Email or Electronic Mail; Protocol.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: GNU_FDL. Internet Message Access Protocol. [Online, 2004.] GNU&lt;br /&gt;Free Documentation License Website. http://www.wordiq.com/definition/IMAP.&lt;br /&gt;Internetwork Operating System (IOS) (general term):An operating system software that&lt;br /&gt;runs on Cisco routers and switches comprising the majority of the Internet. IOS was first&lt;br /&gt;developed by William Yeager at Stanford University’s Knowledge Systems Laboratory.Yeager&lt;br /&gt;licensed the code to Cisco in 1987. IOS brought together a comprehensive collection of routing,&lt;br /&gt;switching, internetworking, and telecommunications functionality running on top of a full&lt;br /&gt;fledged multitasking operating system.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Internet; Operating System Software; Routers; Switch.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading:Triple Fiber Networks. [Online, 2006.] 3Fn Website. http://www.3fn.net/&lt;br /&gt;cisco.php.&lt;br /&gt;Internet Piracy (legal term): Using the Internet to illegally copy and/or distribute software,&lt;br /&gt;which is an infringement of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (or DMCA) in the&lt;br /&gt;United States.&lt;br /&gt;On June 11, 2003,Verizon told four of its Internet service customers that they could soon be&lt;br /&gt;hearing from the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) regarding allegations that&lt;br /&gt;they traded copyrighted music online—in violation of the DMCA and an illustration of Internet&lt;br /&gt;piracy.Though Verizon challenged a subpoena requested by the RIAA to give it the identities of&lt;br /&gt;the alleged violators,Verizon lost in an appeals court and was given two weeks to comply with&lt;br /&gt;RIAA’s request.The subscribers were traced by the RIAA through their Internet Protocol (IP)&lt;br /&gt;addresses, which led the RIAA to the users’ Internet Provider,Verizon.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Copyright; Copyright Laws; Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA);&lt;br /&gt;Intellectual Property (IP); Intellectual Property Rights and Copyright Infringement.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Graham, J. Privacy V. Internet Piracy. [Online, June 11, 2003.] Gannett&lt;br /&gt;Co., Inc.Website. http://www.usatoday.com/life/music/2003-06-11-privacy_x.htm.&lt;br /&gt;Internet Protocol (IP) (general term): Defined in STD 5, RFC 791, is the network layer for&lt;br /&gt;the TCP/IP Protocol Suite, a packet-switching protocol that has address and control information&lt;br /&gt;so that packets can be routed (see Figure 9-2). Both the Transmission Control Protocol&lt;br /&gt;(TCP) and the Internet Protocol (IP) are important. IP provides connectionless, high-level datagram&lt;br /&gt;delivery as well as fragmentation and datagram reassembly to support data links having&lt;br /&gt;varying maximum-transmission unit (MTU) sizes.&lt;br /&gt;Internet Mail or Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) 174&lt;br /&gt;Figure 9-2. Internet Protocol (IP)&lt;br /&gt;The Internet Protocol itself contains the following information:&lt;br /&gt;IP Version: Either 4 for the currently used version 4 of the protocol or 6 for the forthcoming&lt;br /&gt;version of the protocol.&lt;br /&gt;Header Length:The number of 32-bit words in the header (or four times the number of&lt;br /&gt;bytes).The header length is 20 bytes (value 5) if no IP options are set.&lt;br /&gt;TypeOfService: Rarely used; designed to implement quality of service properties in&lt;br /&gt;routing.&lt;br /&gt;Total Length: Length of the complete packets (including header and data). Because this is&lt;br /&gt;a 16-bit field, the maximum IP packet size is 65535.&lt;br /&gt;IP Packet ID: Identifier for a packet. It is incremented by the sender. If packets with identical&lt;br /&gt;IP Packet IDs are received, intrusion analysts assume that these packets were crafted by&lt;br /&gt;a reconnaissance or attack tool and do not contain regular data.&lt;br /&gt;Flags (3bit): First: Unused.&lt;br /&gt;Second: DF (do not fragment), signaling that the packet must not be fragmented in transition.&lt;br /&gt;Used by crackers for reconnaissance by setting it to too high a number for certain&lt;br /&gt;network types, thus trying to trigger an ICMP error message.&lt;br /&gt;Third: MF (more fragments), indicating whether the datagram contains more fragments to&lt;br /&gt;come.&lt;br /&gt;1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3&lt;br /&gt;0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1&lt;br /&gt;DTS/&lt;br /&gt;Type of Service&lt;br /&gt;Header&lt;br /&gt;Length (*4)&lt;br /&gt;IP&lt;br /&gt;Versions Total Length (in bytes)&lt;br /&gt;IP Packet ID Fragment Offset Flags&lt;br /&gt;Options (up to 40 byte)&lt;br /&gt;Destination Address (32 bit)&lt;br /&gt;Source Address (32 bit)&lt;br /&gt;Time To Live (TTL) Embedded Protocol Opcode (16 bit)&lt;br /&gt;Data&lt;br /&gt;175 Internet Protocol (IP)&lt;br /&gt;Fragment offset: Used to direct reassembly of a fragmented datagram. Crackers craft the&lt;br /&gt;package with unexpected offsets and with overlapping fragments, trying to crash recipients’&lt;br /&gt;network protocol stacks.&lt;br /&gt;TimeToLive(TTL): A timer field used to track the lifetime of the datagram. Each router&lt;br /&gt;decrements this field when it forwards a packet to the next router.When the field is decremented&lt;br /&gt;to zero, the datagram is discarded.&lt;br /&gt;Embedded Protocol: Contains information about which protocol is included in the data&lt;br /&gt;portion:&lt;br /&gt;1:ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol)&lt;br /&gt;4:IP (IP in IP encapsulation)&lt;br /&gt;6:TCP (Transmission Control Protocol)&lt;br /&gt;17:UDP (User Datagram Protocol)&lt;br /&gt;41:IPv6 over IPv4&lt;br /&gt;58:ICMP for version 6&lt;br /&gt;89:OSPF Open Shortest Path First Routing Protocol&lt;br /&gt;Header Checksum: Used for error checking of the IP header. It is calculated as a 16-bit complement&lt;br /&gt;of IP header and IP options. Each router has to calculate the checksum because it has&lt;br /&gt;to decrement the TTL field.&lt;br /&gt;Source Address and Destination Address: IP Addresses of the sender and the intended receiver.&lt;br /&gt;The IP addressing setup is critical to the effective routing of IP datagrams through the Internet&lt;br /&gt;because every IP address, having specific components and following a given format, can be subdivided&lt;br /&gt;and used to generate addresses for sub-networks. Each device on a TCP/IP network is&lt;br /&gt;given a unique numerical address (32 bit in IP version 4) that can be divided into two parts: the&lt;br /&gt;host number and the network number.The host number identifies a computer on the network&lt;br /&gt;and is given by the administrator of the local network, whereas the network number identifies a&lt;br /&gt;network and must be given by one of the local Internet Registries (that is,ARIN, RIPE,APNIC,&lt;br /&gt;AfriNIC, or LACNIC) if the network is to be connected to the Internet. An Internet Service&lt;br /&gt;Provider (ISP) can get blocks of network addresses and thereby assign address space to clients.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP); TCP/IP or Transmission Control&lt;br /&gt;Protocol/Internet Protocol; User Datagram Protocol (UDP).&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: QUT Division of Technology, Information and Learning Support.&lt;br /&gt;Network Glossary. [Online, July 17, 2004.] QUT Division of Technology, Information and&lt;br /&gt;Learning Support Website. http://www.its.qut.edu.au/network/glossary.jsp.&lt;br /&gt;Internet Protocol Security (IPSec) (general term): A set of standards for ensuring that communications&lt;br /&gt;delivered over the Internet Protocol (IP) networks are private as well as secure.This&lt;br /&gt;Internet Protocol (IP) 176&lt;br /&gt;objective is completed using cryptographic services. The Microsoft Windows XP IPSec, for&lt;br /&gt;example, was developed using the standards of the Internet Engineering Task Force’s (IETF)&lt;br /&gt;IPSec working group. IPSec provides secure networking via end-to-end security (that is, from&lt;br /&gt;sender to receiver). In Windows XP, IPSec protects communications between LAN computers,&lt;br /&gt;branch offices, domain clients and servers, extranets, and roving clients. Furthermore, the IPSec&lt;br /&gt;protocol is supported on a variety of UNIX and Linux platforms.&lt;br /&gt;According to the British-based National Infrastructure Security Coordination Centre&lt;br /&gt;(NISCC) in a statement released in May 2005, crackers could exploit a major flaw in IPSec&lt;br /&gt;framework to get the plaintext version of IPSec-protected communications with just moderate&lt;br /&gt;attempts.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Cryptography or “Crypto”; Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF); Linux;&lt;br /&gt;UNIX.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Dickinson, P. High-Severity Vulnerability in IPSec. [Online, May 10, 2005.]&lt;br /&gt;Guardian Digital, Inc.Website. http://www.linuxsecurity.com/content/view/119089; Microsoft&lt;br /&gt;Corporation. Internet Protocol Security Defined. [Online, 2004.] Microsoft Corporation Website:&lt;br /&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/windows/xp/all/proddocs/en-us/&lt;br /&gt;sag_ipsec_ov1.mspx.&lt;br /&gt;Internet Protocol Version 4 (IPv4) and Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) (general&lt;br /&gt;term):Though the present Internet Protocol version is IPv4, with the tremendous growth of&lt;br /&gt;the Internet in recent years the need has surfaced for a more robust Internet Protocol version;&lt;br /&gt;the IPv4 addressing and routing mechanisms are being stretched to their limits. Moreover, IPv4&lt;br /&gt;lacks the proper security and authentication techniques critical to meeting today’s business needs.&lt;br /&gt;For these reasons, the Internet Protocol version 6, or IPv6, has been developed. IPv6 has not been&lt;br /&gt;implemented widely.This can be attributed to two major factors; the first is that the implementation&lt;br /&gt;is a major undertaking that has an effect on the whole Internet, its backbone providers,&lt;br /&gt;local ISPs, and customers.The second reason, some experts believe, is a reluctance to go forward&lt;br /&gt;in North America and Europe, where the pressure of shortage of the address space is much lower&lt;br /&gt;than in the rapidly developing East-Asian regions.&lt;br /&gt;The transition process from IPv4 to IPv6 requires considerable thought to compatibility issues&lt;br /&gt;and appropriate methods for the deployment of IPv6. In a document written by Juha Lehtovirta,&lt;br /&gt;a Finnish telecommunications expert with Tascomm Engineering Oy, the requirements and&lt;br /&gt;techniques for satisfying such constraints are provided. Also, the transition process from the network&lt;br /&gt;and application levels are delineated.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Internet; Internet Protocol (IP).&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Estala, A. Internet Protocol Version 6 ( IPv6 ) The Next Generation.&lt;br /&gt;[Online, March 9, 1999.] Geocities.com Website. http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/&lt;br /&gt;Foothills/7626/defin.html; Lehtovirta, J.Transition from IPv4 to IPv6. [Online, 2004.] Tascomm&lt;br /&gt;Engineering Oy Website. http://www.tascomm.fi/~jlv/ngtrans/; Grami,A. and Schell, B. Future&lt;br /&gt;Trends in Mobile Commerce: Service Offerings, Technological Advances and Security&lt;br /&gt;Challenges. Proceedings of Second Annual Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust. University of New&lt;br /&gt;177 Internet Protocol Version 4 (IPv4) and Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6)&lt;br /&gt;Brunswick, New Brunswick, Canada, October 13–15, 2004. [Online, October 2004.] Privacy,&lt;br /&gt;Security,Trust 2004 Website. http://www.unb.ca/pstnet/pst2004/.&lt;br /&gt;Internet Relay Chat (IRC) (general term):A software tool that makes real-time conversations&lt;br /&gt;online (in what is known as chat rooms) possible.Though chat rooms form an important, positive&lt;br /&gt;communication link for hackers, many females and children in particular have filed&lt;br /&gt;complaints to authorities about being cyberharassed or cyberstalked in them.&lt;br /&gt;As one example, in Toronto, Canada, in May 2005, Canadian police infiltrated an Internet chat&lt;br /&gt;room and found disturbing cyber child pornography evidence that resulted in the arrest of&lt;br /&gt;Andrew Gelfand, age 19. After the police obtained a search warrant and raided the suspect’s&lt;br /&gt;home, they seized his computers and reviewed the hard drives. Gelfand faced a number of&lt;br /&gt;charges involving the possession and distribution of child pornography.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Chat Room; Child Pornography; Cyberhassment; Cyberstalkers and Cyberstalking.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Internet Highway, LLC. Internet Terminology: IRC. [Online, 1999.]&lt;br /&gt;Internet Highway, LLC Website. http://www.ihwy.com/support/netterms.html; Moore, O.&lt;br /&gt;Computer User Arrested in Child-Porn Sting. The Globe and Mail, May 12, 2005, p.A14; Schell,&lt;br /&gt;B.H., and Lanteigne,N.M. Stalking, Harassment, and Murder in the Workplace: Guidelines for Protection&lt;br /&gt;and Prevention.Westport, CT: Quorum, 2000.&lt;br /&gt;Internet Service Provider (ISP) (general term): Also sometimes called an Internet Access&lt;br /&gt;Provider (IAP), it is a company that provides clients access to the Internet. For a fee, clients&lt;br /&gt;receive a software package, a username, a password, and an access phone number. Equipped with&lt;br /&gt;a modem or ISDN device, the client can then log on to the Internet.The client can browse the&lt;br /&gt;World Wide Web (WWW) or send and receive email. ISPs offer both dial-up service and highspeed&lt;br /&gt;services using DSL or cable-modem technology. ISPs are connected to each other through&lt;br /&gt;Network Access Points, or NAPs.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: DSL; Electronic Mail or Email; Internet; Internet Usage Policy;World Wide Web&lt;br /&gt;(WWW).&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Jupitermedia Corporation. What is ISP? [Online, March 12, 2004.]&lt;br /&gt;Jupitermedia Corporation Website. http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/I/ISP.html.&lt;br /&gt;Internet Telephony (general term): Placing telephone calls over the Internet using protocols&lt;br /&gt;such as VoIP. Internet telephony is rapidly evolving and has become a serious competitor for&lt;br /&gt;conventional telephony with the advent of high-speed Internet access technologies (such as cable&lt;br /&gt;and DSL).&lt;br /&gt;Many traditional telephony providers are in the process of switching their internal delivery&lt;br /&gt;systems to Internet telephony–based systems in order to provide these services on the same platform&lt;br /&gt;as their data services (convergence).&lt;br /&gt;See Also:Voice over Internet Protocol.&lt;br /&gt;Internet Usage Policy (general term): Companies, government agencies, medical institutions,&lt;br /&gt;and universities and colleges typically have Internet users sign a required Internet Usage Policy&lt;br /&gt;form to make users accountable for their online activities. Such a form may look similar to that&lt;br /&gt;shown in Figure 9-3.&lt;br /&gt;Internet Protocol Version 4 (IPv4) and Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) 178&lt;br /&gt;Figure 9-3. Typical Internet Usage Policy form&lt;br /&gt;There is usually a form for the supervisor to sign (see Figure 9-4).&lt;br /&gt;Figure 9-4. Typical Internet Usage Policy form for supervisors’ use&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Internet;White Hat Ethic.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Institute of Government. Acceptable Internet Usage Policy. [Online,&lt;br /&gt;2004.] Institute of Government Website. http://www.iog.unc.edu.&lt;br /&gt;Intranet Site (general term):The information system internal to an organization and built with&lt;br /&gt;Web-based technology. An intranet site is often referred to as a portal and has typically been&lt;br /&gt;found in large companies (having 15,000 or more employees) able to afford this information&lt;br /&gt;technology “luxury.”&lt;br /&gt;An intranet site is actually a mini-Internet accessed through Web browsers. It is typically run&lt;br /&gt;on private local area networks (LAN) rather than public Web servers. Intranet sites have a&lt;br /&gt;variety of functions but most are intended to keep employees informed about a company’s&lt;br /&gt;important events, distribute software or company newsletters online, and provide routine company&lt;br /&gt;information online—such as policy manuals.Also, intranet sites can be accessed through the&lt;br /&gt;Internet. Thus, when employees are off-site they can still access company information using a&lt;br /&gt;secure login.&lt;br /&gt;I have received a written copy of Company X’s Internet Acceptable Use&lt;br /&gt;Policy. This employee ________ [name cited] has a legitimate workrelated&lt;br /&gt;purpose for accessing the Internet. As this employee’s supervisor,&lt;br /&gt;I am aware of both the responsibilities and the possible misuses of Internet&lt;br /&gt;access. I acknowledge that this employee will be held accountable for&lt;br /&gt;inappropriate usage of the Internet according to this company’s Internet&lt;br /&gt;Acceptable Use Policy.&lt;br /&gt;Supervisor Signature Date:&lt;br /&gt;I have received a copy of Company X’s Internet Acceptable Use Policy. I&lt;br /&gt;understand this policy’s terms and conditions and agree to follow them. I&lt;br /&gt;understand that Company X’s software may record for management’s&lt;br /&gt;review the Internet addresses of all the Websites I visit. I also understand&lt;br /&gt;that management may maintain a record of all of my network activity&lt;br /&gt;(including the sending and receiving of e-files).&lt;br /&gt;I acknowledge that all e-files and e-messages sent or received by me may&lt;br /&gt;be recorded and stored in an archive file for management’s review. I fully&lt;br /&gt;understand that if I violate this policy, I can receive disciplinary action,&lt;br /&gt;ranging from the revoking of my Internet privileges to firing. If I violate&lt;br /&gt;this policy in a criminal way, I understand that I may also face criminal&lt;br /&gt;charges.&lt;br /&gt;Employee Signature&lt;br /&gt;Employee Name (Print)&lt;br /&gt;Date:&lt;br /&gt;179 Intranet Site&lt;br /&gt;New intranet site software made by Microsoft Corporation and Plumtree Software Inc. has&lt;br /&gt;made the technology affordable even for small- and medium-sized enterprises.A number of open&lt;br /&gt;source software solutions such as XOOPS (http://xoops.org) or the JBOSS (http://labs.jboss&lt;br /&gt;.com/portal/jbossportal/index.html) portal are available as well.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Local Area Network (LAN).&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Palmer, I.Workplace: It’s Not Just the Big Boys Using Intranets Any&lt;br /&gt;Longer. The Globe and Mail, May 5, 2005, p. B27.&lt;br /&gt;Intrusion (general term):To compromise a computer system by breaking the security of such a&lt;br /&gt;system or causing it to enter into an insecure state.The act of intruding—or gaining unauthorized&lt;br /&gt;access to a system—typically leaves traces that can be discovered by intrusion detection systems.&lt;br /&gt;One of the goals of intruders is to remain undetected for as long as possible so that they can continue&lt;br /&gt;with their malicious activity undisturbed.&lt;br /&gt;Security professionals need to take steps when a system breach is suspected. First, suspicious&lt;br /&gt;accounts should be disabled immediately.Then, the suspicious accounts need to be reviewed to&lt;br /&gt;assess who set up the account and for what reasons. Because audit logs will indicate who created&lt;br /&gt;the account, finding the time and date on which the account was created will be very useful&lt;br /&gt;information. If the account is the outcome of a crack attack, the system reviewer will have a&lt;br /&gt;particular time frame in which to determine whether other audit log events are “of interest.”&lt;br /&gt;If the reviewer wants to determine whether a suspicious application is indeed being used by&lt;br /&gt;a cracker to listen for incoming connections—a potential “back door” into the system—the&lt;br /&gt;reviewer is well advised to consider using a tool such as TCPView.The TCPView tool will tell&lt;br /&gt;the system reviewer what applications are using open system ports. Because crackers can put&lt;br /&gt;Trojan horses in place of the netstat and Isof programs, the reviewer should scan the attacked system&lt;br /&gt;from a different computer.This feat can be accomplished by using a service such as the free&lt;br /&gt;insecure.org nmap port scanner.&lt;br /&gt;Malware can also be triggered from the operating system’s job scheduler. A system reviewer&lt;br /&gt;can see what jobs—legitimate or otherwise—are scheduled to be executed in the system by typing&lt;br /&gt;AT at the command prompt.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Audit Trail; Back or Trap Door; Cracking; Exploit; Log; Malware;Vulnerabilities of&lt;br /&gt;Computers.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Haberstetzer,V.Thwarting Hacker Techniques: Signs of a Compromised&lt;br /&gt;System. [Online, March 21, 2005.] TechTarget Website. http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/tip/&lt;br /&gt;0,289483,sid14_gci1069097,00.html?track=NL-35.&lt;br /&gt;Intrusion Detection System (IDS) (general term): A security appliance or software running&lt;br /&gt;on some device that tries to detect and warn of ongoing computer system cracks or attempted&lt;br /&gt;cracks in real time or near-real time. Intrusion detection systems fall into three broad categories:&lt;br /&gt;anomaly based, pattern based, and specification based. The first two are the most widely used&lt;br /&gt;types; the last one is still in its infancy.&lt;br /&gt;Anomaly-based IDSes treat all exposed behavior of systems, or the network that is unknown&lt;br /&gt;to them, as a potential attack. These systems require extensive training of the IDS so that it can&lt;br /&gt;distinguish good from bad traffic. Pattern-based IDSes assume that attack patterns are previously&lt;br /&gt;known and therefore can be detected. Because these IDSes cannot detect new attack types, they&lt;br /&gt;Intranet Site 180&lt;br /&gt;require constant maintenance to incorporate new attacks. Specification-based IDSes look for states&lt;br /&gt;of the system known to be undesirable, and upon detection of such a state, they report an intrusion.&lt;br /&gt;Common in all systems is that intrusion-detection analysts review the logs that are generated&lt;br /&gt;and other available network information (such as traffic patterns, unusual open ports, or unexpected&lt;br /&gt;running processes) to look for suspected or real intrusions.This process is time consuming&lt;br /&gt;and requires considerable expertise on the part of the security analysts.A trend toward more automated&lt;br /&gt;Intrusion Prevention Systems that actively step in and limit systems access can be observed.&lt;br /&gt;In March 2004, Hewlett-Packard Company officials said that their software engineers had&lt;br /&gt;developed software that they believed could slow the spread of Internet worms and viruses.&lt;br /&gt;Tentatively dubbed “Virus Throttler,” this software not only identified and alerted professionals&lt;br /&gt;to suspicious network traffic but also caused some of the computer’s functions to slow down so&lt;br /&gt;that the worm or virus is impeded.This capability was meant to give the professional the needed&lt;br /&gt;time to remove the cyber intruder. Shortly after announcing the package, Hewlett-Packard&lt;br /&gt;shelved it for several months because of insurmountable difficulties with integrating it into&lt;br /&gt;Microsoft’s Windows operating systems.The difficulties were resolved.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Audit Trail; Exploit; Forensics; Intrusion; Log;Virus;Vulnerabilities of Computers;&lt;br /&gt;Worm.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: In Brief. HP Strikes at Worms. The Globe and Mail, December 2, 2004,&lt;br /&gt;p. B11; Symantec Security Response. Glossary. [Online, July 15, 2004.] Symantec Security&lt;br /&gt;Response Website. http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/refa.html.&lt;br /&gt;Intrusion Prevention (general term): Because targeted crack attacks on enterprises’ networks&lt;br /&gt;have been increasing in recent years, intrusion prevention is gaining greater importance for companies.&lt;br /&gt;Thus, companies are tending to shift from the time-consuming process of detecting&lt;br /&gt;intrusions and having security administrators react manually to them to implementing automated&lt;br /&gt;mechanisms found in Intrusion Prevention Systems.&lt;br /&gt;Research firm Gartner Inc. has defined three criteria for providing a useful network- and&lt;br /&gt;host-based intrusion-prevention application: (1) It must not disrupt normal operations—meaning&lt;br /&gt;that when it is put online, an intrusion-prevention system must not place unacceptable or unpredictable&lt;br /&gt;latency into a network. A host-based intrusion-prevention system should not consume&lt;br /&gt;more than 10% of a system’s resources so that network traffic and processes on the servers can&lt;br /&gt;continue to run. Blocking actions must take place in real time or almost-real time, with latencies&lt;br /&gt;placing in the tens of milliseconds rather than in seconds. (2) It must block exploits using more than&lt;br /&gt;one algorithm—to operate at the application level as well as at the firewall-processing level. (3)&lt;br /&gt;It must have the capability to ascertain “attack events” from “normal events.”&lt;br /&gt;As intrusion-prevention systems continue to evolve, their capacities will also improve. They&lt;br /&gt;will be better able to identify and therefore block significantly more crack attacks than today’s&lt;br /&gt;intrusion-prevention systems can. Because firewalls are not 100% effective, trained analysts will&lt;br /&gt;continue to have to flag and more thoroughly investigate suspicious traffic activity.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Attack; Exploit; Firewall.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Pescatore, J. Enterprise Security Moves Toward Intrusion Prevention.&lt;br /&gt;[Online, September 25, 2003.] CXO Media. Inc.Website. http://www.csoonline.com/analyst/&lt;br /&gt;report1771.html.&lt;br /&gt;181 Intrusion Prevention&lt;br /&gt;Intrusion Recovery (general term): Reports have consistently indicated that supposed techsavvy&lt;br /&gt;firms have a long way to go in terms of implementing effective system security measures&lt;br /&gt;to enable them to more effectively recover from system intrusions—known simply as intrusion&lt;br /&gt;recovery. For example, a recent IBM Corporation study found that although 86% of companies&lt;br /&gt;surveyed said they used firewalls, 85% said they used anti-virus software, and 74% said they used&lt;br /&gt;authentication procedures, only 63% of the companies surveyed said they used encryption&lt;br /&gt;software—and less than 50% said they used intrusion detection and prevention systems.&lt;br /&gt;Taken as a composite, these survey statistics suggest that there is considerable opportunity for&lt;br /&gt;serious data loss or data manipulation incidents to occur in companies today.&lt;br /&gt;Accepting that computer system downtime equates to high revenue losses for companies, a&lt;br /&gt;2002 recent survey of Fortune 1000 companies conducted by the Find/SVP consulting company&lt;br /&gt;indicated that the average downtime resulting from network intrusions lasted, on average,&lt;br /&gt;four hours, at an average cost of $330,000. Moreover, according to this survey, a “typical” company&lt;br /&gt;experienced, on average, nine downtimes per year. The losses incurred were almost $3&lt;br /&gt;million per year —not including the losses associated with a total lack of employee productivity.&lt;br /&gt;The initial step in preventing unauthorized access is the deployment of intrusion-prevention&lt;br /&gt;systems that actively and automatically limit access to systems. Attacks that cannot be blocked by&lt;br /&gt;the prevention systems typically would be detected by intrusion-detection systems, defined as&lt;br /&gt;applications that monitor operating system software and network traffic for real or probable&lt;br /&gt;security breaches. If these systems fail and an attack is successfully completed, other steps need to&lt;br /&gt;be in place—including having an appropriate disaster recovery plan.&lt;br /&gt;By definition, a disaster recovery plan is a strategy outlining both the technical and organizational&lt;br /&gt;factors related to network security. Such a plan should start with a comprehensive&lt;br /&gt;assessment of the network to determine acceptable risk levels to the system. These results can&lt;br /&gt;then be utilized to produce a set of security policies and procedures for assisting employees&lt;br /&gt;and workgroups in case a network disruption or stoppage occurs. Moreover, decisions can also&lt;br /&gt;be made by system administrators as to which particular methods and systems will be required&lt;br /&gt;by the organization so that it can implement its security policies and procedures quickly and&lt;br /&gt;effectively—the primary goal of intrusion recovery.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Encryption or Encipher; Firewall; Intrusion Detection System (IDS); Operating&lt;br /&gt;System Software; Risk; Security.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Peddle, D. Identifying Vulnerabilities In Networked Systems. [Online,&lt;br /&gt;June 29, 2004.] CBL Data Recovery Website. http://www.cbltech.com/article-identify.html.&lt;br /&gt;IP Address (general term): An identifier required for any machine to communicate on the&lt;br /&gt;Internet. The IP address looks something like this: 123.123.123.123—for numerical segments&lt;br /&gt;separated by dots.Any computer is reachable through its IP address.&lt;br /&gt;An IP address is divided into a part identifying a network as belonging to a university, a government&lt;br /&gt;agency, or a company and another part identifying each computer in that network.The&lt;br /&gt;IP address is comparable to a “nonvirtual” street address with its street name and house number.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Internet Protocol.&lt;br /&gt;IP Address Spoofing (general term):A technique used by crackers to gain unauthorized access&lt;br /&gt;to computers and from which newer routers and firewall arrangements can offer some protection.&lt;br /&gt;Intrusion Recovery 182&lt;br /&gt;IP address spoofing is accomplished when the cracker sends messages to a system with an IP&lt;br /&gt;address identifying these messages as originating at a trusted host.&lt;br /&gt;To spoof an IP address, a cracker must first use a combination of methods and tools to identify&lt;br /&gt;the IP address of a trusted host and then change the packet headers so that it appears as&lt;br /&gt;though the packets are coming from a trusted host.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Crackers; IP Address; Spoofing.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Jupitermedia Corporation.What is IP Spoofing? [Online,April 14, 2004.]&lt;br /&gt;Jupitermedia Corporation Website. http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/I/IP_spoofing.html.&lt;br /&gt;IRL (general term): Chat room talk meaning “in real life.”&lt;br /&gt;ISACA (Information Systems and Control Association) (general term): Provides education,&lt;br /&gt;training, and research for professionals in the areas of IT governance, security, and auditing.&lt;br /&gt;It was founded in 1967 and now has more than 50,000 members worldwide in more than 60&lt;br /&gt;countries.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: ISACA Website. [Online, April 8, 2006.] http://www.isaca.org.&lt;br /&gt;(ISC)2 (International Information Systems Security Certification Consortium) (general&lt;br /&gt;term):A nonprofit organization created to provide an international standard for information&lt;br /&gt;security practitioners. The (ISC)2 developed both the SSCP (Systems Security Certified&lt;br /&gt;Professional) certification and the CISSP (Certified Information Systems Security Professional)&lt;br /&gt;certification.These certifications indicate the Common Body of Knowledge (CBK) required by&lt;br /&gt;information security practitioners. Because the SSCP and CISSP certifications focus on the practices,&lt;br /&gt;responsibilities, and roles of information security practitioners, they are seen as being useful&lt;br /&gt;for advancing practitioners’ careers and adding to their credibility.&lt;br /&gt;The CISSP Certification examination has 250 questions and assesses 10 information systems&lt;br /&gt;security domains relating to the CBK (such as access control systems and methodology; applications&lt;br /&gt;and system development; business continuity planning; cryptography; and law, investigation,&lt;br /&gt;and ethics). On top of the basic CISSP Certification, professionals in good standing can obtain&lt;br /&gt;certifications in one of three concentration areas: Security Engineering, Security Architecture,&lt;br /&gt;and Security Management. The corresponding certificates are, respectively, ISSEP, ISSAP, and&lt;br /&gt;ISSMP.&lt;br /&gt;The SSCP examination has 125 questions and assesses seven information systems security&lt;br /&gt;domains relating to the CBK (such as Access Controls, Administration, Audit and&lt;br /&gt;Monitoring, Cryptography, and Response and Recovery).&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Access Control; Administrator; Cryptography or “Crypto”; SANS Institute.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Systems Security Certified Practitioner. About SSCP Certification.&lt;br /&gt;[Online, 2004.] ISC2 Website. https://www.isc2.org/cgi-bin/content.cgi?category=20.&lt;br /&gt;Island-hopping (general term):To crack one system and then use it as a “launching pad” for&lt;br /&gt;cracking other systems. University computer systems tend to be a hotbed of compromised systems&lt;br /&gt;from which crackers launch DoS attacks. Home computers attached to DSL (Digital&lt;br /&gt;Subscriber Lines) and cable modems are frequently exploited by crackers and used to launch&lt;br /&gt;Denial of Service (DoS) attacks.The primary reason these exploits occur is that home computers&lt;br /&gt;tend to lack key security features and anti-virus software. Given the huge customer base&lt;br /&gt;183 Island-hopping&lt;br /&gt;of Internet Service Providers (ISPs) offering cable modems or DSL services, it is very difficult&lt;br /&gt;to track the origin of such DoS exploits.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Denial of Service (DoS); DSL (Digital Subscriber Lines); Exploits; Internet Service&lt;br /&gt;Provider (ISP);Vulnerabilities of Computers.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Graham, R. Hacking Lexicon. [Online, 2001.] Robert Graham Website.&lt;br /&gt;http://www.linuxsecurity.com/resource_files/documentation/hacking-dict.html.&lt;br /&gt;ISO (International Organization for Standardization) (general term): A federation of the&lt;br /&gt;national standards bodies that forms a nongovernmental,multinational organization. In 2005, 149&lt;br /&gt;countries collaborated under the ISO umbrella.Working groups from the member countries&lt;br /&gt;continue to develop standards that are adopted as national standards by the member countries.&lt;br /&gt;Through the standardization effort, duplication of work is avoided and the seamless transfer of&lt;br /&gt;technology is thus enabled.&lt;br /&gt;ISO 17799 (general term):A detailed security standard that is organized into the following areas:&lt;br /&gt;asset classification and control; business continuity planning; compliance; computer and operations&lt;br /&gt;management; personnel security; physical and environmental security system access control;&lt;br /&gt;security organization; security policy; and system development and maintenance.&lt;br /&gt;Because ISO 17799 is very thorough, it requires a methodical and measured approach to system&lt;br /&gt;security as well as access to essential tools and products.To assist firms and agencies wanting&lt;br /&gt;to improve their ISO 17799 compliance status, a directory can be found at http://www&lt;br /&gt;.iso17799software.com/index.htm.The latter provides links to products and tools geared to making&lt;br /&gt;the compliance process less difficult and including downloadable trial versions.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Download; Risk; Security.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Risk Associates. ISO 17799: What is it? [Online, 2004.] Risk Associates&lt;br /&gt;Website. http://www.iso17799software.com/index.htm.&lt;br /&gt;ITAR (International Traffic in Arms Regulation) (general term): The United States government&lt;br /&gt;controls the export and import of defense-related materials and technology through this&lt;br /&gt;regulation. Many IT security-related technologies—particularly encryption technologies—fall&lt;br /&gt;under ITAR and are therefore restricted from export.&lt;br /&gt;Ivanov, Alexey and Gorshkov,Vasiliy Case (legal case): The real-life case of Alexey Ivanov&lt;br /&gt;and Vasiliy Gorshkov was discussed at the Black Hat Security Conference in Las Vegas in July&lt;br /&gt;2004. It involves two crackers who were smart enough to crack into computer systems but naïve&lt;br /&gt;concerning the social engineering talents of FBI agents. Following is a summary of events in&lt;br /&gt;the case.&lt;br /&gt;On October 10, 2001, in Washington, a jury returned a guilty verdict against Vasiliy Gorshkov,&lt;br /&gt;age 26, of Russia, on 20 counts of conspiracy, numerous computer crimes, and fraud.The targets&lt;br /&gt;included Speakeasy Network (Seattle,Washington), the Nara Bank (Los Angeles, California), the&lt;br /&gt;Central National Bank of Waco (Waco, Texas), and the online credit card payment company&lt;br /&gt;PayPal (Palo Alto, California), among others. For these crimes, Gorshkov faced a maximum&lt;br /&gt;prison term of five years on each count, resulting in a possible sentence of 100 years in prison&lt;br /&gt;and a fine of $250,000 on each count.The jury sentenced him to a three-year prison term.&lt;br /&gt;Island-hopping 184&lt;br /&gt;Gorshkov was one of two Russians persuaded to go to the United States through an FBI sting&lt;br /&gt;operation.The sting came from an investigation of Russian computer intrusions directed at these&lt;br /&gt;targets. Apparently the pair used the targeted computers to steal clients’ personal financial information.&lt;br /&gt;They then attempted to extort money from the targeted firms with threats to either show&lt;br /&gt;the sensitive data to the public or to damage the firms’ computers.The pair also defrauded PayPal&lt;br /&gt;with stolen credit card numbers used to get money to pay for computer parts ordered from U.S.&lt;br /&gt;vendors.&lt;br /&gt;The FBI’s sting operation was formulated to seduce the Russian criminals to arrive on U.S.&lt;br /&gt;soil so that they could be caught and charged. As part of the sting, the FBI created a computer&lt;br /&gt;security company named Invita.Then, pretending to be Invita personnel, during the second half&lt;br /&gt;of the year 2000 the FBI agents communicated with the Russian pair by phone and email.The&lt;br /&gt;pair eventually agreed to a personal meeting in Seattle, where Invita was theoretically based.&lt;br /&gt;Before the FBI agents would bring the pair to the U.S., however, the team had to pass a special&lt;br /&gt;test.They had to crack a test network—an exploit they successfully completed.&lt;br /&gt;Gorshkov and Ivanov landed in Seattle,Washington, on November 10, 2000, to attend the prearranged&lt;br /&gt;meeting at Invita.The Russian men did not know that the Invita meeting participants&lt;br /&gt;were actually FBI agents. The Russians also were not aware that the meeting was recorded on&lt;br /&gt;tape. During the meeting, Gorshkov and Ivanov bragged about their cracking prowess and took&lt;br /&gt;responsibility for their cracking exploits. Gorshkov shrugged off any concerns about the FBI’s&lt;br /&gt;catching them, maintaining that the FBI could not get the pair while they were in Russia.When&lt;br /&gt;asked how they got the U.S. credit cards, Gorshkov said that he was not prepared to discuss that&lt;br /&gt;issue while they were in the United States. He then suggested that such questions would better&lt;br /&gt;be addressed in Russia. At the end of the Invita meeting, the two Russians were arrested and&lt;br /&gt;Ivanov was sent to Connecticut to face charges for a cracking incident regarding the Online&lt;br /&gt;Information Bureau of Vernon (in Connecticut).&lt;br /&gt;Several days after the arrests, the FBI agents got access through the Internet to the men’s&lt;br /&gt;computers in Russia.The FBI copied considerable data from their accounts and obtained a search&lt;br /&gt;warrant from a U.S. judge.The data provided a wealth of cracking evidence.The pair had huge&lt;br /&gt;databases of stolen credit card information: More than 56,000 credit cards’worth of information&lt;br /&gt;was on their computers, as was the personal financial information of online banking clients.&lt;br /&gt;The data also showed that the crackers gained unauthorized control over numerous computers,&lt;br /&gt;including those of a school district in Michigan.The crackers then used those computers to&lt;br /&gt;commit fraud against PayPal and other online firms.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Black Hats; Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI); Internet.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: U.S. Department of Justice. Russian Computer Hacker Convicted by&lt;br /&gt;Jury. [Online, October 10, 2001.] U.S. Department of Justice Website: http://www.usdoj.gov/&lt;br /&gt;criminal/cybercrime/gorshkovconvict.htm.&lt;br /&gt;185 Ivanov, Alexey and Gorshkov, Vasiliy Case&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;J. Random Hacker (general term): The archetypal hacker. Although the hacker world is predominantly&lt;br /&gt;male and no records of the exact numbers of both genders exist, the percentage of&lt;br /&gt;women engaging in hacking and cracking activities seems to be greater than the single-digit&lt;br /&gt;range typically reported for the technical professions.&lt;br /&gt;In the United States, the hacker community is predominantly Caucasian, with strong pockets&lt;br /&gt;of Jewish hackers on the East Coast and strong pockets of Oriental hackers on the West Coast.&lt;br /&gt;Among hackers, ethnic distribution is understood to be simply a function of which groups tend&lt;br /&gt;to seek and value education, particularly in cyberspace. Hackers say that prejudice—whether&lt;br /&gt;gender, racial, or ethnic—is notably uncommon among them. In fact, prejudice, they affirm, tends&lt;br /&gt;to be met with freezing contempt in the computer underground (CU).&lt;br /&gt;Hackers’ notorious umbilical ties to Artificial Intelligence (AI) research writings and science&lt;br /&gt;fiction literature may have helped them to develop a “personhood” concept that is inclusive&lt;br /&gt;rather than exclusive.&lt;br /&gt;Geographically, in the United States hackerdom seems to center along a Bay Area–to–Boston&lt;br /&gt;axis, with about half of the hard-core hackers living within a hundred miles of Cambridge,&lt;br /&gt;Massachusetts.Another hacker magnet is Berkeley, California. Other hackerdom clusters include&lt;br /&gt;university towns such as ones in the Pacific Northwest, as well as Washington, D.C.; Raleigh,&lt;br /&gt;North Carolina; and Princeton, New Jersey.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Artificial Intelligence (AI); Hackers.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Schell, B.H., Dodge, J.L., with S.S. Moutsatsos. The Hacking of America:&lt;br /&gt;Who’s Doing It,Why, and How.Westport, CT: Quorum Books, 2002.&lt;br /&gt;J/K-J/P (general term): Chat room talk meaning “just kidding/just playing.”&lt;br /&gt;Java and JavaScript (general terms):Though these terms sound alike, they have different meanings.&lt;br /&gt;When computer experts discuss the Java programming language, they often mention that&lt;br /&gt;browsers include a type of virtual mechanism (or “sandbox”) encapsulating the Java program and&lt;br /&gt;preventing it from gaining access to local machines.The theory behind Java has been that a Java&lt;br /&gt;“applet” is actually content-like graphics and not full-application software. But as of 2000, all&lt;br /&gt;major browsers have been found to have bugs in the Java virtual mechanisms, allowing hostile&lt;br /&gt;applets to break free of the “sandbox” and gain access to other system parts. Most security experts&lt;br /&gt;now browse with Java disabled on their computers, whereas other security experts encapsulate it&lt;br /&gt;with many more sandboxes. Java is used as a full-fledged programming language in which many&lt;br /&gt;of the server-side applications on the Internet are written.&lt;br /&gt;JavaScript, on the other hand,was developed by Sun Microsystems and Netscape to be a userfriendly&lt;br /&gt;complement to the Java programming language that could be added to basic HTML&lt;br /&gt;pages to create considerably more interactive documents. It is little wonder, therefore, that&lt;br /&gt;JavaScript is often used to create interactive Web-based forms. Most modern-day browsers,&lt;br /&gt;including those from Microsoft and Netscape, have JavaScript support.&lt;br /&gt;Although Java and JavaScript are different, to be able to take market advantage of the negative&lt;br /&gt;marketing hype around Java, Netscape renamed its JavaScript “LiveScript.”&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Browser; Programming Languages C, C++, Perl, and Java.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Graham, R. Hacking Lexicon. [Online, 2001.] Robert Graham Website:&lt;br /&gt;http://www.linuxsecurity.com/resource_files/documentation/hacking-dict.html; www.cnet&lt;br /&gt;.com. JavaScript. [Online, December 2, 2004.] www.cnet.com Website: http://www.cnet.com/&lt;br /&gt;Resources/Info/Glossary/Terms/javascript.html.&lt;br /&gt;Jobs, Steve (person; 1955– ): Along with Steve Wozniak, started the well-known company&lt;br /&gt;Apple Computer, Inc. After studying physics, literature, and poetry at Reed College in Oregon,&lt;br /&gt;Steve sold his Volkswagen minibus in 1976 for funds to start a computer company.&lt;br /&gt;Jobs and Wozniak took the company public just four years later at $22 a share, and by 1984,&lt;br /&gt;they reinvented the personal computer with the Macintosh. He left Apple, and from 1986&lt;br /&gt;through 1997, Jobs founded and ran NeXT Software, Inc., a company that created hardware to&lt;br /&gt;exploit the full potential of object-oriented technologies. Jobs then sold NeXT Software, Inc., to&lt;br /&gt;Apple in 1997, at which time he again associated himself with Apple Computer, Inc.&lt;br /&gt;In 1986, Steve Jobs discovered and bought an animation company called Pixar Animation&lt;br /&gt;Studios.This company became the creator and producer of a number of top-grossing animated&lt;br /&gt;films such as A Bug’s Life; Monsters, Inc.; Toy Story; and Toy Story 2.&lt;br /&gt;Since 1997, Steve Jobs has helped Apple Computer, Inc. to create innovative products such as&lt;br /&gt;iMac, iBook, iMovie, and iPod. He was also part of the team that positioned Apple to venture&lt;br /&gt;onto the Internet.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Internet;Wozniak, Steve.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Jobs, S. “Resume.” [Online, December 1, 2003.] Steve Jobs’ Home Page&lt;br /&gt;Website: http://homepage.mac.com/steve/Resume.html; Schell, B.H., Dodge, J.L., with S.S.&lt;br /&gt;Moutsatsos. The Hacking of America:Who’s Doing It,Why, and How.Westport, CT: Quorum Books,&lt;br /&gt;2002.&lt;br /&gt;Johansen, Jon Lech (person; 1984– ):A Norwegian cracker famous for designing software that&lt;br /&gt;could crack the encryption of DVDs. He resurfaced during August 2004, making media headlines&lt;br /&gt;when he cracked Apple Computer, Inc.’s wireless music streaming technology and then&lt;br /&gt;released on his Website a key for decoding the encryption used for the AirPort Express streaming&lt;br /&gt;media device. His blog can be found at http://www.nanocrew.net/blog/.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Blog; Encryption or Encipher; Key;Wireless.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: In Brief. Hacker Cracks Apple. The Globe and Mail,August 12, 2004, p. B7.&lt;br /&gt;Jurisdiction (legal term): Jurisdiction and power accorded to judges are intimately related.&lt;br /&gt;Power is constitutionally conferred on a judge to decide whether there has been a breach of law,&lt;br /&gt;the causes of the breach, and the kind of prison sentence or penalty that is appropriate for such&lt;br /&gt;a breach.The physical land area or geographical district within which a judge has jurisdiction is&lt;br /&gt;called his or her “territory.”Thus, a judge’s power relative to the territory is called “the territorial&lt;br /&gt;jurisdiction.” Judges have power only in their jurisdictions, and the decisions of judges in&lt;br /&gt;upper courts preside over decisions of judges in inferior courts.&lt;br /&gt;Java and JavaScript 188&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: The ’Lectric Law Library. The ’Lectric Law Library’s Lexicon On&lt;br /&gt;Jurisdiction. [Online, 2004.] The ’Lectric Law Library Website: http://www.lectlaw.com/def/&lt;br /&gt;j013.htm.&lt;br /&gt;Just In Time (JIT) Compiler (general terms): Translates JAVA bytecode into machine language&lt;br /&gt;while the bytecode is being executed.This technology ensures high execution speeds by&lt;br /&gt;doing the translating into machine code while maintaining platform independency.The translation&lt;br /&gt;is done “on the fly” while the program is already running. Several security issues have been&lt;br /&gt;reported as a result of using the technology, particularly through the improper configuration of&lt;br /&gt;the security settings of the compiler.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Java.&lt;br /&gt;189 Just In Time (JIT) Compiler&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Kerberos (general term):A network authentication protocol using symmetric cryptography to&lt;br /&gt;provide authentication for client-server applications.The core of Kerberos architecture is the KDC&lt;br /&gt;(Key Distribution Server), storing authentication information and using it to securely authenticate&lt;br /&gt;users and services. Authentication is called “secure” because it does not occur in plaintext, it does&lt;br /&gt;not rely on authentication by the host operating system, it does not base trust on IP addresses,&lt;br /&gt;and it does not require physical security of the network hosts. For these reasons, the KDC acts as&lt;br /&gt;a trusted third party in performing authentication services.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Authentication; Cryptography or “Crypto”; Host; IP Addresses; Key; Security.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: The Tech FAQ.What is Kerberos? [Online, 2004.] The Tech Faq Website:&lt;br /&gt;http://www.tech-faq.com/cryptology/kerberos.shtml.&lt;br /&gt;Kernel (general term):The heart or essential component of any operating system.When computer&lt;br /&gt;users say something like, “Oh no, my computer crashed!” what they are really saying is,&lt;br /&gt;“Oh, no, my kernel has crashed!”The primary function of the kernel is to coordinate different&lt;br /&gt;parts of the operating system—the disk drive, access to memory, the programs and processes,&lt;br /&gt;input/output devices such as the mouse and the keyboard, as well as networking.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Computer.&lt;br /&gt;Key (general term):The value needed to encrypt or decrypt a message. Keys can be symmetric&lt;br /&gt;or asymmetric. If someone wanted to keep information secret from another, he or she could utilize&lt;br /&gt;one of two strategies: either hide the fact that the information exists, or make the information&lt;br /&gt;that exists unintelligible to another.&lt;br /&gt;Cryptography is the act of securing information by encrypting it, and cryptanalysis is the act&lt;br /&gt;of decrypting encrypted data to make a message intelligible. Cryptology is the area of mathematics&lt;br /&gt;that includes both cryptography and cryptanalysis.&lt;br /&gt;Modern cryptography uses algorithms, or complex mathematical equations, and secret keys to&lt;br /&gt;decrypt and encrypt information. A key is a number or a string that is typically fewer than 20&lt;br /&gt;characters. Symmetric keys use the same key for decryption and encryption, whereas asymmetric&lt;br /&gt;keys are produced in pairs—one key encrypts the information and the other,“mirrored” key&lt;br /&gt;decrypts it.Thus, someone having only one key could not figure out the other key.&lt;br /&gt;A common question in security pertains to differences between 40-bit and 128-bit encryption&lt;br /&gt;in Internet browsers. The easiest way to break encryption in order to read the plaintext is&lt;br /&gt;simply to try all possible keys.To help indicate the relative degree of difficulty in carrying out&lt;br /&gt;this task, it is important to realize that a 40-bit key has one trillion combinations. So, it would&lt;br /&gt;take a lone computer many weeks to attempt all these combinations. A cracker with considerable&lt;br /&gt;time on his or her hands would likely need just a few weeks to decrypt a message sent across&lt;br /&gt;the Internet with a 40-bit browser.&lt;br /&gt;Furthermore, every increase in key length means that the key will take double the time&lt;br /&gt;to crack. For argument’s sake, if a computer needs one week to crack a 40-bit key, it will&lt;br /&gt;take twice as long to break a 41-bit key—and for a 128-bit key, it will need an estimated&lt;br /&gt;309,485,009,821,345,068,724,781,056 times longer to break it.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Cryptography or “Crypto”; Decryption or Decipher; Encryption or Encipher.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Graham, R. Hacking Lexicon. [Online, 2001.] Robert Graham Website:&lt;br /&gt;http://www.linuxsecurity.com/resource_files/documentation/hacking-dict.html; Simpson, S.&lt;br /&gt;Cryptography Defined/Brief History. [Online, Spring, 1997.] University of Texas Economics&lt;br /&gt;Website: http://www.eco.utexas.edu/faculty/Norman/BUS.FOR/course.mat/SSim/history&lt;br /&gt;.html.&lt;br /&gt;Key Escrow (general term): A cryptographic key entrusted to a third party, meaning that the&lt;br /&gt;key is kept “in escrow.” Normally a key would not be released to anyone but the sender or&lt;br /&gt;receiver without proper authorization.The purpose behind the key escrow is to serve as a backup&lt;br /&gt;if the parties with access to the cryptographic key lose the data, such as through some natural&lt;br /&gt;disaster or a crack attack.&lt;br /&gt;Picture this realistic scenario. Company A supplies software that Company B sells embedded&lt;br /&gt;in its hardware. Company B, worried that Company A may go out of business, requests that&lt;br /&gt;Company A place in escrow the source code for the software.Then, if Company A does go out&lt;br /&gt;of business, Company B is still able to sell products.&lt;br /&gt;The public became aware of the controversial side of key escrow at the time of the U.S. Clipper&lt;br /&gt;Proposal in the early 1990s.The Clipper Proposal suggested that to prevent abuse, there should&lt;br /&gt;be two separate escrow agents, each holding half of the key.The controversy began when the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;government suggested in a set of proposals that there should be a broader utilization of cryptography&lt;br /&gt;without intelligence officers and law enforcement agents’ abilities to read encrypted traffic&lt;br /&gt;being hampered. The idea was that key escrow would allow U.S. agents, subject to certain legal&lt;br /&gt;controls, to access copies of cryptographic keys protecting information exchanges.Although these&lt;br /&gt;proposals were publicly stated as being voluntary in nature, they produced much protest from&lt;br /&gt;citizens groups who saw key escrow not only as the first step toward placing domestic controls&lt;br /&gt;on cryptography but also as a step that would undermine the constitutional freedoms given to&lt;br /&gt;U.S. citizens—particularly privacy and freedom from unwarranted government intrusion into&lt;br /&gt;citizens’ private lives.&lt;br /&gt;Those on the other side of the debate maintained that widespread use of strong cryptographic&lt;br /&gt;information protection had certain risks associated with it, such as key loss. For this reason and&lt;br /&gt;particularly in times of emergency, end users needed some way of recovering the key.&lt;br /&gt;The stated objective of key escrow was to find a compromise so that all parties making concessions&lt;br /&gt;would get something in return. After much effort by those who stood more toward the&lt;br /&gt;center, a consensus was eventually reached on the concept of key recovery.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Clipper Proposal or Capstone Project; Cryptography or “Crypto”; Privacy; Privacy&lt;br /&gt;Laws; Risk.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Gladman, B. Key recovery—meeting the needs of users or key escrow in&lt;br /&gt;disguise? [Online, 2004.] B. Gladman Website: http://www.fipr.org/publications/key-recovery&lt;br /&gt;.html; Graham, R. Hacking Lexicon. [Online, 2001.] Robert Graham Website: http://www&lt;br /&gt;.linuxsecurity.com/resource_files/documentation/hacking-dict.html.&lt;br /&gt;Key Exchange (general term):The protocol used to set up a security association in the Internet&lt;br /&gt;Protocol Security (IPSec) protocol suite.Although IPSec, or IKE (Internet Key Exchange), is&lt;br /&gt;Key 192&lt;br /&gt;an optional part of the IPv4 standard, it is a mandatory part of the new IETF IPv6 standard,&lt;br /&gt;which is soon to be adopted throughout the Internet.&lt;br /&gt;The IKE command can perform several functions, including activating, removing, or listing&lt;br /&gt;IKE and IP Security tunnels. IKE uses a Diffie-Hellman key exchange to set up a shared secret&lt;br /&gt;from which cryptographic keys are derived in a partial implementation of the so-called Oakley&lt;br /&gt;protocol. Public key techniques or pre-shared secrets are used to authenticate communicating&lt;br /&gt;parties.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Algorithm; Diffie-Hellman Public-Key Algorithm (DH); Internet Engineering Task&lt;br /&gt;Force (IETF); Internet Protocol Security (IPSec); Internet Protocol Version 4 (IPv4) and Internet&lt;br /&gt;Protocol Version 6 (IPv6).&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Farlex, Inc. Internet Key Exchange. [Online, 2004.] Farlex, Inc.Website:&lt;br /&gt;http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Internet%20key%20exchange.&lt;br /&gt;Key Recovery, User-Controlled (general term): A means of recovering cryptographic keys&lt;br /&gt;when the usual means for obtaining them is unavailable. User-controlled key recovery, in particular,&lt;br /&gt;means that the owner of the information being protected can choose to enable the key&lt;br /&gt;without otherwise altering the cryptographic protection strength available to him or her. As&lt;br /&gt;Gladman suggests, it is important to recognize that ownership of key recovery is retained by the&lt;br /&gt;information owner. Ownership of key recovery is not retained by the government or the end&lt;br /&gt;user.&lt;br /&gt;Key recovery, particularly that which is user controlled, is a controversial topic, with arguments&lt;br /&gt;from the government’s side and those from the companies’ side explained in a 2004 article&lt;br /&gt;by Brian Gladman.&lt;br /&gt;In a business scenario, the business-owned information is at risk. Therefore it is crucial that&lt;br /&gt;key recovery decisions are made by the business and not by consumers. In contrast, in the utilization&lt;br /&gt;of cryptography by private citizens, the interests of the user and the information owner&lt;br /&gt;coincide; thus, the end user should have control of key recovery actions.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Cryptography or “Crypto”; Key.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Gladman, B. Key recovery—meeting the needs of users or key escrow in&lt;br /&gt;disguise? [Online, 2004.] B. Gladman Website: http://www.fipr.org/publications/key-recovery&lt;br /&gt;.html.&lt;br /&gt;Keystroke Logger (general term): A hardware device or small program monitoring each keystroke&lt;br /&gt;a user types on a computer’s keyboard. It is sometimes called a system monitor.&lt;br /&gt;As a hardware device, a keystroke logger is a small plug serving as a connector between the&lt;br /&gt;user’s keyboard and computer. Because the device resembles an ordinary keyboard plug, it is relatively&lt;br /&gt;easy for someone who wants to monitor a user’s behavior—a hacker or a cracker—to&lt;br /&gt;physically hide such a device. (It helps that most workstation keyboards plug into the back of the&lt;br /&gt;computer.) As the user types, the hardware device collects each keystroke and saves it as text in&lt;br /&gt;its own miniature storage device. Later, the person who installed the keystroke logger can return&lt;br /&gt;and remove the device to access the gathered information.&lt;br /&gt;A keystroke logger program does not require physical access to the user’s computer. It can be&lt;br /&gt;downloaded by someone who wants to monitor activity on a particular computer, or it can be&lt;br /&gt;downloaded unwittingly as spyware and executed as part of a rootkit or remote administration&lt;br /&gt;(RAT) Trojan.&lt;br /&gt;193 Keystroke Logger&lt;br /&gt;According to reports, a crack attack on Sumitomo Mitsui Bank in March 2005, involved the&lt;br /&gt;use of inexpensive keyboard logging devices. Apparently, cleaning staff or individuals posing as&lt;br /&gt;cleaning staff attached the devices to computers.When the exploit was discovered, bank investigators&lt;br /&gt;found some of the devices still attached to some of the PCs.To prevent such crack attacks,&lt;br /&gt;many banks are now believed to permanently connect keyboards into their computers or to ban&lt;br /&gt;wireless keyboards.The Sumitomo Bank—post exploit—is said to now use sophisticated software&lt;br /&gt;to monitor the electrical current in computer systems to determine whether the computers have&lt;br /&gt;been compromised.&lt;br /&gt;A keystroke logger program for a Microsoft Windows Operating System typically consists of&lt;br /&gt;two files installed in the same directory: a dynamic link library (DLL) file, which does all the&lt;br /&gt;recording, and an executable file (.EXE), which installs the DLL file, triggering it to work.The&lt;br /&gt;keystroke logger program records each keystroke the user types and uploads the information over&lt;br /&gt;the Internet periodically to whoever installed the logger program.&lt;br /&gt;Although keystroke logger programs are promoted for benign purposes, such as to let parents&lt;br /&gt;keep track of their kids’ travels on the Internet, most privacy advocates argue that the potential&lt;br /&gt;for abuse is so large that laws should be passed to make the unauthorized use of keystroke loggers&lt;br /&gt;a criminal offense. Businesses, too, are becoming concerned about the legal ramifications of&lt;br /&gt;using keystroke loggers to track employees’ computer behaviors during workdays.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Internet; Privacy; Rootkit; Spyware;Trojan.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: TechTarget. Keystroke Logger. [Online, July 19, 2004.] TechTarget Web&lt;br /&gt;Site. http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/gDefinition/0,294236,sid14_gci962518,00.html;&lt;br /&gt;Warren, P. Bank Attack Used Key-Loggers Costing Just 20 Sterling. [Online, April 21, 2005.]&lt;br /&gt;vnu.net europe Website: http://www.vnunet.com/news/1162595.&lt;br /&gt;Kilobyte (KB) (general term): Equal to 1,024 (or 210) bytes.&lt;br /&gt;Knight,Tom and Kotok, Alan Team (general term):Two of the original hackers at MIT in&lt;br /&gt;the 1960s.Then, a “hack” meant a prank of the kind that students played on their MIT faculty&lt;br /&gt;or their rivals—”out of the box” fun tricks such as wrapping the entire roof of the MIT building&lt;br /&gt;in tinfoil.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Good Hack.&lt;br /&gt;Known-Plaintext Attack (general term): The simplest means to “brute-force” a key using a&lt;br /&gt;sample of both the encrypted message and the original plaintext.A known-plaintext attack is a&lt;br /&gt;cryptographic attack in which an individual has the plaintext and its encrypted version&lt;br /&gt;(ciphertext), thereby allowing him or her to use both to reveal further secret information—such&lt;br /&gt;as the secret key. Encrypted archived ZIP files are said to be prone to known-plaintext attacks&lt;br /&gt;because using software available on the Internet, crackers are able to determine the key needed&lt;br /&gt;to decrypt the archived files.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Ciphertext; Encryption or Encipher; Cryptography or “Crypto”; Plaintext.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: GNU_FDL. Known-Plaintext Attack. [Online, 2004.] GNU Free&lt;br /&gt;Documentation License Website: http://www.wordiq.com/definition/Known-plaintext_attack.&lt;br /&gt;Keystroke Logger 194&lt;br /&gt;L (general term): Chat room talk for “laugh.”&lt;br /&gt;L0pht bulletin (general term): For decades, neophyte crackers and hackers have obtained&lt;br /&gt;much of their required information from books, documents, and online mailing lists such as the&lt;br /&gt;L0pht bulletin and Phrack.&lt;br /&gt;One of the founding members of the L0pht Heavy Industries team responsible for producing&lt;br /&gt;the L0pht bulletin was Peiter Zatko, more commonly known in the Computer Underground&lt;br /&gt;as Mudge. Mudge gained notoriety in 1998 when he and other L0pht members testified before&lt;br /&gt;a Senate committee that they could take down the Internet in 30 minutes.Thus, the members&lt;br /&gt;argued, sound computer system security is a must in a wired (and now wireless) world. A highly&lt;br /&gt;sought-after computer security consultant, Mudge not only left the security firm @stake Inc.&lt;br /&gt;several years ago but also stayed away from the security industry for a while. Finally, in February&lt;br /&gt;2005, Zatko decided to come back to the security field by joining BBN Technologies Inc. Zatko&lt;br /&gt;had, in fact, been employed there in the 1990s. BBN Technologies Inc. is best known as the contractor&lt;br /&gt;responsible for building ARPANET.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Crackers; Hackers; Newbies or Scriptkiddies; Phrack.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Fisher, D. Hacker ‘Mudge’ Returns to BBN. [Online, February 2, 2005.]&lt;br /&gt;Ziff Davis Publishing Holdings, Inc.Website. http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1758913,00&lt;br /&gt;.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K0000594.&lt;br /&gt;LACNIC (general term):An acronym for the Latin American and Caribbean Internet Addresses&lt;br /&gt;Registry. It is one of five Internet registries serving different world regions by assigning and&lt;br /&gt;administering IP addresses.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: AfriNIC;ARIN; IANA; IP Address; RIPE NCC.&lt;br /&gt;Lag Time (general term):The time that it takes for data to come back from a server.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Server.&lt;br /&gt;LambdaMOO (general term): A sort of (at least it turned out to be) Black Hat equivalent of&lt;br /&gt;the present-day popular online game Sims Online.To be more precise, LambdaMOO was a subspecies&lt;br /&gt;of MUD (a multi-user dungeon) known as a MOO, an abbreviated form of “MUD,&lt;br /&gt;object-oriented.”&lt;br /&gt;LambdaMOO was a type of database giving users the rather realistic feeling that they were&lt;br /&gt;moving through space. When users dialed into LambdaMOO, the program immediately presented&lt;br /&gt;users with a short text description of one of the database’s fictional rooms in a fictional&lt;br /&gt;mansion. The rooms, the things in them, and the characters were able to interact according to&lt;br /&gt;rules imitating laws in the real world. In general,LambdaMOOers were allowed the positive freedom&lt;br /&gt;“to create.”They could describe their characters in any way, decorate rooms, and build new&lt;br /&gt;objects.&lt;br /&gt;The combination of all this user activity with the physics of the database could induce an illusion&lt;br /&gt;of “presence.”What the user really saw when he or she visited LambdaMOO was a form of&lt;br /&gt;slow-moving text, dialogue, and stage directions that moved up the screen.&lt;br /&gt;One of the controversial cases around LambdaMOO involved a cyber perpetrator by the&lt;br /&gt;name of Mr. Bungle, who, with an online voodoo doll and a piece of programming code, could&lt;br /&gt;spoof other players by taking over their identities and performing offensive actions against them.&lt;br /&gt;The closest thing to this kind of action today would be called identity theft.Though some of&lt;br /&gt;the users of LambdaMOO felt that Mr. Bungle virtually raped them—or at least cyberstalked&lt;br /&gt;them—the claims could not be legally upheld because Mr. Bungle caused the users in&lt;br /&gt;LambdaMOO to commit offensive actions against themselves. Mr. Bungle was not himself virtually&lt;br /&gt;involved in the offensive acts.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Black Hats; Identity Theft or Masquerading; MOO; MUD.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Schell, B.H. and Martin, C. Contemporary World Issues Series: Cybercrime:A&lt;br /&gt;Reference Handbook. Santa Barbara, CA:ABC-CLIO, 2004.&lt;br /&gt;Laser Intelligence (LASINT) (general term): Is technical and geo-spatial intelligence obtained&lt;br /&gt;with laser technology and is therefore a sub-category of electro-optical intelligence.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Intelligence; U.S. Intelligence Community.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: U.S. Military: laser intelligence. [Online, 2004.] About, Inc. Website.&lt;br /&gt;http://usmilitary.about.com/library/glossary/l/bldef03545.htm.&lt;br /&gt;Layers of Networks (general term): The international standards organization for the Open&lt;br /&gt;Systems Interconnection (or OSI) has defined the following seven layers of networks:&lt;br /&gt;• Physical Layer—Defining the electrical and mechanical interfaces to the network, it determines&lt;br /&gt;the upper limit of the transmission speed needed for audio and video information.&lt;br /&gt;• Data Link Layer—Comprising the access protocol to the physical layer, it deals with error&lt;br /&gt;correction, flow control, frame synchronization, and the transmission of data frames.&lt;br /&gt;• Network Layer—Containing switches and router packets, it establishes logical associations of&lt;br /&gt;remote stations and provides services such as addressing, congestion control, error handling,&lt;br /&gt;internetworking, and packet sequencing.&lt;br /&gt;• Transport Layer—Provides a program-to-program connection.&lt;br /&gt;• Session Layer—Coordinates interactions between user application processes on different&lt;br /&gt;hosts, including multi-cast (defined as one to many, multi-drop), many-to-one sessions, and&lt;br /&gt;point-to-point.&lt;br /&gt;• Presentation Layer—Manages abstract data structures and converts different data formats and&lt;br /&gt;codes.&lt;br /&gt;• Application Layer—Contains protocols such as ftp, SMTP, telnet, and email.&lt;br /&gt;The TCP/IP protocol used on the Internet collapses layers 5, 6, and 7 of the above OSI Model&lt;br /&gt;to a single application layer, thus forming a five-layer protocol.&lt;br /&gt;LambdaMOO 196&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Encapsulation;TCP/IP.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Tanenbaum, A. Computer Networks, 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ:&lt;br /&gt;Prentice Hall, 2003.&lt;br /&gt;Leach (general term): A derogatory term in the warez underground community that refers to&lt;br /&gt;self-serving individuals who download an abundance of information for free but never give back&lt;br /&gt;to the community.&lt;br /&gt;Following the passage of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) in 1998 and&lt;br /&gt;particularly since 2004, violators of copyright law have been taken to court by the recording&lt;br /&gt;industry for infringement of the Act—a form of leaching. Many of those targeted by the recording&lt;br /&gt;industry included U.S. students who downloaded music from Napster and shared files with&lt;br /&gt;their friends for free, depriving the recording artists of their royalties and failing to give back to&lt;br /&gt;the entertainment community.The courts generally made each of the student violators pay thousands&lt;br /&gt;of dollars in damages.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA); Napster;Warez Software.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Graham, R. Hacking Lexicon. [Online, 2001.] Robert Graham Website.&lt;br /&gt;http://www.linuxsecurity.com/resource_files/documentation/hacking-dict.html.&lt;br /&gt;Least-privilege (general term):A security principle holding that users should be allocated the&lt;br /&gt;least possible set of privileges on a computer system. For security reasons, users should be given&lt;br /&gt;only the amount of privileges needed to complete their tasks.&lt;br /&gt;Without question, least-privilege is a critical area in security.Accepting that organizations, university&lt;br /&gt;and medical institutions, as well as government agencies have in recent years adopted&lt;br /&gt;the Internet as a key means of conducting important transactions—often involving sensitive&lt;br /&gt;information—one important factor these organizations and agencies have had to address is an&lt;br /&gt;unprecedented demand for security measures to guarantee the confidentiality, integrity, and&lt;br /&gt;availability of sensitive online information. A great place to begin building sound security measures&lt;br /&gt;to protect information assets, note security experts, is to install network perimeter-based&lt;br /&gt;protection with capabilities consistent with the security expectations of the organization.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Integrity; Internet; Security;Type Enforcement Technology.&lt;br /&gt;Leetspeak (general term):A word that derives from the hacker elites, leetspeak not only relies on&lt;br /&gt;humor and improvisation but also is a new kind of language now popular in the hacker community.&lt;br /&gt;Leetspeak, generally also known as L33T speak, incorporates layers of computer&lt;br /&gt;underground references—slang words such as warez (meaning pirated software), for example—&lt;br /&gt;and transforms the letters in the slang words into numbers and symbols (called visual puns or&lt;br /&gt;icons).&lt;br /&gt;As examples, the letter E is written as a 3 and the letter A is written as a 4. Also, L is written&lt;br /&gt;as a 1 and an S is written as a 5. Consistent with earlier TAP methodology, the letter O is written&lt;br /&gt;as a 0. Technically speaking, leetspeak is a cipher on top of jargon: Slang words that are&lt;br /&gt;incomprehensible to those outside the hacker community are further rearranged into symbols.&lt;br /&gt;Other fun consists of alternating uppercase and lowercase letters and deliberately misspelling&lt;br /&gt;common-usage words. For example, porn will often be written as pr0n and the as teh.&lt;br /&gt;197 Leetspeak&lt;br /&gt;Hacker community jokes are designed to fool not only people but also machines.The technique&lt;br /&gt;called “fat-finger typing” is what spammers use to circumvent filters on email. Fat-finger&lt;br /&gt;typing makes a word usually readable to a human (who can mentally adjust for errors in the typing&lt;br /&gt;and “see” the word as it should be) but unreadable to a search engine. Because search engines&lt;br /&gt;are not blessed with the cognitive flexibility and adaptation of humans, fat-finger typing often&lt;br /&gt;lets undesirable things such as pornography ads get through software filters.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Electronic Mail or Email;TAP;Warez Software.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Smith, R. Virtual Culture: Hackers Devise Their Own Language&lt;br /&gt;Literacies. The Globe and Mail, July 22, 2004, p. R1, R3.&lt;br /&gt;Levin,Vladimir (person; 1971– ):A graduate of St. Petersburg Technology University in Russia,&lt;br /&gt;mathematician Vladimir Levin supposedly masterminded the Russian cracker gang’s exploit that&lt;br /&gt;tricked Citibank’s computers into relinquishing $10 million. Levin apparently used a laptop computer&lt;br /&gt;in London to crack the Citibank network in order to get a list of the bank clients’&lt;br /&gt;passwords. He then logged on to the network 18 times over several weeks with the intent of&lt;br /&gt;transferring money to accounts his group had in the United States, Finland, the Netherlands,&lt;br /&gt;Germany, and Israel. Levin was arrested at Heathrow Airport in 1995 and was sentenced to a&lt;br /&gt;three-year prison term in the United States.He was also ordered to pay back more than $240,000&lt;br /&gt;of the stolen money to Citibank—supposedly his share.&lt;br /&gt;After this incident, Citibank began using the dynamic encryption card, an extremely tight&lt;br /&gt;security system possessed by other financial institutions worldwide.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Black Hats; Cracking; Exploit; Network;Vulnerabilities of Computers.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Discovery Communications, Inc. Hackers: Outlaws and Angels. [Online,&lt;br /&gt;2004.] Vladimir Levin. Discovery Communications, Inc. Website. http://tlc.discovery.com/&lt;br /&gt;convergence/hackers/bio/bio_09.html; Flohr, U. Bank Robbers Go Electric. [Online, May 20,&lt;br /&gt;2005.] CMP Media, LLC.Website. http://www.byte.com/art/9511/sec3/art11.htm.&lt;br /&gt;Levy, Steven and His Books on Hackers (general term): In 1984, Steven Levy wrote the&lt;br /&gt;book Hackers: Heroes of the Computer Revolution, which is held in high regard in the Computer&lt;br /&gt;Underground. Levy not only discussed many important talents in the hacker world in this book&lt;br /&gt;but also detailed the tenets of the Hacker’s Ethic—the foundation of hacker culture. Levy’s&lt;br /&gt;more recent books include Unicorn’s Secret, Artificial Life, Insanely Great, and Crypto. He is a senior&lt;br /&gt;technology editor for Newsweek magazine.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Computer Underground (CU);White Hat Ethic.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Levy, S. Steven Levy’s Home Page. [Online, 2004.] Steven Levy’s Website.&lt;br /&gt;http://mosaic.echonyc.com/~steven/index.html.&lt;br /&gt;Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) (general term):A communication protocol&lt;br /&gt;used to transport and format messages in order to access information in an X.500-like&lt;br /&gt;directory.A directory able to be accessed with LDAP is known as an LDAP directory.The LDAP&lt;br /&gt;Version 3 (LDAPv3) protocol has become the standard used by large firms to access user and&lt;br /&gt;resource directory data.&lt;br /&gt;The shortcoming of LDAPv3 is its lack of access control and back-end enterprise integration&lt;br /&gt;extensions (such as replication) that are widely adopted and necessary for integrating disparate&lt;br /&gt;directories and for constructing a distributed directory service. Today within most enterprises,&lt;br /&gt;Leetspeak 198&lt;br /&gt;meta-directories tend to resolve the issue. Endeavors are underway to address shortcomings of&lt;br /&gt;LDAP, ironically by reintroducing features that were stripped out in the transition of the more&lt;br /&gt;complex X.500 standard to make it more “lightweight.”&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Protocol.&lt;br /&gt;Link (general term):Typically used as a short form of hyperlink, which is used in Web documents&lt;br /&gt;written in the HyperText Markup Language (HTML) to enable navigation from one Web&lt;br /&gt;page to another by the user’s clicking the link. Links can cause concern for security experts, particularly&lt;br /&gt;when the text describing the link does not correspond with its destination and is a&lt;br /&gt;deliberate attempt to lure an unsuspicious user to a Website that might contain malicious code&lt;br /&gt;or trick the user into revealing personal data.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: HTML; HTTP.&lt;br /&gt;Link Virus (general term):A computer virus that is downloaded and launched by clicking a link&lt;br /&gt;embedded in a Website. The link usually seems to point to a harmless destination and is frequently&lt;br /&gt;obscured so that an unwary user believes that nothing bad can happen. It is often used&lt;br /&gt;in phishing or spear phishing attacks to smuggle attack code through the perimeter defenses of&lt;br /&gt;an organization.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Link; Phishing;Virus.&lt;br /&gt;Linux (general term): An operating system widely used on Internet servers and embraced by&lt;br /&gt;large corporations as an alternative to the Microsoft operating system software. Linux was&lt;br /&gt;named after a Finnish man, Linus Torvalds, who started the community development process&lt;br /&gt;of this UNIX-compatible operating system. Linux is also viewed as an alternative to commercial&lt;br /&gt;flavors of UNIX.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Internet; Operating System Software;Torvalds, Linus; UNIX.&lt;br /&gt;LMAO (general term): Chat room talk meaning “laughing my ass off.”&lt;br /&gt;Local Area Network (LAN) (general term):A computer network contained in one or more&lt;br /&gt;buildings that are physically close to one another.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Computer; Network.&lt;br /&gt;Local Exploit or Intrusion (general term): Requires that the cracker has access to a machine.&lt;br /&gt;The cracker then runs an exploit script granting him or her administrator or root access.A number&lt;br /&gt;of sites on the Internet give newbies in the Computer Underground (called scriptkiddies)&lt;br /&gt;an idea of how vulnerabilities can be exploited in just a few steps. Though a number of techniques&lt;br /&gt;can be used to accomplish this task, the most common are misconfiguration, poor&lt;br /&gt;SUID, buffer overflows, and temp files.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Buffer Overflows; Exploit; Misconfiguration Problems; Poor SUID;Temp Files.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Nomad Mobile Research Center. The Hack FAQ: UNIX Local Attacks.&lt;br /&gt;[Online, 2004.] Nomad Mobile Research Center Website. http://www.nmrc.org/pub/faq/&lt;br /&gt;hackfaq/hackfaq-29.html.&lt;br /&gt;Local Loop (general term): A logical network interface on a computer having TCP/IP networking&lt;br /&gt;software. A local loop interface is used for the interprocess communication of two&lt;br /&gt;199 Local Loop&lt;br /&gt;processes on the same machine. Modeled within the kernel memory, it is faster than a connection&lt;br /&gt;made through a real-network interface.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Network;TCP/IP or Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol.&lt;br /&gt;Local Loop,Wireless (WLL) (general term): Often referred to as Radio in the Loop (RITL),&lt;br /&gt;Fixed-Radio Access (FRA), or Wireless Local Loop (WLL), these are systems connecting customers&lt;br /&gt;to the public-switched telephone network (or PSTN). Radio signals are used as a copper&lt;br /&gt;substitute to provide part or full connection between the user and the switch. This system&lt;br /&gt;includes cordless access systems, fixed cellular systems, and proprietary fixed-radio access.&lt;br /&gt;Today’s industry analysts predict that the worldwide WLL market will soon attract millions of&lt;br /&gt;users, with considerable growth in emerging economies that reach only a very limited percentage&lt;br /&gt;of their population with traditional wire-based telephone service. For example, analysts suggest&lt;br /&gt;that China, India, Brazil, Russia, and Indonesia might adopt WLL technology as an efficient means&lt;br /&gt;of deploying telephone service to multitudes of subscribers without having to undergo the&lt;br /&gt;expense of burying tons of copper wire.&lt;br /&gt;Moreover, say analysts, in developed countries WLL technology will assist in unlocking competition&lt;br /&gt;in the local loop, thus enabling operators to bypass existing wire-line networks in order&lt;br /&gt;to deliver telephone services and data access. So the question, say analysts, is not “will the local&lt;br /&gt;loop go wireless?” but “where and when?”&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Local Loop.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: International Engineering Consortium.Wireless Local Loop. [Online,&lt;br /&gt;2004.] International Engineering Consortium Website. http://www.iec.org/online/tutorials/wll/.&lt;br /&gt;Log (general term): A record of actions and events occurring on a computer when a user is&lt;br /&gt;active. Many components of a computer’s operating system and numerous applications generate&lt;br /&gt;logs.Web servers generate traffic and usage logs in a common logfile format (CLF) that can be&lt;br /&gt;used as input to a variety of statistical tools.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Computer.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Symantec Security Response. Glossary. [Online, July 15, 2004.] Symantec&lt;br /&gt;Security Response Website. http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/refa.html.&lt;br /&gt;Log Subsystem (general term): System administrators must analyze numerous types of log&lt;br /&gt;entries not only from multitudes of sub-systems within each system but also from multitudes of&lt;br /&gt;systems in order to detect system intrusions. For example, an FTP server will write an entry for&lt;br /&gt;every connection it gets, the kernel will generate entries for failures of hardware (such as in a&lt;br /&gt;disk drive), and a DNS server might regularly report usage statistics. Some of these log entries&lt;br /&gt;might require the immediate attention of a system administrator or of someone having expertise&lt;br /&gt;in a particular type. Still other entries simply need to be recorded for future reference.To deal&lt;br /&gt;with these important matters, most UNIX systems have a log sub-system facility called Syslog,&lt;br /&gt;implemented as a daemon program named “Syslogd.” This program listens for messages on a&lt;br /&gt;socket called /dev/log.&lt;br /&gt;By classifying information in the entries and in the contents of the config file (typically&lt;br /&gt;/etc/syslog.conf), Syslogd routes the information—such as “print to the system console,”“mail to&lt;br /&gt;a specific user,”“create entry in a logfile,”“forward to another daemon,” or “discard.” Syslogd can&lt;br /&gt;also listen for information on the Syslog UDP port and on the local socket.Though Syslogd can&lt;br /&gt;Local Loop 200&lt;br /&gt;operate on information from the operating system, the kernel does not write to /dev/log. Instead,&lt;br /&gt;another daemon (named Klogd) receives information from the kernel and forwards it to Syslogd.&lt;br /&gt;Syslogd must receive a two-part classfication piece of information from each process consisting&lt;br /&gt;of “facility” and “priority.” A facility/priority number is one indicating both the facility and&lt;br /&gt;the priority. Facility ascertains the source—such as the kernel, the mail subsystem, or an FTP&lt;br /&gt;server. Priority ascertains the importance of the contents—such as debug, informational, warning,&lt;br /&gt;or critical. Except for the fact that priorities have a defined order, the real meaning of these&lt;br /&gt;is determined by the system administrator.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Administrator; Daemon; Domain Name System (DNS); /etc/syslog.conf; FTP (File&lt;br /&gt;Transfer Protocol); Kernel; Logfile; Socket; UNIX; User Datagram Protocol (UDP).&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: GNU Organization. Overview of Syslog. [Online, 2004.] GNU&lt;br /&gt;Organization Website. http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/Overview-of-&lt;br /&gt;Syslog.html.&lt;br /&gt;Logfiles (general term): The area on a computer system where, according to crackers,&lt;br /&gt;“interesting” events are stored. Interesting events can include the logging in and logging out of&lt;br /&gt;users, access to certain applications (such as mail, FTP, and Web pages), system startup, system&lt;br /&gt;shutdown, and error messages. Crackers typically try to hide their tracks by altering the contents&lt;br /&gt;of logfiles to delete entries caused by their malicious acts.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Computer; Crackers; Cracking; Logs; Logging In.&lt;br /&gt;Logging In (general term): Gaining access to a computer system through an authentication&lt;br /&gt;process.Typically, a username and a secret password are used to authenticate a user in the login&lt;br /&gt;process. Increasingly, because of security concerns biometric means such as fingerprints or access&lt;br /&gt;cards are being used instead of passwords.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Authentication; Fingerprinting; Password.&lt;br /&gt;Logic Bomb (general term): Hidden code instructing a computer virus to perform some&lt;br /&gt;potentially destructive action when specific criteria are met.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Code or Source Code; Malware;Virus.&lt;br /&gt;Logon Procedures (general term): Identifying someone trying to establish a connection to a&lt;br /&gt;computer. During logon procedures, two requests are made from the individual trying to gain&lt;br /&gt;access: a preauthorized account (or user) name and a preset password. On a computer system used&lt;br /&gt;by more than one individual, the logon procedure identifies the authorized users and the protocols&lt;br /&gt;of users’ access time. These logon procedures are meant to uphold system security by&lt;br /&gt;managing access to sensitive files and operations.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Access Control; Computer; Logging In.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Symantec Security Response. Glossary. [Online, July 15, 2004.] Symantec&lt;br /&gt;Security Response Website. http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/refa.html.&lt;br /&gt;LOL (general term): Chat room talk meaning “laughing out loud.”&lt;br /&gt;Loop Carrier System (general term): Uses programmable remote computers to integrate voice&lt;br /&gt;and information communications for an efficient transmission over a fiber-optic cable. In many&lt;br /&gt;ways, loop carrier systems act as circuit breaker boxes in homes.&lt;br /&gt;201 Loop Carrier System&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Fiber-Optic Cable; Loop Carrier System.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Schell, B.H. and Martin, C. Contemporary World Issues Series: Cybercrime:A&lt;br /&gt;Reference Handbook. Santa Barbara, CA:ABC-CLIO, 2004.&lt;br /&gt;Lotus Domino (general term): A popular commercial groupware service providing e-mail, collaboration,&lt;br /&gt;and data exchanges to its registered users.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Microsoft Exchange.&lt;br /&gt;lsof Tool (general term): A UNIX-specific diagnostic tool whose name means “LiSt Open&lt;br /&gt;Files.” It lists all files that processes running on the computer system have opened. It also lists the&lt;br /&gt;communications opened by each process. For these reasons, lsof is used by system administrators&lt;br /&gt;to figure out whether all the processes running are legitimate.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Administrator; UNIX.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Abell, V. lsof 4.68 (Default). [Online, March 22, 2004.] Open Source&lt;br /&gt;Technology Group Website. http://freshmeat.net/projects/lsof/?branch_id=6029&amp;amp;release_id=&lt;br /&gt;127461.&lt;br /&gt;Lynx (general term): A text-based Web browser that does not require a graphical user interface&lt;br /&gt;to display Web pages.Although the World Wide Web becomes more and more media rich in content,&lt;br /&gt;the number of purists who prefer text-only renderings of Web pages does not seem to&lt;br /&gt;shrink. Often, Lynx is the only solution for displaying Web pages over low bandwidth lines and&lt;br /&gt;on slow client computers.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Browser.&lt;br /&gt;LZW (general term): Stands for Lempel-Ziv-Welch (Algorithm).The authors,Abraham Lempel&lt;br /&gt;and Jacob Ziv, presented the algorithm in 1977 as a lossless universal algorithm for sequential data&lt;br /&gt;compression. In 1984,Terry Welch improved the algorithm to its present form.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Compression.&lt;br /&gt;Loop Carrier System 202&lt;br /&gt;Macro (general term): A sequence of commands in an application that can be recorded or&lt;br /&gt;directly programmed to repeatedly execute this sequence. Macros have access to resources such&lt;br /&gt;as disks and networks on the computer. They are stored within the document format of the&lt;br /&gt;application.Typical examples are macros in Office Applications such as MS Word or Excel, where&lt;br /&gt;they are used extensively. Newer versions of these applications include options to turn off the&lt;br /&gt;execution of macros for security reasons.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Macro Virus.&lt;br /&gt;Macro Virus (general term): A computer virus that uses the macro capabilities of an application&lt;br /&gt;to execute code or programming steps that are embedded in data files associated with specific&lt;br /&gt;applications. Because users have learned not to execute programs from unknown sources for security&lt;br /&gt;reasons, attackers have turned to using macro viruses to embed malware in innocuous data&lt;br /&gt;files. Modern virus scanners detect macro viruses, as well.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Macro;Virus.&lt;br /&gt;Mafiaboy (person; 1985– ): As has the United States, Canada has generated its share of spectacular&lt;br /&gt;crack attacks and crackers. In February 2000, the high-profile case of Mafiaboy (his identity&lt;br /&gt;was not disclosed at the time because he was a 15-year-old minor) raised Internet security concerns&lt;br /&gt;in the United States, Canada, and elsewhere. In fact, say legal analysts, Mafiaboy’s computer&lt;br /&gt;cracking trial had the potential to redefine “reasonable doubt” in a relatively unexplored area of&lt;br /&gt;Canadian law.&lt;br /&gt;What could have been a lengthy trial ended when Mafiaboy pleaded guilty on January 18,&lt;br /&gt;2001, to charges that he cracked Internet servers and used them as launching pads for extremely&lt;br /&gt;costly DoS attacks on several high-profile Websites, including Amazon.com, eBay, and Yahoo!.&lt;br /&gt;As is typical of most young crackers facing the prospect of a long and expensive trial, Mafiaboy&lt;br /&gt;admitted his part in the DoS attacks before the Youth Court of Quebec in Montreal. He pleaded&lt;br /&gt;guilty to a number of counts of mischief and illegal access to a computer as well as one count of&lt;br /&gt;breaching bail conditions. In September 2001, the judge hearing the case ruled that the teenager&lt;br /&gt;committed a criminal act and sentenced him to eight months in a youth detention center. The&lt;br /&gt;judge also ordered Mafiaboy to have one year of probation after his detention ended and fined him&lt;br /&gt;$250. Nowadays, Mafiaboy writes high tech pieces for Canoe, an online news and information&lt;br /&gt;company based in Toronto, Canada. One of his interesting columns, entitled “Hacking becoming&lt;br /&gt;even easier,” details his strategy for the exploits that got him detention time.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Crackers; Cracking; Denial of Service (DoS); Exploit; Internet.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Schell, B.H., Dodge, J.L., with S.S. Moutsatsos. The Hacking of America:&lt;br /&gt;Who’s Doing It,Why, and How.Westport, CT: Quorum Books, 2002.&lt;br /&gt;Magnetic Strip (general term):Though most adults have plastic credit cards or debit cards that&lt;br /&gt;they use for purchasing goods and services, few likely know how the magnetic strip on the back&lt;br /&gt;of the card works. The magnetic strip actually comprises very small iron-based magnetic particles&lt;br /&gt;in a plastic-like film.&lt;br /&gt;Each particle is a tiny bar magnet designed so that the magnetic strip can be written in either&lt;br /&gt;a north pole– or a south pole–direction. (They must be one or the other.) The magnetization&lt;br /&gt;can then be “read” when the user swipes the credit card through a particular machine.&lt;br /&gt;To be more specific, the magnetic strip is actually split into three tracks “understood” by a&lt;br /&gt;magnetic strip reader (that is, the particular machine). Each track holds a specific number of characters&lt;br /&gt;with defined functions.The characters contain information about the cardholder and his&lt;br /&gt;or her account, but they can be “read” only in a certain order, and they are encrypted. So, even&lt;br /&gt;if someone did access the heavily guarded communication lines between banks and retailers, the&lt;br /&gt;cracker would also have to determine the encrypted code before he or she could use the card’s&lt;br /&gt;details to commit fraud.&lt;br /&gt;Three methods are commonly used to determine that a user’s credit card is legitimate and will&lt;br /&gt;pay for what he or she is charging. First is the conventional means of using a touch-tone phone&lt;br /&gt;to dial in for permission. Second is a virtual terminal on the Internet.Third is the card-swiping&lt;br /&gt;machine—today’s most frequently used method for purchasing goods and services in stores.&lt;br /&gt;In the card-swiping method, information held on the magnetic strip is picked up by&lt;br /&gt;Electronic Data Capture, or EDC.After the plastic card has been swiped, the EDC software contacts&lt;br /&gt;an acquirer by dialing a stored telephone number through a modem. An acquirer is the&lt;br /&gt;organization collecting credit authentication requests from retailers and providing them with a&lt;br /&gt;payment guarantee.When the acquirer receives an authentication request, it checks the transaction&lt;br /&gt;for validity and the magnetic strip record for important particulars. If a user’s credit card&lt;br /&gt;appears to be dysfunctional at the time that an attempted purchase is made, often the problem is&lt;br /&gt;that the magnetic strip has become damaged or obscured.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Encryption or Encipher; Internet.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Cardy, L. The Credit Card Strip: How Does It Work? [Online, 2004.]&lt;br /&gt;Crystal Guides Limited Website. http://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/Article361.html.&lt;br /&gt;Mail Bomb (general term): A massive amount of email that is sent to a specific person or system,&lt;br /&gt;consuming the recipient’s disk space on the server or creating an overload situation for the&lt;br /&gt;server, which causes it to slow down considerably or stop functioning altogether. In the past, mail&lt;br /&gt;bombs have been used to punish Internet users who are netiquette violators (such as those who&lt;br /&gt;spam others on the Internet).&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Electronic Mail or Email; Internet; Spam; Spammers.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading:TechTarget. Mail Bomb. [Online, October 28, 2003.] TechTarget Website.&lt;br /&gt;http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/gDefinition/0,294236,sid14_gci212514,00.html.&lt;br /&gt;Mail Subsystem (general term): A software package responsible for receiving, delivering, and&lt;br /&gt;forwarding email.The mail transport protocol used throughout the Internet is the Simple Mail&lt;br /&gt;Transfer Protocol (SMTP). Implementations of this protocol are available from different vendors&lt;br /&gt;and public-domain sources.The oldest and still most popular is sendmail. Mail access from client&lt;br /&gt;programs such as Outlook, Outlook Express, Eudora, and others can be handled through IMAP&lt;br /&gt;and POP3.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Internet; Internet Mail or Message Access Protocol (IMAP); SMTP (Simple Mail&lt;br /&gt;Transfer Protocol).&lt;br /&gt;Magnetic Strip 204&lt;br /&gt;Malicious Code (general term): Programs such as viruses and worms designed to exploit&lt;br /&gt;weaknesses in computer software replicate and/or attach themselves to other software programs&lt;br /&gt;on a computer or a network. Because they are designed to cause harm to a computer’s or a network’s&lt;br /&gt;operation, viruses and worms are known as malicious code. In short, malicious code not&lt;br /&gt;only propagates itself but also typically causes damage to a computer system—such as denying&lt;br /&gt;access to legitimate users, altering or deleting data, or deleting complete file systems and disks.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Exploit;Virus;Worm.&lt;br /&gt;Malware (general term): Comes in many forms and can be any program or source code producing&lt;br /&gt;output that the computer owner does not need, want, or expect. For example, malware&lt;br /&gt;can be a remote access Trojan horse that can not only open a back door to a remote computer&lt;br /&gt;but also control someone’s computer or network from a remote location. Malware includes&lt;br /&gt;viruses, worms,Trojan horses (that can, for example, spy on the system and display ads when the&lt;br /&gt;user least expects it), and malicious active content arriving through email or Web pages visited.&lt;br /&gt;These forms of malware normally run without the knowledge and permission of the user.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Back or Trap Door; Electronic Mail or Email;Trojan;Virus;Worm.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Spy Sweeper. Malware: Are you running malicious software? [Online,&lt;br /&gt;2004.] Spy Sweeper Website. http://www.spysweeper.com/malware.html.&lt;br /&gt;Man-in-the-Middle Attack (general term): An attack in which a cracker intercepts data and&lt;br /&gt;replies to it, making it look as though the reply came from the intended recipient. A victim thus&lt;br /&gt;attacked might expose private data—such as credit card or bank account information—that can&lt;br /&gt;later be used to defraud the victim.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Attack; Crackers; Exploit; Fraud; Identity Theft or Masquerading.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Schell, B.H. and Martin, C. Contemporary World Issues Series: Cybercrime:A&lt;br /&gt;Reference Handbook. Santa Barbara, CA:ABC-CLIO, 2004.&lt;br /&gt;Markoff, John (person; 1949– ): John Markoff ’s journalistic stories about Kevin Mitnick’s&lt;br /&gt;cracking exploits led to a book called Takedown. The book was written by Markoff and elite&lt;br /&gt;hacker Tsutomu Shimomura after Shimomura assisted U.S. federal agents in finding Mitnick.&lt;br /&gt;When Kevin Mitnick’s trial for cracking-related crimes was scheduled to begin April 20, 1999,&lt;br /&gt;the “Free Kevin” supporters became angered on two fronts. First, they argued that Takedown&lt;br /&gt;exaggerated Mitnick’s alleged crimes. Second, they were mad that the book was about to become&lt;br /&gt;a movie produced by Miramax—furthering the negative propaganda disseminated by the media&lt;br /&gt;about computer hackers. The movie also called “Takedown” was released in 2000 and was&lt;br /&gt;directed by Joe Chappelle. For a fuller discussion of the case leading to Mitnick’s arrest, see The&lt;br /&gt;Hacking of America: Who’s Doing It, Why, and How (p. 13–19) by Schell and Dodge with&lt;br /&gt;Moutsatsos.&lt;br /&gt;John Markoff is now an adjunct faculty member at Stanford University. His Web page can be&lt;br /&gt;found at http://communication.stanford.edu/faculty/markoff.html.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Cracking; Exploit; Mitnick, Kevin (a.k.a. Condor); Shimomura, Tsutomu;&lt;br /&gt;Vulnerabilities of Computers.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Schell, B.H., Dodge, J.L., with S.S. Moutsatsos. The Hacking of America:&lt;br /&gt;Who’s Doing It,Why, and How.Westport, CT: Quorum Books, 2002.&lt;br /&gt;205 Markoff, John&lt;br /&gt;Mask (general term): See Nemasks.&lt;br /&gt;Matrix (general term): Means many things. It is, for one, the world’s telecommunications network.&lt;br /&gt;Because of its importance to the world, a number of artists have been drawn to the&lt;br /&gt;concept of a matrix and have incorporated it into their creative works.Thus, The Matrix is the&lt;br /&gt;name given to a book, a movie, and a computer game—all describing a virtual world of information&lt;br /&gt;similar in some ways to the Internet but completely different in other ways.&lt;br /&gt;“The Matrix,” upon which fiction novels, movies, and games have been based, is a computergenerated&lt;br /&gt;three-dimensional world in which users can do anything because the world comprises&lt;br /&gt;ICons, or IC (pronounced “ice”). IC, known more formally as Intrusion Countermeasure electronics,&lt;br /&gt;are programs stopping illegal access by intruders to computers and highly sensitive&lt;br /&gt;information. For example, IC might look like a bull with guns or a moose with guns, depending&lt;br /&gt;on what type of IC it is and what its function is. IC comes in many forms, including Black&lt;br /&gt;IC (the lethal form) and Probe IC (which searches for intruders and then fires back with some&lt;br /&gt;nasty stuff intended to stop the intruder in his or her tracks). Moreover, in “The Matrix,” a node&lt;br /&gt;(actually part of a host, such as a sub-system, and usually represented by a virtual landscape) might&lt;br /&gt;be seen as a hole or a gas pump. If that node is destroyed, the hole might suddenly disappear, or&lt;br /&gt;the gas pump might quickly explode. In this virtual world, a user will look like whatever he or&lt;br /&gt;she asked the Cyberdeck to identify him or her as.What is more, users in a nonsubmersive system&lt;br /&gt;cannot be hurt because the user is represented by an Icon and is not physically there.The&lt;br /&gt;ICon represents a computer system, and any attacks directed at the user’s ICon can damage his&lt;br /&gt;or her system.&lt;br /&gt;Since 2001, the term matrix has gained a whole new meaning.The Florida police department&lt;br /&gt;operated an anti-terrorism information system called the Multistate Anti-Terrorism&lt;br /&gt;Information Exchange, or Matrix, to locate patterns among people and events by pooling police&lt;br /&gt;records with commercial data on U.S. adults. The Justice Department provided $4 million to&lt;br /&gt;broaden the Matrix program on a national basis, and the Department of Homeland Security&lt;br /&gt;pledged $8 million to assist with the Matrix program expansion—so that Virginia, Maryland,&lt;br /&gt;Pennsylvania, and New York could join the Matrix network.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Department of Homeland Security (DHS); Internet; Network;Telcom;Terrorism;&lt;br /&gt;Terrorist-Hacker Links; The Matrix of 1999.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Clutton, R. The Matrix. [Online, November 26, 1999.] R. Clutton&lt;br /&gt;Website. http://tip.net.au/~rclutton/matrix.html; Wilson, C. CRS Report for Congress:&lt;br /&gt;Computer Attack and Cyberterrorism:Vulnerabilities and Policy Issues for Congress. [Online,&lt;br /&gt;October 17, 2003.] CRS Report Website. http://www.fas.org/irp/crs/RL32114.pdf.&lt;br /&gt;Mauchly, John (person; 1907–1980):The co-inventor with Presper Eckert of the first electronic&lt;br /&gt;computer, the ENIAC (Electrical Numerical Integrator and Calculator). In 1935, he was a&lt;br /&gt;physics professor at Ursinus College in Pennsylvania. From 1968 until his death, Mauchly was&lt;br /&gt;president of Dynatrend Inc., a company he created. He was also president of Marketrend Inc.&lt;br /&gt;from 1970 until his death. He received many awards for his pioneering work in computing,&lt;br /&gt;including the Emanual R. Pione Award, the Harry M. Goode Memorial Award, the Philadelphia&lt;br /&gt;Award, the Potts Medal, and the Scott Medal. Mauchly was elected a member for life of the&lt;br /&gt;Franklin Institute, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Society for the Advancement&lt;br /&gt;Mask 206&lt;br /&gt;of Management. In his later years, Mauchly received advanced honorary degrees from the&lt;br /&gt;University of Pennsylvania and Ursinus College.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Antonelli, Kay McNulty Mauchly; Computer.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: O’Connor, J. and Robertson, E. John William Mauchly. [Online, October,&lt;br /&gt;2003.] University of St. Andrew’s Scotland Website. Department of Computer Science Website.&lt;br /&gt;http://www.gap.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Mathematicians/Mauchly.html.&lt;br /&gt;Maximum Transmit Unit (MTU) or Maximum Transmission Unit (general term): A&lt;br /&gt;packet-size property of physical network interfaces. For example, for Ethernet the MTU is 1500&lt;br /&gt;bytes.The MTU can also be specified for higher-level protocols such as TCP/IP and set to higher&lt;br /&gt;values. Furthermore, a network’s MTU has major performance implications. For example, in&lt;br /&gt;Microsoft Windows, the maximum packet size for the TCP protocol is specified in the Registry.&lt;br /&gt;If this value is set to too small a number, data will be fragmented into a relatively high number of&lt;br /&gt;smaller packets—with an overall negative impact on performance. On the other hand, if the maximum&lt;br /&gt;TCP packet size is set too high, it will exceed the physical layer’s MTU and, again, reduce&lt;br /&gt;performance.The reason for reduced performance under these circumstances is that each message&lt;br /&gt;on the TCP layer is split into at least two smaller ones—a process called fragmentation.&lt;br /&gt;For owners of home PCs, setting an optimal TCP packet size can be a bit tricky.For LAN, leaving&lt;br /&gt;the MTU setting at 1500 bytes works well with Ethernet and is considered to be a wise bet.&lt;br /&gt;For communications over a dial-up connection to the Internet, the suggested MTU setting is 576&lt;br /&gt;bytes. Finally, high-speed connections (including cable service, DSL, and home LANs) typically&lt;br /&gt;perform better at higher values.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Ethernet; Internet; Local Area Network (LAN); Network; Packet; Registry;&lt;br /&gt;TCP/IP or Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: About, Inc. MTU. [Online, 2004.] About, Inc. Website. http://&lt;br /&gt;compnetworking.about.com/library/glossary/bldef-mtu.htm.&lt;br /&gt;McAfee, Inc. (general term):With headquarters in California, McAfee Inc. (MFE on the New&lt;br /&gt;York stock exchange) develops computer security solutions to stop network intrusions and to&lt;br /&gt;protect computer systems from evolving malware (such as worms, viruses, and blended&lt;br /&gt;attacks). McAfee, Inc. offers two families of products: McAfee System Protection Solutions for&lt;br /&gt;securing desktops and servers, and McAfee Network Protection Solutions for protecting corporate&lt;br /&gt;networks. McAfee has a wide-ranging client base, including governments, small and large&lt;br /&gt;businesses, and home computer users.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Anti-Virus Software; Blended Threats; Computer; Malware;Virus;Worm.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: McAfee, Inc. About Us. [Online, June 6, 2006.] McAfee, Inc.Website.&lt;br /&gt;http://www.mcafee.com/us/about/index.html.&lt;br /&gt;McAfee, John (person, 1946– ): A controversial personality and former Silicon Valley entrepreneur,&lt;br /&gt;John McAfee,well-known as the developer of the McAfee anti-virus software company,&lt;br /&gt;returned to the San Francisco Bay Area on April 24, 2004, for a rare appearance. McAfee was&lt;br /&gt;there to headline a dynamic weekend experience—not for a computer security conference but&lt;br /&gt;for one named “Journey into The Self with Two Masters—John McAfee and Yogi Amrit Desai.”&lt;br /&gt;207 McAfee, John&lt;br /&gt;At this event, McAfee was joined by Yogi Amrit Desai, the founder of Kripalu Yoga and the&lt;br /&gt;Kripalu Center for Yoga and Health.Yogi Amrit Desai is considered to be one of the earliest pioneers&lt;br /&gt;of yoga in the United States.&lt;br /&gt;McAfee left Silicon Valley in the early 1990s. He currently resides in the Rocky Mountains of&lt;br /&gt;Colorado, far from the fast-paced, high-tech, boom-and-bust scene of which he is considered to&lt;br /&gt;be one of the pioneers. In recent years, John founded Relational Yoga and the Relational Yoga&lt;br /&gt;Mandiram in Woodland Park, Colorado. He has been teaching self-discovery and breath-work&lt;br /&gt;techniques for more than fifteen years. McAfee has written life-change books such as The Secrets&lt;br /&gt;of the Yamas and Into the Heart of Truths.&lt;br /&gt;McAfee’s high-tech career self-destructed in March 1992 when the Michelangelo virus failed to&lt;br /&gt;destroy the cyber world as he had predicted. Consequently, McAfee Associates Inc. first demoted&lt;br /&gt;the then Chief Executive Officer to Chief Technology Officer.The company then eliminated his&lt;br /&gt;company presence entirely. Rumors place McAfee’s “golden parachute” buyout from McAfee&lt;br /&gt;Associates Inc. at or near $100 million.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Anti-Virus Software.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: PR Web. John McAfee: From High Tech to Ancient Tech-nique. [Online,&lt;br /&gt;March 25, 2004.] PR Web Website. http://www.prweb.com/releases/2004/3/prweb113660.php;&lt;br /&gt;Rosenberger, R. The Return of John McAfee. [Online, October 9, 2000.] Rhode Island Soft&lt;br /&gt;Systems, Inc.Website. http://vmyths.com/rant.cfm?id=160&amp;amp;page=4.&lt;br /&gt;Means of Infection (general term): The technique a virus uses to achieve its execution.&lt;br /&gt;Malicious code typically tries to achieve two things: first, to propagate by infecting other systems,&lt;br /&gt;programs, or data; and second, to perform some malicious activity such as deleting or altering&lt;br /&gt;data, or to gather some intelligence on the attacked system. Some of the more common Means&lt;br /&gt;of Infection are the following:&lt;br /&gt;• Opening an infected e-mail attachment&lt;br /&gt;• Exploiting a security vulnerability of the operating system or an application&lt;br /&gt;• Executing programs from untrusted sources, such as those on the Internet&lt;br /&gt;• Sharing infected floppy disks, memory sticks, or other forms of mobile media&lt;br /&gt;• Receiving infected attachments (either programs or data) through IRC, Instant Messaging,&lt;br /&gt;or file-sharing applications&lt;br /&gt;• Visiting Websites containing malicious code&lt;br /&gt;• Accessing systems locally with the intent to install a virus&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Means of Transmission;Virus;Worm.&lt;br /&gt;Means of Transmission (general term): One goal of malicious code is to propagate, meaning&lt;br /&gt;that it needs to find and spread to other potential hosts (systems or programs) that it can infect.&lt;br /&gt;Some of the more common Means of Transmission for malicious code are by the following:&lt;br /&gt;McAfee, John 208&lt;br /&gt;• Email as an attachment, using either harvested email accounts or collecting e-mail accounts&lt;br /&gt;from address books of infected systems.The actual sending of the e-mail can be achieved&lt;br /&gt;either by using existing mail server infrastructures or embedding the mail server in the payload&lt;br /&gt;of the malicious code.&lt;br /&gt;• Sharing programs infected with a Trojan horse.&lt;br /&gt;• Accessing Websites embedding malware.&lt;br /&gt;• Remaining in the computer memory and causing itself to be embedded in every program&lt;br /&gt;that is executed.&lt;br /&gt;• Infecting the boot sector of a computer’s hard disk so that the virus code is launched every&lt;br /&gt;time the computer is started.&lt;br /&gt;• Actively searching for data or programs on a computer’s storage device that the virus code&lt;br /&gt;can embed itself in.&lt;br /&gt;• Accessing shared resources such as shared file systems on file servers.&lt;br /&gt;• Actively using network connections to propagate (computer worms).&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Means of Infection;Virus;Worm.&lt;br /&gt;Media Access Control Address (MAC Address) (general term):An identifier stored inside a&lt;br /&gt;network card or similar network interface that is used to give unique addresses in the OSI model&lt;br /&gt;layer 2 networks and in the physical layer of the Internet Protocol suite.The MAC Addresses,&lt;br /&gt;assigned by the IEEE, are global in nature and used in a number of network technologies, including&lt;br /&gt;but not limited to Ethernet,Token ring, Bluetooth, and 802.11 wireless networks.&lt;br /&gt;Because the developers of Ethernet had the vision to use a 48-bit address space, there are a&lt;br /&gt;potential 248 (or 281 trillion) MAC addresses. Ethernet MAC addresses are typically given as a&lt;br /&gt;string of 12 hexadecimal digits. The first six digits identify the manufacturer of the card (comprising&lt;br /&gt;the Organizational Unique Identifier, or OUI), and the last six digits are assigned by the&lt;br /&gt;manufacturer (comprising the Burned-In Address, or BIA). The IEEE assigns the 24-bit OUI&lt;br /&gt;prefixes to organizations by allocating blocks of 224 (that is, about 16 million) MAC addresses at&lt;br /&gt;one time. In short, MAC addresses can be used for the authentication of computers.&lt;br /&gt;MAC addresses of modern network cards can be changed to arbitrary values. Thus, mechanisms&lt;br /&gt;based solely on MAC authentication are susceptible to spoofing attacks.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Authentication; Bit and Bit Challenges; Computers; Ethernet; Internet.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Farlex, Inc. MAC Address. [Online, May 13, 2005.] Farlex, Inc.Website.&lt;br /&gt;http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/MAC%20address.&lt;br /&gt;Megabyte (MB) (general term): Equal to 1024 KB or 1020 bytes.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Bit and Bit Challenge; Byte; Kilobyte.&lt;br /&gt;Meinel, Carolyn (person; 1946– ): A computer security professional and engineer who has&lt;br /&gt;written many articles on hacking, worms, and viruses for Scientific American and is the author of&lt;br /&gt;several books, including The Happy Hacker: A Guide to Mostly Harmless Computer Hacking (2001)&lt;br /&gt;209 Meinel, Carolyn&lt;br /&gt;and Uberhacker! How to Break Into Computers (2000). She started the online Happy Hacker&lt;br /&gt;Newsletter and has been a strong advocate of bringing women into computer security. Carolyn&lt;br /&gt;wrote the piece in Appendix A of this book entitled “How do hackers break into computers?”&lt;br /&gt;Her Website can be found at http://verbosity.wiw.org/issue6/meinel.html.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Computer; Security; Uberhackers.&lt;br /&gt;Melissa worm (general term): In 1999, it took down much of the Internet for days, and at that&lt;br /&gt;time, the world had never seen a computer virus move so fast. Melissa, a Microsoft Word–based&lt;br /&gt;worm, replicated itself through email and came out of nowhere to take over computer systems&lt;br /&gt;in businesses, governments, and the military.The FBI commenced the biggest Internet personhunt&lt;br /&gt;ever to find Melissa’s developer. Eventually, the person suspected of creating the malware&lt;br /&gt;was a New Jersey resident by the name of David L. Smith. In 2002, Smith was sentenced to 20&lt;br /&gt;months of jail time, a fine of $5,000, and 100 hours of community service upon his release.&lt;br /&gt;Many computer security technologies—including anti-virus software, firewalls, and mobile&lt;br /&gt;code—are based on the concept of querying the user with the question,“There is a security issue&lt;br /&gt;here; are you sure you want to continue?” Security professionals have long warned that this kind&lt;br /&gt;of dependency is unreliable because users have to be “lucky” in answering the questions right all&lt;br /&gt;the time—whereas a cracker needs to “get lucky” only a few times.&lt;br /&gt;In the case of the Melissa virus, every user who spread the virus was first prompted with the&lt;br /&gt;query, “This document contains macros; do you want to run them?” Inevitably, the users&lt;br /&gt;answered incorrectly, that is, they answered “yes.”&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Electronic Mail or Email; Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI); Internet; Malware;&lt;br /&gt;Virus;Worm.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Melissavirus.com. Melissa Virus. [Online, August 14, 2004.]&lt;br /&gt;Melissavirus.com Website. http://www.melissavirus.com; Graham, R. Hacking Lexicon. [Online,&lt;br /&gt;2001.] Robert Graham Website. http://www.linuxsecurity.com/resource_files/documentation/&lt;br /&gt;hacking-dict.html.&lt;br /&gt;Message (general term): Recorded information or a stream of data in plain or encrypted language&lt;br /&gt;put in a format specified for transmission in a telecommunication system. In the computer&lt;br /&gt;field, certain object-oriented programming languages such as Smalltalk and Objective-C use&lt;br /&gt;messages—actually instructions to an object—to perform particular tasks. In this context, a message&lt;br /&gt;is similar to a member function. In the Objective-C runtime environment, messages can still&lt;br /&gt;be forwarded even if an object does not recognize (that is, respond to) a particular message.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Programming Languages C, C++, Perl, and Java.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: GNU Free Documentation License. Message. [Online, April 30, 2005.]&lt;br /&gt;GNU Free Documentation License Website. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Message.&lt;br /&gt;Message Authentication Code (MAC) (general term): An ANSI standard in cryptography&lt;br /&gt;for a short piece of information used to authenticate a message based on DES. A message&lt;br /&gt;authentication code involves an algorithm (often a one-way hash function or a block cipher)&lt;br /&gt;that accepts a secret key and a message as input; it then produces a MAC (sometimes known as&lt;br /&gt;a tag). This process provides both an integrity check (by ensuring that a different MAC will&lt;br /&gt;result if the message has been altered) and an authenticity check (because only the person&lt;br /&gt;knowing the secret key could have produced a MAC).&lt;br /&gt;Meinel, Carolyn 210&lt;br /&gt;See Also: American National Standards Institute (ANSI); Authenticity; Data Encryption&lt;br /&gt;Standard (DES); Hash, One-Way; Integrity.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: GNU Free Documentation License. Message Authentication Code (MAC).&lt;br /&gt;[Online, April 21, 2005.] GNU Free Documentation License Website. http://en.wikipedia.org/&lt;br /&gt;wiki/Message_authentication_code.&lt;br /&gt;Message Digest MD5 (general term): A checksum confirming that the information has&lt;br /&gt;remained unchanged by computing a hash algorithm with the information after it is received.A&lt;br /&gt;hash function is a one-way operation changing any length of information string into a shorter&lt;br /&gt;one with a fixed length so that no two strings of information result in the same hash value.The&lt;br /&gt;resulting hash value is then compared to the hash value sent with the information. If the two values&lt;br /&gt;match, this result suggests that the information has not been changed; therefore, its integrity&lt;br /&gt;may be trusted.&lt;br /&gt;In August 2004, researchers reported that they found weaknesses in the prevalently utilized&lt;br /&gt;encryption tools thought to be secure, including Message Digest MD5. This is a big worry&lt;br /&gt;because MD5 is frequently used with digital signatures and to secure the open source Apache&lt;br /&gt;Web server products. It has also been adopted for use in programs such as PGP or SSL and in&lt;br /&gt;the only digital signature algorithm accepted by the U.S. government’s Digital Signature&lt;br /&gt;Standard.The flaws, warned the researchers, could allow powerful computers to read or potentially&lt;br /&gt;alter encrypted documents thought to be secure.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Digital Signature; Hash, One-Way; Integrity; Pretty Good Privacy (PGP); Secure&lt;br /&gt;Sockets Layer (SSL).&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: In Brief. Popular Crypto Flawed. The Globe and Mail, August 12, 2004, p.&lt;br /&gt;B7; Symantec Security Response. Glossary. [Online, July 15, 2004.] Symantec Security Response&lt;br /&gt;Website. http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/refa.html.&lt;br /&gt;Metcalfe’s Law (general term): Dr. Bob Metcalfe, inventor of Ethernet, once said that the network’s&lt;br /&gt;power grows exponentially by the number of computers linked to it. According to him,&lt;br /&gt;every computer added to the network not only utilizes the network as a resource but also adds&lt;br /&gt;more choice and value.This is Metcalfe’s Law.&lt;br /&gt;By the same token, it has been argued by security experts that the power of crack attacks&lt;br /&gt;grows exponentially as more crackers from developed, developing, and third-world countries get&lt;br /&gt;on the Internet, the information highway.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Ethernet; Network.&lt;br /&gt;MI5 (general term): The United Kingdom’s security intelligence agency, which is based in&lt;br /&gt;Thames House, London. Its Director General is Eliza Manningham-Buller.&lt;br /&gt;The MI5 is responsible for protecting the country against threats to national security including&lt;br /&gt;terrorism, espionage, and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (such as&lt;br /&gt;biological warfare).This security service supports law enforcement agencies in fighting crime and&lt;br /&gt;provides security advice to a range of institutions and organizations so that they are better able&lt;br /&gt;to reduce their vulnerability to threats.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Terrorism.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Crown Copyright. MI5. [Online, 2004.] MI5 Website. http://www.mi5&lt;br /&gt;.gov.uk/output/Page18.html.&lt;br /&gt;211 MI5&lt;br /&gt;Michelangelo virus (general term): In 1992, a virus scare centered on the Michaelangelo virus.&lt;br /&gt;Up to five million computers were estimated to be targets for infection by the virus, according&lt;br /&gt;to John McAfee, producer of McAfee’s virus-scan software. Millions of dollars were spent by&lt;br /&gt;companies, institutions, and government agencies to prepare for this possible cyber Apocalypse—&lt;br /&gt;which turned out to be no more than a minor virus scare.The virus received its name from the&lt;br /&gt;day on which it was expected to strike—Michelangelo’s birthday. Because of McAfee’s obvious&lt;br /&gt;error in predicting a potential cyber Apocalypse, his IT career ended. However, McAfee left with&lt;br /&gt;a nice “golden parachute” from the anti-virus software company he founded.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Anti-Virus Software; Cyber Apocalypse; Malware; McAfee, John Company;Virus.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Colgate University Computer Science.The Virus Scare. [Online, 2004.]&lt;br /&gt;Colgate University Computer Science Website. http://cs.colgate.edu/faculty/nevison.pub/&lt;br /&gt;web150/virus/Helenfolder/virusscarelink.htm.&lt;br /&gt;Microsoft Exchange Server (general term) Microsoft’s implementation of an Internet mail&lt;br /&gt;server. It serves as a central communication platform for organizations with its calendar, meeting&lt;br /&gt;scheduling, and form-handling functionality. It works best with the specialized client&lt;br /&gt;program Outlook.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Electronic Mail or Email; Internet; Mail Subsystem; Server.&lt;br /&gt;Middleware (general term): An application connecting two separate applications.&lt;br /&gt;Middleware systems provide functionality such as distribution of components, deployment,&lt;br /&gt;and transaction services that developers can integrate into their own applications without having&lt;br /&gt;to worry about implementation details.&lt;br /&gt;In 2006, Microsoft’s .NET architecture and various implementations of Sun Microsystems’&lt;br /&gt;J2EE Standard were popular forms of middleware.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Symantec Security Response. Glossary. [Online, July 15, 2004.] Symantec&lt;br /&gt;Security Response Website. http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/refa.html.&lt;br /&gt;MIME or Multipurpose Internet Mail Exchange (general term): A protocol that permits&lt;br /&gt;users to send and receive files using email via the Internet. Since its inception, MIME has been&lt;br /&gt;adopted in other domains as well.Web servers use MIME extensively to establish the type of data&lt;br /&gt;to be served out to clients.This establishment is typically done via server-side MIME settings and&lt;br /&gt;the “Content Type” field in the HTTP header, informing the Web client (browser) about the type&lt;br /&gt;of data to be sent.The information about the content type allows the client to launch an appropriate&lt;br /&gt;application to display the content.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Electronic Mail or Email; Internet.&lt;br /&gt;Misconfiguration Problems (general term): A major cause of field problems with network&lt;br /&gt;appliances, meaning that the system configuration is not perfect.This is an odd event because, in&lt;br /&gt;principle, an appliance is supposed to be a simple computer system specially designed to perform&lt;br /&gt;a single task, and an appliance system is supposed to be relatively easy to configure and use.&lt;br /&gt;However, making appliances work well in a network in a variety of application environments&lt;br /&gt;often has considerable configuration complexity. One reason for the complexity is that an appliance&lt;br /&gt;in use is only part of a complex, distributed system. For example, the performance of a file&lt;br /&gt;server is contingent on the performance of a distributed system.A distributed system is made up&lt;br /&gt;Michelangelo virus 212&lt;br /&gt;of a client system (usually an all-purpose computer system) connected to the file server through&lt;br /&gt;a potentially complicated network fabric (including cables, routers, switches, patch panels, and&lt;br /&gt;so on).These components commonly come from various vendors, meaning that they all need to&lt;br /&gt;be configured and function well together if the file server is to function at its best. Unfortunately,&lt;br /&gt;this positive outcome does not occur for a number of technical reasons, as outlined in the 2000&lt;br /&gt;technical piece by G. Banga.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Computer; Network; Routers; Switch.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Banga, G. Misconfiguration. [Online, April 24, 2000.] Gaurav Banga&lt;br /&gt;Website. http://www.usenix.org/publications/library/proceedings/usenix2000/general/full_&lt;br /&gt;papers/banga/banga_html/node4.html.&lt;br /&gt;MIT Tech Model Railroad Club (general term): In the 1960s, the MIT all-male computer&lt;br /&gt;geeks had an incurable curiosity about how things worked in the real world and in the cyber&lt;br /&gt;world. Back then, computers were huge mainframes stored in temperature-controlled, glassed-in&lt;br /&gt;lairs. These slow machines were expensive hunks of metal (called PDP) that allowed computer&lt;br /&gt;programmers only very limited access. Nevertheless, the Signals and Power committee of MIT’s&lt;br /&gt;Tech Model Railroad Club chose the PDP-6 and PDP-10s as their favorite “tech toy.” Because&lt;br /&gt;of the computer’s slow pace, the smarter programmers created what back then were called&lt;br /&gt;“hacks,” or creative programming tricks, to complete their jobs faster. Sometimes their shortcuts&lt;br /&gt;were more beautiful than the original programs.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Good Hack.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Schell, B.H., Dodge, J.L., with S.S. Moutsatsos. The Hacking of America:&lt;br /&gt;Who’s Doing It,Why, and How.Westport, CT: Quorum Books, 2002.&lt;br /&gt;Mitnick, Kevin (a.k.a. Condor) (person; 1963– ): Born in 1963, he is one of the most famous&lt;br /&gt;American crackers to serve time in prison. He is now a security consultant and author of security&lt;br /&gt;books, including the popular The Art of Deception: Controlling the Human Element of Security.&lt;br /&gt;In 2003, at the DefCon hacker convention in Las Vegas, Mitnick networked with the young&lt;br /&gt;hacker community and wound up winning the Hacker Jeopardy contest. In July, 2004, Mitnick&lt;br /&gt;signed books at the HOPE 5 hacker convention in New York City and at the Black Hat&lt;br /&gt;Briefings and Training in Las Vegas. Mitnick is a cult figure in the Computer Underground.&lt;br /&gt;Whenever he is scheduled to speak on various computer security issues at hacker conventions,&lt;br /&gt;he usually draws a large crowd and much publicity.&lt;br /&gt;Once on the FBI’s most-wanted criminal list and a past cyber colleague of cracker Susan&lt;br /&gt;Thunder, Mitnick was imprisoned in February 1995 on charges of wire fraud and possessing&lt;br /&gt;computer files stolen from Nokia, Motorola, and Sun Microsystems. His capture was detailed in&lt;br /&gt;the book and movie Takedown (described in more detail in the Schell, Dodge with Moutsatsos&lt;br /&gt;book The Hacking of America).&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Black Hat Briefings; Cracker; Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI); HOPE&lt;br /&gt;(Hackers On Planet Earth); Security; Shimomura,Tsutomu;Thunder, Susan and Kevin Mitnick&lt;br /&gt;Case.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Schell, B.H., Dodge, J.L., with S.S. Moutsatsos. The Hacking of America:&lt;br /&gt;Who’s Doing It,Why, and How.Westport, CT: Quorum Books, 2002.&lt;br /&gt;213 Mitnick, Kevin&lt;br /&gt;Mobile Code (general term): Software that is transmitted from a host to a client (that is, another&lt;br /&gt;computer) so that it can be executed, or run. A virus and a worm are two common types of&lt;br /&gt;malicious mobile code. Applets that are embedded in Web sites to perform some computation&lt;br /&gt;on behalf of the user (such as a stock tracker) are examples of nonmalicious mobile code.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Code or Source Code; Host; Malware;Virus;Worm.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Symantec Security Response. Glossary. [Online, July 15, 2004.] Symantec&lt;br /&gt;Security Response Website. http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/refa.html.&lt;br /&gt;Modem (general term):Acronym for Modulator Demodulator, which changes information from&lt;br /&gt;analog form (such as that used on telephone lines) to digital form (such as that used on computers)&lt;br /&gt;for computer-to-computer communications. Though modems can transmit information at&lt;br /&gt;maximum rates of 56,000 bits per second (bps) or 56 kbps, limitations in the telephone system realistically&lt;br /&gt;produce modem speeds at 33.6 kbps or lower in practice.Today, modems for cable and DSL&lt;br /&gt;service are called digital modems, whereas those used for dial-up service are called analog modems.&lt;br /&gt;This terminology is somewhat misleading because all modems actually involve analog signaling.&lt;br /&gt;“Digital” relates to enhanced digital processing in the service provider’s systems and not within the&lt;br /&gt;modem per se. Cable modems and DSL modems utilize broadband signaling methods to obtain&lt;br /&gt;dramatically higher network speeds than traditional modems were able to obtain.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Cable Modem; DSL; Modem.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: About, Inc. Modem. [Online, 2004.] About, Inc. Website. http://&lt;br /&gt;compnetworking.about.com/library/glossary/bldef-modem.htm.&lt;br /&gt;MOO (general term): Acronym for MUD, Object-oriented.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: LambdaMoo; MUD.&lt;br /&gt;Moore’s Law (general term): In the late 1960s, Gordon Moore, one of the founders of Intel,&lt;br /&gt;said that computer power doubles roughly every 12 to 18 months.This statement—now known&lt;br /&gt;as Moore’s Law—has been amazingly accurate for more than four decades.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Computer.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Graham, R. Hacking Lexicon. [Online, 2001.] Robert Graham Website.&lt;br /&gt;http://www.linuxsecurity.com/resource_files/documentation/hacking-dict.html.&lt;br /&gt;Morris Worm (general term): Unleashed on November 3, 1988, it—named after its developer,&lt;br /&gt;Robert Morris—crashed the Internet by exploiting bugs in several UNIX programs, including&lt;br /&gt;sendmail and finger.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Exploit; Sendmail; UNIX;Virus;Worm.&lt;br /&gt;Mosquito Virus (general term): Made the rounds in August 2004, forcing some cell phones&lt;br /&gt;based on the Symbian operating system software to produce very expensive text messages for&lt;br /&gt;its owners.The virus resided in an illegal copy of the cell-phone game “Mosquito” and was available&lt;br /&gt;for free on the Internet and on peer-to-peer (P2P) networks.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Internet; Network; Operating System Software; Peer-to-Peer (P2P).&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: In Brief. Mosquito Virus Bites Phones. The Globe and Mail, August 12,&lt;br /&gt;2004, p. B7.&lt;br /&gt;Mobile Code 214&lt;br /&gt;Moss, Jeff (a.k.a.The Dark Tangent) (person; 1970– ):A computer security professional who&lt;br /&gt;is the founder and CEO of Black Hat (Security) Briefings and Training in Las Vegas, Asia, and&lt;br /&gt;Europe. Moss is also a computer security book author and the organizer of DefCon. Besides&lt;br /&gt;being a hacker, he is an entrepreneur with a vision for marketing computer security issues of&lt;br /&gt;concern to companies, government agencies, and medical and educational institutions. He habitually&lt;br /&gt;opens the Black Hat Briefings and Training in Las Vegas at the end of July in each year.&lt;br /&gt;An interview with Jeff regarding Black Hat Europe 2004 can be found at this Website: http://&lt;br /&gt;www.itvc.net/blackhat04/moss.asp.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Black Hat Briefings; DefCon; Hacker.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Black Hat, Inc. Black Hat Briefings Upcoming Conventions. [Online,&lt;br /&gt;June 6, 2006.] Black Hat, Inc.Website. http://www.blackhat.com/html/bh-link/briefings.html.&lt;br /&gt;MUD (general term):A multi-user dungeon scenario used in computer gaming.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: LambdaMOO.&lt;br /&gt;Multicast (general term):To send an online message simultaneously to a list of recipients on the&lt;br /&gt;network.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: IP Address; Ethernet; Network.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Symantec Security Response. Glossary. [Online, July 15, 2004.] Symantec&lt;br /&gt;Security Response Website. http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/refa.html.&lt;br /&gt;Multi-Homed Hosts (general term): Refers to systems with more than one network interface&lt;br /&gt;that do not function as routers because they do not forward packets. Multi-Homed Hosts are&lt;br /&gt;sought-after targets for crackers, because they connect to a number of different segments of a&lt;br /&gt;local network and, therefore, can serve as an excellent plotform for further attacks.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Host; Packet; Routers.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading:Wasserman, M. Multi-homed host. [Online,August 15, 2004.] Hypermail&lt;br /&gt;Development Center Website. http://dict.regex.info/ipv6/multi6/2002-10.mail/0000.html.&lt;br /&gt;Multipartite Virus (general term): Uses more than one Means of Transmission or more than&lt;br /&gt;one Means of Infection. An example is the infection of an executable program and the boot&lt;br /&gt;sector, such that a mutual re-infection can take place after one of the two infections is detected&lt;br /&gt;and removed, thus keeping the virus alive.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Means of Infection; Means of Transmission;Virus.&lt;br /&gt;Mutex (Mutual Exclusion Object) (general term): A programming concept that serializes&lt;br /&gt;access to a shared resource, such as a file or data in memory. Frequently, this serialization is necessary&lt;br /&gt;to protect the resource from being changed in an inconsistent manner. Poorly designed&lt;br /&gt;Mutual Exclusion Objects are targets of crackers looking for a possible path for an attack.&lt;br /&gt;Mydoom and Doomjuice Worms (general term): Around January 27, 2004, the MyDoom&lt;br /&gt;worm wreaked havoc on computer systems by leaving a back door—thereby permitting a&lt;br /&gt;cracker to gain access to computers infected by the worm at some later time. Several forms of&lt;br /&gt;the worm roamed the Internet in July 2004. Malicious programs related to Mydoom had been&lt;br /&gt;released under the names Doomjuice and Zindos. At the height of the release of these worms,&lt;br /&gt;215 Mydoom and Doomjuice Worms&lt;br /&gt;Microsoft issued alerts urging users to take action to remove these worms and to keep their computers&lt;br /&gt;safe from other malicious intrusions by installing security features such as anti-virus&lt;br /&gt;software and firewalls.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Back or Trap Door; Intrusion;Worm.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Microsoft Corporation.What You Should Know About the Mydoom and&lt;br /&gt;Doomjuice Worms. [Online, July 30, 2004.] Microsoft Corporation Website. http://www&lt;br /&gt;.microsoft.com/security/incident/mydoom.mspx.&lt;br /&gt;Mydoom and Doomjuice Worms 216&lt;br /&gt;Name Server (general term): A network server that provides the Domain Name Service&lt;br /&gt;(DNS).&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Domain Name System.&lt;br /&gt;Napster (general term): Once boasting millions of registered users, Napster Inc. was one of the&lt;br /&gt;hottest network software applications in history because it allowed its members to exchange&lt;br /&gt;music files over the Internet for free. Napster Inc. implemented a quite simple IP-based protocol&lt;br /&gt;for communicating information as well as control operations, and it used a custom-name&lt;br /&gt;space that was in some ways similar to but in other ways sufficiently different from DNS.&lt;br /&gt;Shawn Fanning and Sean Parker developed Napster Inc. in their Northeastern University dormitory&lt;br /&gt;room, and they must have been pleased to see that their vision became a huge success in&lt;br /&gt;the late 1990s. However, Napster’s success was rather short lived.&lt;br /&gt;Because the network traffic generated by Napster downloads flooded some university networks,&lt;br /&gt;a few institutions prevented it from entering their networks by blocking ports. Challenges&lt;br /&gt;brought about by DMCA—costing millions of dollars to the music industry—eventually put the&lt;br /&gt;original Napster Inc. out of business. The original Napster Inc. helped, however, to popularize&lt;br /&gt;peer-to-peer (P2P) network computing.&lt;br /&gt;Because of its popularity, Napster was reestablished in 2004 as a commercial music-download&lt;br /&gt;service through which users pay for downloaded songs.This made the service compatible with&lt;br /&gt;the particulars of the DMCA.Working with some of the original Napster Inc.’s employees and&lt;br /&gt;investors, Shawn Fanning, now in his mid-twenties, formed Snocap, Inc.The new company has&lt;br /&gt;a registry that allows recording companies to set the pricing terms under which their music can&lt;br /&gt;be sold to online consumers.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA); Domain Name System (DNS);&lt;br /&gt;Flooding; Internet Protocol (IP); Online File Sharing; Peer-to-Peer (P2P); Record Industry&lt;br /&gt;Association of America (RIAA) Legal Cases.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: About, Inc. Napster. [Online, 2004.] About, Inc.Website. http://compnetworking.&lt;br /&gt;about.com/cs/napsterp2p/g/bldef_napster.htm; Wingfield, N. Napster’s Fanning&lt;br /&gt;Back in Business. The Globe and Mail, December 3, 2004, p. B10.&lt;br /&gt;National Center for Supercomputing Applications (NCSA) (general term): Created by&lt;br /&gt;the National Science Foundation (NSF) in 1986 as one of five centers for supercomputing&lt;br /&gt;research in the United States. The NCSA is based at the University of Illinois in Urbana-&lt;br /&gt;Champaign. Researchers at NCSA created Mosaic, one of the very first Web browsers, and&lt;br /&gt;HTTP server programs.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Browser.&lt;br /&gt;National Cybersecurity Defense Team Authorization Act (legal term): Allowed the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;President’s Advisor for Cyberspace Security to set up a National Cyber Security Defense Team&lt;br /&gt;to identify Internet infrastructures vulnerable to terrorist attacks and to recommend ways of&lt;br /&gt;eliminating such vulnerabilities. On March 5, 2002, the Act was referred to the Committee on&lt;br /&gt;the Judiciary. On May 23, 2002, the bill was placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar under&lt;br /&gt;General Orders, but was not passed in this form.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Cyberspace; Internet;Vulnerabilities of Computers.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Center for Democracy and Technology. Legislation Affecting the Internet.&lt;br /&gt;[Online, July 28, 2004.] Center for Democracy and Technology Website. http://www.cdt.org/&lt;br /&gt;legislation/107th/wiretaps/.&lt;br /&gt;National Cyber Security Division (NCSD) (general term): In 2003, the U.S. Department&lt;br /&gt;of Homeland Security (DHS) started the National Cyber Security Division, or NCSD, under&lt;br /&gt;the jurisdiction of the Department’s Information Analysis and Infrastructure Protection&lt;br /&gt;Directorate. Its purpose was to oversee a Cyber Security Tracking, Analysis and Response&lt;br /&gt;Center (CSTARC).&lt;br /&gt;CSTARC’s role was to conduct analysis of cyberspace threats and vulnerabilities, improve&lt;br /&gt;information sharing, issue alerts and warnings for cyber threats, respond to major cyber security&lt;br /&gt;incidents, and aid in national-level recovery efforts.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Analysis and Response Center; (CSTARC); Cyber Security Tracking; Department&lt;br /&gt;of Homeland Security (DHS).&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Wilson, C. CRS Report for Congress: Computer Attack and&lt;br /&gt;Cyberterrorism:Vulnerabilities and Policy Issues for Congress. [Online, October 17, 2003.] CRS&lt;br /&gt;Report Website. http://www.fas.org/irp/crs/RL32114.pdf.&lt;br /&gt;National Director for Cyber Security (general term): In September 2003, the Department&lt;br /&gt;of Homeland Security (DHS) announced that Amit Yoran would be the National Director&lt;br /&gt;of its Cyber Security Division.Yoran was responsible for implementing recommendations to&lt;br /&gt;improve national cybersecurity in the United States. He stepped down from his position on&lt;br /&gt;September 30, 2004. Andy Purdy, who served as Deputy Cyber-security Director under Amit&lt;br /&gt;Yoran, acted as interim director.Yoran went on to become President of Yoran Associates, a technology&lt;br /&gt;strategy and risk-assessment company in Virginia. On April 20, 2005,Yoran appeared&lt;br /&gt;before the Homeland Security Subcommittee on Economic Security, Critical Infrastructure&lt;br /&gt;Protection, and Cybersecurity. He spoke to the House of Representatives about HR 285:The&lt;br /&gt;Department of Homeland Security Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2005.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Critical Infrastructures; Critical Networks; Department of Homeland Security&lt;br /&gt;(DHS).&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Committee on Homeland Security. Statement by Amit Yoran: HR 285:&lt;br /&gt;The Department of Homeland Security Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2005. [Online, May&lt;br /&gt;15, 2005.] Committee on Homeland Security Website. http://hsc.house.gov/files/Testimony_&lt;br /&gt;Yoran_2005-04-20.pdf; MacMillan, R. Purdy Tapped as Cyber-Security Director. [Online,&lt;br /&gt;October 7, 2004.] Washington Post Website. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/&lt;br /&gt;A12240-2004Oct6.html.&lt;br /&gt;National High-Tech Crime Unit (NHTCU) (general term): Located in the United&lt;br /&gt;Kingdom. This organization conducted a survey among businesses in 2003 to determine how&lt;br /&gt;much money they lost from computer security breaches over the previous twelve months.The&lt;br /&gt;NHTCU found that security breaches cost U.K. businesses an estimated £143m during that&lt;br /&gt;National Cybersecurity Defense Team Authorization Act 218&lt;br /&gt;period.The 105 businesses surveyed said there were 3,000 incidents among them.The breaches&lt;br /&gt;included information theft, virus attacks, and the physical loss of hardware (such as laptops).&lt;br /&gt;Similar surveys have been jointly conducted in the United States by the CSI and FBI. As is&lt;br /&gt;the case with these annual U.S. surveys, a number of companies chose not to participate in the&lt;br /&gt;U.K. survey.&lt;br /&gt;Moreover, as in the United States, in many cases of computer intrusions U.K. organizations&lt;br /&gt;believe that they have more to lose in terms of damage to their brand and customer confidence&lt;br /&gt;if they report the breaches to the police than if they keep quiet and have their security experts&lt;br /&gt;try to deal with the intrusions.This belief is the nature of the problem facing the police and businesses&lt;br /&gt;trying to curb system intrusions by getting a better handle on the number of intrusions&lt;br /&gt;and particulars on these intrusions.&lt;br /&gt;For this reason, information security exploit reporting was one of the topics for discussion at&lt;br /&gt;the 2004 e-crime congress, organized by the NHTCU.Without accurate figures and with very&lt;br /&gt;few financial institutions willing to discuss the subject, affirmed the NHTCU, it is possible to&lt;br /&gt;present only a rough estimate of the level of electronic crime existing in the U.K. and elsewhere.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Computer; CSI/FBI Survey.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Moores, S. Security: No Place to Hide. [Online, September 16, 2003.]&lt;br /&gt;ComputerWeekley.com Website. http://www.computerweekly.com/Article124889.htm.&lt;br /&gt;National Homeland Security and Combating Terrorism Act of 2002 (legal term): In&lt;br /&gt;2002, U.S. Senator Joseph Lieberman, D-CT, brought in the National Homeland Security and&lt;br /&gt;Combating Terrorism Act of 2002 to set up the Department of National Homeland Security and&lt;br /&gt;the National Office for Combating Terrorism. The Act was sent to the Committee on&lt;br /&gt;Governmental Affairs on May 2, 2002, and on June 24, 2002, it was placed on the Senate&lt;br /&gt;Legislative Calendar. It was never passed in this form. For additional information on creation of&lt;br /&gt;the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), see H.R. 5005, which became Public Law&lt;br /&gt;107-296 on November 22, 2002.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Department of Homeland Security (DHS);Terrorism.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Center for Democracy and Technology. Legislation Affecting the Internet.&lt;br /&gt;[Online, July 28, 2004.] Center for Democracy and Technology Website. http://www.cdt.org/&lt;br /&gt;legislation/107th/wiretaps/.&lt;br /&gt;National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) or National Geospatial-Intelligence&lt;br /&gt;Agency (NGA) (general term): Headquartered in Bethesda, Maryland, the agency was established&lt;br /&gt;under the name NIMA on October 1, 1996, and was renamed to NGA in 2004.&lt;br /&gt;Because it has clients beyond the boundaries of the U.S. Department of Defense, this agency&lt;br /&gt;was originally designated as a part of the broader U.S. Intelligence Community.The formation&lt;br /&gt;of this agency centralized imagery and mapping responsibilities, a step toward achieving the&lt;br /&gt;Department of Defense’s so-called mission of “dominant battle space awareness.”This agency was&lt;br /&gt;developed to capitalize on enhanced collection systems, digital processing technology, and the&lt;br /&gt;future growth in commercial imagery. Its goal was to provide up-to-date, accurate, and important&lt;br /&gt;intelligence of a geospatial nature to support the national security of the United States.The&lt;br /&gt;objectives of NGA remain as originally created.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Intelligence; U.S. Intelligence Community.&lt;br /&gt;219 National Imagery and Mapping Agency or National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: GNU_FDL. National Geospatial Intelligence Agency. [Online, 2004.]&lt;br /&gt;GNU Free Documentation License Website. http://www.wordiq.com/definition/NIMA.&lt;br /&gt;National Information Infrastructure Protection Act of 1996 (legal term): In October of&lt;br /&gt;1996, the U.S. National Information Infrastructure Protection Act of 1996 was passed as part of&lt;br /&gt;Public Law 104-294. It made changes to the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, codified at&lt;br /&gt;18 U.S.C. § 1030.The changes were meant to add strength to that Act by closing legal voids to&lt;br /&gt;more ably protect the confidentiality, integrity, and security of computer information and&lt;br /&gt;networks.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Computer; Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1986; Integrity; Network.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: U.S. Department of Justice.The National Information Infrastructure Act.&lt;br /&gt;[Online, May 15, 2000.] U.S. Department of Justice Website. http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/&lt;br /&gt;cybercrime/s982.htm#I.&lt;br /&gt;National Infrastructure Protection Center (NIPC) (general term):A U.S. agency that investigates&lt;br /&gt;threats to critical infrastructures and provides warnings regarding likely attacks to&lt;br /&gt;banks, emergency services, utilities, government operations, telecommunications, and water systems.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Attack; Blended Threats; Critical Infrastructures; Critical Networks Telecom.&lt;br /&gt;National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) (general term): Started in 1901,&lt;br /&gt;NIST is a federal agency embedded in the U.S. Commerce Department’s Technology&lt;br /&gt;Administration, whose goals are to develop and advance measurement, standards, and technology&lt;br /&gt;to improve productivity in the United States, stimulate trade, and elevate the quality of life for&lt;br /&gt;citizens.&lt;br /&gt;In January 2005, NIST’s Information Technology Laboratory released its Special Publication&lt;br /&gt;800-65, delineating the important risk variables that should be taken into consideration by an&lt;br /&gt;agency’s capital and investment planning process so that policies are consistent with the Federal&lt;br /&gt;Information Security Management Act (FISMA) and with current NIST standards.&lt;br /&gt;NIST fulfills its purpose by maintaining four cooperative programs.These include the NIST&lt;br /&gt;Laboratories, which conduct research to promote the technology infrastructure and improve services&lt;br /&gt;and products; the Baldrige National Quality Program, which campaigns for performance&lt;br /&gt;excellence among educational institutions, health care providers,manufacturers, and service companies&lt;br /&gt;through outreach programs and by managing the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality&lt;br /&gt;Award Program; the Manufacturing Extension Partnership, which offers assistance in technical&lt;br /&gt;and business matters relating to smaller companies, in particular; and the Advanced Technology&lt;br /&gt;Program, which promotes the development of innovative technologies by co-funding Research&lt;br /&gt;and Development (R &amp;amp; D) partnerships with private companies.&lt;br /&gt;NIST plays a key role in encryption by being the primary organization responsible for AES&lt;br /&gt;(Advanced Encryption Standard)—therefore driving the encryption standard that most large entities&lt;br /&gt;strive to implement.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Risk.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Hash, J.S. Integrating IT Security Into the Capital Planning and Investment&lt;br /&gt;Control Process. [Online, January 30, 2005.] NIST Website. http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/&lt;br /&gt;nistpubs/index.html; National Institute of Standards and Technology. NIST. [Online, August 2,&lt;br /&gt;National Imagery and Mapping Agency or National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency 220&lt;br /&gt;2004.] National Institute of Standards and Technology Website. http://www.nist.gov/&lt;br /&gt;public_affairs/general2.htm.&lt;br /&gt;National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) (general term): Set up by the U.S. Defense&lt;br /&gt;Department in 1992.The NRO Director is typically appointed by the Secretary of Defense and&lt;br /&gt;is responsible for consolidating into one program all Department of Defense air vehicle and satellite&lt;br /&gt;overflight projects for intelligence.This mission is defined as the National Reconnaissance&lt;br /&gt;Program.&lt;br /&gt;The NRO works with the Defense Space Operations Committee (DSOC) on budgets, policy,&lt;br /&gt;programs, and requirements.The NRO also performs operations approved by the Defense&lt;br /&gt;Space Operations Committee and establishes interfaces between the Defense Intelligence&lt;br /&gt;Agency, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the National Reconnaissance Office, the National Security&lt;br /&gt;Agency, and the U.S. Intelligence Board. Moreover, when needed, the NRO utilizes qualified&lt;br /&gt;personnel from the Department of Defense as full-time personnel in the NRO.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA); Intelligence; National Security Agency (NSA).&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Aftergood, S. NRO Organization. [Online, March 11, 1996.] National&lt;br /&gt;Reconnaissance Office Website. http://www.fas.org/irp/nro/nroorg.htm.&lt;br /&gt;National Security Agency (NSA) (general term):The U.S. organization that coordinates and&lt;br /&gt;directs highly specialized activities to protect information systems and to produce foreign intelligence.&lt;br /&gt;On March 3, 2005, the NSA said that it constructed Linux-version security tools to assist in&lt;br /&gt;making the U.S. computing infrastructure less vulnerable to intruders. Its success, however,&lt;br /&gt;depends on its being adopted by companies and government agencies alike—an outcome that is&lt;br /&gt;not all that predictable. After the NSA took a risk in 2000 on the then-emerging Linux operating&lt;br /&gt;system, the NSA turned more recently to open-source code.These efforts have produced the&lt;br /&gt;NSA’s Security Enhanced Linux technology—which the agency says should raise the country’s&lt;br /&gt;overall level of cybersecurity.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Intelligence; Linux; Risk.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Farlex, Inc. NSA. [Online, 2004.] Farlex, Inc. Website. http://www&lt;br /&gt;.thefreedictionary.com/NSA; Greenemeier, L. Linux Security Rough Around the Edges, But&lt;br /&gt;Improving. [Online, March 3, 2005.] CMP Media LLC Website. http://www.informationweek&lt;br /&gt;.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=60405086.&lt;br /&gt;National Strategy to Secure Cyberspace (general term): A report published in 2003 by the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;government to encourage companies in the private sector to improve computer security.The&lt;br /&gt;U.S. government was especially concerned about computer security related to critical infrastructures.&lt;br /&gt;Moreover, federal agencies were to set the example for “walking and talking” the best&lt;br /&gt;cyber-security practices.&lt;br /&gt;In this report, the government also said that it reserved the right to respond in an appropriate&lt;br /&gt;manner if the United States were to be hit with cyberwarfare. It also noted that if a cyberwar&lt;br /&gt;were to occur, the United States could retaliate using cyber attack tools or malicious code&lt;br /&gt;designed to crack and disrupt the adversary’s computer systems.&lt;br /&gt;Another issue raised in the report was whether the National Strategy to Secure Cyberspace can&lt;br /&gt;safely trust that voluntary actions would be taken by private firms, home computer users,&lt;br /&gt;221 National Strategy to Secure Cyberspace&lt;br /&gt;universities, and government agencies to protect their networks.The report also raised the possibility&lt;br /&gt;of bringing in regulations to ensure best security practices. Critics against such regulations&lt;br /&gt;argued that they not only would interfere with innovation but also possibly harm the country’s&lt;br /&gt;economic competitiveness.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Attack; Blended Threats; Computer; Critical Infrastructures; Cyber Apocalypse;&lt;br /&gt;Cyberspace; Cyber Terrorism; Cyber Warfare; Network;Trust.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Wilson, C. CRS Report for Congress: Computer Attack and&lt;br /&gt;Cyberterrorism:Vulnerabilities and Policy Issues for Congress. [Online, October 17, 2003.] CRS&lt;br /&gt;Report Website. http://www.fas.org/irp/crs/RL32114.pdf.&lt;br /&gt;National-Level Guidance for Launching Computer Network Attacks (general term): In&lt;br /&gt;February 2003, President George W. Bush announced plans to develop national-level guidance&lt;br /&gt;to assess when and how the U.S. would launch computer network attacks against an adversary’s&lt;br /&gt;computer systems, because such attacks could cause considerable retaliation.&lt;br /&gt;A controversial issue for the U.S. Congress has been that any cyber attack response by the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;military could be viewed by other nations as an unprovoked first strike against a targeted terrorist&lt;br /&gt;group. Moreover, the use of cyber weapons by the U.S. could also be argued to exceed the&lt;br /&gt;customary rules of military conflict, known as the International Laws of War. Also, the effects of&lt;br /&gt;offensive cyber weapons could be difficult to limit; for there is, after all, the possibility that malicious&lt;br /&gt;code aimed against terrorist groups could accidentally infect large numbers of systems on&lt;br /&gt;the Internet. Thus, such a move could have the unintended effect of shutting down the critical&lt;br /&gt;infrastructure systems of countries friendly to the United States.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Attack; Computer; Internet, Network;Terrorist-Hacker Links.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Wilson, C. CRS Report for Congress: Computer Attack and&lt;br /&gt;Cyberterrorism:Vulnerabilities and Policy Issues for Congress. [Online, October 17, 2003.] CRS&lt;br /&gt;Report Website. http://www.fas.org/irp/crs/RL32114.pdf.&lt;br /&gt;NCC or RIPE NCC (general term): The Réseaux IP Européens Network Coordination&lt;br /&gt;Centre, one of five regional Internet registries assigning and administering IP addresses. RIPE&lt;br /&gt;NCC was started in 1989 as a nonprofit organization that gives IP numbers in Europe, the&lt;br /&gt;Middle East, and parts of Africa and Asia.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Internet; IP Address.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Jupitermedia Corporation. What is RIPE NCC? [Online, February 5,&lt;br /&gt;2003.] Jupitermedia Corporation Website. http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/R/RIPE_&lt;br /&gt;NCC.html.&lt;br /&gt;Net Police (general term): Online users who take it upon themselves to flame (that is, to insult&lt;br /&gt;and denigrate) those failing to display online etiquette (netiquette).&lt;br /&gt;NetBIOS (general term): Software developed by IBM that provides the interface between the&lt;br /&gt;PC operating system, the i/o bus, and the network. Since its design, NetBIOS has become a de&lt;br /&gt;facto standard, making it the target of crackers because of its many Windows vulnerabilities.&lt;br /&gt;Netcat (general term): A simple but powerful tool that can connect two hosts on the Internet&lt;br /&gt;so that data can be sent. Because Netcat can use any port, it is frequently used to hide an&lt;br /&gt;National Strategy to Secure Cyberspace 222&lt;br /&gt;attacker’s control connection to a compromised computer behind an apparently legitimate&lt;br /&gt;connection.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Computer; Internet; Port and Port Numbers.&lt;br /&gt;Netmasks (general term): A bit field used in version 4 of the Internet Protocol to calculate&lt;br /&gt;the network part from a given IP Address by using a binary AND operation.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Bit and Bit Challenges; Internet Protocol (IP); IP Address.&lt;br /&gt;NetProwler Agent (general term): A component monitoring network traffic to detect, identify,&lt;br /&gt;and respond to crack attacks.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Attack; Cracking; Network.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Symantec Security Response. Glossary. [Online, July 15, 2004.] Symantec&lt;br /&gt;Security Response Website. http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/refa.html.&lt;br /&gt;Net-Runners (general term): See Crackers.&lt;br /&gt;NetWare Operating System (general term): Among the earliest products to create Personal&lt;br /&gt;Computer networks, which were introduced in the late 1980s. NetWare emphasizes file and&lt;br /&gt;print serving capabilities.Today it is installed on millions of computers worldwide.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Computer; Local Area Networks (LAN).&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: About, Inc. Netware. [Online, 2004.] About, Inc. Website. http://&lt;br /&gt;compnetworking.about.com/library/glossary/bldef-netware.htm.&lt;br /&gt;Network (general term): A group of computers and related devices connected by communications&lt;br /&gt;hardware and software to share data and peripherals such as printers and modems.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Local Area Network (LAN).&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Symantec Security Response. Glossary. [Online, July 15, 2004.] Symantec&lt;br /&gt;Security Response Website. http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/refa.html.&lt;br /&gt;Network Address Translation (NAT) (general term):Allows an Internet Protocol (IP) network&lt;br /&gt;to translate public IP addresses into private ones.NAT, a popular technology for Internet&lt;br /&gt;connection sharing, is at times used in server load-balancing applications on networks in corporations.&lt;br /&gt;One of the most popular configurations is to have NAT map all the private IP addresses&lt;br /&gt;on a small local network to the single IP address assigned through an Internet Service&lt;br /&gt;Provider (ISP), thus allowing local systems to use a single Internet connection. In addition,&lt;br /&gt;NAT improves network security by preventing external computers from accessing the home network&lt;br /&gt;IP space. NAT intercepts both incoming and outgoing IP traffic and adjusts the addresses&lt;br /&gt;according to its translation rules.&lt;br /&gt;NAT changes the source or destination address in the packet header (and adjusts the checksums)&lt;br /&gt;to perform the desired mapping.NAT performs either fixed or dynamic translations of one&lt;br /&gt;or more IP addresses.Typically, NAT’s functionality is implemented on routers and other gateway&lt;br /&gt;systems at the network’s boundary. Microsoft’s Internet Connection Sharing (ICS) adds&lt;br /&gt;NAT support to the Windows operating system.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Internet Protocol (IP); Internet Service Provider (ISP); IP Address.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: About, Inc. NAT. [Online, 2004.] About, Inc. Website. http://&lt;br /&gt;compnetworking.about.com/cs/tcpipaddressing/g/bldef_nat.htm.&lt;br /&gt;223 Network Address Translation (NAT)&lt;br /&gt;Network Attached Storage Server or NAS (general term): Permits files to be stored and&lt;br /&gt;retrieved on a network. The NAS authenticates users and manages file operations in much the&lt;br /&gt;same way as traditional file servers do through protocols such as NFS and CIFS/SMB, but at a&lt;br /&gt;much lower cost. Rather than use all-purpose computer systems with Windows XP, which drives&lt;br /&gt;up the price, NAS tends to use a small operating system embedded in a simplified hardware&lt;br /&gt;platform. Though NAS boxes support hard drives and at times tape drives, they do not have&lt;br /&gt;input/output devices such as a monitor or keyboard. NAS is easier to manage than a file server&lt;br /&gt;because it is designed specifically for network storage. Attacks to these systems are not widely&lt;br /&gt;known, but that might be because they are not yet widely installed throughout industry.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Network; Network File Systems (NFS).&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: About, Inc. NAS. [Online, 2004.] About, Inc. Website. http://&lt;br /&gt;compnetworking.about.com/library/glossary/bldef-nas.htm.&lt;br /&gt;Network File Systems (NFS) (general term): A file-sharing protocol used on UNIX and&lt;br /&gt;Linux computers. Because NFS was not designed with security concerns taken into consideration,&lt;br /&gt;it has some reported design vulnerabilities.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Linux; UNIX;Vulnerabilities of Computers.&lt;br /&gt;Network Hackers (general term): See Crackers.&lt;br /&gt;Network Operating System (NOS) (general term): Implements protocol stacks and device&lt;br /&gt;drivers for networking hardware. Some operating system software (such as Windows 98,&lt;br /&gt;Second Edition, and later versions) also has networking features such as Internet Connection&lt;br /&gt;Sharing (ICS). NOS has been in existence for more than thirty years.The UNIX operating system&lt;br /&gt;was designed right from the start to effectively support networking.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Network; Operating System Software; Protocol.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: About, Inc. NOS. [Online, 2004.] About, Inc. Website. http://&lt;br /&gt;compnetworking.about.com/library/glossary/bldef-nos.htm.&lt;br /&gt;Neumann, Peter G. and Concerns About a Cyber Apocalypse (general term): In the early&lt;br /&gt;2000s, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) funded no fewer than&lt;br /&gt;12 key computer security projects under the umbrella of the Composable High-Assurance&lt;br /&gt;Trustworthy Systems (CHATS) program. Peter G. Neumann from the Stanford Research&lt;br /&gt;Institute Computer Science Laboratory led one of those key projects. The emphasis in the&lt;br /&gt;CHATS program was on trustworthy open-source operating systems having trusted components.&lt;br /&gt;A technical paper on the results of the project appeared in the 2003 DISCEX03&lt;br /&gt;proceedings Achieving Principled Assuredly Trustworthy Composable Systems and Networks.&lt;br /&gt;In a less technical piece appearing in The New Yorker in May 2001, Peter G. Neumann underscored&lt;br /&gt;his concerns about the possibility of the cyber-criminal arm causing a Cyber&lt;br /&gt;Apocalypse. What worried Neumann was “the big one.” Because malicious crackers can get&lt;br /&gt;into the United States’ most critical computers in just a few minutes and clear a third of the computer&lt;br /&gt;drives in America in a single day, or because they could shut down the power grids and&lt;br /&gt;emergency-response systems of numerous states, Neumann warned in his piece that the Internet&lt;br /&gt;lies in wait for its Chernobyl. Moreover, Neumann said that he does not believe the wait will be&lt;br /&gt;much longer.&lt;br /&gt;Network Attached Storage Server or NAS 224&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Cybercrime and Cybercriminals; Internet, Cyber Apocalypse; Open Source;&lt;br /&gt;Security;Trust.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Specter, M. The Doomsday Click. The New Yorker. May 28, 2001,&lt;br /&gt;p. 101–107; SRI International Computer Science Laboratory. Peter G. Neumann. [Online,&lt;br /&gt;2004.] SRI International Computer Science Laboratory Website. http://www.csl.sri.com/users/&lt;br /&gt;neumann/neumann.html.&lt;br /&gt;Newbies or Scriptkiddies (general term): Relatively inexperienced crackers in the&lt;br /&gt;Computer Underground who tend to rely on prefabricated software to do their cracking&lt;br /&gt;exploits.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Computer Underground (CU); Crackers; Exploit.&lt;br /&gt;Nibble (general term): Half of a byte (4 bits).&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Byte.&lt;br /&gt;NIMDA worm (general term): A costly worm that first struck computers on September 18,&lt;br /&gt;2001, and was still around in August 2002. NIMDA is thought to have cost about $500 million&lt;br /&gt;in damages as corporations repaired their networks and added virus protection software and&lt;br /&gt;other security services.Without any assistance from computer users, the NIMDA worm spread&lt;br /&gt;quickly through Windows 2000 computers on the Internet.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Computer; Internet; Malware; Network;Virus;Worm.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Bruck, M. The Key to Eradicating Viruses and Bugs. [Online,&lt;br /&gt;August 5, 2002.] Entrepreneur.com, Inc. Website. http://www.entrepreneur.com/article/&lt;br /&gt;0,4621,302155,00.html.&lt;br /&gt;NMAP (general term): Short for Network Mapper, an open source utility for exploring networks&lt;br /&gt;or doing a security audit. It is available without charge and was developed to quickly scan&lt;br /&gt;large networks. It performs well in this environment as well as with single hosts.&lt;br /&gt;Nmap utilizes raw IP packets in novel ways to ascertain a number of things, including which&lt;br /&gt;hosts are available on the network, which services a host is offering (including application name&lt;br /&gt;and version), which operating system software and OS version is running, what type of&lt;br /&gt;packet filters/firewalls are being utilized, and more. Nmap runs on most types of computers&lt;br /&gt;(with console and graphical versions obtainable) and is obtainable with complete source code&lt;br /&gt;under the terms and conditions of the GNU GPL.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Audit Trail; Code or Source Code; Firewalls; Internet Protocol (IP);Network;Open&lt;br /&gt;Source; Operating System Software.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Insecure.org. Nmap. [Online, 2004.] Insecure.org Website. http://www&lt;br /&gt;.insecure.org/nmap/.&lt;br /&gt;Node (general term): Any devices attached to a telecommunications network such as cell&lt;br /&gt;phones, computers, personal digital assistants (PDAs), and other network appliances. In the IP&lt;br /&gt;domain, any device having an IP address is called a node. Servers in a clustering setting, such&lt;br /&gt;as database clusters or Web farms (large installations of Web servers), are also called nodes.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Internet Protocol (IP); IP Address; Network;Telecom.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: About, Inc. Node. [Online, 2004.] About, Inc. Website. http://&lt;br /&gt;compnetworking.about.com/library/glossary/bldef-node.htm.&lt;br /&gt;225 Node&lt;br /&gt;Nonrepudiation (general term):Term that can be used in the legal sense and in the cryptotechnical&lt;br /&gt;sense. In a legal sense, someone who signs a legal paper is permitted to “repudiate” a&lt;br /&gt;signature that has been attributed to him or her. A forged signature is one example of repudiation;&lt;br /&gt;a true signature obtained under conditions of duress is another.&lt;br /&gt;The term “nonrepudiation” crypto-technically means that during authentication, a service&lt;br /&gt;providing proof of the integrity and origin of the information can be verified by a third party at&lt;br /&gt;any time. Put another way, nonrepudiation means that during authentication, the information&lt;br /&gt;can be found to be genuine with high assurance; for this reason, chances are slim that it could be&lt;br /&gt;refuted afterward.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Authentication; Cryptography or “Crypto”; Signature.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: McCullagh, A. and Caelli, W. Non-repudiation in the Digital&lt;br /&gt;Environment. [Online, August, 2000.] First Monday Website. http://www.firstmonday.dk/&lt;br /&gt;issues/issue5_8/mccullagh/.&lt;br /&gt;NSA National Computer Security Center (NSA/CSS) (general term):A U.S. government&lt;br /&gt;group in the National Security Agency (NSA) that assesses computing equipment for highsecurity&lt;br /&gt;applications to make sure that the firms processing classified and sensitive information&lt;br /&gt;are using trusted computer systems and parts. NCSC was started in 1981 as the Department of&lt;br /&gt;Defense Computer Security Center. It received its current name of NSA/CSS in 1985.&lt;br /&gt;The NSA/CSS encourages businesses, educational institutions, and government agencies to&lt;br /&gt;advance research and standardization efforts to ensure that secure information systems are&lt;br /&gt;designed.The NSA/CSS also distributes information about issues dealing with secure computing.&lt;br /&gt;It does this in part by holding an annual National Information Systems Security Conference.&lt;br /&gt;On February 15, 2005, President George W. Bush announced that he was considering making&lt;br /&gt;the NSA the online traffic police for helping agencies to share homeland security&lt;br /&gt;information in a secure fashion across government computer networks.To this end, on March 2,&lt;br /&gt;2005, the NSA presented its recommendations for securing U.S. government sensitive and&lt;br /&gt;unclassified documents. Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC), a public key cryptosystem produced&lt;br /&gt;by Canadian company Certicom Security Architecture,was recommended by the NSA to&lt;br /&gt;assist in this regard.&lt;br /&gt;ECC’s advanced cryptography algorithms known as Suite B were of particular interest to the&lt;br /&gt;NSA.The public key protocols included in Suite B were Elliptic Curve Menezes-Qu-Vanstone&lt;br /&gt;(ECMAQ) and Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman (ECDH) for key agreement.The Elliptic Curve&lt;br /&gt;Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) was included for authentication. The Advanced&lt;br /&gt;Encryption Standard (AES) for data encryption and SHA for hashing were also part of the recommended&lt;br /&gt;suite.&lt;br /&gt;Other countries besides the United States are becoming concerned about cyber security for&lt;br /&gt;government documents. For example, during the week of February 15, 2005, the Auditor&lt;br /&gt;General for Canada, Sheila Fraser, warned that federal agents in Canada are failing to keep up&lt;br /&gt;with the crackers, making confidential government documents vulnerable. Fraser said that she&lt;br /&gt;was disappointed that the Canadian government did not meet its own minimum standards for&lt;br /&gt;IT security, despite the fact that guidelines had been available for almost a decade.&lt;br /&gt;As a case in point cited by Fraser, in May, 2004, the Treasury Board Secretariat surveyed 90&lt;br /&gt;government departments and found that of the 46 departments that responded, only one agency&lt;br /&gt;Nonrepudiation 226&lt;br /&gt;met the minimum requirements of the Canadian government’s security policy and related online&lt;br /&gt;standards. Even worse, the survey results showed that 16% of the departments did not have any&lt;br /&gt;information security policy, and more than 25% of the departments did not have a policy requiring&lt;br /&gt;a plan to keep critical systems and services running if a major cyber attack or power blackout&lt;br /&gt;occurred.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Algorithm; Diffie-Hellman Public-Key Algorithm (DH); Digital Signature;&lt;br /&gt;Encryption or Encipher; National Security Agency (NSA).&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Bridis, T. White House Eyes NSA for Network ‘Traffic Cop.’ [Online,&lt;br /&gt;February 15, 2005.] The Washington Post Website. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/&lt;br /&gt;articles/A25583-2005Feb15.html; Canoe Inc. Security Gaps in Federal Computers. [Online,&lt;br /&gt;February 15, 2005.] Canoe Inc. Website. http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWA/Canada/2005/&lt;br /&gt;02/15/931808-cp.html; TechTarget. National Computer Security Center. [Online, February 2,&lt;br /&gt;2001.] TechTarget Website. http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/gDefinition/0,294236,sid14_&lt;br /&gt;gci519382,00.html; The Globe and Mail. U.S. Government to Rely on Canadian Cryptography.&lt;br /&gt;[Online, March 2, 2005.] The Globe and Mail Website. http://www.globetechnology.com/&lt;br /&gt;servlet/story/RTGAM.20050302.gtcrypto0303/BNStory/Technology/.&lt;br /&gt;NSF (National Science Foundation) and NSFnet (general term): A U.S. government&lt;br /&gt;agency that has funded the development of a cross-country backbone network, as well as regional&lt;br /&gt;networks designed to connect scientists over the Internet, thereby taking on the term NSFnet.&lt;br /&gt;Nuking (general term): A form of abuse found in Internet chat rooms. An example of nuking&lt;br /&gt;is sending someone a large number of ICMP or other high-priority packets, thus provoking a&lt;br /&gt;Denial of Service attack. If the victim has a low connection speed compared to the sender’s, he&lt;br /&gt;or she may get dropped from various Internet services (such as IRC), because his or her machine&lt;br /&gt;is so busy handling the high-priority packets that it does not handle the lower-priority packets&lt;br /&gt;before it idles out.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Denial-of-Service (DoS); Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP); Internet&lt;br /&gt;Relay Chat (IRC); Packet.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Eskimo Organization. IRC Abuses. [Online, July 15, 1998.] Eskimo&lt;br /&gt;Organization Website. http://www.eskimo.com/~cwj2/chan-atheism/abuses.html.&lt;br /&gt;227 Nuking&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Oakley Protocol (general term): Cites a sequence of key exchanges and describes their services,&lt;br /&gt;particularly authentication and identity protection.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Authentication; Key.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: TechTarget. Internet Key Exchange. [Online, February 16, 2004.]&lt;br /&gt;TechTarget Website. http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid14_gci884946,00&lt;br /&gt;.html.&lt;br /&gt;Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection and Emergency Preparedness (OCIPEP)&lt;br /&gt;(general term): Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chrétien announced the development of this&lt;br /&gt;agency on February 5, 2001. It took over the functions of the former Emergency Preparedness&lt;br /&gt;Canada, and its role was to protect Canada’s critical infrastructures from disruption or complete&lt;br /&gt;failure in order to assure the health, safety, and economic well-being of Canadians. A prolonged&lt;br /&gt;disruption or failure in one utility contributing to the infrastructure could produce cascading disruptions&lt;br /&gt;or failures across a number of other infrastructures, with major economic and social&lt;br /&gt;repercussions for Canadians.&lt;br /&gt;In December 2003, Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin said that OCIPEP would be integrated&lt;br /&gt;into a new department known as Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada&lt;br /&gt;(known as PSEPC). The first Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Public Safety and&lt;br /&gt;Emergency Preparedness appointed by the Prime Minister was Anne McLellan.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Critical Infrastructures; Critical Networks; Cyber Apocalypse.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: OCIPEP. OCIPEP: Who We Are. [Online, May 11, 2004.] OCIPEP&lt;br /&gt;Website. http://www.ocipep-bpiepc.gc.ca.&lt;br /&gt;OMG (general term): Stands for Object Management Group, an open-membership consortium&lt;br /&gt;of computer companies committed to producing and upholding computer industry specifications&lt;br /&gt;for enterprise applications that are interoperable.The OMG Board of Directors contains&lt;br /&gt;well-known names in the computer and Internet industry including IBM,Alcatel, the Boeing&lt;br /&gt;Company, NASA, Sun Microsystems, and Hitachi.&lt;br /&gt;OMG’s star specification is the multi-platform Model-Driven Architecture (MDA), and&lt;br /&gt;OMG’s own middleware platform is CORBA (an acronym that stands for Common Object&lt;br /&gt;Request Broker Architecture). CORBA is OMG’s open and vendor-free architecture and infrastructure&lt;br /&gt;that various computer applications use to be able to function together over networks.&lt;br /&gt;When the standard protocol IIOP is used, a CORBA-based program from any vendor on almost&lt;br /&gt;any computer or operating system in any programming language and on any network can interoperate&lt;br /&gt;with a CORBA-based program from the same or another vendor in all of these ways.&lt;br /&gt;Because of how easily CORBA integrates machines from huge mainframes to desktops and&lt;br /&gt;PDAs, it has become the middleware of choice for many large and some smaller enterprises. One&lt;br /&gt;of CORBA’s most common uses is in servers handling a huge volume of customers and having&lt;br /&gt;high hit rates but still maintaining high reliability.&lt;br /&gt;Moreover, the OMG Interface Definition Language (IDL) allows interfaces to objects to be&lt;br /&gt;defined independently of an object’s implementation. After an interface in IDL is defined, it is&lt;br /&gt;used as input to an IDL compiler, whose output is to be compiled and linked with an object&lt;br /&gt;implementation and its clients.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Compiler; Computer; Internet; Middleware.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Barry &amp;amp; Associates, Inc. OMG Interface Definition Language. [Online,&lt;br /&gt;May 16, 2005.] Barry &amp;amp; Associates, Inc.Website. http://www.service-architecture.com/webservices/&lt;br /&gt;articles/omg_interface_definition_language_idl.html; Barry &amp;amp; Associates, Inc.CORBA.&lt;br /&gt;[Online, May 16, 2005.] Barry &amp;amp; Associates, Inc.Website. http://www.service-architecture.com/&lt;br /&gt;web-services/articles/corba.html.&lt;br /&gt;On-Access Scanner (general term): Relates to the constant monitoring of the file system on&lt;br /&gt;workstations and servers. For anti-virus software effectiveness, it is important that a computer&lt;br /&gt;virus be found and then blocked before it is activated.Therefore, every time a file is accessed for&lt;br /&gt;reading or writing, or whenever a program is launched, the on-access scanner is invoked. The&lt;br /&gt;on-access scanner literally scans the file. Although on-access scanning is a quite secure way to&lt;br /&gt;check for viruses, it is not well liked by sophisticated users because of its adverse impact on performance.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Anti-Virus Software; On-Demand Scanner; Server;Virus.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: SAV25 Data Systems. SAV25 Data Systems. [Online, 2000.] SAV25 Data&lt;br /&gt;Systems Website. http://www.sav25.com/norman/nvc/nvc_corp_features.htm.&lt;br /&gt;On-Demand Scanner (general term): Used for the manual scanning of selected areas on a&lt;br /&gt;computer, including entire drives or certain folders. For example,Windows Explorer allows an&lt;br /&gt;object to be selected and then scanned.The user simply chooses the on-demand Virus Scanner&lt;br /&gt;entry from the right-mouse button menu.&lt;br /&gt;In a networked environment, the system administrator can schedule scanning operations to&lt;br /&gt;be run on some or on all workstations and servers within the corporation.Tasks can be run&lt;br /&gt;immediately, scheduled to be run at a later point in time, or scheduled to be run at some fixed&lt;br /&gt;interval.The on-demand scanner can use a sandbox-type of technology to add more protection&lt;br /&gt;levels to detect novel and unknown malware before it can create havoc on the network.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Administrator; Computer; On-Access Scanner; Malware; Server;Virus.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: SAV25 Data Systems. SAV25 Data Systems. [Online, 2000.] SAV25 Data&lt;br /&gt;Systems Website. http://www.sav25.com/norman/nvc/nvc_corp_features.htm.&lt;br /&gt;One-time Password (general term): One-time passwords can be used for only one authentication&lt;br /&gt;process in order to gain access to a system. By using one-time passwords, the probability&lt;br /&gt;of an attack relying on the interception and replay of network traffic is lessened because a previously&lt;br /&gt;valid password will not be accepted on a second or following round. One-time passwords&lt;br /&gt;are typically used in security-critical environments in which clear-text passwords continue to&lt;br /&gt;be used.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Attack; Authentication; Password; Security.&lt;br /&gt;One-Way Hash Function (general term): A mathematical transformation of data of arbitrary&lt;br /&gt;length into a fixed-length string.The mathematical properties of the transformation ensure that&lt;br /&gt;OMG 230&lt;br /&gt;the reversion of the hashing is computationally hard and that similar data yield dissimilar hashes.&lt;br /&gt;The output of a hash function—called a hash, message digest, or digital fingerprint—is used for&lt;br /&gt;authentication and message integrity purposes.&lt;br /&gt;Online File Swapping or Online File Sharing (general term): Recent studies indicate that&lt;br /&gt;more people than ever are using Peer-to-Peer (P2P) services for online file swapping and file&lt;br /&gt;sharing.These terms mean just as they sound: users swap or share files online with others, usually&lt;br /&gt;without paying royalties.The files shared are typically music, movies, and photos.&lt;br /&gt;For example, BigChampagne, which tracks Internet file-sharing in the United States, says that&lt;br /&gt;more than eight million people were online at any one time in June 2004, using unauthorized&lt;br /&gt;services such as KaZaA and eDonkey. That is an increase of 19% from 6.8 million people who&lt;br /&gt;engaged in unauthorized file-sharing in June 2003.Though BigChampagne says that the majority&lt;br /&gt;of files being swapped are music, pornography videos and images is the second-biggest&lt;br /&gt;category.&lt;br /&gt;After September 2003, the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) filed 3,500&lt;br /&gt;lawsuits against U.S. online music sharers who uploaded songs to the Internet.The charges relied&lt;br /&gt;on the infringement of the DMCA law.The RIAA had settled about 600 of these cases as of July&lt;br /&gt;2004, with fines levied ranging from $2,000 to $15,000. After 2004, the RIAA continued to file&lt;br /&gt;suits against individuals they believed to be infringing the DMCA. As of September 30, 2005, the&lt;br /&gt;milestone number of cases reached 15,000. In some jurisdictions outside the United States, such as&lt;br /&gt;in Canada, online file swapping is not illegal.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA); Internet; Napster; Peer-to-Peer&lt;br /&gt;(P2P); Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA).&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Graham, J. Online File Swapping Endures. USA Today, July 12, 2004, p.A1.&lt;br /&gt;Rank One Media Group. US music industry hits milestone, has sued 15,000 people. [Online June&lt;br /&gt;2006]. cdfreaks Web site. http://www.cdfreaks.com/news/12474.&lt;br /&gt;Opcode (general term): Short for Operation Code, which is the part of an instruction in&lt;br /&gt;machine language to specify the operation to be performed. A complete machine language&lt;br /&gt;instruction consists of an opcode and zero or more operands with which the specified operation&lt;br /&gt;is performed. Examples are “add memory location A to memory location B,” or “store the number&lt;br /&gt;five in memory location C.”“Add” and “Store” are the opcodes in these examples. Because&lt;br /&gt;virus scanners try to detect and remove malicious patterns of machine instructions, virus writers&lt;br /&gt;have now turned to metamorphic viruses that rewrite themselves using equivalent opcodes, or&lt;br /&gt;that re-order the machine instructions to achieve the same computational result while at the&lt;br /&gt;same time avoiding detection.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Virus.&lt;br /&gt;Open Relay (general term):An SMTP email server permitting outsiders to relay email not for&lt;br /&gt;or from local users. Spammers rely on open relay to send unwanted messages to potential consumers.&lt;br /&gt;Open relays are blacklisted by some Internet services, and other mail servers use these&lt;br /&gt;lists to block emails from the open relay servers. System administrators of open relays are contacted&lt;br /&gt;by the listing service asking them to fix their configurations in order to be removed from&lt;br /&gt;the black list.&lt;br /&gt;231 Open Relay&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Administrators; Electronic Mail or Email; Internet; Simple Mail Transfer Protocol&lt;br /&gt;(SMTP); Spam; Spammers.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: MarketingSherpa, Inc.The Ultimate Email Glossary: 180 Common Terms&lt;br /&gt;Defined. [Online, 2004.] MarketingSherpa, Inc. Website. http://www.marketingsherpa.com/&lt;br /&gt;sample.cfm?contentID=2776.&lt;br /&gt;Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) (general term):A gateway-routing protocol created for IP&lt;br /&gt;networks that implements the “shortest path first” (or link-state) algorithm. Routers use the&lt;br /&gt;algorithms to forward routing information to all other OSPF routers on the Internet by calculating&lt;br /&gt;the shortest path to each router, based on a connection graph of the network as it is “seen”&lt;br /&gt;by each router.&lt;br /&gt;Each router sends not only the portion of the routing table describing the state of its own&lt;br /&gt;links but also the complete routing structure (known as the topography).The positive aspect of&lt;br /&gt;“shortest path first” algorithms is that they produce smaller, more frequent updates, thus preventing&lt;br /&gt;problems such as routing loops and count-to-infinity (which occurs when routers&lt;br /&gt;continue to increment the distance counter to a destination net).&lt;br /&gt;OSPF results in a stable network. OSPF’s major disadvantage is its large requirement of CPU&lt;br /&gt;power and memory.The advantages far outweigh the costs, however.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Algorithm; Internet; Protocol; Routers.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Jupitermedia Corporation.What is OSPF? [Online, February 13, 2004.]&lt;br /&gt;Jupitermedia Corporation Website. http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/O/OSPF.html.&lt;br /&gt;Open Software Foundation (OSF) (general term): Founded in 1988 to develop an open,&lt;br /&gt;interoperable standard for UNIX operating systems.The group, consisting initially of all but two&lt;br /&gt;major players in the UNIX market, included IBM, Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC),&lt;br /&gt;Hewlett Packard, Apollo, Groupe Bull, Siemens, and Nixdorf.The Foundation was largely seen&lt;br /&gt;to be an attempt to unify forces against Sun Microsystems and American Telephone &amp;amp; Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;(AT&amp;amp;T) and their System V version of UNIX.The competition between the coalition of seven&lt;br /&gt;and the pair consisting of Sun Microsystems and AT&amp;amp;T became known as the UNIX wars.&lt;br /&gt;Commercially, the developed standard was a failure. The only implementation was OSF/1 by&lt;br /&gt;DEC, which was later renamed Digital UNIX. In 1996, OSF merged with X/Open to form the&lt;br /&gt;Open Group.The OSF is frequently confused with the Free Software Foundation (FSF), but&lt;br /&gt;there has never been a connection between OSF and FSF.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Free Software Foundation; UNIX.&lt;br /&gt;Open Source (general term): Open source proponents believe that software users should be able&lt;br /&gt;to view the source code and make changes to it to correct glitches or produce value-added features.&lt;br /&gt;The Linux operating system, for example, is open source.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Internet; Open Source Initiative (OSI).&lt;br /&gt;Open Source Initiative (OSI) (general term): In addition to giving other software users open&lt;br /&gt;access to the source code, the distribution conditions for software under the OSI license scheme&lt;br /&gt;must also comply with the following conditions, among others:&lt;br /&gt;Open Relay 232&lt;br /&gt;• Free Redistribution.The license should not stop anyone from selling or giving away the&lt;br /&gt;software when it is part of an aggregate software having programs from a number of different&lt;br /&gt;sources. Moreover, the license should not require a royalty fee for such a sale.&lt;br /&gt;• Source Code.The product must include source code and permit its distribution.When a&lt;br /&gt;product is distributed without source code, there has to be some clearly stated way to get it&lt;br /&gt;for a price not exceeding reasonable reproduction costs. In fact, the source code should be&lt;br /&gt;able to be downloaded from the Internet, preferably for free. Furthermore, the source code&lt;br /&gt;should be in the form in which, say, a programmer could amend it.&lt;br /&gt;• Derived Works.The license should permit software changes, and works derived from the&lt;br /&gt;original software should be permitted to be distributed under the same terms and conditions&lt;br /&gt;as the license of the original software version.&lt;br /&gt;• No Discrimination Against Persons or Groups.The license is not allowed to discriminate&lt;br /&gt;against any person or group.&lt;br /&gt;• No Discrimination Against Fields of Endeavor.The license is not allowed to restrict any&lt;br /&gt;person from using the program for a specific purpose, such as for business or for genetic&lt;br /&gt;research.&lt;br /&gt;• Distribution of License.The rights to the program must apply to everyone who receives it&lt;br /&gt;without having to obtain more licenses.&lt;br /&gt;• License Must Not Restrict Other Software.The license must not put restrictions on other&lt;br /&gt;software distributed with the licensed software.That is, the license must not insist that other&lt;br /&gt;programs distributed on the same medium as the licensed software also be open source.&lt;br /&gt;• License Must Be Technology Neutral. No license provision may be predicated on any particular&lt;br /&gt;technology or interface style.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Code or Source Code; Internet; Open Source.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Open Source Initiative. The Open Source Definition. [Online, 2004.]&lt;br /&gt;Open Source Initiative Website. http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition_plain.php.&lt;br /&gt;Open Systems Interconnect (OSI) Model (general term): Defines Internet function through&lt;br /&gt;a vertical stack of seven layers.The uppermost layers represent the implementation of network services&lt;br /&gt;such as encryption and connection management, and the lowermost layers implement the&lt;br /&gt;hardware-oriented functions such as addressing, flow control, and routing.&lt;br /&gt;Data communication begins with the top layer at the sending side, descends the OSI model&lt;br /&gt;stack to the bottom layer, crosses the network connection to the bottom layer on the receiving&lt;br /&gt;side, and ascends the OSI model stack.&lt;br /&gt;The OSI model was developed in 1984 to be an abstract model, but it has become a practical&lt;br /&gt;framework for developing current network technologies such as Ethernet and protocols such&lt;br /&gt;as IP.&lt;br /&gt;233 Open Systems Interconnect (OSI) Model&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Encapsulation; Encryption or Encipher; Ethernet; Internet; Internet Protocol;&lt;br /&gt;Layers; Network.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: About, Inc. OSI Model. [Online, 2004.] About, Inc. Website. http://&lt;br /&gt;compnetworking.about.com/cs/designosimodel/g/bldef_osi.htm.&lt;br /&gt;Operating System Software (general term): Software managing the computer hardware.&lt;br /&gt;Operating systems vary in their make-up because they are organized in different ways, and&lt;br /&gt;designing a new Operating System is a major undertaking. Because an Operating System is complex,&lt;br /&gt;it has to be designed one piece at a time. Moreover, each piece needs to be a well-defined&lt;br /&gt;section of the systems, with well defined inputs. For PCs, the most popular current operating system&lt;br /&gt;software is the Microsoft Windows family, but experts project that Linux will replace&lt;br /&gt;Windows on at least one-fifth of all computer systems by 2010.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Linux.&lt;br /&gt;Operation Sun Devil of 1990 (general term): A nation-wide raid carried out by the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;Secret Service as part of an online investigation into the cyberwar between the Legion of&lt;br /&gt;Doom (LoD) and the Masters of Deception (MoD).&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Hacker Clubs; Legion of Doom (LoD); Masters of Deception (MoD).&lt;br /&gt;Orange Book (general term): A standard from the U.S. National Computer Security Council&lt;br /&gt;(an arm of the National Security Agency). It defines criteria for trusted computer products&lt;br /&gt;and describes four trust levels, designated as A, B, C, and D.&lt;br /&gt;Each level of trust includes more features and requirements:&lt;br /&gt;D is a nonsecure system.&lt;br /&gt;C1 requires a user to logon but does not prohibit group ID.&lt;br /&gt;C2 requires individual logons with a password and an audit mechanism.&lt;br /&gt;B1 requires Department of Defense security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;B2 requires secure communication links between the system and users and gives assurance that&lt;br /&gt;system testing is performed regularly and clearances are maintained.&lt;br /&gt;B3 requires that the system be characterized by a viable mathematical model, and&lt;br /&gt;A1 requires a system characterized by a proven mathematical model&lt;br /&gt;See Also: National Security Agency (NSA);Trust.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Farlex, Inc. The Orange Book. [Online, 2004.] Farlex, Inc. Website.&lt;br /&gt;http://computing-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Orange%20Book.&lt;br /&gt;Osowski, Geoffrey and Tang,Wilson Case (legal case): Accountants Geoffrey Osowski and&lt;br /&gt;Wilson Tang pleaded guilty in April 2001 to exceeding their authorized access to the Cisco&lt;br /&gt;Systems Inc. computers so that they could illegally issue about $8 million in Cisco stock to&lt;br /&gt;themselves.They were charged with violating Title 18, United States Criminal Code by committing&lt;br /&gt;computer and wire fraud. Under a plea bargain, they consented to pay back money&lt;br /&gt;amounting to the difference between almost $8 million that they issued to themselves and that&lt;br /&gt;Open Systems Interconnect (OSI) Model 234&lt;br /&gt;which the government could recover from the sale of jewelry, an automobile, and other purchased&lt;br /&gt;goods.&lt;br /&gt;The pair admitted that between October 2000 and March 2001, they worked together to&lt;br /&gt;defraud Cisco Systems so that they could get Cisco stock they were not authorized to get. In&lt;br /&gt;December 2000, they moved 97,750 shares of Cisco stock into two separate accounts at Merrill&lt;br /&gt;Lynch, with 58,250 of the shares to be deposited into an account for Osowski and 39,500 shares&lt;br /&gt;to be deposited into an account for Tang.&lt;br /&gt;In February 2001, the cybercrime team caused two more transfers of stock to their accounts,&lt;br /&gt;this time of 67,500 and 65,300 shares. For their cybercrime, Osowski and Tang were sentenced&lt;br /&gt;to 34 months in prison.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Access Control; Cisco Systems Inc.; Fraud.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: U.S. Department of Justice. Former Cisco Accountants Plead Guilty to&lt;br /&gt;Wire Fraud via Unauthorized Access to Cisco Stock. [Online, January 17, 2003.] U.S.&lt;br /&gt;Department of Justice Website. http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/cybercrime/OsowskiPlea.htm.&lt;br /&gt;Out-of-Band Management (general term): Refers to a method of accessing network firewalls,&lt;br /&gt;routers, switches, or servers allowing security technicians to configure and manage these devices&lt;br /&gt;through dial-up lines instead of using the devices’ regular network connection.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Firewall; Network; Routers; Server; Switch.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Communication Devices, Inc. Products: Out of Band Management.&lt;br /&gt;[Online,May 18, 2005.] Communication Devices, Inc.Website. http://www.commdevices.com/&lt;br /&gt;oob_story.htm.&lt;br /&gt;Outsider Hacker or Cracker (general term): A hacker or cracker known as an outsider is&lt;br /&gt;not an employee of a company or government agency whose computer systems have been&lt;br /&gt;attacked.&lt;br /&gt;The “outsider” personality profile is based primarily on crackers under age 30 who were&lt;br /&gt;caught and convicted on cracking-related crimes. As with insiders caught for computer crimes,&lt;br /&gt;outsider crackers have multidimensional rather than unidimensional motivational needs. For&lt;br /&gt;example, in a piece written in 1994, the infamous British “Prestel Hacker” Schifreen described&lt;br /&gt;the motivational factors of outsider hackers as being broad and existing in degrees of White Hat&lt;br /&gt;and Black Hat traits.These motivational factors included seizing the cracking opportunity available&lt;br /&gt;because of poor system controls as well as the cracker’s internal need for a challenge, to&lt;br /&gt;relieve boredom, to get revenge, or to satisfy greed.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Black Hats; Cracker; Hacker; Schifreen, Robert;White Hats or Ethical Hackers or&lt;br /&gt;Sumarai Hackers.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Schell, B.H., Dodge, J.L., with S.S. Moutsatsos. The Hacking of America:&lt;br /&gt;Who’s Doing It,Why, and How.Westport, CT: Quorum Books, 2002.&lt;br /&gt;Overrun Error (general term):Typically occurs in devices and applications when they receive&lt;br /&gt;more data then they anticipate, usually because the allocated or physical memory buffer is not&lt;br /&gt;big enough. Crackers try to create these conditions. Because frequently the application or&lt;br /&gt;device does not handle the Overrun Error in a secure way, it allows a cracker to exploit a vulnerable&lt;br /&gt;state of the system.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Buffer Overflows.&lt;br /&gt;235 Overrun Error&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Package (general term): An object containing files and instructions for distributing software.&lt;br /&gt;Packet (general term): Data travels along the Internet in packets that are sent individually across&lt;br /&gt;the network and then reassembled into the original data at the correct recipient address. Each&lt;br /&gt;packet is like a letter in that it has a sender and a receiver. When the packet reaches the correct&lt;br /&gt;receiver address, it stops traveling.&lt;br /&gt;Every packet has the following fields: source IP address (such as 10.23.1.156); destination IP&lt;br /&gt;address; transport type (such as ICMP=1, TCP=6,UDP=17); source port and destination port&lt;br /&gt;(such as DNS=53, FTP=21, HTTP=80); and flags (such as SYN).&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Encapsulation; Internet; Internet Protocol (IP); IP Address; Port and Port Numbers;&lt;br /&gt;Synchronize Packet (SYN).&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Graham, R. Hacking Lexicon. [Online, 2001.] Robert Graham Website.&lt;br /&gt;http://www.linuxsecurity.com/resource_files/documentation/hacking-dict.html.&lt;br /&gt;Packet Filters (general term): In firewalls, the technology used most often to control traffic.&lt;br /&gt;The fields in every packet are compared against a rule set configured on the firewall. Rules&lt;br /&gt;might be of the following form:&lt;br /&gt;BLOCK destination=196.0.3.x TCP flag=SYN&lt;br /&gt;ALLOW destination=196.0.3.129 TCP destport=25&lt;br /&gt;ALLOW destination=196.0.3.130 TCP destport=80&lt;br /&gt;So, if the private network is 196.0.3.x, the initial rule in the preceding list blocks all incoming&lt;br /&gt;TCP connections, but outbound connections can continue.The following rules override the&lt;br /&gt;first; thus, access to the email server at port 25 is allowed and access to the Web server at port 80&lt;br /&gt;also is allowed.&lt;br /&gt;Packet filters are susceptible to fragmentation attacks, whereby an attacker splits up a TCP&lt;br /&gt;connection into many smaller packets to avoid detection by packet-filtering rules.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Firewall; Fragmentation; Packet;TCP/IP or Transmission Control Protocol/Internet&lt;br /&gt;Protocol.&lt;br /&gt;Packet Storm (general term): A nonprofit group of security professionals who provide information&lt;br /&gt;necessary for securing networks by posting new security information on a global&lt;br /&gt;network of Websites. Information posted includes current and earlier security tools, exploits, and&lt;br /&gt;advisories.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Exploit; Network; Security.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Packetstorm Security.About Packet Storm. [Online, 2004.] Packet Storm&lt;br /&gt;Website. http://packetstormsecurity.org.&lt;br /&gt;Packet-Switched Network (general term): Computers connected to the Internet use a&lt;br /&gt;packet-switching network to transmit data packets from one attached device to another.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Ethernet; Internet; Network; Packet; Routing and Traceroute Tool.&lt;br /&gt;PAD or Padding (general term):An encryption algorithm used to encrypt or “padlock” a message.&lt;br /&gt;In cryptosystems, padding also refers to random characters, blanks, zeros, and nulls added to&lt;br /&gt;the beginning and ending of messages to conceal their actual length or to satisfy the data block&lt;br /&gt;size requirements of some ciphers. Padding also serves to obscure the location at which cryptographic&lt;br /&gt;coding actually begins.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Algorithm; Encryption or Encipher.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Schell, B.H., Dodge, J.L., with S.S. Moutsatsos. The Hacking of America:&lt;br /&gt;Who’s Doing It,Why, and How.Westport, CT: Quorum Books, 2002.&lt;br /&gt;Parson, Jeffrey Lee Case (legal case): On August 12, 2004, Jeffrey Lee Parson appeared before&lt;br /&gt;a judge in Seattle,Washington, admitting to having created the B variant of the Blaster worm.&lt;br /&gt;Known also as the “teekids” variant, it exploited nearly 50,000 computers on the Internet in&lt;br /&gt;2003. In January 2005, Parson was sent to jail for 18 months. He was also ordered to put in 10&lt;br /&gt;months of community service after his release.The judge said that she was sentencing him at the&lt;br /&gt;lighter end of the potential jail-term range, because though Parson was 18 when he launched his&lt;br /&gt;cyber attack, he was emotionally immature. If the judge wanted to be tougher, Parson could have&lt;br /&gt;faced a jail term of 10 years and a $250,000 fine.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Blaster Worm; Hackers’ Psychological Profile; Malware;Worm.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: ECT News Network. Jeffrey Lee Parson Pleads Guilty to Blaster Worm&lt;br /&gt;Crime. [Online, August 15, 2004.] ECT News Network Website. http://www.technewsworld&lt;br /&gt;.com/story/35820.html; Johnson, G. Teen Sentenced for Releasing Blaster Worm Variant.&lt;br /&gt;[Online, January 28, 2005.] Security Focus Website. http://securityfocus.com/news/10377.&lt;br /&gt;Passive Attack (general term): On a cryptographic system. It is a method that starts with some&lt;br /&gt;information about plaintexts and their corresponding ciphertexts (under some unknown key)&lt;br /&gt;and then determines more information about the plaintexts.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Attack; Ciphertext; Passive Countermeasures; Plaintext.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Electronic Frontier Foundation. Passive Attack. [Online, 2004.] Electronic&lt;br /&gt;Frontier Foundation Website. http://gnupg.unixsecurity.com.br.&lt;br /&gt;Passive Countermeasures (general term):Though there is no true means of defending against&lt;br /&gt;Denial of Service (DoS) attacks, the most effective means seem to be passive countermeasures.&lt;br /&gt;Passive countermeasures are used to prevent network resources from being taken over by crackers&lt;br /&gt;as clients for a DoS attack.&lt;br /&gt;Specific passive countermeasures include configuring the router to do egress filtering, thus&lt;br /&gt;preventing spoofed traffic from exiting the network; asking the Internet Service Provider to&lt;br /&gt;configure routers to perform ingress filtering on the network; using a firewall that exclusively&lt;br /&gt;employs application proxies; and disallowing unnecessary ICMP, TCP, and UDP traffic.&lt;br /&gt;Moreover, if the ICMP traffic cannot be blocked, passive countermeasures can include disallowing&lt;br /&gt;unsolicited (or all) ICMP_ECHOREPLY packets; disallowing UDP and TCP, with the&lt;br /&gt;Packet-Switched Network 238&lt;br /&gt;exception of a specific list of ports; and setting up the firewall to block any outgoing data traffic&lt;br /&gt;whose originating address is not on the protected network.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Active Countermeasures; Denial of Service (DoS); Firewall; Internet Control&lt;br /&gt;Message Protocol (ICMP); Internet Service Provider (ISP); Passive Attacks; TCP/IP or&lt;br /&gt;Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol; User Datagram Protocol (UDP).&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading:AXENT Technologies, Inc.TFN2K — An Analysis. [Online,March 7, 2000.]&lt;br /&gt;AXENT Technologies, Inc. Website. http://gaia.ecs.csus.edu/~dsmith/csc250/lecture_notes/&lt;br /&gt;wk12/tfn2k.html.&lt;br /&gt;Passive Fingerprinting (general term): See Fingerprinting.&lt;br /&gt;Passive Wiretapping (general term):A type of wiretapping that is not active but rather attempts&lt;br /&gt;merely to observe the traffic flow to gain desired knowledge, whether it be snooping for a password&lt;br /&gt;or just logging traffic.&lt;br /&gt;Passphrase (general term): Text string consisting of several words and numbers that a user enters&lt;br /&gt;to access a computer, network, or an applicaiton. Some systems allow users to use entire&lt;br /&gt;passphrases rather than a short string for passwords.Though passphrases are deemed to be more&lt;br /&gt;secure because they are harder to crack, they are generally used only when extreme security is&lt;br /&gt;demanded.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Authentication; Cracking; Password.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Graham, R. Hacking Lexicon. [Online, 2001.] Robert Graham Website.&lt;br /&gt;http://www.linuxsecurity.com/resource_files/documentation/hacking-dict.html.&lt;br /&gt;Password (general term):A unique character string that a user types to access a computer, network,&lt;br /&gt;or an application such as a database or a Web-based service. Essentially, passwords are&lt;br /&gt;identification codes restricting access to computers, networks, and sensitive files.&lt;br /&gt;The system compares the typed user identification and password against a list of authorized&lt;br /&gt;users and passwords stored on the system. If the entered user identification (that is, id) and password&lt;br /&gt;are valid, the system lets the user access at the security level preapproved for him or her.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Access Control; Authentication; Computer; Network.&lt;br /&gt;Password Authentication Protocol (PAP) (general term): One of the earlier forms of&lt;br /&gt;authentication for gaining access to a network.A user’s name and password were transmitted over&lt;br /&gt;a network and compared to a list of name-password pairs.Typically, the passwords stored in the&lt;br /&gt;table were encrypted. It is important to note that PAP was not a strong authentication method,&lt;br /&gt;for passwords were sent over the wire as “clear text.” Furthermore, there was no protection from&lt;br /&gt;replay attacks or from brute-force trial and error attacks. Because of these shortcomings, PAP is&lt;br /&gt;no longer in wide use.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: IETF, PPP Authentication Protocols. [Online, October 1992.] Website.&lt;br /&gt;http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1334.txt.&lt;br /&gt;Password Cache (general term): A temporary copy of a password; an internal prompting that&lt;br /&gt;occurs inside a computer during a session to prevent the user from being externally prompted&lt;br /&gt;to continually reenter the password.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Computer; Password.&lt;br /&gt;239 Password Cache&lt;br /&gt;Patches or Fixes or Updates (general term): Updated system software created to close security&lt;br /&gt;gaps discovered after the software has been released to the public.&lt;br /&gt;Patent Law and Automated Business Methods (legal term): Once considered a taboo subject&lt;br /&gt;matter of patent law,Automated Business Methods (or ABMs) are now accepted by the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;Patent and Trademark Office and U.S. courts.ABMs, business methods that once were manually&lt;br /&gt;completed but are now automated, are used by some of the largest businesses operating on the&lt;br /&gt;Internet, known generally as “electronic-commerce” or “e-commerce.”&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Internet;Trademark Law.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Kirsch, G. The Software and E-Commerce Patent Revolution. [Online,&lt;br /&gt;2004.] Gigalaw.com Website. http://www.gigalaw.com/articles/2000-all/kirsch-2000-01-all&lt;br /&gt;.html.&lt;br /&gt;PATRIOT Act of 2001 (legal term):Also known as the USA PATRIOT Act and Patriot Act I,&lt;br /&gt;this controversial Act was introduced as H.R. 3162 by Representative F. James Sensenbrenner, RWI,&lt;br /&gt;on October 23, 2001, in response to the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.The acronym&lt;br /&gt;“USA PATRIOT” stands for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate&lt;br /&gt;Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism. The Act’s stated intent was to deter and&lt;br /&gt;punish terrorist acts in the United States and elsewhere and to enhance law enforcement investigation&lt;br /&gt;tools. Related bills include H.R. 2975 (an earlier anti-terrorism bill that passed the&lt;br /&gt;House on October 12, 2001) and H.R. 3004 (the Financial Anti-Terrorism Act). On October&lt;br /&gt;26, 2001, H.R. 3162 became Public Law No. 107-56, that is, the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001.&lt;br /&gt;Though federal courts have found some provisions of the Act unconstitutional, and despite&lt;br /&gt;continuing public controversy and concern, the law was renewed in March 2006.&lt;br /&gt;Further controversy brewed when on February 7, 2003, the Center for Public Integrity, a public&lt;br /&gt;interest think tank in Washington, D.C., disclosed the content of a classified document that&lt;br /&gt;was to be introduced as the Domestic Security Enhancement Act of 2003 or Patriot Act II.The&lt;br /&gt;legislation was not brought forward in this form, although some of the controversial sections&lt;br /&gt;were reintroduced in the Tools to Fight Terrorism Act of 2004. This act was read in the Senate&lt;br /&gt;on July 19, 2004. It was not passed in this form.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Terrorism.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Center for Democracy and Technology. Legislation Affecting the Internet.&lt;br /&gt;[Online, July 28, 2004.] Center for Democracy and Technology Website. http://www.cdt.org/&lt;br /&gt;legislation/107th/wiretaps/. Azulay, Jessica. ‘Chilling’ Pieces of Patriot Act II return to Senate.&lt;br /&gt;The NewStandard. [Online, September 22, 2004]. http://newstandardnews.net/content/&lt;br /&gt;?action=show_item&amp;amp;itemid=1027.&lt;br /&gt;Payload (general term): Associated with a computer virus, it is the malicious software content&lt;br /&gt;that the virus executes.The term payload is also the actual data that is encapsulated in a packet&lt;br /&gt;and is transmitted on a network. Payload is also a critical concept in Web services, identifying&lt;br /&gt;the data that is transmitted.The payload in Web services is XML based, thus delivering the data&lt;br /&gt;in a standardized format that can be understood by many diverse applications.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Encapsulation; Network; Packet;Virus.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Symantec Security Response. Glossary. [Online, July 15, 2004.]. http://&lt;br /&gt;securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/refa.html.&lt;br /&gt;Patches or Fixes or Updates 240&lt;br /&gt;PBX (Private Branch Exchange) (general term):A type of internal telephone switchboard—&lt;br /&gt;typically circuit-switched networks—found in corporations. As telephony continues to evolve&lt;br /&gt;to Voice Over IP (or VoIP), companies will use a so-called “hybrid” networks made up of both&lt;br /&gt;circuit-switched and VoIP equipment. According to security experts, during this transitional&lt;br /&gt;period, present-day security vulnerabilities of circuit-switched networks will continue—&lt;br /&gt;including toll fraud, service theft, the use of unauthorized modems, and eavesdropping on the&lt;br /&gt;Public Switched Telephone Network—and new vulnerability issues will emerge. How security&lt;br /&gt;professionals deal with these vulnerabilities will depend on the selected vendor, the configuration&lt;br /&gt;used, and the particular deployment scenario under investigation.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Fraud; Modem; Network;Theft;Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP).&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Collier, M.The Value of VoIP Security. [Online, July 6, 2004.] CMP Media&lt;br /&gt;LLC. Website. http://subscriber.acumeninfo.com/uploads2/5/E/5E9080CAB3A1ABE63E3B&lt;br /&gt;8EFB7B21E22D/1090506012673/SOURCE/secureLogix.html.&lt;br /&gt;PDA (Personal Digital Assistant) (general term):A small, handheld system combining in one&lt;br /&gt;device multiple computing, Internet, networking, and fax/telephone features. A typical PDA&lt;br /&gt;can work as a personal organizer, a cell phone, and, in some cases, an Internet browser. One of&lt;br /&gt;the favorite PDAs of executives is the Canada-produced BlackBerry; other popular models are&lt;br /&gt;produced by Hewlett-Packard and Palm, Inc. In fact, today’s technology is making it easier for a&lt;br /&gt;handheld phone to become what telecommunications expert George Gilder calls a “teleputer”—&lt;br /&gt;a wireless device able to perform all of the functions typically associated with a much larger&lt;br /&gt;computer.For example, the Nokia N91 has a four-gigabyte hard drive—about ten times more storage&lt;br /&gt;than a desktop computer had ten years ago. That provides enough storage for thousands of&lt;br /&gt;MP3 files, hundreds of photos, or numerous office documents. Some say that the modern-day&lt;br /&gt;cellular phone is the equivalent of a small laptop PC in the user’s pocket.&lt;br /&gt;Though very useful, even the BlackBerry has some security concerns. It is interesting to note&lt;br /&gt;that during the week of March 1, 2005, the Canadian military and U.S. security agencies commenced&lt;br /&gt;a one-year joint effort to make it and other PDAs more secure in the hopes that one&lt;br /&gt;day PDAs can be used for transmitting top-secret information.&lt;br /&gt;Though the Blackberry device allows government officials and executives to make critical&lt;br /&gt;decisions using a wireless device in the palm of their hands even when they are away from their&lt;br /&gt;worksites, the security of PDAs, in general, came fully into question when in February, 2005,&lt;br /&gt;reports indicated that a cracker accessed personal information from Paris Hilton’s PDA (a&lt;br /&gt;Sidekick II).The cracker obtained over 500 celebrities’ phone numbers and email addresses from&lt;br /&gt;her PDA and then posted on the Net topless photos of the hotel heiress and model.&lt;br /&gt;It is interesting to note that on February 15, 2005, a PDA-cracking cybercriminal was taken&lt;br /&gt;to court, and the media questioned whether he was Paris Hilton’s PDA-cracker. In a plea agreement&lt;br /&gt;with prosecutors, Nicolas Jacobsen, aged 22, pleaded guilty in U.S. federal court to one&lt;br /&gt;felony charge related to his intentionally gaining access to a protected computer and causing&lt;br /&gt;damage to it. Jacobsen’s crime spree began in late 2003 and ended when he was arrested in the&lt;br /&gt;fall of 2004. Though Jacobsen’s 2003–2004 cyber targets included Paris Hilton’s T-Mobile&lt;br /&gt;Sidekick II as well as other T-Mobile users, he was not apparently connected to the late February,&lt;br /&gt;2005, crack attack that resulted in Hilton’s topless photos being shown on the Net.&lt;br /&gt;241 PDA (Personal Digital Assistant)&lt;br /&gt;The intrusion into T-Mobile’s servers by Jacobsen seemed to have resulted from the company’s&lt;br /&gt;failure to patch a known security hole in a commercial software package. For example, at least&lt;br /&gt;one Internet Website noted that anybody using a service to spoof caller ID could have exploited&lt;br /&gt;the flaw.Though T-Mobile agreed that the vulnerability existed, they said that the solution to the&lt;br /&gt;problem is a simple one. Users simply need to set their voice mail to require a particular password;&lt;br /&gt;by default, clients are not required to do this.&lt;br /&gt;In July, 2003, the vulnerability was discussed in a Black Hat Briefing talk in Las Vegas.An SPI&lt;br /&gt;Dynamics researcher talked about how to exploit the Weblogic vulnerability, and, apparently,&lt;br /&gt;Jacobsen learned of the hole from an issued advisory. He then created his own 20-line exploit in&lt;br /&gt;Visual Basic and searched the Internet for potential targets who failed to install the issued patch.&lt;br /&gt;In October, 2003, Jacobsen discovered that T-Mobile was, indeed, one such place.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Browser; Internet; Network;Wireless.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Ingram,M.Cellphones Becoming ‘Small Laptop in Your Pocket.’ The Globe&lt;br /&gt;and Mail, May 18, 2005, p. B.3; Lemos, R. Flaw Threatens T-Mobile Voice Mail Leaks. [Online,&lt;br /&gt;February 24, 2005.] CNET Networks Inc. Website. http://news.com.com/Flaw+threatens+&lt;br /&gt;T-Mobile+voice+mail+leaks/2100-1002_3-5589608.html; Poulsen, K. Known Hole Aided&lt;br /&gt;T-Mobile Breach. [Online, February 28, 2005.] Lycos, Inc. Website http://www.wired.com/&lt;br /&gt;news/privacy/0,1848,66735,00.html; Thorne, S. Canadian Military, U.S. Agencies Launch&lt;br /&gt;Blackberry Security Project. [Online, March 1, 2005.] Attrition.org. Website. http://www&lt;br /&gt;.attrition.org/pipermail/isn/2005-March.txt.&lt;br /&gt;PDP-10 or Programmed Data Processor-10 (general term): One of an earlier series of minicomputers&lt;br /&gt;produced by Digital Electronic Corporation (DEC). These minicomputers not only&lt;br /&gt;made time-sharing real but also held a special place in hacker history because they were used in&lt;br /&gt;the 1970s by academic computing centers and research laboratories, including the MIT Artificial&lt;br /&gt;Intelligence (AI) Lab.&lt;br /&gt;Some aspects of the instruction set (especially the bit-field instructions) are to this day considered&lt;br /&gt;by some to be unsurpassed. The PDP-10 was eventually made obsolete by the VAX&lt;br /&gt;machines (a descendant of the PDP-11) when DEC realized that the PDP-10 and the VAX computer&lt;br /&gt;systems were in competition with each other. DEC decided to concentrate its software&lt;br /&gt;development efforts on the more profitable choice—VAX. The PDP-10 computer was eliminated&lt;br /&gt;from DEC’s product line in 1983.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Artificial Intelligence (AI); Hacker.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Webnox Corporation. PDP-10 Definition. [Online, 2004.] Webnox&lt;br /&gt;Corporation Website. http://www.hyperdictionary.com/dictionary/PDP-10.&lt;br /&gt;Peer-to-Peer (P2P) (general term):Architecture permitting hardware and software to work on&lt;br /&gt;a network without central servers It is frequently used to set up home computer networks, for&lt;br /&gt;which a dedicated server can be too costly; it became popular with software applications such as&lt;br /&gt;Napster.&lt;br /&gt;A controversial tool for P2P communications is known as Skype, an encrypted Internet telephony&lt;br /&gt;system allowing for the swapping of files; it interconnects with the publicly switched&lt;br /&gt;telephone system. Skype is controversial and a headache for enterprises, because it can easily&lt;br /&gt;PDA (Personal Digital Assistant) 242&lt;br /&gt;penetrate firewalls; however, businesses can implement safeguards by, for example, placing Skype&lt;br /&gt;on a separate, dedicated segment of their network.&lt;br /&gt;Released in 2004 by the makers of KaZaA, Skype scans the Internet searching for a supernode&lt;br /&gt;(by definition, other users running the software and, therefore, not being screened by&lt;br /&gt;firewalls). An unknown quantity of supernodes links to other supernodes, eventually looping&lt;br /&gt;back to Skype’s servers, thus allowing users on the Internet to send and receive files.&lt;br /&gt;Skype is marketed as having communications encrypted with a 256-bit encryption standard,&lt;br /&gt;and keys are exchanged with the RSA encryption algorithm. Unlike other, nonproprietary Voice&lt;br /&gt;Over Internet protocols (VoIP), Skype uses a proprietary, secret protocol. So, for financial and&lt;br /&gt;health institutions required by law to monitor the communications between their employees and&lt;br /&gt;their clients, they need to be aware that Skype is unmonitorable. Skype appears to be more secure&lt;br /&gt;than cell phones having their encryption disabled or landlines having zero encryption.With&lt;br /&gt;Skype, even large files of 100MB size can be sent without contending with server size restrictions.&lt;br /&gt;In recent years, the P2P abbreviation has taken on another meaning “People-to-People.”&lt;br /&gt;Thus, P2P (or People-to-People) has become a marketing abbreviation for selling P2P software&lt;br /&gt;and for creating businesses that can help individuals on the Internet to meet one another or to&lt;br /&gt;share some common interests.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Internet; Napster; Online File Swapping; Peer-to-Peer (P2P);Voice Over Internet&lt;br /&gt;Protocol (VoIP).&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: About, Inc. P-2-P. [Online, 2004.] About, Inc. Website. http://&lt;br /&gt;compnetworking.about.com/library/glossary/bldef-p2p.htm; Garfinkel, S. Can 9 Million Skype&lt;br /&gt;Users Be Wrong? [Online, March 22, 2005.] CXO Media Inc. Website. http://www&lt;br /&gt;.csoonline.com/read/030105/machine.html.&lt;br /&gt;Penetration Testing (general term):The process of probing and identifying security vulnerabilities&lt;br /&gt;and the extent to which they are used to a cracker’s advantage. It is a critical tool for&lt;br /&gt;assessing the security state of an organization’s IT systems, including computers, network components,&lt;br /&gt;and applications. Hackers of the White Hat variety are often hired by companies to&lt;br /&gt;do penetration testing. It is money well spent, computer security experts contend.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Hacker;Network;White Hats or Ethical Hackers or Sumari Hackers;Vulnerabilities&lt;br /&gt;of Computers.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Lowery, J. Penetration Testing:The Third Party Hacker. [Online, February,&lt;br /&gt;2002.] Sans Institute Website. http://www.sans.org/rr/papers/index.php?id=264.&lt;br /&gt;Perimeter Authentication (general term):The process of authenticating the identity of an offsite&lt;br /&gt;user not within the application server’s domain.This process is completed by a remote user&lt;br /&gt;specifying an identity and some form of corresponding “proof ” of identity.The proof provided&lt;br /&gt;is generally a secret string of letters and/or numbers (such as a credit card number, a password,&lt;br /&gt;or a Personal Identification Number such as an important date to the user) that can then be&lt;br /&gt;verified.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Authentication; Fraud; Identity Theft or Masquerading; Password; Personal&lt;br /&gt;Identification Number (PIN).&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: BEA Systems. Security Fundamentals. [Online, 2004.] BEA Systems&lt;br /&gt;Website. http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs81/secintro/concepts.html#1077583.&lt;br /&gt;243 Perimeter Authentication&lt;br /&gt;Perimeter Defenses (general term): Used for security purposes to keep a zone secure.A secure&lt;br /&gt;zone is some combination of policies, procedures, technical tools, and techniques enabling a&lt;br /&gt;company to protect its information. Perimeter defenses provide a physical environment with&lt;br /&gt;management’s support in which privileges for access to all electronic assets are clearly laid out&lt;br /&gt;and observed. Some perimeter defense parameters include installing a security device at the&lt;br /&gt;entrance of and exit to a secure zone and installing an intrusion detection monitor outside the&lt;br /&gt;secure zone to monitor the zone. Other means of perimeter defense include ensuring that&lt;br /&gt;important servers within the zone have been hardened—meaning that special care has been&lt;br /&gt;taken to eliminate security holes and to shut down potentially vulnerable services—and that&lt;br /&gt;access into the secure zone is restricted to a set of configured IP addresses. Moreover, access to&lt;br /&gt;the security appliance needs to be logged and all changes to the security appliance need to be&lt;br /&gt;documented, and changes regarding the security appliance must require the approval of the&lt;br /&gt;secure zone’s owner. Finally, intrusion alerts detected in the zone must be immediately transmitted&lt;br /&gt;to the owner of the zone and to Information Security Services for rapid and effective&lt;br /&gt;resolution.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Intrusion; IP Address; Security Zones; Server.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: The University of California. Anatomy of a Secure Zone. [Online,&lt;br /&gt;November 3, 2003.] The University of California San Francisco Website. http://isecurity.ucsf&lt;br /&gt;.edu/main.jsp?content=secure_zones/secure_zones.&lt;br /&gt;Peripherals (general term): Equipment such as printers, modems, mouse devices, and keyboards&lt;br /&gt;that attach to one of the computer’s ports so that users can send, receive, and print&lt;br /&gt;information using that computer.&lt;br /&gt;For users with disabilities that restrict their ability to use mouse devices and keyboards, voicerecognition&lt;br /&gt;software provides an alternative means for these individuals to conduct their&lt;br /&gt;computing activities. By wearing a headset and by speaking into a microphone, users can substitute&lt;br /&gt;typing with dictating words and sentences. Users “train” the voice-recognition software&lt;br /&gt;system to become familiar with their voices and convert spoken words into text.The software is&lt;br /&gt;designed to track errors that it makes—such as correcting the word “lock” to appear as “luck”&lt;br /&gt;by learning the individual’s speech patterns and idiosyncrasies.&lt;br /&gt;Two suppliers of speech-to-text dictation software include the former ScanSoft, Inc. (now&lt;br /&gt;called Nuance Communications, Inc.) and IBM Corporation. The suppliers claim an accuracy&lt;br /&gt;rate approaching 99%.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Modem; Port and Port Numbers.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading:Weinberg, P. Speak and It Shall Be Written (Or Pretty Close). The Globe&lt;br /&gt;and Mail, March 10, 2005, p. B10.&lt;br /&gt;Perl (general term): A popular scripting language that runs on a wide variety of platforms,&lt;br /&gt;including UNIX and Windows. PERL is open source, easily integrated into Web servers for&lt;br /&gt;CGI, easy to learn, and supports a large library of utilities.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Common Gateway Interface (CGI Scripts, cgi-bin); Open Source; Programming&lt;br /&gt;Languages C, C++, Perl, and Java; Server; UNIX.&lt;br /&gt;Perimeter Defenses 244&lt;br /&gt;Personal Identification Number (PIN) (general term): A string of numerals used for the&lt;br /&gt;identification of authorized users or clients. For example, Automated Teller Machines (ATMs)&lt;br /&gt;can be accessed by registered bank clients after they enter a PIN into a keypad.Though convenient,&lt;br /&gt;PINs can be stolen and used fraudulently.&lt;br /&gt;For debit card fraud to occur, a robber needs two things: the account information found on&lt;br /&gt;the user’s card’s magnetic strip and the user’s PIN.According to police, the PIN can be obtained&lt;br /&gt;in a number of ways, including stealing the user’s wallet and finding the PIN written on a paper&lt;br /&gt;in it, or watching a user enter the PIN into an ATM machine and then stealing the user’s card.&lt;br /&gt;Another trick used by fraud artists is to have a legitimate-looking store clerk skim the card on&lt;br /&gt;a legitimate point of-sale terminal and then skim it again on an illegitimate card reader designed&lt;br /&gt;to store information embedded on the card’s magnetic strip.Though the initial sale will be sent&lt;br /&gt;to the financial institution, giving the PIN user the idea that everything is okay, the criminal will&lt;br /&gt;then make a new card with the personal information stored on it and use the PIN that had been&lt;br /&gt;entered by the legitimate user (and captured on film by an overhead camera) to fraudulently purchase&lt;br /&gt;goods and services with the fake card. The legitimate card user typically calls the police&lt;br /&gt;when he or she discovers that large sums of money or the entire amount thought to be in the&lt;br /&gt;user’s account no longer exists. One such PIN scam occurred in Ajax, Ontario, Canada, in&lt;br /&gt;December 2004, at a gas station that engaged in such illegal practices.&lt;br /&gt;Victimized users sometimes find that after informing the bank of the missing account funds,&lt;br /&gt;the bank investigator might ascertain that the user failed to take appropriate protections to safeguard&lt;br /&gt;his or her PIN.The bank therefore might not replace the stolen funds. Such moves hurt&lt;br /&gt;consumer loyalty.&lt;br /&gt;It is for this reason that in 2004, credit card companies began urging merchants to buy into a&lt;br /&gt;new payment method allowing consumers to use their plastic cards without swiping them&lt;br /&gt;through a machine and inputting a PIN. On May 19, 2005, J.P. Morgan Chase &amp;amp; Co., the largest&lt;br /&gt;credit card issuer in the United States, announced plans to distribute millions of new cards that&lt;br /&gt;simply need to be waved or held in front of a special reader. Such a card can also be swiped&lt;br /&gt;through the more traditional machine. The technology is known simply as “blink.” The cards&lt;br /&gt;contain a special chip recognized by the merchant’s terminal. When clients wave their cards in&lt;br /&gt;front of the machine, the card reader lights and then beeps to signal that the transaction has been&lt;br /&gt;authorized. The card never needs to leave the client’s hand. Visa, MasterCard, and American&lt;br /&gt;Express have agreed to accept any card equipped with “blink.”&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Fraud; Identity Theft or Masquerading.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Durham Regional Police Service. Debit Card Fraud. [Online, 2002.]&lt;br /&gt;Durham Regional Police Service Website. http://www.police.durham.on.ca/internet_explorer/&lt;br /&gt;public_safety/safety_tips/index.asp?Action=3&amp;amp;Topic_ID=73&amp;amp;Category_ID=12&amp;amp;AbsPage=2;&lt;br /&gt;Metroland. Card Scam Targeted Durham Gas Bars, Police Say. [Online, December 28, 2004.]&lt;br /&gt;Metroland Website. http://www.durhamregion.com/dr/regions/ajax/story/2450588p-2838370c&lt;br /&gt;.html; Sidel, R. Credit Cards Charge Into Future. The Globe and Mail, May 19, 2005, p. B16.&lt;br /&gt;Pew Internet and American Life Project Survey (general term): The Pew Internet and&lt;br /&gt;American Life Project conducted a national telephone survey between March 12, 2003, and May&lt;br /&gt;20, 2003, to discover the extent of Internet usage and types of online activities engaged in by&lt;br /&gt;245 Pew Internet and American Life Project Survey&lt;br /&gt;U.S. adults.The survey conductors discovered that more than 53 million U.S. adults, or 44% of&lt;br /&gt;the U.S. adult Internet users, have used the Internet to accomplish a number of objectives,&lt;br /&gt;including sharing their thoughts in chat rooms, responding to others through email, posting&lt;br /&gt;pictures, and sharing files. Moreover, about 13% of the respondents said that they have their own&lt;br /&gt;Websites, and about 7% of the respondents said that they have Web cameras running on their&lt;br /&gt;computers to let other Internet users view live pictures of them and their surroundings. Only 2%&lt;br /&gt;of the respondents said they kept Web diaries or blogs.&lt;br /&gt;By the end of 2004, an updated study showed that eight million users in the United States had&lt;br /&gt;created blogs, and that blog readership increased by 58% in 2004 to encompass 27% of U.S.&lt;br /&gt;Internet users. It is expected that this growth rate has not diminished significantly and the number&lt;br /&gt;of active bloggers has grown substantially.&lt;br /&gt;A 2006 study released on April 26 shows that Internet penetration has now reached 73% (up&lt;br /&gt;from 66% in the 2005 survey) of American adults. The respondents said that improvements in&lt;br /&gt;e-commerce are noticeable, as are the online opportunities to pursue hobbies and personal&lt;br /&gt;interests.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Blog; Chat Rooms; Electronic Mail or Email; Internet; Online File Swapping.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Lenhart, A., Fallows, D., and Horrigan, J. Reports: Online Activities and&lt;br /&gt;Pursuits. [Online, February 29, 2004.] Pew Internet and American Life Project Website. http://&lt;br /&gt;www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/113/report_display.asp. Madden, M. Internet Penetration and&lt;br /&gt;Impact. [Online, April 26, 2006.] Pew Internet and American Life Project Website. http://&lt;br /&gt;www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/182/report_display.asp.&lt;br /&gt;Phiber Optik (a.k.a. Mark Abene) (person; 1972– ): In the early 1990s, Mark Abene was&lt;br /&gt;engaged in cyberwarfare with Erik Bloodaxe.The online war eventually led to Abene’s arrest.&lt;br /&gt;Abene, who became publicly known in Manhattan for his intelligence both on- and offline, served&lt;br /&gt;a one-year federal prison sentence for his cyberwar activities.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Cyberwarfare; Hacker Clubs.&lt;br /&gt;Phishing (general term): A form of identity theft whereby a scammer uses an authenticlooking&lt;br /&gt;email from a large corporation to trick email receivers into disclosing online sensitive&lt;br /&gt;personal information, such as credit card numbers or bank account codes.&lt;br /&gt;According to a 2004 report released by Gartner, Inc., an IT marketing research firm, phishing&lt;br /&gt;exploits cost banks and credit card companies an estimated $1.2 billion in 2003. Moreover,&lt;br /&gt;according to the Anti-Phishing Working Group (a nonprofit group of government agencies and&lt;br /&gt;corporations trying to reduce cyber fraud), more than 2,800 active phishing sites were known&lt;br /&gt;to exist.&lt;br /&gt;In April 2005, a new “cousin” of phishing was defined and called “WiPhishing” (pronounced&lt;br /&gt;“why phishing”)—an act executed when an individual covertly sets up a wireless-enabled laptop&lt;br /&gt;computer or access point to get other wireless-enabled laptop computers to associate with it&lt;br /&gt;before launching a crack attack. About 20% of wireless access points use default SSIDs. Because&lt;br /&gt;users failed to rename them, a cracker can quite easily guess the name of a network that target&lt;br /&gt;computers are normally configured to, thereby gaining access to the laptop computer and putting&lt;br /&gt;malicious code into it. Intrusion detection appliances such as AirPatrol Enterprise have been&lt;br /&gt;designed to detect wireless exploits.&lt;br /&gt;Pew Internet and American Life Project Survey 246&lt;br /&gt;Firms having wired networks are at risk of being cracked if employees’ laptop computers are&lt;br /&gt;left on. Instead of exploiting wireless networks with WiPhishing, crackers could do even more&lt;br /&gt;damage by hijacking the legitimate connection to a wired computer network, exploiting the soft&lt;br /&gt;underbelly of that network, and launching an invasive attack.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Cracking; Exploit; Electronic Mail or Email; Fraud; Identity Theft or&lt;br /&gt;Masquerading.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Levinsky,D. Hacker Teenage Pleads Guilty. [Online,May 14, 2005.] Calkins&lt;br /&gt;Media, Inc. Website. http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn/news/112-05142005-489320.html;&lt;br /&gt;Leyden, J. WiPhishing Hack Risk Warning. [Online, April 20, 2005.] http://www&lt;br /&gt;.theregister.co.uk/2005/04/20/wiphishing; MarketingSherpa, Inc. The Ultimate Email Glossary:&lt;br /&gt;180 Common Terms Defined. [Online, 2004.] MarketingSherpa, Inc.Website. Reg SETI Group&lt;br /&gt;Website. http://www.marketingsherpa.com/sample.cfm?contentID=2776.&lt;br /&gt;Phrack (general term): Phrack Magazine, or simply Phrack, began in 1985 as the first electronically&lt;br /&gt;distributed magazine, or e-zine, connecting the hacker community. The online magazine provided&lt;br /&gt;those in the computer underground with information on anarchy, cryptography,&lt;br /&gt;reverse-engineering, phreaking, and numerous other features of high-tech interest.The last edition&lt;br /&gt;of Phrack #63 appeared on July 30, 2005. In the final edition, an announcement was made&lt;br /&gt;that a new editorial team could be expected for 2006–2007.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Cryptography or “Crypto”; Defcon; Hacker.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: phrackstaff@phrack.org. PHRACK #63. [Online, July 30, 2005.] Phrack&lt;br /&gt;Website. http://www.phrack.org/archives/phrack63.tar.gz.&lt;br /&gt;Phreaking (general term): A form of cyberspace theft and/or fraud using technology to make&lt;br /&gt;free telephone calls. John Draper (a.k.a. Cap’n Crunch) is probably the most famous phreaker in&lt;br /&gt;the Computer Underground, because he was the first in the U.S. who was jailed for this type&lt;br /&gt;of exploit.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Computer Underground (CU); Fraud.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Schell, B.H. and Martin, C. Contemporary World Issues Series: Cybercrime:A&lt;br /&gt;Reference Handbook. Santa Barbara, CA:ABC-CLIO, 2004.&lt;br /&gt;Phun (general term): A phreaking magazine popular in the computer underground during&lt;br /&gt;the late 1980s.The first copy was released on September 20, 1988, and contained 13 articles covering&lt;br /&gt;such topics as telecommunications, radio, and overcoming computer security. Red Knight&lt;br /&gt;was the President and Editor.The Website can be found at: http://www.etext.org/CuD/Phun/&lt;br /&gt;phun-1.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Phreaking;Telecom.&lt;br /&gt;Physical Exposure (general term):A rating used to calculate a system’s vulnerability. It is based&lt;br /&gt;on whether a perpetrator needs physical access to a system in order to exploit the system’s vulnerability.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Access Control;Vulnerabilities of Computers.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Symantec Security Response. Glossary. [Online, July 15, 2004.] Symantec&lt;br /&gt;Security Response Website. http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/refa.html.&lt;br /&gt;247 Physical Exposure&lt;br /&gt;Physical Infrastructure Attacks (general term): Cause a Denial of Service (DoS) attack.&lt;br /&gt;These physical infrastructure attacks can be accomplished simply by snipping a fiber-optic&lt;br /&gt;cable.They are typically mitigated by the reality that traffic can quickly be rerouted.&lt;br /&gt;If physical access to a computer system can be obtained, then gaining access to the information&lt;br /&gt;on that computer system can also be obtained.With new U.S. laws pertaining to the security&lt;br /&gt;of information—including HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act),&lt;br /&gt;the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act—data in both physical and electronic&lt;br /&gt;forms must not only be protected by adequate access control mechanisms but also be audited if&lt;br /&gt;compliance with the various regulations is to be maintained.&lt;br /&gt;Recommendations on physical and logical security integration can be found at this TechTarget&lt;br /&gt;Website: http://www.searchSecurity.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid14_gci1046324,00.html?&lt;br /&gt;track+NL-358&amp;amp;ad=502258.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Accountability; Fiber-Optic Cable; Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (Financial&lt;br /&gt;Services Modernization Act); Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996&lt;br /&gt;(HIPAA).&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Maiwald, E. The ‘How-tos’ of Security Integration. [Online, January 20,&lt;br /&gt;2005.] TechTarget Website. http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,&lt;br /&gt;sid14_gci1046324,00.html?track+NL-358&amp;amp;ad=502258; McAlearney, S.Wedded to Physical and&lt;br /&gt;IT Security? [Online, January 20, 2005.] KnowledgeStorm, Inc.Website. http://knowledgestorm&lt;br /&gt;.techtarget.com/searchsecurity/MainServlet?track+NL-358&amp;amp;ad=502258&amp;amp;ksAction+Home&amp;amp;c=&lt;br /&gt;TT&amp;amp;n+home;TechTarget. Denial of Service. [Online,May 16, 2001.] TechTarget Website. http://&lt;br /&gt;searchsecurity.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid14_gci213591,00.html.&lt;br /&gt;Ping of Death Attack (general term): Uses IP fragmentation to crash computers.This kind&lt;br /&gt;of attack was so named because the Ping program built into Windows in earlier years easily&lt;br /&gt;could be told to fragment packets.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Attack; Fragmentation; Internet Protocol (IP); Packet; Ping or Packet Internet&lt;br /&gt;Groper.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Graham, R. Hacking Lexicon. [Online, 2001.] Robert Graham Website.&lt;br /&gt;http://www.linuxsecurity.com/resource_files/documentation/hacking-dict.html.&lt;br /&gt;ping or Packet Internet Groper (general term):The ping command, built into both Windows&lt;br /&gt;and UNIX operating systems, is a universal way of testing network response time and performance.&lt;br /&gt;The ping command is used by system administrators for diagnostic problems, particularly&lt;br /&gt;for testing, measuring, and managing networks. Ping is a TCP/IP utility that sends ICMP information&lt;br /&gt;packets to a computer on a network and waits for their return.The ping command is&lt;br /&gt;particularly helpful in verifying whether a host is working and whether a system is attached to&lt;br /&gt;the Internet.&lt;br /&gt;For system administrators not using Windows, several Websites offering ping are available. On&lt;br /&gt;UNIX or Linux, for example, the system administrator simply needs to type “ping host_name.”&lt;br /&gt;System administrators using a Windows-type operating system can open a command window&lt;br /&gt;and then type “ping host_name” (that is, the name of the host the system administrator wants to&lt;br /&gt;check). Figure 16-1 shows how the output will appear when someone pings the Whitehouse&lt;br /&gt;Webserver from a Windows machine.&lt;br /&gt;Physical Infrastructure Attacks 248&lt;br /&gt;Figure 16-1. Output from ping command used to locate a host&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Internet; Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP); Linux; Packets; TCP/IP or&lt;br /&gt;Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol; UNIX.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Silvestri,M.Ping. [Online, 2000.] Wowarea Website. http://www.wowarea&lt;br /&gt;.com/english/researches/wg4_ping.htm.&lt;br /&gt;Piracy (general term): Copying protected software without authorization; in most jurisdictions,&lt;br /&gt;it is considered a crime.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Authorization; Copyright Laws; Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA);&lt;br /&gt;Infringing Intellectual Property Rights and Copyright.&lt;br /&gt;Plain Old Telephone System (POTS) (general term):The regular analog telephone service,&lt;br /&gt;using copper wiring, as opposed to ISDN,ADSL, and other digital phone services.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Internet Telephony;Voice over IP.&lt;br /&gt;Plaintext (general term):An email message with no formatting code.The term is also used to&lt;br /&gt;describe the unencrypted version of a message.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Code or Source Code; Electronic Mail or Email; Encryption or Encipher.&lt;br /&gt;Platform for Privacy Preferences (P3P) (general term):The World Wide Web Consortium&lt;br /&gt;(W3C) developed P3P as a standard protocol to enable Web users to take more control over their&lt;br /&gt;individual privacy settings. P3P was officially recommended as a standard on April 16, 2002.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: W3C, The Platform for Privacy Preferences 1.0 (P3P1.0) Specification.&lt;br /&gt;[Online, April 16, 2002.] http://www.w3.org/TR/P3P/.&lt;br /&gt;Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) (general term): Is an Internet protocol for connecting computers&lt;br /&gt;over a serial line. It is most widely used to connect to Internet dial-up services over&lt;br /&gt;telephone lines.&lt;br /&gt;Point-to-Point Protocol Over Ethernet (PPPoE) (general term): This technology, documented&lt;br /&gt;in RFC 2516, has been adopted by some DSL service providers and combines Ethernet&lt;br /&gt;and Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) standards especially for use with modems having broadband&lt;br /&gt;connectivity capabilities.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Ethernet; Modem; Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP).&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: About, Inc. PPPOE. [Online, 2004.] About, Inc. Website. http://&lt;br /&gt;compnetworking.about.com/library/glossary/bldef-pppoe.htm.&lt;br /&gt;C:\WINDOWS&gt;ping www.whitehouse.gov&lt;br /&gt;Ping a12389.g.akamai.net [212.105.197.134] with 32 byte&lt;br /&gt;Reply from 212.105.197.134: Bytes=32 Time=89ms TTL=55&lt;br /&gt;Reply from 212.105.197.134: Bytes=32 Time=85ms TTL=55&lt;br /&gt;Reply from 212.105.197.134: Bytes=32 Time=87ms TTL=55&lt;br /&gt;Reply from 212.105.197.134: Bytes=32 Time=113ms TTL=55&lt;br /&gt;Ping statistic for 212.105.197.134:&lt;br /&gt;Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),&lt;br /&gt;Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:&lt;br /&gt;Minimum = 85ms, Maximum = 113ms, Average = 93ms&lt;br /&gt;249 Point-to-Point Protocol Over Ethernet (PPPoE)&lt;br /&gt;Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol (PPTP) (general term): An early network protocol that&lt;br /&gt;enabled the secure transfer of data from a remote client to an organization’s server, establishing a&lt;br /&gt;virtual private network (VPN) on top of the Internet or an IP-based local area network.&lt;br /&gt;See Also:VPN.&lt;br /&gt;Police and Criminal Evidence Act of 1984, Order 2002 (legal term):A British Act updated&lt;br /&gt;with changes that took effect on October 14, 2002.The changes allowed an agent appointed by&lt;br /&gt;the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry to investigate a serious charge leading to a possible&lt;br /&gt;arrest to have the same powers as those given to police in the Police and Criminal Evidence Act&lt;br /&gt;of 1984. Prior to 2002, such an agent had to apply to a circuit judge for an order to search for&lt;br /&gt;and seize evidence possibly leading to the suspect’s arrest in a given jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Crown Copyright. The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984&lt;br /&gt;(Department of Trade and Industry Investigations) Order 2002. [Online, September 18, 2002.]&lt;br /&gt;Crown Copyright Website. http://www.legislation.hmso.gov.uk/si/si2002/20022326.htm.&lt;br /&gt;Polymorphic Virus (general term): A virus that can alter its byte pattern when it replicates,&lt;br /&gt;thereby avoiding detectioin by simple string-scanning intrusion detection techniques.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Intrusion Detection System (IDS);Virus.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Symantec Security Response. Glossary. [Online, July 15, 2004.] Symantec&lt;br /&gt;Security Response Website. http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/refa.html.&lt;br /&gt;Poor SUID (general term): Sometimes poor SUID scripts (shell or other programs that Set the&lt;br /&gt;UserID to run under another user’s privileges) that perform certain tasks can be run as root. If&lt;br /&gt;the scripts are writeable by an id, for example, the scripts can be edited and executed.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: id (identity); Shell.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: NMRC. The Hack FAQ. Unix Local Attacks. [Online, 2004.] NMRC&lt;br /&gt;Website. http://www.nmrc.org/pub/faq/hackfaq/hackfaq-29.html.&lt;br /&gt;Port and Port Numbers (general term):A port is a communication endpoint for passing data&lt;br /&gt;over the network.A port is typically associated with a specific application or protocol. Port 80,&lt;br /&gt;for example, is normally used for the http protocol and, therefore,Web traffic. Port 25, as another&lt;br /&gt;example, is used for mail transfer.&lt;br /&gt;The Well Known Ports are both controlled and assigned numbers by the IANA (Internet&lt;br /&gt;Assigned Numbers Authority). They can be used only by root (or system) processes or by&lt;br /&gt;programs run by privileged users. Port numbers fall into three distinct ranges: (1) the Well Known&lt;br /&gt;Ports; (2) the Registered Ports; and (3) the Dynamic or Private Ports.&lt;br /&gt;The Well Known Ports are in the 0–1023 range, the Registered Ports are in the 1024–49151&lt;br /&gt;range, and the Dynamic or Private Ports are in the 49152–65535 range.&lt;br /&gt;The complete list of Registered Ports and Dynamic or Private Ports can be found at&lt;br /&gt;http://www.codecutters.org/resources/ports.html.&lt;br /&gt;System administrators need to know these port numbers very well and must be aware that&lt;br /&gt;any application can be executed on any port. From a cracking standpoint, this means that&lt;br /&gt;“something” communicating over port 80 is not necessarily an innocent connection between a&lt;br /&gt;Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol (PPTP) 250&lt;br /&gt;browser and a Web server. It might very well be a back door hiding behind this well-known&lt;br /&gt;connection—hiding in wait until the cracker decides to exploit the system.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: HTTP (HyperText Transfer Protocol); IANA or Internet Assigned Numbers&lt;br /&gt;Authority; Network; Protocol; TCP/IP or Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol;&lt;br /&gt;User Datagram Protocol (UDP).&lt;br /&gt;Port Scan (general term): A port scan or port scanner attempts to connect to all 65536 ports&lt;br /&gt;on a server to see whether there are services listening (that is,waiting for connections) on those&lt;br /&gt;ports. The purpose of a port scan is to audit network computers for likely vulnerabilities or&lt;br /&gt;exploits.Typically, scanners have built-in databases of known port vulnerabilities.&lt;br /&gt;A number of network scanners exist. For example, the Infiltrator Network Security Scanner&lt;br /&gt;tool reveals and catalogues a number of important security features, such as installed software,&lt;br /&gt;Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) information, and open ports. It can audit&lt;br /&gt;password and security policies and conduct a registry audit, and it includes 18 network utilities&lt;br /&gt;for footprinting, scanning, and gaining access to computers via a ping sweep, email tracking,&lt;br /&gt;whois lookups, and so on.&lt;br /&gt;Also, the port scanner (formerly known as port probe) is a tool for determining the daemons&lt;br /&gt;or open ports running on a targeted computer.This tool supports these kinds of scans:TCP Full&lt;br /&gt;Connect (the most accurate way to detect open ports); UDP ICMP Port Unreachable Connect;&lt;br /&gt;TCP Full/UDP ICMP Combined;TCP SYN Half Open (only for Windows 2003/XP/2000);&lt;br /&gt;and TCP Other (only for Windows 2003/XP/2000).&lt;br /&gt;The de facto standard in the security industry is a public domain tool called nmap, which is&lt;br /&gt;considered to be the “Swiss Army knife” of port scanners because of its versatility.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Network; Ping or Packet Internet Groper; Port and Port Numbers; Scanner;Whois.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: NorthWest Performance Software, Inc. NetScan Tools Pro Technical Info.&lt;br /&gt;[Online, May 18, 2005.] NorthWest Performance Software, Inc. Website. http://www&lt;br /&gt;.netscantools.com/nstpro_port_scanner.html; WebAttack, Inc. Infiltrator Network Security&lt;br /&gt;Scanner 2.0. [Online, May 18, 2005.] WebAttack, Inc. http://www.snapfiles.com/features/&lt;br /&gt;infiltrator-803-461696.php.&lt;br /&gt;Portable Document Format (PDF) (general term): A file format that captures the exact&lt;br /&gt;details of a printed, hard-copy document into an electronic document to allow individuals to&lt;br /&gt;view, navigate, print, or forward the e-document to another individual.&lt;br /&gt;PDF files are made with software such as Adobe Acrobat. Many other programs have included&lt;br /&gt;the pdf-file format as a possible output format.To view and use the files, an individual needs a&lt;br /&gt;document viewer.Among the freely available viewers,Acrobat Reader is the most popular. It provides&lt;br /&gt;an implementation of the latest version of the file format as it is released by Adobe.The&lt;br /&gt;program can be easily downloaded from the Internet. After Acrobat Reader has been downloaded,&lt;br /&gt;it will start automatically whenever the individual wants to view a PDF file. PDF files are&lt;br /&gt;great for viewing magazine pieces, product and service brochures, and academic papers when&lt;br /&gt;getting the original graphic look online is important.&lt;br /&gt;A PDF file contains a single or many page images with zooming capabilities. The Adobe&lt;br /&gt;Acrobat product for making PDF files costs $200–$300. Free alternatives to the commercial&lt;br /&gt;251 Portable Document Format (PDF)&lt;br /&gt;product are numerous. An example is PDFcreator (available as a freeware project on sourceforge.&lt;br /&gt;net). It is used in the form of a printer driver that plugs into any Windows program,&lt;br /&gt;meaning that any program that can generate output for a real printer can also create PDF files.&lt;br /&gt;Some features of the full Adobe product—such as the generation of forms—are typically not&lt;br /&gt;included in the free alternatives. It is interesting to note that in July 2001, just before he was to&lt;br /&gt;give a speech at DefCon 9, Russian Dmitry Sklyarov was carried off by Federal agents and&lt;br /&gt;charged with violation provisions in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Dmitry’s claim to&lt;br /&gt;fame was a software program that he developed and was sold by his Russian employer ElcomSoft&lt;br /&gt;Company Ltd. The software allowed users to convert books in Adobe’s copy protected e-book&lt;br /&gt;format to the more commonly used PDF format. In short, the Federal agents alleged that&lt;br /&gt;Sklyarov made unauthorized copies of e-books.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Download.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: TechTarget. PDF. [Online, September 9, 2004.] TechTarget Website.&lt;br /&gt;http://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/0,,sid9_gci214288,00.html.&lt;br /&gt;Portal (general term): Known also as Web portal, is a special kind of Website. The term portal&lt;br /&gt;was initially given to large Internet search engines that expanded their offerings to include&lt;br /&gt;email, news, stock quotes, and other information tidbits of practical use. Some large companies&lt;br /&gt;developed Intranet Websites with a similar approach, giving way to what is now known as&lt;br /&gt;“enterprise information” or “corporate portals.”A portal typically has a home page allowing for&lt;br /&gt;navigation of loosely integrated features provided by a company’s divisions or by independent&lt;br /&gt;third parties and a large, diversified target audience.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Electronic Mail or Email; Internet; Intranet.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: About, Inc. Portal. [Online, 2004.] About, Inc. Website. http://&lt;br /&gt;compnetworking.about.com/library/glossary/bldef-portal.htm.&lt;br /&gt;Post Office Protocol or POP (general term):What an email user uses to retrieve electronic&lt;br /&gt;messages from an email server.The most widely used version is POP3.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Electronic Messages or Email; Server.&lt;br /&gt;Poulsen, Kevin (person; 1965– ): In 1988, Kevin Poulsen was indicted in the United States on&lt;br /&gt;phone tampering charges. He took over all the telephone lines going into radio station KIISFM,&lt;br /&gt;assuring that he would be the 102nd caller and thus the winner of a Porsche 944 S2. He&lt;br /&gt;pleaded guilty to the charges. He currently writes for ZDNet and his Web page can be found at:&lt;br /&gt;http://www.iss.net/security_center/advice/Underground/Hackers/Kevin_Poulsen/default.htm.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Fraud.&lt;br /&gt;Prehistory Era (general term): Defined as the era from the 1800s until 1969, the Prehistory Era&lt;br /&gt;included the activities of such math and computing superstars as Ada Byron, Kay McNulty&lt;br /&gt;Mauchly Antonelli, the Tech Model Railroad Club hackers at MIT, the early days of Dennis&lt;br /&gt;Ritchie and Ken Thompson at Bell Laboratories, and the early years of Rear Admiral Dr. Grace&lt;br /&gt;Murray Hopper.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Antonelli, Kay McNulty Mauchly; Byron, Ada; Hopper, Rear Admiral Dr. Grace&lt;br /&gt;Murray; Ritchie, Dennis;Thompson, Ken.&lt;br /&gt;Portable Document Format (PDF) 252&lt;br /&gt;President Clinton’s Commission on Critical Infrastructure Protection (general term):&lt;br /&gt;President Bill Clinton issued Executive Order 13010 in 1996 to set up the President’s&lt;br /&gt;Commission on Critical Infrastructure Protection (known as PCCIP).The PCCIP’s role was to&lt;br /&gt;examine the burgeoning dependency of the U.S. economy and way of life on critical infrastructures.&lt;br /&gt;A set of recommendations by the PPCIP was given to the President in November&lt;br /&gt;1997, and in May 1998 President Clinton ordered two Presidential Decision Directives (PDD)&lt;br /&gt;to better protect critical infrastructures.&lt;br /&gt;One directive was known as PDD-62 (called Combating Terrorism) and the other as PDD-63&lt;br /&gt;(called Critical Infrastructure Protection). Noting that the government cannot on its own adequately&lt;br /&gt;protect critical infrastructures to maintain citizens’ safety and quality of life, the framework&lt;br /&gt;selected for optimizing defensive and security activities focused on leadership rather than micromanagement.&lt;br /&gt;For example, PDD-63 explained that every federal department and agency would&lt;br /&gt;develop its own plan for defending its jurisdiction, and businesses were encouraged to do the&lt;br /&gt;same.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Critical Infrastructures; Critical Networks;Terrorism.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Ryan, J.The Infrastructure of the Protection of the Critical Infrastructure.&lt;br /&gt;[Online, Fall 1998.] The Information Warfare Site. http://www.iwar.org.uk/cip/resources/&lt;br /&gt;pdd63/pdd63-article.htm.&lt;br /&gt;Pretty Good Privacy (PGP) (general term): Software used to encrypt and thereby protect&lt;br /&gt;email as it is transmitted from one computer to another. PGP can be used for sender identity&lt;br /&gt;verification.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Electronic Mail or Email; Encryption or Encipher.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: MarketingSherpa, Inc.The Ultimate Email Glossary: 180 Common Terms&lt;br /&gt;Defined. [Online, 2004.] MaarketingSherpa, Inc.Website. http://www.marketingsherpa.com/&lt;br /&gt;sample.cfm?contentID=2776.&lt;br /&gt;Privacy (general term): Freedom from unauthorized access. Privacy issues in the security sense&lt;br /&gt;include digital rights management, spam deterrence, anonymity maintenance, and cracker disclosure&lt;br /&gt;rule adequacy. Privacy also means being able to maintain a balance between individuals’&lt;br /&gt;privacy rights and those of the government in providing national security.&lt;br /&gt;In April 2005, the U.S. government added Canada to its “piracy watch list” and ordered a&lt;br /&gt;review of Canadian Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) enforcement measures. The review&lt;br /&gt;was apparently fueled by a number of industry complaints alleging that Canada has become a&lt;br /&gt;haven for pirated and counterfeit goods, primarily because it and six other countries—the&lt;br /&gt;Ukraine, Belize, Latvia, Lithuania,Taiwan, and Thailand—act as channels for pirated goods moving&lt;br /&gt;from countries such as China to the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Intellectual Property (IP); Intellectual Property Rights and Copyright&lt;br /&gt;Infringement; Piracy; Security.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Grami, A. and Schell, B. Future Trends in Mobile Commerce: Service&lt;br /&gt;Offerings, Technological Advances and Security Challenges. Proceedings of Second Annual&lt;br /&gt;Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust. University of New Brunswick, New Brunswick, Canada,&lt;br /&gt;October 13–15, 2004. [Online, October, 2004.] Privacy, Security, Trust 2004 Website.&lt;br /&gt;253 Privacy&lt;br /&gt;http://www.unb.ca/pstnet/pst2004/;McKenna,B.Trade:U.S. Puts Canada on Piracy Watch List.&lt;br /&gt;The Globe and Mail, May 2, 2005, p. B1, B4; Whitman, M. and Mattord, H. Principles of&lt;br /&gt;Information Security. Boston: Thomson Learning, Inc., 2003; http://www.tascomm.fi/~jlv/&lt;br /&gt;ngtrans/.&lt;br /&gt;Privacy Enhanced Mail (general term): Defines a set of methodologies to provide confidentiality,&lt;br /&gt;authentication, and message integrity using various encryption methods.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: E-Mail; Encryption; Privacy.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: The Internet Engineering Task Force, Privacy Enhancement for Internet&lt;br /&gt;Electronic Mail. [Online, February 1993.] IETF Website. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1421.txt.&lt;br /&gt;Privacy Laws (legal term): Deal with the right of individual privacy, critical to maintaining the&lt;br /&gt;quality of life that citizens in a free society expect. Privacy laws generally maintain that an individual’s&lt;br /&gt;privacy shall not be violated unless the government can show some compelling reason&lt;br /&gt;to do so—such as by providing evidence that the safety of the nation is at risk.This tenet forms&lt;br /&gt;the basis of privacy laws in the United States and elsewhere.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Privacy; Risk.&lt;br /&gt;Privacy Policy (general term): A clear description of how companies use email addresses and&lt;br /&gt;other information they gather when online users opt to be included in requests for company&lt;br /&gt;information, newsletters, or third-party deals.U.S. state laws compel companies to not only state&lt;br /&gt;their privacy policy on their Websites but also place it where people can plainly see it. State laws&lt;br /&gt;may also prescribe the display form for the policy.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Electronic Mail or Email; Privacy.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: MarketingSherpa, Inc.The Ultimate Email Glossary: 180 Common Terms&lt;br /&gt;Defined. [Online, 2004.] MaarketingSherpa, Inc.Website. http://www.marketingsherpa.com/&lt;br /&gt;sample.cfm?contentID=2776.&lt;br /&gt;Private Keys (general term): Also known as a secret key and is known just to its creator and,&lt;br /&gt;with respect to secure messaging environments, to the receiver of an encrypted message. Private&lt;br /&gt;Keys are also used in other areas as well.The secure, remote session protocol ssh relies heavily on&lt;br /&gt;the notion of private keys.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Key.&lt;br /&gt;Privilege Escalation or Elevation (general term): A classic attack against a system, whereby&lt;br /&gt;a user has an account on a system and uses it to gain additional privileges on the system that he&lt;br /&gt;or she was not meant to have.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Attack; Exploit.&lt;br /&gt;Probe (general term):Any online effort, such as a request, program, or transaction, intended to&lt;br /&gt;get data about a computer’s or a network’s state. For example, a person can conduct a probe of&lt;br /&gt;the network by sending an “empty” message to determine whether a destination really exists.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Network.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Symantec Security Response. Glossary. [Online, July 15, 2004.] Symantec&lt;br /&gt;Security Response Website. http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/refa.html.&lt;br /&gt;Privacy 254&lt;br /&gt;Problem of Ascertainment (general term): Difficulties obtaining accurate information.Applies&lt;br /&gt;to surveys distributed to system administrators inquiring about the suspected identity of crack&lt;br /&gt;attackers, the methods they employed, the frequency of system intrusions, the systems affected,&lt;br /&gt;and the dollar amount lost as a result of the intrusions.These vital pieces of information, though&lt;br /&gt;often difficult to get from companies because they fear misuse of such information by competitors,&lt;br /&gt;are used as a basis for determining a given organization’s system risk management strategies.&lt;br /&gt;When system administrators try to project the right level of investment in computer security that&lt;br /&gt;their company should make, they tend to compare their company’s risk level of “crack attack,”&lt;br /&gt;or intrusion, by assessing the reports of organizations having similar computer systems and business&lt;br /&gt;characteristics.&lt;br /&gt;Because of the problem of ascertainment, precautions should be taken in interpreting such&lt;br /&gt;data. First, one needs to accept that it is impossible for survey respondents to give completely&lt;br /&gt;reliable answers to such security breach questions. One reason is that an unknown number of&lt;br /&gt;crimes go undetected and therefore cannot be reported. Another reason is that even when the&lt;br /&gt;crack attacks are detected, few of these incidents are actually reported to authorities. For example,&lt;br /&gt;according to the CSI/FBI 2003 Survey, the number of reported incidents is only about 30%.&lt;br /&gt;In fact, a commonly held view in the information security community is that only about onetenth&lt;br /&gt;of all cyber crimes are detected.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: CSI/FBI Survey; Intrusion Detection System (IDS).&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Schell, B.H. and Martin, C. 2004. Contemporary World Issues Series:&lt;br /&gt;Cybercrime: A Reference Handbook. Santa Barbara, CA:ABC-CLIO, 2004.&lt;br /&gt;Process ID (general term): All software runs within an operating system concept known as&lt;br /&gt;“a process,” and each program running on a system is, therefore, assigned its own process ID,&lt;br /&gt;or PID.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Operating System Software.&lt;br /&gt;Programming Languages C, C++, Perl, and Java (general term): Standardized communication&lt;br /&gt;techniques for expressing computer instructions. Programming languages are sets of syntax&lt;br /&gt;and semantic rules defining computer programs. In this way, programmers can specify exactly&lt;br /&gt;what information a computer will execute, how the information will be transmitted and stored,&lt;br /&gt;and exactly what actions the computer should complete under a variety of circumstances.&lt;br /&gt;The main purpose of programming languages is to allow programmers to state their intentions&lt;br /&gt;for a computation more easily than if they used a lower-level language or code. Thus,&lt;br /&gt;programming languages tend to be designed to use a higher-level syntax that can be readily communicated&lt;br /&gt;to and understood by programmers and computers alike. Common programming&lt;br /&gt;languages include Ada, Basic, C, C++, Pascal, Perl, Python, and Java.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Code or Source Code.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: GNU_FDL. Programming Languages. [Online, August 11, 2004.] GNU&lt;br /&gt;Free Documentation License Website. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programming_language.&lt;br /&gt;Promiscuous Mode Network Interface (general term): In networking terms, a computer&lt;br /&gt;having its network interface card set to “promiscuous mode” receives all packets on the same&lt;br /&gt;network segment. In “normal mode,” a network card accepts only packets addressed to its MAC&lt;br /&gt;Address.&lt;br /&gt;255 Promiscuous Mode Network Interface&lt;br /&gt;When the network card is in “promiscuous mode,” it not only accepts all of the packets on&lt;br /&gt;the same network segment but also passes them to the OS.This process is helpful for capturing&lt;br /&gt;passwords, monitoring networks, and finding malicious packets. Using sniffers, system administrators&lt;br /&gt;routinely check whether any network interfaces are set to “promiscuous mode” to&lt;br /&gt;discover possible intrusions.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Administrator; Ethernet; Message Authentication Code (MAC); Message&lt;br /&gt;Authentication Code (MAC) Address; Network; Password.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Eyeonsecurity. About Sniffers—Their (ab)use in Networks. [Online,&lt;br /&gt;2004.] Eyeonsecurity Website. http://eyeonsecurity.org/articles/sniffers.html.&lt;br /&gt;Property Paradigm in Cybercrime (legal term): Relates to property harm resulting from&lt;br /&gt;cracking exploits.These exploits include such common variations as:&lt;br /&gt;• Flooding: A form of cyberspace vandalism resulting in Denial of Service (DoS) to&lt;br /&gt;authorized users of a Website or a computer system&lt;br /&gt;• Virus and worm production and release: A form of cyberspace vandalism causing corruption&lt;br /&gt;and possibly erasing of data&lt;br /&gt;• Spoofing: The cyberspace appropriation of an authentic user’s identity by non-authentic&lt;br /&gt;users with the intent of causing fraud or attempted fraud, in some cases, and critical infrastructure&lt;br /&gt;breakdown, in other cases;&lt;br /&gt;• Phreaking: A form of cyberspace theft and/or fraud involving the use of technology to&lt;br /&gt;make free telephone calls&lt;br /&gt;• Infringing Intellectual Property (IP) rights and copyright: A form of cyberspace&lt;br /&gt;theft involving the copying of a target’s information or software without appropriate documentation&lt;br /&gt;or consent.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Critical Infrastructures; Cyberspace; Denial of Service (DoS); Infringing&lt;br /&gt;Intellectual Property (IP) Rights and Copyright; Phreaking; Spoofing;Virus;Worm.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Schell, B.H. and Martin, C. 2004. Contemporary World Issues Series:&lt;br /&gt;Cybercrime: A Reference Handbook. Santa Barbara, CA:ABC-CLIO, 2004.&lt;br /&gt;Prosecutorial Remedies and Tools Against the Exploitation of Children Today Act&lt;br /&gt;(PROTECT Act of 2002 and PROTECT Act of 2003) (legal term):The intent of this Act&lt;br /&gt;was to strengthen the U.S. government’s ability to prosecute crimes involving child pornography.&lt;br /&gt;The PROTECT Act of 2002 also attempted to extend prosecutorial power beyond U.S.&lt;br /&gt;jurisdictions.The Act was sent to the Committee on Judiciary on May 15, 2002. It became public&lt;br /&gt;law 108-21 as the Protect Act of 2003 on April 30, 2003.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Child Pornography.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Center for Democracy and Technology. Legislation Affecting the Internet.&lt;br /&gt;[Online, July 28, 2004.] Center for Democracy and Technology Website. http://www.cdt.org/&lt;br /&gt;legislation/107th/wiretaps/.&lt;br /&gt;Promiscuous Mode Network Interface 256&lt;br /&gt;Protected Extensible Authentication Protocol (PEAP) (general term): Pronounced peep.&lt;br /&gt;An authentication type for wireless networks that provides a set of unique features, such as strong&lt;br /&gt;security, extensibility of the user database, and support for one-time password authentication, as&lt;br /&gt;well as the aging of passwords. PEAP is based on an Internet Draft (I-D) to the IETF.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Authentication; Internet Engineering Task Force;Wireless.&lt;br /&gt;Protected Mode and Safe Mode (general term): Protected Mode is a modus of operating an&lt;br /&gt;Intel Microprocessor in which access control to privileged commands is enabled. Safe Mode is a&lt;br /&gt;diagnostic and troubleshooting mode of the Microsoft Windows operating system. Safe Mode&lt;br /&gt;skips over the portion of the registry that loads protected-mode device drivers; it also bypasses&lt;br /&gt;the Autoexec.bat and Config.sys files. Safe Mode prevents all 32-bit (protected-mode) disk drivers&lt;br /&gt;from being loaded except the floppy driver.&lt;br /&gt;Protection Ring (general term): One of a hierarchy of privileged modes of an IT system that&lt;br /&gt;grants a set of access privileges to applications and processes that are authorized to operate in a&lt;br /&gt;given mode.&lt;br /&gt;Protocol (general term): A set of rules governing how communications between two programs&lt;br /&gt;have to take place to be considered valid. It describes various ways of achieving and operating&lt;br /&gt;compatibility.&lt;br /&gt;Protocol Stack (general term): In networking, protocols are layered on top of each other, with&lt;br /&gt;each layer being responsible for a different aspect of communication. A protocol stack is a particular&lt;br /&gt;software implementation of a computer network protocol suite.The suite consists of the&lt;br /&gt;protocol definitions, whereas the stack is the software implementation.&lt;br /&gt;Protocols within a suite are designed with a very specific purpose, and each protocol typically&lt;br /&gt;communicates with two others in the stack.The lowest protocol deals with the low-level physical&lt;br /&gt;interaction of hardware, whereas user applications deal with only the uppermost layers.&lt;br /&gt;Protocol stacks are generally divided into three parts dealing with applications, transport, and&lt;br /&gt;media.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Encapsulation; Network; OSI-Model; Protocol.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Wikipedia. Protocol Stack. [Online, May 5, 2005.] Wikipedia Website.&lt;br /&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protocol_stack.&lt;br /&gt;Provider Protection (general term, legal ramifications): Provider protection for Internet&lt;br /&gt;Service Providers has legal ramifications. For example, to be exempted from copyright infringement&lt;br /&gt;liability under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), “the party” must be&lt;br /&gt;a “service provider” as defined in the Act. However, the protection afforded Internet Service&lt;br /&gt;Providers is limited, and there are a number of rigid legal requirements that must be met. Also,&lt;br /&gt;Internet Service Providers who do not fully comply with the stipulated restrictions can lose their&lt;br /&gt;protections.Thus, Internet Service Providers should review their Websites to make sure that they&lt;br /&gt;are, indeed, compliant with the DMCA rules and regulations.&lt;br /&gt;The DMCA covers four categories of services that qualify as “service providers,” many of&lt;br /&gt;them broad enough to encompass businesses that may not consider themselves to be such.These&lt;br /&gt;categories include:&lt;br /&gt;257 Provider Protection&lt;br /&gt;• Transitory communications, whereby the provider routs, transmits, or provides connections&lt;br /&gt;for data coming through the network&lt;br /&gt;• System caching, whereby the provider temporarily stores data coming through the network&lt;br /&gt;• Data storage at the user’s direction, whereby the provider hosts Websites or runs chat rooms,&lt;br /&gt;mailing lists, or news groups&lt;br /&gt;• Data location tools, whereby the provider is a search engine&lt;br /&gt;The overarching rule seems to be simple for companies:When in doubt, comply.Any parties&lt;br /&gt;even remotely falling within the scope of the DMCA definitions of “provider” should, as a precaution,&lt;br /&gt;register under the DMCA.Without the protection afforded under the DMCA, an&lt;br /&gt;Internet Service Provider would have to attempt other defenses when it came to copyright&lt;br /&gt;infringement claims—such as “the fair use” policy.&lt;br /&gt;One example in which the protection as a Provider did not hold occurred in February 2005,&lt;br /&gt;when the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) settled a lawsuit against&lt;br /&gt;LokiTorrent.com, a Website that the MPAA alleged helps Internet users to find pirated copies of&lt;br /&gt;films for download. Edward Webber, the owner of LokiTorrent, agreed to pay $1 million in damages&lt;br /&gt;to the MPAA in an out-of-court settlement of the case, after having collected $40,000 in&lt;br /&gt;voluntary contributions to his legal defense fund from LokiTorrent’s user base.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA); Internet Service Provider (ISP).&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Hoffman, I. Are You a ‘Service Provider’? [Online, 2001.] Ivan Hoffman&lt;br /&gt;Website. http://www.ivanhoffman.com/provider.html; In Brief. Hollywood Settles Download&lt;br /&gt;Suit. The Globe and Mail, February 17, 2005, p. B10.&lt;br /&gt;Proxy Server (general term):An intermediary system to which a client program (such as a Web&lt;br /&gt;browser) connects.The proxy server connects to the destination on behalf of the client.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Browser; Server.&lt;br /&gt;Pseudo-Random Number Generator (PRNG) (general term): A random number generator&lt;br /&gt;creates a sequence of randomly distributed numbers.A Pseudo-Random Number Generator&lt;br /&gt;creates random numbers as well, but it will create the same sequence of numbers repeatedly.&lt;br /&gt;Many algorithms have been developed in an attempt to produce truly random sequences of&lt;br /&gt;numbers, with the goal of making it theoretically impossible to predict the next number in the&lt;br /&gt;sequence, based on the numbers up to a given point. Unfortunately, the very existence of an&lt;br /&gt;algorithm that calculates this number means that the next digit can be predicted.&lt;br /&gt;For all real applications, PRNGs are considered to be sufficient. PRNGs play a role in encryption&lt;br /&gt;schemes that use random numbers as part of the encryption process. It has been shown that&lt;br /&gt;weak, predictable PRNGs make the encryption less secure and therefore crackable.&lt;br /&gt;Public Data Network (PDN) (general term): A public data network is defined as a network&lt;br /&gt;shared and accessed by users not belonging to a single organization.A public data network is set&lt;br /&gt;up for public use.The Internet is an example of a PDN.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Internet.&lt;br /&gt;Provider Protection 258&lt;br /&gt;Public Key (general term): Public key cryptography uses two mathematical keys that are related.&lt;br /&gt;A message encrypted by one key can only be decrypted by the other related key. This notion&lt;br /&gt;contrasts with traditional cryptography, now called symmetric cryptography, which uses the&lt;br /&gt;same key for encryption as for decryption.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Cryptography or “Crypto”; Decryption or Decipher; Encryption or Encipher;Key.&lt;br /&gt;Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) (general term):A system of certificate authorities, digital certificates,&lt;br /&gt;and registration authorities that verify and authenticate parties involved in Internet&lt;br /&gt;transactions. Because PKIs are evolving, no single PKI or one agreed-upon standard for setting&lt;br /&gt;up a PKI exists. However, no one in the security field disagrees that reliable PKIs are critical for&lt;br /&gt;ensuring trust in online transactions if electronic commerce (known as e-commerce) is to reach&lt;br /&gt;its fullest potential. PKI is also known as “a trust hierarchy.”&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Internet;Trust.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Jupitermedia Corporation. What is PKI? [Online, October 31, 2001.]&lt;br /&gt;Jupitermedia Corporation Website. http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/P/PKI.html.&lt;br /&gt;Puffer, Stefan Case (legal case): In February 2003, a Texas jury acquitted a computer security&lt;br /&gt;analyst by the name of Stefan Puffer, who in March 2002 was accused of wrongfully accessing&lt;br /&gt;the Harris County wireless computer network. Stefan Puffer not only discovered the vulnerability&lt;br /&gt;in the network but also reported it to the Harris County district clerk’s office, telling those&lt;br /&gt;in the office that anyone with a wireless network card could gain access to their sensitive&lt;br /&gt;computer information. In fact, Puffer gave authorities a face-to-face demonstration of the vulnerability.&lt;br /&gt;Instead of receiving thanks from the Harris County officials for his warning, Puffer was&lt;br /&gt;indicted on fraud charges. Though he could have received five years of imprisonment and a&lt;br /&gt;$250,000 fine for each offense, the jurors hearing the case found after just 15 minutes of deliberation&lt;br /&gt;that Mr. Puffer did not intend to cause any damage to the county’s systems. He was&lt;br /&gt;therefore found not guilty of the charges.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Network;Wireless.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: 2600: The Hacker Quarterly. Man Who Exposed County’s Wireless&lt;br /&gt;Insecurity Found Innocent. [Online, February 21, 2003.] 2600:The Hacker Quarterly Website.&lt;br /&gt;http://www.2600.com/news/view/article/1546.&lt;br /&gt;259 Puffer, Stefan Case&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;QAZ Virus of 2000 (general term):Though in 2004, the QAZ virus was assessed as being at a&lt;br /&gt;low Level 2 threat by Symantec Security Response, the virus (known as W32.HLLW.Qaz.A) was&lt;br /&gt;discovered in China in July 2000.The QAZ virus spread over a network through a back door,&lt;br /&gt;enabling a remote user to set up a connection to take control over someone’s computer&lt;br /&gt;using port 7597. Because this virus could not be spread to machines outside the network, it may&lt;br /&gt;have been initially sent by email. The virus, originally called Qaz.Trojan, was renamed&lt;br /&gt;W32.HLLW.Qaz.A on August 10, 2000.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Back or Trap Door; Electronic Mail or Email; Network; Port and Port Numbers.&lt;br /&gt;Quality of Service (QOS) (general term): As demand for bandwidth in networks continues to&lt;br /&gt;grow, the competition between different applications and protocols for these resources will continue&lt;br /&gt;to grow as well. Certain applications, such as Voice over IP (VoIP) and Video&lt;br /&gt;Conferencing, require guaranteed minima of resources so that users will not experience unacceptable&lt;br /&gt;delays or dropouts during their communications.The Internet Protocol in its currently&lt;br /&gt;used version 4 does not provide a formal mechanism for applications to reserve these resources on&lt;br /&gt;the network.With version 6 of IP—as well as in a number of other network protocols—the&lt;br /&gt;notion of Quality of Service has been formally introduced, meaning that a mechanism to solve&lt;br /&gt;this problem has been provided.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Internet Protocol;TCP/IP.&lt;br /&gt;Quarantine (general term):To isolate files, just as to quarantine sick persons means to isolate them&lt;br /&gt;from others in order to stop the spread of disease.Typically, files suspected of containing a virus are&lt;br /&gt;put into quarantine so that they cannot be opened or executed.&lt;br /&gt;Symantec’s AntiVirus Corporate Edition of software detects suspected files as well as virusinfected&lt;br /&gt;files that cannot be patched with current sets of virus-definition remedies. From the&lt;br /&gt;“Quarantine” area on a local computer, the quarantined files can be forwarded to Symantec&lt;br /&gt;Security Response’s central network quarantine for analysis. If the file is found to be infected by&lt;br /&gt;a new virus, updated virus definitions and remedies are returned.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Anti-Virus Software; Malware;Virus.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Symantec Security Response. Glossary. [Online, July 15, 2004]. Symantec&lt;br /&gt;Security Response Website. http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/refa.html.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;r Services (general term): Refer to a class of remote tools in UNIX systems.The most popular&lt;br /&gt;are “rsh” for a remote shell,“rlogin” for a remote login, and “rexec” for remote execution.These&lt;br /&gt;tools were very popular in the pre-Internet era because they were easy to use and could be set&lt;br /&gt;up to automate a wide range of system administration tasks.However, security for these tools was&lt;br /&gt;weak and data was sent across the network in an unencrypted form. For these reasons, these tools&lt;br /&gt;have been widely replaced by their cryptographic counterpart, ssh.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Internet; Shell; UNIX.&lt;br /&gt;Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) (general term): Also known as electromagnetic interference.&lt;br /&gt;Electric circuits that carry rapidly changing signals, such as data lines, emit an&lt;br /&gt;electromagnetic signal. This signal can interfere with—or disturb—signals on other lines. This&lt;br /&gt;physical property can be abused by crackers (more properly called phreakers) to block or slow&lt;br /&gt;down the communication infrastructure of a target.&lt;br /&gt;Rainbow Series Books (general term): Includes technical manuals distinguished by cover color&lt;br /&gt;and related to computer security. The first Rainbow series was derived by the National&lt;br /&gt;Computer Security Center.These security manuals dealt with evaluating trusted computer systems&lt;br /&gt;and appeared between 1988 and 1995. The most prominent one was the Orange Book,&lt;br /&gt;upon which most of the other titles in the series expanded. Portions of the series were superseded&lt;br /&gt;by the Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme published by the National&lt;br /&gt;Institute of Standards and Technology.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Orange Book;Trust.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Gallagher, P. The Rainbow Books. [Online, 1990.] National Computer&lt;br /&gt;Security Center Website. http://www.fas.org/irp/nsa/rainbow/tg011.htm.&lt;br /&gt;Raymond, Eric (person; 1957– ): In 1996, he wrote The New Hacker’s Dictionary (MIT Press),&lt;br /&gt;a book that defined the jargon used by computer hackers and programmers and detailed the&lt;br /&gt;writing and speaking styles of hackers. Besides presenting the portrait of J. Random Hacker, the&lt;br /&gt;book also provided interesting computer folklore.&lt;br /&gt;Raymond’s 2001 book The Cathedral and Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an&lt;br /&gt;Accidental Revolutionary is required reading for those caring about the computer industry’s future,&lt;br /&gt;the dynamics of the information economy, and the particulars of open source. His Website can&lt;br /&gt;be found at http://www.catb.org/~esr/.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: J. Random Hacker; Linux; Open Source.&lt;br /&gt;Record Industry Association of America (RIAA) Legal Cases (general term): Beginning&lt;br /&gt;in 2003 and continuing into the present, the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA)&lt;br /&gt;has commenced lawsuits against individuals thought to have violated provisions in the Digital&lt;br /&gt;Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). Sometimes the RIAA has won the legal battles, sometimes&lt;br /&gt;not.&lt;br /&gt;In September 2003, in a case of mistaken identity, the RIAA withdrew its lawsuit against a&lt;br /&gt;sculptor, aged 66, who claimed she and her husband never downloaded song-sharing software or&lt;br /&gt;used it numerous times—in alleged violation of the DMCA. Sarah Seabury Ward of&lt;br /&gt;Massachusetts said that she and her husband used their computer only to email their children&lt;br /&gt;and grandchildren.They did not at any time download songs illegally.&lt;br /&gt;The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) assisted the woman in fighting her case. The&lt;br /&gt;attorney handling the case argued that the elderly couple used a Macintosh computer—on which&lt;br /&gt;the KaZaA file-sharing software they were allegedly using cannot be run.Ward was one of 261&lt;br /&gt;individuals sued by the RIAA for illegal Internet file sharing.The accused illegally shared more than&lt;br /&gt;2,000 music titles, argued the RIAA.The RIAA eventually withdrew their case against Ward, labeling&lt;br /&gt;the withdrawal a good-faith gesture. An RIAA spokesperson said that they still believed the&lt;br /&gt;computer address provided by Comcast Corporation,Ward’s Internet Service Provider,was correct.&lt;br /&gt;An attorney with the EFF said that more cases like Ward’s will probably surface, given the difficulties&lt;br /&gt;of identifying IP addresses for particular subscribers. Internet Service Providers such as&lt;br /&gt;Comcast do not have enough IP addresses for each subscriber, so they do not assign addresses&lt;br /&gt;to users permanently. Instead, providers assign IP addresses dynamically when a user connects to&lt;br /&gt;the service. It is not easy to ascertain which addresses are used by which specific account.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA); Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF);&lt;br /&gt;Electronic Mail or Email; Internet Service Provider (ISP); IP Address; Online File Sharing; Peerto-&lt;br /&gt;Peer (P2P).&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Mercury News. Music industry drops suit against sculptor accused&lt;br /&gt;of downloading rap. [Online, September 24, 2003.] http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/&lt;br /&gt;mercurynews/business/6850484.htm?1c.&lt;br /&gt;Recovery or Disaster Recovery (general term): The act of restoring regular business operations&lt;br /&gt;as quickly as possible after a natural or man-made disaster. Typically, a set of preventive&lt;br /&gt;measures is put in place to ensure that the restoration can be performed in a timely fashion.&lt;br /&gt;Redundant (duplicate) hardware, software, data centers, and other facilities are used as standby&lt;br /&gt;and backup facilities to which operations can be switched over when the primary ones are wiped&lt;br /&gt;out. A number of organizations that were hit by Hurricane Katrina in 2005 found that their&lt;br /&gt;backups and backup systems were not far enough removed from their normal sites of operation;&lt;br /&gt;they, therefore, suffered destruction of these backups as well.&lt;br /&gt;Red Box (general term):When a coin is put into a payphone, the payphone emits tones to the&lt;br /&gt;ACTS (Automated Coin Toll System).A red box can fool the ACTS into believing that an individual&lt;br /&gt;actually put money into the phone simply by playing the ACTS tones into the telephone&lt;br /&gt;microphone. After ACTS hears the simulated tones, an individual can place a telephone call for&lt;br /&gt;free.This sort of action mimics what phreakers did to fool the phone system into letting them&lt;br /&gt;make calls for free.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Phreaking.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: The Tech FAQ.What is Red Box? [Online, 2004.] The Tech FAQ Website.&lt;br /&gt;http://www.linuxsecurity.com/docs/Hack-FAQ/telephony/red-box.shtml.&lt;br /&gt;Record Industry Association of America (RIAA) Legal Cases 264&lt;br /&gt;Red Route (general term): Is one registered with the Internet Routing Registry (IRR) and is&lt;br /&gt;configured to be proxied by the route servers but is not announced in a view. It is one of three&lt;br /&gt;categories of Internet route states defined by the Policy Analysis of Internet Routing (PAIR)&lt;br /&gt;project, an initiative dedicated to the development of tools that ISPs (Internet Service Providers),&lt;br /&gt;network operators, and end-users can use to troubleshoot Internet routing and policy problems.&lt;br /&gt;The other two categories are green and grey routes. A green route is one that is registered&lt;br /&gt;with the IRR, complies with policy, and is proxied by the route servers.A grey route is one that&lt;br /&gt;has been received by a route server but is not configured to be proxied in any view.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Internet; Network.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: TechTarget. Red Route. [Online, July 3, 2002.] TechTarget Website.&lt;br /&gt;http://searchnetworking.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid7_gci837125,00.html.&lt;br /&gt;Red Team (general term): A military term that refers to a team of experts who focus on penetration&lt;br /&gt;testing, assessment, and the design of secure systems.The name actually comes from the&lt;br /&gt;game “Capture the Flag,” in which a Blue Team tries to guard the flag—but in this case, the “flag”&lt;br /&gt;is sensitive data or a sensitive computer system.The referees are known as the White Team.&lt;br /&gt;The annual Cyber Defense Exercise competition was held on May 12, 2005, and the winning&lt;br /&gt;team was the U.S. Naval Academy. The competition is meant to assist the participants to better&lt;br /&gt;protect the U.S. critical information systems and is sponsored by the National Security Agency&lt;br /&gt;(NSA). Each team designs, builds and configures a computer network simulating a deployed jointservice&lt;br /&gt;command. The network operations “Red Team” (consisting of NSA and Defense&lt;br /&gt;employees) takes four days to identify the vulnerabilities and then crack into each network.The&lt;br /&gt;winning team is found to be superior in its ability to detect, respond to, and recover from the network&lt;br /&gt;exploits.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Exploit;Vulnerabilities of Computers.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Graham, R. Hacking Lexicon. [Online, 2001.] Robert Graham Website.&lt;br /&gt;http://www.linuxsecurity.com/resource_files/documentation/hacking-dict.html; Onley, D.S.&lt;br /&gt;Naval Academy Knows Its Cybersecurity. [Online, May 12, 2005.] Post-NewsWeek Media&lt;br /&gt;Website. http://www.gcn.com/vol1_no1/daily-updates/35786-1.html.&lt;br /&gt;Registrar, Domain Name (general term): A company licensed to sell Internet names by the&lt;br /&gt;Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), a nonprofit corporation&lt;br /&gt;created in 1998 to take over a number of Internet-related tasks previously performed by&lt;br /&gt;other organizations.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN).&lt;br /&gt;Registry (general term): An important hierarchical database used in the Windows 9x, ME, NT,&lt;br /&gt;2000, and XP operating system software to store configuration information for applications,&lt;br /&gt;hardware, and users on the system.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Operating System Software.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Kephyr. The Windows Registry—A definition. [Online, 2004.] Kephyr&lt;br /&gt;Website. http://www.kephyr.com/spywarescanner/library/glossary/registry.phtml.&lt;br /&gt;265 Registry&lt;br /&gt;Regression Test (general term): Performed on a program after a change was performed to&lt;br /&gt;ensure that the modifications are correct and that the changes did not negatively affect the&lt;br /&gt;unchanged portions of the program.&lt;br /&gt;Regular Expression (REGEX) (general term):A programmer’s “Swiss Army knife” for everything&lt;br /&gt;related to pattern matching. With a regular expression, a programmer can search for&lt;br /&gt;basically any type of pattern in textual data.&lt;br /&gt;Relational Database Management System (RDBMS) (general term): Today’s prevalent&lt;br /&gt;type of database management systems. Data are stored in tables that relate to one another in some&lt;br /&gt;way. Successful commercial RDMBSs are IBM’s DB2, Microsofts’s SQL Server, and Oracle’s&lt;br /&gt;Oracle RDMBS. Many Web services are built around MySQL, an RDBMS available without a&lt;br /&gt;license fee.&lt;br /&gt;Remanence or Magnetic Remanence (general term):The information that stays behind after&lt;br /&gt;storage media are erased.The information remains in the form of traces of the original magnetization&lt;br /&gt;of a storage device. Remanence is a treasure trove for forensic investigators who need to&lt;br /&gt;determine what was stored on a disk erased by an alleged perpetrator before it could be secured&lt;br /&gt;for investigation.&lt;br /&gt;Remote Access (general term): A service allowing users to connect to their local network by&lt;br /&gt;telephone.When users try to connect remotely, they dial a remote-access server on the network&lt;br /&gt;and are thereby given access.To gain access, the request needs to be consistent with the server’s&lt;br /&gt;remote access policies, the account needs to be approved for remote access, and the user-server&lt;br /&gt;authentication needs to be successful.&lt;br /&gt;After users are authorized, their access to the network might be limited to specific servers, subnets,&lt;br /&gt;or protocol types, depending on the users’ profiles. Services typically available to users&lt;br /&gt;connected to a local area network—file and print sharing,Web access, and messaging—are similarly&lt;br /&gt;available to users through remote access connection.&lt;br /&gt;Crackers are drawn to poorly configured remote access points, for often they provide an open&lt;br /&gt;door into the network—and crackers do not have to worry about security devices at the Internet&lt;br /&gt;border.The reality is that although most networks have remote access points, the majority of these&lt;br /&gt;do not have enough security.&lt;br /&gt;Firms such as Sun Microsystems, Inc., which acquired remote-access software maker&lt;br /&gt;Tarantella, Inc. for about $25 million in May 2005, build software programs allowing organizations&lt;br /&gt;to access and manage their information and applications across all platforms, networks, and&lt;br /&gt;devices.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Authentication; File and Print Sharing; Local Area Network (LAN);Network; Outof-&lt;br /&gt;Band Management; Protocol.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Habersetzer,V.Thwarting Hacker Techniques: Securing Remote Access&lt;br /&gt;Points. [Online, February 25, 2005.] TechTarget Website. http://www.searchSecurity.com/tip/&lt;br /&gt;1,289483,sid14_gci1062436,00.html?track+NL-358&amp;amp;ad=506214; In Brief. Sun Acquiring&lt;br /&gt;Maker of Remote Access Software. The Globe and Mail, May 12, 2005, p. B8; Microsoft&lt;br /&gt;Corporation. Planning Distributed Security. [Online, 2001.] Microsoft Corporation Website.&lt;br /&gt;Regression Test 266&lt;br /&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/techinfo/reskit/en-us/default.asp?url=/windows2000/&lt;br /&gt;techinfo/reskit/en-us/deploy/dgbe_sec_xqlf.asp.&lt;br /&gt;Remote Administration Trojans (RATs) (general term):Typically malicious code appearing&lt;br /&gt;to be harmless or to be doing proper applications.Trojans tend to be created to cause losses&lt;br /&gt;or theft of computer information and are even capable of destroying information systems.&lt;br /&gt;RATs let a cracker get unrestricted access to another person’s computer whenever that user&lt;br /&gt;is online.The cracker can then do such things as transfer files, add or delete files, and even control&lt;br /&gt;the mouse and keyboard.Trojans are usually distributed as email attachments or bundled&lt;br /&gt;with another software program.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Code or Source Code; Electronic Mail or Email; Malicious Code;Trojan.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Webroot Software, Inc. Spyware Defined. [Online, 2004.] Webroot&lt;br /&gt;Software, Inc.Website. http://www.webroot.com/wb/products/spysweeper/spywaredefined.php.&lt;br /&gt;Remote Attacks or Exploits or Intrusions (general term):A common way to classify attacks,&lt;br /&gt;exploits, or intrusions is to indicate whether they are done remotely by a cracker across the&lt;br /&gt;Internet or by a user’s having privileges on the system. It is important to note that remote attacks&lt;br /&gt;can be launched by any of the hundreds of millions of people on the Internet—at any time and&lt;br /&gt;without first logging on.&lt;br /&gt;In a case of remote cracking that occurred in March 2005, Limp Bizkit singer Fred Durst’s home&lt;br /&gt;computer was the subject of a remote attack. The cybercriminals made a copy of a 2003 threeminute&lt;br /&gt;private video in Durst’s possession. Saying that the video was not meant for public viewing,&lt;br /&gt;Durst became visibly upset when the video appeared on at least ten Websites. Durst filed a lawsuit&lt;br /&gt;in U.S. federal court, seeking more than $70 million in damages and any profit that the Website&lt;br /&gt;operators gained as a result of the video’s appearance on the Web.Though the singer secured copyrights&lt;br /&gt;to the video before commencing the lawsuit, he maintains that the Website operators invaded&lt;br /&gt;his privacy and misappropriated his name and appearance.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Crackers; Internet.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Associated Press.This Just In: Limp Bizkit’s Durst Sues Websites Over Sex&lt;br /&gt;Tape. The Globe and Mail, March 10, 2005, p. R2; Graham, R. Hacking Lexicon. [Online, 2001.]&lt;br /&gt;Robert Graham Website. http://www.linuxsecurity.com/resource_files/documentation/&lt;br /&gt;hacking-dict.html.&lt;br /&gt;Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service (RADIUS) (general term): A network protocol&lt;br /&gt;enabling remote access servers to talk with a central server to authenticate dial-in users and&lt;br /&gt;grant access to the computer system or service. RADIUS allows an organization to store user&lt;br /&gt;profiles in a central location that can be shared by all remote servers.This centralization provides&lt;br /&gt;better security by enabling a company to define a policy at a single administered point in the&lt;br /&gt;network.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Authentication; Authorization.&lt;br /&gt;Remote Data Objects (RDO) (general term): An application program interface (API) from&lt;br /&gt;Microsoft Corporation permitting individuals writing Windows applications to get access to the&lt;br /&gt;267 Remote Data Objects (RDO)&lt;br /&gt;database. RDO statements embedded in the code use the lower-layer Data Access Objects&lt;br /&gt;(DAO) for allowing database access. Databases reply to these requests by writing to the DAO&lt;br /&gt;interface.&lt;br /&gt;RDO has developed into ActiveX Data Objects (ADO), the program interface that the&lt;br /&gt;Microsoft Corporation currently suggests for new programs. ADO not only gives individuals&lt;br /&gt;access to nonrelational databases but also is considerably easier to use than RDO.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: ActiveX Data Objects (ADO); Code or Source Code.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: TechTarget. Remote Data Objects. [Online, July 27, 2001.] TechTarget&lt;br /&gt;Website. http://searchdatabase.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid13_gci214261,00.html.&lt;br /&gt;Remote Procedure Call (RPC): A sender makes a request via a function, method, or procedure&lt;br /&gt;call. RPC then translates these into requests transmitted over the network to the intended destination.&lt;br /&gt;A relatively common programming technique available in UNIX since the 1990s and&lt;br /&gt;introduced into the Windows family with Windows NT more recently, the RPC receiver processes&lt;br /&gt;the request on the basis of a procedure’s name and list of arguments and then sends a response to&lt;br /&gt;the sender when this step is completed. RPC applications implement software modules called&lt;br /&gt;“proxies” and “stubs” to broker the remote calls and cause them to appear to the programmer to&lt;br /&gt;be identical to local procedure calls. Applications making use of RPC programming operate synchronously,&lt;br /&gt;meaning that they wait until the remote procedure returns a result. RPC incorporates&lt;br /&gt;a “time-out” logic to deal with network failures or scenarios in which RPCs do not return.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Network; UNIX.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: About, Inc. RPC. [Online, 2004.] About, Inc. Website. http://&lt;br /&gt;compnetworking.about.com/cs/programming/g/bldef_rpc.htm.&lt;br /&gt;Remote Service Crash (general term):Typically caused by a fault in the particular service or&lt;br /&gt;daemon software that causes the service to terminate.A remote service crash is initiated or caused&lt;br /&gt;over the network.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Daemon.&lt;br /&gt;Remote System Crash (general term):Typically caused by a fault in the operating system&lt;br /&gt;software that makes it stop working properly, if at all.A remote system crash is caused by a fault&lt;br /&gt;or exploited vulnerability in the networking components of the operating system.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Operating System Software.&lt;br /&gt;Replay Attack (general term): Using a previously recorded or captured message to attack a&lt;br /&gt;computer system or network or to gain access to somewhere one is not authorized to be (a form&lt;br /&gt;of identity theft). Many people consider biometrics to be a very secure means of authentication&lt;br /&gt;and a rather effective means of fighting off a replay attack.However, the 1983 movie War Games&lt;br /&gt;showed how someone can fool cryptographic systems if the systems are created in a naïve and&lt;br /&gt;vulnerable manner. For example, a cracker can record an authorized person’s voice and replay&lt;br /&gt;it in order to access a system. This replay attack can be enhanced if the cracker uses digitalized&lt;br /&gt;information.The 1997 movie Gattaca showed how even more sophisticated DNA-based computer&lt;br /&gt;security systems could be fooled. The movie tells a futuristic story about a genetically&lt;br /&gt;imperfect man who has an unrequitable need to travel in space, so he takes on the identity of an&lt;br /&gt;athlete who is genetically able to pursue the dream.&lt;br /&gt;Remote Data Objects (RDO) 268&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Cracker;War Games of 1983.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Barmala,C.Attack. [Online, 2004.] Christian Barmala’s Free CA Website.&lt;br /&gt;http://ca.barmala.com/attack.en.php#replay; Rees, C. Plot Summary for Gattaca (1997).&lt;br /&gt;[Online, May 19, 2005.] Internet Movie Database, Inc.Website. http://www.imdb.com/title/&lt;br /&gt;tt0119177/plotsummary.&lt;br /&gt;Request for Comments (RFC) (general term): University and corporate researchers publish&lt;br /&gt;RFC documents to get feedback from others regarding new Internet technologies, and many of&lt;br /&gt;the most widely implemented networking standards such as IP and Ethernet have been documented&lt;br /&gt;in RFCs.&lt;br /&gt;The first RFC is thought to have been published in April 1969. Though today the RFC’s&lt;br /&gt;plaintext format has remained the same as it was in the early days, as the Internet technologies&lt;br /&gt;have evolved, the need for RFCs has markedly decreased. Some RFCs are still being developed&lt;br /&gt;for cutting-edge research regarding Internet-based networking, however.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Ethernet; Internet; Internet Protocol (IP).&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: About, Inc. RFC. [Online, 2004.] About, Inc. Website. http://&lt;br /&gt;compnetworking.about.com/library/glossary/bldef-rfc.htm.&lt;br /&gt;Resident (general term): A piece of code, whether a regular program or a virus, that is not&lt;br /&gt;cleared from memory after its execution.A resident virus loads its replication module into memory&lt;br /&gt;and makes sure that the operating system always calls this module when it wants to execute&lt;br /&gt;another program, thus allowing the virus to spread.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Means of Infection;Virus.&lt;br /&gt;Residue or Residual Data (general term): Also sometimes referred to as “ambient data,” this&lt;br /&gt;is data or information that is not actively used on a computer system. Residual data includes data&lt;br /&gt;found in unallocated blocks on storage media; data found in the slack space of files and file systems;&lt;br /&gt;and data within files that has technically been deleted so that it is not accessible by the&lt;br /&gt;application used to create the file.To access any of these three types, one must undelete or use&lt;br /&gt;special data-recovery tools. Forensic investigators sift through the residual data to find traces of&lt;br /&gt;wrongdoing on computer systems under investigation.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Remanence.&lt;br /&gt;Reverse-engineering (general term): Involves analyzing a computer system to identify its components&lt;br /&gt;and their relationships.Then, the parts of the system are put together in a different form&lt;br /&gt;or at some other abstraction level. Reverse-engineering is often done to redesign a system for&lt;br /&gt;increased maintainability or to produce system replicas without having access to the original&lt;br /&gt;design.&lt;br /&gt;For example, an individual might take the code of a computer program, execute it to review&lt;br /&gt;how it behaves with different inputs, and then write a program that performs the same as before,&lt;br /&gt;or, preferably, even better. On the Black Hat side of the equation, an integrated circuit might&lt;br /&gt;be reverse-engineered by a firm that wants to make unlicensed (and therefore illegal) copies of&lt;br /&gt;a hot-selling chip.&lt;br /&gt;Researchers who reverse-engineer software to find programming flaws cannot legally publish&lt;br /&gt;their findings online in France. During the first week of March 2005, a French court ruled that&lt;br /&gt;269 Reverse-engineering&lt;br /&gt;when researcher Guillaume Tena discovered a number of vulnerabilities in the Viguard antivirus&lt;br /&gt;software in 2001 and then published his findings online in March 2002, he violated article 335.2&lt;br /&gt;of the Code of Intellectual Property.Though he could have gone to jail for four months, he was&lt;br /&gt;set free but was fined 5,000 Euros.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Black Hats; Code or Source Code.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Farlex, Inc. Reverse-Engineering.[Online, 2004.] Farlex, Inc.Website.&lt;br /&gt;http://computing-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/reverse%20engineering; Kotadia, M. France&lt;br /&gt;Puts a Damper on Flaw Hunting. [Online, March 9, 2005.] CNET Networks, Inc.Website.&lt;br /&gt;http://news.com.com/France+puts+a+damper+on+faw+hunting/2100-7350_3-5606306.html.&lt;br /&gt;REXEC Protocol (general term): See r Services.&lt;br /&gt;RFID or Radio Frequency Identification (general term):A tiny communication chip placeable&lt;br /&gt;on just about anything. Some high-tech experts tout it as being the next biggest&lt;br /&gt;technological development since the Internet.&lt;br /&gt;RFID is particularly exciting to the business community. For example,Wal-Mart and other&lt;br /&gt;major retailers in the United States and elsewhere plan to use it to replace the soon-to-be oldfashioned&lt;br /&gt;bar code.The reason for RFID use is to reduce inventory losses through theft as well&lt;br /&gt;as personnel costs by hundreds of millions of dollars. Moreover, RFID usage is expected to&lt;br /&gt;improve just-in-time stocking issues.&lt;br /&gt;RFID appears to be consumer friendly. For example, at the Barcelona Baja Beach Club,VIP&lt;br /&gt;(Very Important People) customers have embedded chips under their skin so that staff members&lt;br /&gt;at the club can treat them with special respect.&lt;br /&gt;A volunteer watchdog group in Canada, Britain, the United States, and Australia monitors the&lt;br /&gt;accuracy of the old-fashioned bar code scanners in stores.The group began its activities in 2002&lt;br /&gt;to discipline businesses that refused to reimburse consumers when the store bar scanners overcharged&lt;br /&gt;them.With RFID, the group may choose to close down their shop.&lt;br /&gt;Speaking at the March 1, 2005,Wireless/RFID Conference and Exhibition in Washington,&lt;br /&gt;D.C., wireless experts said that the growth of wireless technologies such as RFID chips and&lt;br /&gt;nano-scale “smart dust” is not all positive; it has privacy losses as well as consumer-friendly gains.&lt;br /&gt;Generally, wireless networks become vulnerable to attack because system administrators fail to&lt;br /&gt;properly configure wireless access points with password protection. Also, they tend to use little&lt;br /&gt;or no encryption, fail to disable infrared ports and P2P aspects of the wireless networks, and&lt;br /&gt;tend to provide little to no private network protection.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Encryption or Encipher; Infrared or IrDA Ports; Internet; Peer-to-Peer (P2P);&lt;br /&gt;Wireless.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: In Brief. Bar-Code Scanner Practices Scrutinized. The Globe and Mail,&lt;br /&gt;January 20, 2005, p. B9; Grami, A. and Schell, B. Future Trends in Mobile Commerce: Service&lt;br /&gt;Offerings,Technological Advances and Security Challenges. Proceedings of Second Annual Conference&lt;br /&gt;on Privacy, Security and Trust. University of New Brunswick, New Brunswick, Canada, October&lt;br /&gt;13–15, 2004. [Online, October, 2004.] Privacy, Security, Trust 2004 Website. http://www&lt;br /&gt;.unb.ca/pstnet/pst2004/; Olsen, F. Security Through Layers. [Online, March 1, 2005.] FCW Media&lt;br /&gt;Group Website. http://www.fcw.com/fcw/articles/2005/0228/web-wiresec-03-01-05.asp; Ticoll,&lt;br /&gt;Reverse-engineering 270&lt;br /&gt;D. RFID:The Tiny Chip That Can Do Just About Everything. The Globe and Mail, July 22, 2004,&lt;br /&gt;p. B8.&lt;br /&gt;Rhosts Mechanism (general term): The Berkeley rlogin utility allows remote users to obtain&lt;br /&gt;access to a system without supplying a password through the .rhosts mechanism, a list of host&lt;br /&gt;names and/or IP addresses considered to be trusted. Because it is considered to be highly insecure,&lt;br /&gt;experts recommend replacing this service with the more secure and encrypted SSH. If&lt;br /&gt;rlogin access is required, the service should be protected by the use of TCP Wrappers.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: IP Address; Password; r Services; SSH;TCP Wrappers;Trust.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: UNIX Systems Support Group. Common Services. [Online, August&lt;br /&gt;16, 2004.] Indiana University Website. http://uwsg.iu.edu/index.php?option=articles&amp;amp;task=&lt;br /&gt;viewarticle&amp;amp;artid=15&amp;amp;Itemid=3.&lt;br /&gt;Ridge,Tom (person; 1946– ):The first U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security, a position created&lt;br /&gt;in October 2001 after the September 11, 2001, terrorist events. Prior to this appointment,&lt;br /&gt;Ridge was Governor of Pennsylvania from 1995–2001, was a member of the House of&lt;br /&gt;Representatives from 1983–1995, and is a Vietnam combat veteran.Tom Ridge resigned from his&lt;br /&gt;post as Secretary of Homeland Security on November 30, 2004 and stayed on the job until&lt;br /&gt;February 2005.&lt;br /&gt;Ridge, the seventh cabinet member to announce his departure since George W. Bush was&lt;br /&gt;reelected U.S. President in October 2004,may be remembered for the heavily ridiculed color-coded&lt;br /&gt;terrorist warning system that he introduced, as well as for his comment that duct tape might be helpful&lt;br /&gt;in the event of a poison-gas attack.After he left his post, Ridge became a speaker worldwide on&lt;br /&gt;the importance of Homeland Security for all nations. For example, in a speech to a Toronto Bay&lt;br /&gt;Street audience on May 11, 2005, Ridge rejected recent U.S. complaints that Canada’s security and&lt;br /&gt;immigration systems are lax and therefore responsible for helping terrorists invade U.S. borders. He&lt;br /&gt;added, however, that Canada and the European Union should develop a unified approach to identifying&lt;br /&gt;suspected terrorists, suggesting that biometric scanning is a likely solution.&lt;br /&gt;On December 2, 2004, President Bush announced that Bernard Kerik, who directed New&lt;br /&gt;York City’s emergency response to the September 11 attacks in his capacity as New York City’s&lt;br /&gt;police commissioner, was chosen to assume the leadership role of the Department of Homeland&lt;br /&gt;Security. Kerik soon withdrew his nomination, however, and was replaced by federal Judge&lt;br /&gt;Michael Chertoff.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Department of Homeland Security (DHS); September 11, 2001,Terrorist Events.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: CP. Canada’s Doing Its Part on Security, Ridge Says. The Globe and Mail,&lt;br /&gt;May 12, 2005, p.A14; GNU_FDL.Tom Ridge. [Online, 2004.] GNU Free Distribution License&lt;br /&gt;Website. http://www.wordiq.com/definition/Tom_Ridge;Koring, P. Ridge Quits U.S. Post. The&lt;br /&gt;Globe and Mail, December 1, 2005, p. A17; Riechmann, D. Bush Picks Ex-Police Officer as&lt;br /&gt;Homeland Security Chief. The Globe and Mail, December 3, 2004, p. A20.&lt;br /&gt;Rip (general term): It means to make an illegal copy of a copyrighted work.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Computer Underground (CU); Copyright Laws.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Graham, R. Hacking Lexicon. [Online, 2001.] Robert Graham Website.&lt;br /&gt;http://www.linuxsecurity.com/resource_files/documentation/hacking-dict.html.&lt;br /&gt;271 Rip&lt;br /&gt;RIPE (general term): Stands for Réseaux IP Européens and is one of the five regional bodies that&lt;br /&gt;administer the IP Address space. RIPE is set up as a collaboration between the European operators&lt;br /&gt;of IP networks.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: AfriNIC;APNIC;Arin; LatNIC.&lt;br /&gt;RIPE MessageDigest (general term): The base class for hashing algorithms in the Java programming&lt;br /&gt;language. Implementations of MessageDigest algorithms must extend this class and&lt;br /&gt;implement all the abstract methods.The integration of this algorithm into the programming language&lt;br /&gt;standard libraries is an example of how higher-level programming languages include&lt;br /&gt;security-aware programming features enabling programmers to write better, more secure&lt;br /&gt;software.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Algorithm; Hash, One-Way; Java.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Sun Microsystems, Inc. Overview Package. [Online, 1999.] Sun&lt;br /&gt;Microsystems, Inc.Website. http://java.sun.com/products/javacard/htmldoc/javacard/security/&lt;br /&gt;MessageDigest.html.&lt;br /&gt;Risk (general term): In security, its assessment is an attempt to assess or measure the likelihood&lt;br /&gt;that a cracker will successfully exploit system or network vulnerabilities. In its 2004 Global&lt;br /&gt;Security Survey, Deloitte reported that 83% of respondents confirmed that their companies’ systems&lt;br /&gt;had been exploited in some way in 2003—and the percentage is likely higher because of&lt;br /&gt;respondent underreporting.These compromised systems cost companies money. For example, in&lt;br /&gt;2002, NetworkITWeek in the United Kingdom noted that KMPG consultants estimated that&lt;br /&gt;security breaches cost businesses an average of $108,000.&lt;br /&gt;The underlying principle behind risk assessment considers three critical elements: assets,&lt;br /&gt;threats, and vulnerabilities. Assets include tangible items having value, such as computer systems,&lt;br /&gt;as well as intangible items having value, such as the company’s reputation.Thus, a primary step&lt;br /&gt;in risk assessment is to determine the items of value and their approximate value amounts—just&lt;br /&gt;as homeowners would determine their items of value and their approximate value amounts in&lt;br /&gt;order to buy the appropriate amount of insurance.&lt;br /&gt;Threats are defined as the means that could be used by crackers or company insiders to compromise&lt;br /&gt;the company’s computer systems.An action plan and appropriate security devices should&lt;br /&gt;be employed to counter these threats.&lt;br /&gt;Vulnerability assessment indicates the likelihood that an exploit could occur, including where&lt;br /&gt;in the system and how. Questions that typically need answering include, for example, the following:&lt;br /&gt;Are passwords produced properly and amended regularly? Are systems locked-down and&lt;br /&gt;are networks adequately secured?&lt;br /&gt;A major challenge facing system administrators is to consider the threats to which valued&lt;br /&gt;company assets are vulnerable and determine what security efforts are required—and in what&lt;br /&gt;priority—to not only stop possible exploits from occurring but also to be able to quickly and&lt;br /&gt;effectively recover from these exploits should they occur.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Administrator; Cracking; CSI/FBI Survey; Exploit;Vulnerabilities of Computers.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: McLean,D. Companies Neglect IT Security At Their Peril. The Globe and&lt;br /&gt;Mail,May 12, 2005, p. B9; Schell, B.H. and Martin,C. Contemporary World Issues Series: Cybercrime:&lt;br /&gt;A Reference Handbook. Santa Barbara, CA:ABC-CLIO, 2004.&lt;br /&gt;RIPE 272&lt;br /&gt;Risk Analysis (general term): In an IT security context, it is the process of determining the&lt;br /&gt;actual likelihood or risk that an organization’s security will be breached, and what kind of material&lt;br /&gt;or immaterial losses will potentially result from such a security breach. Immaterial losses&lt;br /&gt;typically describe hard-to-measure losses such as loss of reputation. An example for such a loss&lt;br /&gt;would be a successful attack on a bank or financial institution in which data privacy was violated.&lt;br /&gt;The risk is typically expressed as a financial risk and used to budget for investments in IT&lt;br /&gt;security technology, personnel, and processes; it is similar to insuring against a natural disaster or&lt;br /&gt;a theft.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Risk.&lt;br /&gt;Ritchie, Dennis (person; 1941– ): In 1969, he and Ken Thompson developed an open set of&lt;br /&gt;rules to run computers on the virtual frontier. They called their standard operating system&lt;br /&gt;UNIX, and to hackers then and now, it was and is a thing of beauty.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Thompson, Ken; UNIX.&lt;br /&gt;ROFL or ROTFL (general term): Chat room talk meaning “rolling on the floor laughing.”&lt;br /&gt;Root (general term): In UNIX, it is the superuser or administrator account having complete&lt;br /&gt;control over everything in the machine.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Administrator; Superuser or Administrative Privileges.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Graham, R. Hacking Lexicon. [Online, 2001.] Robert Graham Website.&lt;br /&gt;http://www.linuxsecurity.com/resource_files/documentation/hacking-dict.html.&lt;br /&gt;Root Servers (general term): A group of thirteen servers located throughout the world that are&lt;br /&gt;responsible for the basic level of the Domain Name System (DNS).&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Domain Name System (DNS); Root.&lt;br /&gt;Rootkit (general term): A backdoor Trojan horse hiding behind or within processes and files&lt;br /&gt;that can provide crackers remote access to a compromised system. Besides being the name of&lt;br /&gt;a specific software tool, the term rootkit is often used in a more general sense to describe a tool&lt;br /&gt;providing system administrators access privileges to snoop while avoiding detection.&lt;br /&gt;During the week of February 17, 2005, Microsoft Corporation security experts cautioned&lt;br /&gt;about a new group of system-monitoring programs, or kernel rootkits, that are nearly impossible&lt;br /&gt;to detect using present-day security products.This new generation of rootkits therefore pose&lt;br /&gt;a serious security challenge to companies’ systems. Going by names such as Hacker Defender,&lt;br /&gt;FU, and Vanquish, these rootkits not only can snoop but also may be creating a whole new group&lt;br /&gt;of spyware and worms that can wreak havoc on systems. Experts further feared that online criminal&lt;br /&gt;groups would find these to be of extreme interest as a means to commit cyber crimes.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Administrator; Remote Access;Trojan.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Roberts, P. RSA: Microsoft on ‘Rootkits’: Be Afraid, Be Very Afraid.&lt;br /&gt;[Online, February 17, 2005.] Computerworld Inc. Website. http://www.computerworld.com/&lt;br /&gt;securitytopics/security/story/0,10801,99843,00.html; Symantec Security Response. Rootkit.&lt;br /&gt;[Online, November 7, 2003.] Symantec Security Response Website. http://securityresponse&lt;br /&gt;.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/backdoor.isen.rootkit.html.&lt;br /&gt;273 Rootkit&lt;br /&gt;Rotation cipher (general term): A very simple form of encryption. The encryption is performed&lt;br /&gt;by shifting the letters of the alphabet by a certain number of places.The cipher Rot13&lt;br /&gt;displaces a character by 13 positions; it was widely used to obscure the content of messages on&lt;br /&gt;the Usenet news network.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Encryption.&lt;br /&gt;Rough Auditing Tool for Security (RATS) (general term): RATS (not to be confused with&lt;br /&gt;RATs, or Remote Administration Trojans) is a set of tools to analyze C and C++ source code&lt;br /&gt;for potential security flaws, such as insecure function calls.The tool has not yet reached a state in&lt;br /&gt;which it can fix security problems in any automated fashion, but it provides a very good starting&lt;br /&gt;point for manual security audits.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Buffer Overflows; Languages.&lt;br /&gt;Routers (general term): Specialized computer devices at the border of an Internet-connected&lt;br /&gt;network that store a specialized map of the Internet and contribute to this map by informing&lt;br /&gt;its neighbors about what it “knows” about its part of the Internet. Internal routers are used to&lt;br /&gt;structure larger networks.These contain routing tables representing the internal network structure.&lt;br /&gt;Functionally, routers forward data packets to their destinations through the routing&lt;br /&gt;process—usually associated with the Internet Protocol. Routing occurs at the layer 3 Network&lt;br /&gt;Level of the OSI seven-layer model.&lt;br /&gt;Cisco Systems, Inc. and Juniper are two providers of router equipment, and in recent times&lt;br /&gt;both have issued advisories regarding vulnerable routing software. For example, on January 27,&lt;br /&gt;2005, Juniper told all M- and T-series router clients using software made before January 7, 2005,&lt;br /&gt;to either upgrade the software or risk becoming victimized by a serious security vulnerability&lt;br /&gt;that was exploitable either by a device directly attached to the router or by a remote attack. Cited&lt;br /&gt;as a “high” risk level, the vulnerability was transmitted to the U.S. Computer Emergency&lt;br /&gt;Readiness Team by Qwest. Previously, Juniper had marketed its software as being more stable and&lt;br /&gt;more reliable than Cisco’s IOS.&lt;br /&gt;On February 16, 2005, Cisco released a fresh line of security products that it claimed could&lt;br /&gt;thwart elusive network threats such as phishing, viruses, and DoS attacks.With this news, IT&lt;br /&gt;security professionals had both rave but very cautious reviews.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Cisco Systems, Inc.; Denial of Service (DoS); Internet; Network; Phishing;Virus.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Duffy, J. Juniper Bitten by Software Bug. [Online, January 27, 2005.]&lt;br /&gt;Network World, Inc. Website. http://www.nwfusion.com/edge/news/2005/0127juniper&lt;br /&gt;.html; GNU_Free Documentation License. Routers. [Online, May 18, 2005.] GNU_Free&lt;br /&gt;Documentation License Website. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Router; Schell, B.H. and Martin,&lt;br /&gt;C. Contemporary World Issues Series: Cybercrime: A Reference Handbook. Santa Barbara, CA:&lt;br /&gt;ABC-CLIO, 2004; Storer, A. New Cisco Security Strategy Targets Elusive Threats. [Online,&lt;br /&gt;February 16, 2005.] TechTarget Website. http://searchnetworking.techtarget.com/original&lt;br /&gt;Content/0,289142,sid7_gci1059436,00.html.&lt;br /&gt;Routing and Traceroute Tool (general term): Information is routed through the Internet in&lt;br /&gt;small packets, and a traceroute tool can check the path that one packet followed.&lt;br /&gt;Rotation cipher 274&lt;br /&gt;To comprehend how routing works and what the traceroute tool does, readers need to understand&lt;br /&gt;that all information sent or received on the Internet is just a small piece of the original data.&lt;br /&gt;For example, when requestors visit a Website and they want to retrieve a Web page, the server of&lt;br /&gt;that Website receives the request for the Web page and sends the Web page to the requestor.The&lt;br /&gt;requestor does not receive the whole Web page all at one time; instead, it is divided into little&lt;br /&gt;pieces of information called packets.These packets reach the requestor by traveling through the&lt;br /&gt;Internet and passing through computers along the way.&lt;br /&gt;Each packet is like a letter, in that it has a sender and a receiver. Computers connected to the&lt;br /&gt;Internet use a packet-switching technique to transfer packets from one system to another.The&lt;br /&gt;packet is, essentially, handled as a “hot potato”; that is, the sending computer (for example, the&lt;br /&gt;server of the Website the requestor is visiting) sends it to the closest router.This router receives&lt;br /&gt;the packet and looks at the recipient address. If the recipient address belongs to a computer in&lt;br /&gt;the same network segment as the router, the router delivers the packet to this computer and the&lt;br /&gt;process stops. If the recipient address is not correct, the packet is sent on to the next nearest&lt;br /&gt;router. If the recipient address is still not correct, the packet is sent on to the next nearest computer.&lt;br /&gt;The cycle continues until the packet reaches the receiver with the correct recipient address.&lt;br /&gt;The Web page may pass through routers in several countries before it reaches the right requestor&lt;br /&gt;with the right address. Routing tables stored in each router assist in the process of determining&lt;br /&gt;the “next nearest” router.&lt;br /&gt;Also, if some routers along the way are down, the data will take another active path. Some&lt;br /&gt;routers may be found to be too busy or too crowded, so they will take quite some time to&lt;br /&gt;respond. For this reason, the traceroute tool was developed.This tool, which can check the path&lt;br /&gt;that one packet followed, can be used by system administrators not only to discover the path&lt;br /&gt;taken but also ascertain the amount of time the packet took to reach the correct address&lt;br /&gt;recipient.&lt;br /&gt;Every IP packet has a field named TTL (TimeToLive), which can take values between 0 and&lt;br /&gt;255. Each router processing the packet looks at this value and subtracts 1 from it.This procedure&lt;br /&gt;continues until the content of the TTL field is decremented to contain 0 or 1.When the TTL&lt;br /&gt;field has reached 0, the router drops the packet. Such a mechanism is needed to keep a packet&lt;br /&gt;from traveling on forever, never finding the correct receiver.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Internet; Internet Protocol (IP); Packet;Traceroute and Traceroute Program.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Silvestri, M.Traceroute Tools. [Online, 2000.] Wowarea Website. http://&lt;br /&gt;www.wowarea.com/english/researches/wg4_traceroute.htm.&lt;br /&gt;Routing Information Protocol (RIP) (general term): An interior gateway protocol specifying&lt;br /&gt;how routers exchange information about routing tables. Routers exchange entire tables&lt;br /&gt;periodically when they are using RIP. Because this is a rather inefficient process, RIP is currently&lt;br /&gt;replaced by the newer Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) protocol.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Open Shortest Path First (OSPF); Protocol.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Jupitermedia Corporation. What is Routing Information Protocol?&lt;br /&gt;[Online, August 9, 2004.] Jupitermedia Corporation Website. http://www.webopedia.com/&lt;br /&gt;TERM/R/Routing_Information_Protocol.html.&lt;br /&gt;275 Routing Information Protocol (RIP)&lt;br /&gt;RSA Public/Private Key Algorithm (general term):The most prevalently used public/private&lt;br /&gt;key algorithm. It was invented in the 1970s by Ron Rivest, Adi Shamir, and Leonard&lt;br /&gt;Adleman.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Algorithm; Key.&lt;br /&gt;Russian FSB (formerly KGB) (general term): President Vladimir Putin recently signed a decree&lt;br /&gt;to identify the criteria for reorganizing Russia’s Federal Security Service (FSB).The FSB played a&lt;br /&gt;direct part in drafting the decree, a move indicating that most of the proposals made by the counterintelligence&lt;br /&gt;service will be accounted for.A number of independent services will be established&lt;br /&gt;under the reorganization, as will special subdepartments for combating terrorism and extremism.&lt;br /&gt;New organizational decisions are expected to allow Russia’s security services to react more appropriately&lt;br /&gt;to contemporary terrorist and cyberterrorist threats.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Cyberterrorism; Intelligence;Terrorism.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: The Russian Journal Publishing Company.The future of Russian counterintelligence.&lt;br /&gt;[Online, July 20, 2004.] The Russian Journal Publishing Company Website. http://&lt;br /&gt;www.russiajournal.com/news/cnews-article.shtml?nd=44715.&lt;br /&gt;RSA Public/Private Key Algorithm 276&lt;br /&gt;S (general term): Chat room talk meaning “smiling.”&lt;br /&gt;S.1837 (Otherwise Untitled) (legal term): U.S. Senator Robert Torricelli, D-NJ, introduced&lt;br /&gt;the bill S.1837 on December 18, 2001, to establish a board of inquiry to review the activities of&lt;br /&gt;U.S. intelligence, law enforcement agents, and other relevant agencies regarding their roles and&lt;br /&gt;shortcomings in not preventing the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. On December 18,&lt;br /&gt;2001, the bill was sent to the Senate committee, was read twice, and was sent to the Committee&lt;br /&gt;on the Judiciary. It was not passed in this form.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Intelligence; September 11, 2001,Terrorist Events.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Center for Democracy and Technology. Legislation Affecting the Internet.&lt;br /&gt;[Online, July 28, 2004.] Center for Democracy and Technology Website. http://www.cdt.org/&lt;br /&gt;legislation/107th/wiretaps/.&lt;br /&gt;S/Mime (Secure Multipurpose Internet Mail Extension) (general term):A MIME protocol&lt;br /&gt;version supporting message encryption. S/MIME uses the RSA’s public-key encryption as&lt;br /&gt;a base technology.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Encryption or Encipher; RSA Public/Private Key Algorithm.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Jupitermedia Corporation.What is S/Mime? [Online, February 25, 2004.]&lt;br /&gt;Jupitermedia Corporation Website. http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/S/S_MIME.html.&lt;br /&gt;Safe Frequency (general term): Of backups is the frequency done on a particular computer&lt;br /&gt;system at which the maximum possible system loss would be bearable.The safe frequency has to&lt;br /&gt;be determined after a thorough risk assessment and an evaluation of what the computing and&lt;br /&gt;data assets are worth for a company.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Computer; Risk.&lt;br /&gt;Safeguard (general term): A feature, procedure, process, or technique intended to mitigate the&lt;br /&gt;effects of intrusion risk but that rarely if ever eliminates all risk. It does reduce risk to some&lt;br /&gt;acceptable organizational or institutional level.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Risk.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Symantec Security Response. Glossary. [Online, July 15, 2004.] Symantec&lt;br /&gt;Security Response Website. http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/refa.html.&lt;br /&gt;Sandbox or Sandbox Security Model (general term): Provides an alternative for ensuring that&lt;br /&gt;software not coming from the usual trusted sources can be assessed.Thus, the sandbox model lets&lt;br /&gt;users accept code from any source. As it is running, the sandbox restricts code from untrusted&lt;br /&gt;sources to be able to take actions that could possibly harm a system.The advantage is that users&lt;br /&gt;do not need to determine what code they can or cannot trust.Also, they do not need to scan for&lt;br /&gt;viruses, for the sandbox prevents any viruses or other malicious code invited into the system from&lt;br /&gt;doing any damage they may have been designed to do.&lt;br /&gt;Users need to trust software before they run it on their computers, or face the possibility of their&lt;br /&gt;experiencing some dire consequences.Traditionally, users have achieved relative security by being&lt;br /&gt;careful to use software only from trusted sources and by regularly scanning their systems for known&lt;br /&gt;viruses and worms.When viruses or worms have access to a user’s system, they can gain full control.&lt;br /&gt;If the virus or software is malicious code, it can cause much damage to the user’s system&lt;br /&gt;because no restrictions would be placed on the software by the computer’s runtime environment.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Code or Source Code; Malicious Code.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Venners, B. Java’s Security Architecture. [Online, July, 1997.] Artima&lt;br /&gt;Software, Inc.Website. http://www.artima.com/underthehood/overviewsecurity2.html.&lt;br /&gt;Sanitize (general term): Means to erase a storage device, such as a computer hard drive, so thoroughly&lt;br /&gt;that no residual data can be collected from the device. Old computer disks should be&lt;br /&gt;sanitized—and not only superficially erased—before they are thrown away in order to avoid the&lt;br /&gt;possibility that a cracker can obtain any valuable information from scavenging through an organization’s&lt;br /&gt;garbage (electronic dumpster diving).&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Remanence; Residue.&lt;br /&gt;SANS Institute (general term): Likely the largest information security training and certification&lt;br /&gt;source in the world. The SANS Institute develops, maintains, and makes available for free an&lt;br /&gt;impressive collection of research documents about information security.The SANS Institute also&lt;br /&gt;operates the Internet’s early-warning system known as the Internet Storm Center.&lt;br /&gt;The SANS (SysAdmin, Audit, Network, Security) Institute was started in 1989 as a research&lt;br /&gt;and education organization. Today, its programs get to more than 165,000 auditors, Chief&lt;br /&gt;Information Officers (CIOs), network administrators, and security professionals who share&lt;br /&gt;with each other lessons they have learned about information security.They try to find solutions&lt;br /&gt;to the cyber challenges they encounter.&lt;br /&gt;The SANS Institute shared resources include a weekly vulnerability digest (@RISK), the&lt;br /&gt;weekly NewsBites news digest, the Internet Storm Center warning system for the Internet, flash&lt;br /&gt;security alerts, and more than 1,200 award-winning research papers.&lt;br /&gt;During the first week of May 2005, for example, the SANS Institute warned that in the first&lt;br /&gt;quarter of 2005, more than 600 new system vulnerabilities were detected, including flaws in&lt;br /&gt;products by Microsoft Corporation, Computer Associates, Oracle, McAfee and F-Secure,&lt;br /&gt;Trend Micro, Symantec Corporation, and some relatively new “players” such as RealPlayer,&lt;br /&gt;iTunes, and WinAmp.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Administrator; Network; Security; Symantec Corporation; Vulnerabilities of&lt;br /&gt;Computers.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Brenner,B. SANS: Security Software, Media Players Increasingly Vulnerable.&lt;br /&gt;[Online,May 2, 2005.] TechTarget Website. http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/originalContent/&lt;br /&gt;0,289142,sid14_gci1084324,00.html?track=NL-358&amp;amp;ad=513148; The SANS Institute. About&lt;br /&gt;SANS. [Online, 2004.] The SANS Institute Website. http://www.sans.org/aboutsans.php.&lt;br /&gt;Scanner (general term): Uses rules to scan for vulnerabilities on the network, computer&lt;br /&gt;system, application program, or Web-based service, typically working with a list of known vulnerabilities.&lt;br /&gt;Some Web-application scanners scan for vulnerabilities within applications.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Network; On-Access Scanner; On-Demand Scanner;Vulnerabilities of Computers.&lt;br /&gt;Sandbox or Sandbox Security Model 278&lt;br /&gt;Scavenging Technique (general term): Used by crackers who dial up to the Internet hoping&lt;br /&gt;to find connections left dangling when somebody else abruptly hung up.They can then exploit&lt;br /&gt;the connections.The term is also used to describe the activity of hunting for Residual Data on&lt;br /&gt;erased devices.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Crackers; Residue; Sanitize; Internet.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Graham, R. Hacking Lexicon. [Online, 2001.] Robert Graham Website.&lt;br /&gt;http://www.linuxsecurity.com/resource_files/documentation/hacking-dict.html.&lt;br /&gt;Schifreen, Robert (person): See Gold, Steven and Schifreen, Robert Case.&lt;br /&gt;Schneier, Bruce Books (general term): A well-respected cryptographer who has written a&lt;br /&gt;number of books, including Beyond Fear (2003), Secrets and Lies: Digital Security in a Networked&lt;br /&gt;World (2000), and Applied Cryptography: Protocols, Algorithms, and Source Code in C (1995).&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Algorithm; Code or Source Code; Cryptography or “Crypto.”&lt;br /&gt;Schwartz, Randal Case (legal case): A case illustrating that some judgment mistakes can cause&lt;br /&gt;a system administrator to become a convicted felon.&lt;br /&gt;Randal Schwartz started his career at the Intel Corporation in early 1988 and left at the end&lt;br /&gt;of 1993. During Schwartz’s employment at Intel iWarp (a part of Intel’s Supercomputer System&lt;br /&gt;Division, or SDD), he recommended to the company that it keep its systems secure by following&lt;br /&gt;some standard procedures such as using good passwords.To this end, in 1991 Schwartz began&lt;br /&gt;checking passwords by running a software program known as “crack,” distributed by CERT. It&lt;br /&gt;attempts to crack a set of passwords found in a UNIX /etc/passwd file. In 1991, Schwartz was&lt;br /&gt;no newcomer to “crack”; he served as a beta-tester for its version 3.&lt;br /&gt;As part of his job at Intel iWarp, Schwartz gave security training courses to individuals in other&lt;br /&gt;firms. Many of these courses focused on Perl, a popular programming language at that time.&lt;br /&gt;Because much of his job involved travel, Schwartz set up various ways to read his email at Intel&lt;br /&gt;iWarp when off-site.This seemed to be a wise move because starting in late 1993, he was responsible&lt;br /&gt;for setting up DNS (Domain Name System) servers for the company.&lt;br /&gt;In late 1993, while working for Intel’s SGI division as a system administrator, Schwartz ran the&lt;br /&gt;“crack” software on the password file of an SGI computer in his previous division where he still&lt;br /&gt;had an account. Schwartz decided to investigate the problem further by testing the password file&lt;br /&gt;of the central set of systems at the SSD division, but he thought that he would wait until he had&lt;br /&gt;final study results before telling SSD officials what he was doing. One of his staff members&lt;br /&gt;noticed that Schwartz was running “crack” and told his manager, who reported the incident to&lt;br /&gt;those at the top of the firm.When word reached the top, corporate leaders began to think that&lt;br /&gt;Schwartz was a corporate spy.&lt;br /&gt;Soon thereafter, the police arrived at Randal Schwartz’s house, took all his computer equipment,&lt;br /&gt;and pressed charges under an Oregon law for altering or transporting computerized&lt;br /&gt;information. Because the district attorney viewed Schwartz’s moving a password file from one of&lt;br /&gt;Intel’s computers to another to be at least transporting, Schwartz was charged on March 14, 1994,&lt;br /&gt;with three criminal felony counts—even though the district attorney never alleged that any&lt;br /&gt;information ever left Intel’s premises.&lt;br /&gt;In September 1995, after a jury trial, Schwartz was given five years of probation, 480 hours&lt;br /&gt;of community service, 90 days of initially deferred and then suspended jail time, and he was&lt;br /&gt;279 Schwartz, Randal Case&lt;br /&gt;ordered to pay Intel Corporation $68,000 in restitution. On appeal, the court upheld the conviction&lt;br /&gt;on all counts but reversed the restitution order, sending it back to the original court for&lt;br /&gt;reconsideration.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Administrator; Cracking; Domain Name System (DNS); Server.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Pacenka, S. Computer Crime. [Online,April 8, 2001.] Lightlink Website.&lt;br /&gt;http://www.lightlink.com/spacenka/fors/; Quarterman, J. System Administration as a Criminal&lt;br /&gt;Activity or, the Strange Case of Randal Schwartz. [Online, September, 1995.] MIT Computer&lt;br /&gt;Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory “Project Mac”Website, http://www.swiss.ai.mit&lt;br /&gt;.edu/6095/articles/computer-crime/schwartz-matrix-news.txt.&lt;br /&gt;Screensaver (general term): A program that is activated by the operating system after a predetermined&lt;br /&gt;period of inactivity by the user. A screensaver serves two goals: By blanking the screen&lt;br /&gt;or displaying a constantly-changing pattern, the screensaver avoids the burn-in effect on the&lt;br /&gt;screen’s photo-sensitive layers, through which a pattern displayed for longer periods of time&lt;br /&gt;remains visible as a ghost image on the screen.The second goal is to lock the access to the computer&lt;br /&gt;system after a period of inactivity. Users who return to their workstations have to enter&lt;br /&gt;their password to regain access to the computer.&lt;br /&gt;Scriptkiddie or Newbie (general term): Inexperienced crackers who rely on prefabricated&lt;br /&gt;software to perform computer exploits.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Crackers; Exploit.&lt;br /&gt;Scripts (general term): Programs consisting of instructions for an application.Thus, scripts usually&lt;br /&gt;have instructions expressed with the application’s syntax and rules.Typically, scripts contain&lt;br /&gt;simple control structures.&lt;br /&gt;A scripting language is not compiled into machine code but interpreted “on the fly” by a&lt;br /&gt;script interpreter, which makes scripting languages slower than compiled languages. Scripting&lt;br /&gt;languages are popular among system administrators, primarily because they incorporate many&lt;br /&gt;of the tools and syntactical elements that the administrator is already familiar with. In fact, the&lt;br /&gt;command-line interpreters in Windows and in UNIX are scripting language interpreters also&lt;br /&gt;featuring an interactive mode—the command prompt or shell.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Administrator; Shell; UNIX.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Symantec Security Response. Glossary. [Online, July 15, 2004.] Symantec&lt;br /&gt;Security Response Website. http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/refa.html.&lt;br /&gt;Se7en Controversy (general term): A self-proclaimed hacker with a charismatic pseudonym&lt;br /&gt;whose real name is Christian Valor. Valor created controversy when in the late 1990s he conducted&lt;br /&gt;an alleged vigilante campaign against online pedophiles. However, some in the Computer&lt;br /&gt;Underground believe that he never did this because, they say,Valor lacks the required hacking&lt;br /&gt;skills.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Hacker; Computer Underground (CU);Vigilante.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Silberman, S. Kid-Porn Vigilante Hacked Media. [Online, February 8,&lt;br /&gt;1999.] Wired Magazine Website. http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,17789,00.html.&lt;br /&gt;Search Engine (general term): Existing in a variety of types, all search engines procure information&lt;br /&gt;but organize it in a variety of unique ways, which is why there are so many different&lt;br /&gt;Schwartz, Randal Case 280&lt;br /&gt;search engines. At a basic level, a search engine is one of two things: a Robot or a Directory.&lt;br /&gt;Though some search engines combine features of both, most are predominantly either Robots&lt;br /&gt;or Directories.&lt;br /&gt;A Robot uses a software program to search, catalog, and then organize information on the&lt;br /&gt;Internet. Organization of data can be completed in a number of ways—including through a harvester,&lt;br /&gt;robot, spider, wanderer, and worm—and employing diverse ways of searching Websites to&lt;br /&gt;gather data.&lt;br /&gt;Directory search engines do not search on the Internet for information but rather obtain it&lt;br /&gt;from individuals who enter it into the search engine’s database. Because each Directory has its&lt;br /&gt;own means to categorize information, multitudes of them exist.&lt;br /&gt;In March 2005, Google, Inc., a popular search engine, released its first official version of its&lt;br /&gt;free software for finding information stored on computer hard drives.The software scours hard&lt;br /&gt;drives for information contained in Adobe Acrobat’s portable document format (known as PDF),&lt;br /&gt;and it scours music, video files, and email content.&lt;br /&gt;On Saturday, May 7, 2005, the Google, Inc. search engine went down from 6:45 p.m. until&lt;br /&gt;7:00 pm. Eastern Time. Google spokesman David Krane said that the problem was not a crack&lt;br /&gt;attack, as many people thought, but a problem related to the DNS or Domain Name System.&lt;br /&gt;He did not elaborate.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Bot or Robot; Domain Name System (DNS); Internet.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Churilla, K. Secrets of Searching the Web &amp;amp; Promoting Your Website.&lt;br /&gt;[Online, 2004.] Gocee Company Website. http://www.gocee.com/eureka/e_sedef.htm; Google&lt;br /&gt;Admin. Google Down? Getting 404! Google Hacked? [Online, May 9, 2005.] Search Engine&lt;br /&gt;Forums Website. http://www.submitexpress.com/bbs/post-1601.html&amp;amp;highlight=&amp;amp;sid=&lt;br /&gt;cdfcb4b3aa56cdca7df35ed920dd8079; In Brief. Google’s Official Desktop Search Software&lt;br /&gt;Released. The Globe and Mail, March 10, 2005, p. B10.&lt;br /&gt;Secure HTTP (general term): Abbreviated S-HTTP. Developed in 1995 and extends the&lt;br /&gt;HTTP protocol, having as its primary function the transmitting of data in a secure way over the&lt;br /&gt;World Wide Web. Not all Internet browsers and servers understand S-HTTP.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: HTTP (HyperText Transfer Protocol); Protocol;World Wide Web (WWW).&lt;br /&gt;Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) (general term):A network protocol running on top of TCP/IP&lt;br /&gt;that assists in improving the safety of Internet communications and serves as a standard for&lt;br /&gt;encrypted client/server communications between network devices. SSL and S-HTTP have&lt;br /&gt;uniquely different designs and goals, so it is actually possible to put together the two protocols.&lt;br /&gt;Whereas SSL has been developed to create a secure connection between two systems, S-HTTP&lt;br /&gt;has been developed to securely transmit individual messages. SSL uses different kinds of network&lt;br /&gt;security techniques, such as certificates, public keys, and symmetric keys.Websites typically use&lt;br /&gt;SSL to safeguard the transmission of an individuals’ personal information such as banking account&lt;br /&gt;numbers and credit card numbers. Moreover, both SSL and S-HTTP have been sent to the&lt;br /&gt;Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) to be approved as a standard.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: HTTP (HyperText Transfer Protocol); Internet; Internet Engineering Task Force&lt;br /&gt;IETF);TCP/IP or Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol;World Wide Web (WWW).&lt;br /&gt;281 Secure Sockets Layer (SSL)&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: About, Inc. SSL. [Online, 2004.] About, Inc.Website. http://compnet&lt;br /&gt;working.about.com/cs/securityssl/g/bldef_ssl.htm; Jupitermedia Corporation.What is S-HTTP?&lt;br /&gt;[Online, October 7, 2002.] Jupitermedia Corporation Website. http://www.webopedia.com/&lt;br /&gt;TERM/S/S_HTTP.htm.&lt;br /&gt;Secure Transactions (general term): Secure Web transactions are increasingly commonplace. If&lt;br /&gt;anyone has ever ordered a book, a CD, or any other product or service over the Web (say, through&lt;br /&gt;Amazon.com), he or she likely utilized a secure transaction system.The e-commerce company&lt;br /&gt;Amazon.com processes thousands of secure e-transactions daily. As do most secure e-commerce&lt;br /&gt;Websites, Amazon.com encrypts confidential information with the Secure Sockets Layer&lt;br /&gt;(SSL) technology as it is transmitted between the consumer’s Web browser and the online company’s&lt;br /&gt;Web server.&lt;br /&gt;No computer system can be assumed to be completely secure.Therefore, one needs to understand&lt;br /&gt;that security in an e-commerce sense is best defined in terms of acceptable risk—meaning&lt;br /&gt;that the consumer must feel comfortable that his or her personal information will be relatively&lt;br /&gt;safe from inappropriate use after it is sent online as part of the transaction. Moreover, acceptable&lt;br /&gt;risk means that the company operating the server must be confident that it can defy internal and&lt;br /&gt;external exploits.&lt;br /&gt;Because of concerns regarding e-commerce secure transactions, on February 9, 2005, XRamp&lt;br /&gt;Technologies announced that it is now issuing 256-bit digital SSL technology certificates that&lt;br /&gt;function with browsers and servers capable of the 256-bit Advanced Encryption Standard&lt;br /&gt;(AES). Besides working with the frequently used Mozilla Firefox Web browser, the SSL technology&lt;br /&gt;certificates are backward compatible—able to provide encryption for software not meeting&lt;br /&gt;this standard.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Advanced Encryption Standard (AES); Exploit; Risk; Secure Sockets Layer (SSL);&lt;br /&gt;Security.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Cahoon, B.What Are Secure Web Transactions? [Online, May 28, 1998.]&lt;br /&gt;Technology Expo ’98 Website. http://www.arches.uga.edu/~cahoonb/techexpo/security.html;&lt;br /&gt;XRamp Technologies, Inc. XRamp Offers the Industry’s First 256-Bit Secure Server Certificates.&lt;br /&gt;[Online, February 9, 200.] XRamp Technologies, Inc.Website. http://list.windowsitpro.com/&lt;br /&gt;t?ctl=3E11:4FB69.&lt;br /&gt;SecureID (general term): A system involving a small, portable device generating a one-time&lt;br /&gt;password at set intervals (for example, one minute) and a software component on an access&lt;br /&gt;device synchronized with this password-generation mechanism. A user gets access to the system&lt;br /&gt;when he or she enters the password displayed on the portable device. Carrying the portable&lt;br /&gt;device around (such as in the form of a key ring attachment) is more comfortable than carrying&lt;br /&gt;a one-time password list, but it serves the same purpose.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: One-Time Password; Password.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Experts Exchange LLC. Solution Title: Can you do one time passwords ala&lt;br /&gt;SecureID on Linux? [Online, August 16, 2004.] Experts Exchange LLC Website. http://www&lt;br /&gt;.experts-exchange.com/Security/Linux_Security/Q_20647635.html.&lt;br /&gt;Security (general term): Having protection from one’s adversaries, particularly from those&lt;br /&gt;who would do harm—intentionally, or otherwise, to property or to a person. Information&lt;br /&gt;Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) 282&lt;br /&gt;Technology security issues include but are not limited to authentication, critical infrastructure&lt;br /&gt;protection, disaster recovery, intrusion detection and network management, malicious code software&lt;br /&gt;protection, physical security of networks, security policies, the sharing of rights and&lt;br /&gt;directories, and wireless security.&lt;br /&gt;Security breaches occur daily, with some of them making media headlines and embarrassing&lt;br /&gt;the targeted companies or agencies. On January 30, 2005, for example, a security incident&lt;br /&gt;occurred that brought considerable embarrassment to the Dutch armed forces. About 75 pages&lt;br /&gt;of highly classified documents about human traffickers from the computers of the Dutch Royal&lt;br /&gt;Marechaussee (the armed forces contingency that guards the Dutch borders) somehow found&lt;br /&gt;their way to the controversial weblog Geen Stijl (meaning “No Style”).&lt;br /&gt;The conjecture is that a Dutch armed forces staffer worked on the documents at home and&lt;br /&gt;unwittingly shared the contents of his computer’s hard drive to numerous others when he logged&lt;br /&gt;onto KaZaA—which is unsecure.&lt;br /&gt;This was not the first time that the Dutch have made media headlines over computer security&lt;br /&gt;issues. In 2004, the Dutch public prosecutor’s office was equally embarrassed after it was&lt;br /&gt;publicized that the prosecutor threw his old PC into the trash, making available for public&lt;br /&gt;scrutiny his hard drive with hundreds of pages of classified data on high-profile Dutch crimes—&lt;br /&gt;as well as his own credit card numbers and personal tax file information. As a result, the&lt;br /&gt;prosecutor resigned from his job.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Harm to Property.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Estala, A. Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6). The Next Generation.&lt;br /&gt;[Online, March 9, 1999.] Geocities.com Website. http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/&lt;br /&gt;Foothills/7626/defin.html; Grami,A. and Schell, B. Future Trends in Mobile Commerce: Service&lt;br /&gt;Offerings, Technological Advances and Security Challenges. Proceedings of Second Annual&lt;br /&gt;Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust. University of New Brunswick, New Brunswick, Canada,&lt;br /&gt;October 13–15, 2004. [Online, October 2004.] Privacy, Security, Trust 2004 Website. http://&lt;br /&gt;www.unb.ca/pstnet/pst2004/; Lehtovirta, J. Transition from IPv4 to IPv6. [Online, 2004.]&lt;br /&gt;Tascomm Engineering Oy Website. http://www.tascomm.fi/~jlv/ngtrans/; Libbenga, J. Classified&lt;br /&gt;Dutch Military Documents Found on P2P Site. [Online, January 30, 2005.] Reg SETI Group&lt;br /&gt;Website. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/01/30/dutch_classified_info_found_on_kazaa/.&lt;br /&gt;Security Account Manager (SAM) (general term): On Microsoft Windows 2000 and NT,&lt;br /&gt;user account data is stored within the SAM, which is actually just one file on the disk. SAM is a&lt;br /&gt;primary target for crackers. Given that SAM is stored in both an original and a repair version,&lt;br /&gt;crackers tend to seek the “repair” version because it is not locked by the operating system.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Crackers.&lt;br /&gt;Security Administrator Tool for Analyzing Networks (SATAN) (general term): Dan&lt;br /&gt;Farmer and Wietse Venema designed this security tool to assist system administrators in recognizing&lt;br /&gt;a number of network-related security problems. SATAN, though a UNIX-based tool,was&lt;br /&gt;first designed for SunOS/Solaris and Irix.Today, ports to many other varieties of UNIX now&lt;br /&gt;exist, including one for Linux—thereby permitting any individual with a Personal Computer&lt;br /&gt;and a Slip/PPP account to get information provided by SATAN (which normally requires root&lt;br /&gt;access for execution).&lt;br /&gt;283 Security Administrator Tool for Analyzing Networks (SATAN)&lt;br /&gt;As noted, though SATAN is a UNIX-based tool, it can be configured to scan most networks.&lt;br /&gt;SATAN works by procuring as much data as possible about system and network services—such&lt;br /&gt;as finger, ftp, NFS, and rexd. SATAN also procures data on known software glitches, network&lt;br /&gt;configurations, and poorly set up network utilities. On vulnerabilities discovered, SATAN gives&lt;br /&gt;rather limited data on fixing the problem, but despite this limitation, it is a useful tool for testing&lt;br /&gt;single computers or entire networks. Its successor, known as SAINT, is also on the market.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Administrator; File Transfer Protocol (FTP); Linux; Network File Systems (NFS);&lt;br /&gt;REXEC Protocol; Root; UNIX.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Computer Incident Advisory Capability (CIAC). Network Monitoring&lt;br /&gt;Tools. [Online, 2004.] CIAC Website. http://ciac.llnl.gov/ciac/ToolsUnixNetMon.html&lt;br /&gt;#Courtney; The Center for Education and Research in Information Assurance and Security&lt;br /&gt;(CERIAS). Info About SATAN. [Online, June 2, 1995.] CERIAS Website. http://www.cerias&lt;br /&gt;.purdue.edu/about/history/coast/satan.php.&lt;br /&gt;Security Kernel (general term):The part of a computer that realizes the fundamental security&lt;br /&gt;procedures for controlling access to system resources. In the formal conceptual framework of a&lt;br /&gt;Trusted Computing Base, the security kernel implements the reference monitor.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Access Control; Operating System.&lt;br /&gt;Security Policy Checklist (general term): A checklist developed by security experts using&lt;br /&gt;questions dealing with a number of security issues. But before detailing the questions (which is&lt;br /&gt;not a complete listing), this overriding question needs to be answered by organizations having&lt;br /&gt;security policy checklists: Are all of the items on the checklist distributed to all employees and&lt;br /&gt;fully understood? Take, for example, the following items:&lt;br /&gt;• Administrator rights and responsibilities: Under what conditions may a system administrator&lt;br /&gt;examine an employee’s account or his or her email, and what parts of the system should the&lt;br /&gt;system administrator not examine (for example, Netscape bookmarks)? Can the system administrator&lt;br /&gt;monitor network traffic, and if so, what boundaries exist?&lt;br /&gt;• Backups:What systems are backed up, and how often? How are backups secured and verified?&lt;br /&gt;• Connections to and from the Internet: What computers should be seen from the outside?&lt;br /&gt;If computers are outside the firewall (bastion hosts), how securely are they separated from&lt;br /&gt;computers on the inside? Are connections from the Internet to the internal network&lt;br /&gt;allowed and, if so, how are they authenticated and encrypted? What traffic is allowed to go&lt;br /&gt;outside the internal network? If there is traffic across the Internet, how is it secured, and&lt;br /&gt;what protection is in place against worms, viruses, or hostile java applets?&lt;br /&gt;• Dial-up connections:Are dial-up connections allowed, and if so, how are they authenticated&lt;br /&gt;and what access level to the internal network do dial-up connections provide? How are&lt;br /&gt;modems distributed in this company, and can employees set up modem connections to&lt;br /&gt;their home or desktop computers?&lt;br /&gt;• Documentation: Does a map of the network topology exist, and is it clearly stated where&lt;br /&gt;each computer fits on that map? Is there an inventory of all hardware and software, and does&lt;br /&gt;a document exist detailing the preferred security configuration of every system?&lt;br /&gt;Security Administrator Tool for Analyzing Networks (SATAN) 284&lt;br /&gt;• Emergency procedures:What kinds of procedures exist for installing security patches or&lt;br /&gt;handling exploits? In cases of system intrusion, is it company policy to shut down the network&lt;br /&gt;immediately, or does the company prefer to monitor the intruder for a while? How&lt;br /&gt;and when are employees notified of exploits, and at what stage and at what time are law&lt;br /&gt;enforcement agencies called in?&lt;br /&gt;• Logs: What information is logged, and how and where? Are the information logs secure&lt;br /&gt;from tampering, and if so, are they regularly examined, and, if so, by whom?&lt;br /&gt;• Physical security:Are systems physically protected from outsider crackers and adequately&lt;br /&gt;secured, where needed, from insider crackers? Are reusable passwords used internally or&lt;br /&gt;externally, and are employees told through company policy to change their passwords&lt;br /&gt;routinely?&lt;br /&gt;• Sensitive information: How are sensitive and proprietary information protected online, and&lt;br /&gt;how are backup tapes protected?&lt;br /&gt;• User rights and responsibilities: How much freedom do employees have in terms of selecting&lt;br /&gt;their own operating system, software, and games for their computers, and can employees&lt;br /&gt;in our company send and receive personal email or do personal work on company computers?&lt;br /&gt;What policies exist regarding resource consumption (for example, disk or CPU&lt;br /&gt;quotas) and abuse (accidental or intentional) of services? What penalties exist, for example,&lt;br /&gt;if an employee brings down a server?&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Administrator; Electronic Mail or Email; Firewall; Internet; Logs; Modem; Password.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Queeg Company. Security Policy Checklist. [Online, October 6, 1997.]&lt;br /&gt;Queeg Company Website. http://queeg.com/~brion/security/secpolicy.html.&lt;br /&gt;Security Zones (general term): Internet Explorer divides the Internet into these so that users&lt;br /&gt;can assign a Website to zones having suitable security levels. Users can ascertain which zone any&lt;br /&gt;Web page is in by viewing the right side of the browser’s status bar.When a user tries to download&lt;br /&gt;information from any Website, Internet Explorer reviews the security configuration for that&lt;br /&gt;site’s zone.The four zones are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;• Local Intranet zone: Has addresses not requiring a proxy server, and the addresses here are&lt;br /&gt;configured by the system administrator in the Internet Explorer Administrator’s Kit&lt;br /&gt;(IEAK). By default, the security level of this zone is Medium.&lt;br /&gt;• Trusted site zone: Has sites that users should be able to trust, meaning that they should be&lt;br /&gt;able to download or run files without worrying about damage being caused to their computer&lt;br /&gt;or information. Users can assign sites to this zone, whose default security level is Low.&lt;br /&gt;• Restricted site zone: Has sites that users would not trust because they cannot be sure that&lt;br /&gt;they could download or run files without damaging their computers or information.&lt;br /&gt;Though users can assign sites to this zone, it defaults to the High security level.&lt;br /&gt;• Internet zone: Has information not on the user’s computer, not on an Intranet, and not&lt;br /&gt;assigned to any other zone.This level’s default security level is Medium.&lt;br /&gt;285 Security Zones&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Administrator, Browser; Internet.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Prescription Pricing Authority.What are Security Zones? [Online, 2004.]&lt;br /&gt;Prescription Pricing Authority Website. http://www.ppa.org.uk/help/www/int00290.htm.&lt;br /&gt;Seepage (general term): The inadvertent distribution of data through uncontrolled holes (or&lt;br /&gt;leaks) in the security perimeter.The leak occurs because of a lack of proper security procedures,&lt;br /&gt;or because of lax enforcement of such procedures. Employees may not be aware of the potential&lt;br /&gt;damage that they cause when sending proprietary information outside of the organization.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Beaver, K. Don’t Spring a Leak. Information Security, [Online, Jan 2006],&lt;br /&gt;http://informationsecurity.techtarget.com/magPrintFriendly/0,293813,sid42_gci1154838,00.&lt;br /&gt;html.&lt;br /&gt;Segments Internal Networks, Isolation, and Separation (general term): Internal networks&lt;br /&gt;are split into logical segments so that they can be isolated and separated. Initially, these segments&lt;br /&gt;were introduced to contain and limit network traffic and to save bandwidth. Now, segmented&lt;br /&gt;networks serve as additional elements in a comprehensive security architecture. Additional&lt;br /&gt;Firewalls can be introduced between network segments.&lt;br /&gt;As a case in point, a financial accounting department’s network might be tightly controlled&lt;br /&gt;and not even be accessible from other internal locations. Should one of the internal systems be&lt;br /&gt;compromised by crackers, the intruder would face additional barriers before he or she could brag&lt;br /&gt;about “0wning” the complete network or having access to the “crown jewels.”&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Firewalls; Network; 0wn.&lt;br /&gt;Sendmail (general term):Widely used program that implements the SMTP mail delivery protocol&lt;br /&gt;on most UNIX and Linux systems. If someone’s ISP delivers email using SMTP, it is&lt;br /&gt;important to configure sendmail correctly to avoid “bouncing” email. If sendmail does not know&lt;br /&gt;a particular user name, it will reject the email and deliver the error message “550 User unknown.”&lt;br /&gt;As with regular land mail, when a recipient is not known because of a wrong or changed address,&lt;br /&gt;the land mail will be returned to the sender. The same principle applies to email. Bouncing&lt;br /&gt;wanted email is considered to be a beginner system administrator’s mistake by more seasoned&lt;br /&gt;experts, especially when it is from a mailing list.&lt;br /&gt;Bouncing wanted email can occur when connecting UNIX to the Internet for the first time.&lt;br /&gt;These techniques can increase the chances that correctly addressed email is accepted by sendmail.&lt;br /&gt;Make sure that: any user name to which email is addressed is defined as a UNIX user, any name&lt;br /&gt;used on email is defined as an alias to UNIX users, and email addressed to unknown user names&lt;br /&gt;is redirected to defined UNIX users.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Electronic Mail or Email; Internet Service Provider (ISP); Simple Mail Transfer&lt;br /&gt;Protocol (SMTP); UNIX.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Kempston Webmaster.Solaris Resources at Kempston. [Online,&lt;br /&gt;February, 1, 2000.] Kempston Website. http://www.kempston.net/solaris/configsendmail2.html.&lt;br /&gt;Sensepost (general term): A South African IT security consulting company as well as the handle&lt;br /&gt;of one of its founders, R.Temmingh.This person is a well-respected security professional and&lt;br /&gt;frequent speaker at IT security conferences.At the 2005 DefCon hacker gathering, he presented&lt;br /&gt;a tool to automate network assessments called “BiDiBLAH.” At the July 2004 Black Hat&lt;br /&gt;Security Zones 286&lt;br /&gt;Briefings in Las Vegas, Sensepost’s entertaining and content-rich talk was entitled, “When the&lt;br /&gt;Tables Turn.” At the July 2003 DefCon hacking convention, he spoke about vulnerabilities&lt;br /&gt;in critical infrastructures. The company Website can be found at http://www.sensepost.com/&lt;br /&gt;company_profile.html.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Black Hat Briefings, DefCon.&lt;br /&gt;Sensitive (general term): Certain parts of an organization’s data or information is classified as&lt;br /&gt;this; if there is concern about a loss of data or about access to this data by an unauthorized party,&lt;br /&gt;resulting in some damage to the organization.&lt;br /&gt;Separation of Duties (general term):This principle prevents any part of the computer system&lt;br /&gt;from being under the control of a single person. Every duty or transaction therefore requires multiple&lt;br /&gt;people to be involved, with tasks being split among them. In banking, this idea has long been&lt;br /&gt;part of the security features of the financial community as a means to control fraud and theft.&lt;br /&gt;Now the same concept is applied to computer systems and information security practitioners.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Computer; Fraud.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Graham, R. Hacking Lexicon. [Online, 2001.] Robert Graham Website.&lt;br /&gt;http://www.linuxsecurity.com/resource_files/documentation/hacking-dict.html.&lt;br /&gt;September 11, 2001, Terrorist Events (general term): The events that took place in the&lt;br /&gt;United States on September 11, 2001, had a profound impact worldwide and enhanced citizens’&lt;br /&gt;fears about both terrorism and cyberterrorism.Within minutes, two passenger jets controlled by&lt;br /&gt;terrorists of the al-Qaeda network crashed into the twin towers of the World Trade Center in&lt;br /&gt;Manhattan and a third crashed into the Pentagon in Washington, D.C., causing one side of the&lt;br /&gt;five-sided structure to collapse. Shortly thereafter, a fourth jet crashed in a field about 120 kilometers&lt;br /&gt;southeast of Pittsburgh. The latter crash was diverted by passengers on the jet from its&lt;br /&gt;intended target: the U.S. Capitol.&lt;br /&gt;Prior to this event, the media headlines in the United States tended to focus on crackers’&lt;br /&gt;exploits—and incorrectly labeled the cybercriminal arm as “hackers.” Also, the FBI focused on&lt;br /&gt;the exploits of hackers and crackers alike, often seeing both camps as major criminals in society.&lt;br /&gt;After the September 11 event, media headlines in the United States and elsewhere—as well as the&lt;br /&gt;attention of the FBI—turned sharply toward terrorists and considerably away from hackers.This&lt;br /&gt;movement was visible in the anti-terrorist laws that were quickly passed in the United States following&lt;br /&gt;the September 11 event.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Crackers; Hacker;Terrorists;Terrorist-Hacker Links.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Schell, B.H., Dodge, J.L., with S.S. Moutsatsos. The Hacking of America:&lt;br /&gt;Who’s Doing It,Why, and How.Westport, CT: Quorum Books, 2002.&lt;br /&gt;Server (general term): A computer program carrying out some task on behalf of a user, such as&lt;br /&gt;delivering a Web page or sending email messages. Computers on which these server applications&lt;br /&gt;are found are also called servers.&lt;br /&gt;Servers have often been the focus of computer security attacks. For example, on March 8,&lt;br /&gt;2005, a security researcher announced in an advisory that Microsoft Corporation’s newest operating&lt;br /&gt;systems are vulnerable to Denial of Service (DoS) attacks. In particular, researcher Dejan&lt;br /&gt;Lavaja said that Windows Server 2003 and XP Service Pack 2 (with the Windows Firewall not&lt;br /&gt;287 Server&lt;br /&gt;on) could suffer from LAND attacks—remote DoS incidents created when a packet is sent to a&lt;br /&gt;computer on which the source host/port is the same as the destination host/port. Using reverseengineering&lt;br /&gt;tools, this researcher discovered that just one LAND packet transmitted to a file&lt;br /&gt;server could result in “frozen”Windows Explorers on all the workstations connected to that&lt;br /&gt;server. In fact, warned Lavaja, because of this vulnerability the network could totally collapse.&lt;br /&gt;Soon thereafter, however, a spokesperson for the Microsoft Corporation said that although the&lt;br /&gt;vulnerability exists, the adverse impact of such an attack would result only in the computer’s running&lt;br /&gt;sluggishly for a brief period. Users were cautioned to filter traffic with the same IP source&lt;br /&gt;and destination address.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Denial of Service (DoS); Electronic Mail or Email; Host; Node; Packet.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Naraine, R. Old-School DoS Attack Can Penetrate XP SP2. [Online,&lt;br /&gt;March 8, 2005.] Ziff Davis Publishing Holdings Inc.Website. http://www.eweek.com/article2/&lt;br /&gt;0,1759,1773958,00.asp.&lt;br /&gt;Severity (general term):The level assigned to an intrusion incident.&lt;br /&gt;Sex Crimes Wiretapping Act of 2001 (legal term): Introduced by U.S. Representative Nancy&lt;br /&gt;Johnson, R-CT, on May 16, 2001, the Sex Crimes Wiretapping Act of 2001 was intended to&lt;br /&gt;change Title 18 of the United States Code so that sexual crimes with minors as targets would be&lt;br /&gt;classified as “predicate crimes for the interception of communications.” On May 22, 2002, this&lt;br /&gt;Act was sent to the Senate Committee, was received in the Senate, and was sent to the&lt;br /&gt;Committee on the Judiciary. It was not passed in this form.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Child Pornography.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Center for Democracy and Technology. Legislation Affecting the Internet.&lt;br /&gt;[Online, July 28, 2004.] Center for Democracy and Technology Website. http://www.cdt.org/&lt;br /&gt;legislation/107th/wiretaps/.&lt;br /&gt;Shared Drives (general term): Disk drives that are accessible from other computers under the&lt;br /&gt;Microsoft Corp. operating system software. In UNIX terminology, the concept is known as&lt;br /&gt;“exported” file system.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Network File Systems (NFS); Operating System Software; UNIX.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Symantec Security Response. Glossary. [Online, July 15, 2004.] Symantec&lt;br /&gt;Security Response Website. http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/refa.html.&lt;br /&gt;Shaw, Eric Team (general term): Eric Shaw, along with his colleagues J. Post and K. Ruby,&lt;br /&gt;undertook an innovative 1999 research study to help define the traits and personality profiles of&lt;br /&gt;insider crackers, those existing within corporate and government agency walls.The Eric Shaw&lt;br /&gt;research team found that insider crackers tend to be introverted individuals with a history of significant&lt;br /&gt;family problems in early childhood. They also tend to have an online computer&lt;br /&gt;dependency that significantly interferes with or replaces their direct social and professional interactions&lt;br /&gt;in adulthood. Insider crackers also seem to have an ethical flexibility allowing them to&lt;br /&gt;justify their exploits, and they were found to have a stronger loyalty to their computer specialty&lt;br /&gt;than to their employers. Moreover, the Eric Shaw research team found that insider crackers have&lt;br /&gt;a sense of entitlement; they think that they are special and thus owed the recognition, privilege,&lt;br /&gt;or exception to the normative rules governing other employees with regard to online behaviors.&lt;br /&gt;Server 288&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Crackers; Hacker; Insider Hacker or Cracker.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Schell, B.H., Dodge, J.L., with S.S. Moutsatsos. The Hacking of America:&lt;br /&gt;Who’s Doing It,Why, and How.Westport, CT: Quorum Books, 2002.&lt;br /&gt;Shell (general term):The default command-line interface on UNIX systems.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: UNIX.&lt;br /&gt;Shell Metacharacters (general term): Characters used for input or output in UNIX shells having&lt;br /&gt;special meaning. For the shell, these include wildcards, quotes, and logical operators.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Shell.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Currie, M. Glossary. [Online, January 9, 1998.] University of Leeds&lt;br /&gt;Computer Based Learning Website. http://www.starlink.rl.ac.uk/star/docs/sc4.htx/node75&lt;br /&gt;.html.&lt;br /&gt;Shellcode (general term): Code or code fragments for various operating systems that can be&lt;br /&gt;pasted onto buffer overflow exploits. When crackers successfully exploit vulnerabilities such as&lt;br /&gt;buffer overflows, they typically open a shell at the end of the exploit.With a command-line shell,&lt;br /&gt;the cracker then can perform any task he or she desires. However, opening shells within buffer&lt;br /&gt;overflow exploits can be difficult. For this reason, crackers often maintain libraries of shellcode.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Buffer Overflows; Crackers; Shell.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Graham, R. Hacking Lexicon. [Online, 2001.] Robert Graham Website.&lt;br /&gt;http://www.linuxsecurity.com/resource_files/documentation/hacking-dict.html.&lt;br /&gt;Shimomura,Tsutomu (person; 1965– ):A computational physicist who at just 30 years of age&lt;br /&gt;helped the U.S. federal authorities catch cracker Kevin D. Mitnick in 1995. At that time, frequent&lt;br /&gt;cracker Mitnick (who is now a computer security consultant and computer security book&lt;br /&gt;writer), was on the FBI’s Ten Most Wanted fugitives list. Following the capture of Mitnick,&lt;br /&gt;Shimomura wrote the book Takedown to describe the event, and in 2002, a movie of the same&lt;br /&gt;name was released. He is now a Senior Fellow at the San Diego Supercomputer Center.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI); Mitnick, Kevin (a.k.a. Condor).&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Schell, B.H., Dodge, J.L., with S.S. Moutsatsos. The Hacking of America:&lt;br /&gt;Who’s Doing It,Why, and How.Westport, CT: Quorum Books, 2002.&lt;br /&gt;Shoulder Surf (general term): One way in which crackers steal a legitimate user’s passwords—&lt;br /&gt;by watching that individual type his or her password on the keyboard.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Crackers; Password.&lt;br /&gt;Shunning (general term): In networking terms, is the sensor’s ability to use a network device to&lt;br /&gt;prevent entry to either a specific network host or to a whole network.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Network.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Cisco Systems Inc. Documentation. [Online, July 28, 2000.] Cisco Systems&lt;br /&gt;Inc. Website. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/csids/csids2/220ug/&lt;br /&gt;preface.htm#4199.&lt;br /&gt;Signature (general term): In anti-virus software and intrusion detection systems (IDS), a&lt;br /&gt;pattern that the system looks for when scanning files or network traffic.This term should not be&lt;br /&gt;confused with a digital signature. Virus or worm signatures are increasingly hard to determine&lt;br /&gt;289 Signature&lt;br /&gt;because malicious code has begun to use code-morphing techniques—such that each propagated&lt;br /&gt;new signature version looks somewhat different from that of the previous generation.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Anti-Virus Software; Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS); Polymorphic Virus;Virus;&lt;br /&gt;Worm.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Graham, R. Hacking Lexicon. [Online, 2001.] Robert Graham Website.&lt;br /&gt;http://www.linuxsecurity.com/resource_files/documentation/hacking-dict.html.&lt;br /&gt;Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) (general term): Email is sent with this protocol, as&lt;br /&gt;defined in RFC 821. SMTP has been assigned port 25. If someone knows this information, he&lt;br /&gt;or she can use telnet to directly connect to any email server worldwide and send email.The only&lt;br /&gt;tools necessary to do this are a telnet client program (included in any operating system supporting&lt;br /&gt;TCP/IP, which basically means all modern ones) and a recipient’s email address. Email&lt;br /&gt;programs, text editors, and browsers are not needed.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Electronic Mail or Email; Port and Port Numbers;TCP/IP or Transmission Control&lt;br /&gt;Protocol/Internet Protocol.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Dru. SMTP with telnet. [Online, 1999.] Daemon News Website. http://&lt;br /&gt;www.daemonnews.org/199905/telnet.html.&lt;br /&gt;Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) (general term): A network protocol used&lt;br /&gt;to manage TCP/IP networks. On UNIX systems and in Windows, the SNMP service provides&lt;br /&gt;status information about a host on a TCP/IP network, as well as a means of managing network&lt;br /&gt;hosts (such as bridges, hubs, routers, and workstations or servers) from a computer running network-&lt;br /&gt;management software. SNMP utilizes a distributed architecture of agents and management&lt;br /&gt;systems. Because network management is critical for both auditing and resource management,&lt;br /&gt;SNMP can be used to do a number of useful things, including auditing network usage, configuring&lt;br /&gt;remote devices, detecting network faults and nonauthorized access, and monitoring network&lt;br /&gt;performance.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Routers; Server; TCP/IP or Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol;&lt;br /&gt;UNIX.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Microsoft Corporation. SNMP Defined. [Online, 2004.] Microsoft&lt;br /&gt;Corporation Website. http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/WindowsServ/&lt;br /&gt;2003/standard/proddocs/en-us/Default.asp?url=/resources/documentation/WindowsServ/&lt;br /&gt;2003/standard/proddocs/en-us/sag_snmpwhatis.asp.&lt;br /&gt;SkipJack (general term): An encryption algorithm developed by the U.S. National Security&lt;br /&gt;Agency to be included in the Clipper chip, a device through which U.S. governmental agencies&lt;br /&gt;would retain access to information that a user encrypted with the Clipper chip.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Clipper Proposal; Encryption.&lt;br /&gt;Skylarov, Dmitry Case (legal case): At the DefCon 9 hacking gathering in Las Vegas in July&lt;br /&gt;2001, Russian Dmitry Sklyarov was arrested about the time he was to give his talk to the hacker&lt;br /&gt;crowd. Sklyarov developed a software program sold by his Russian employer ElcomSoft Co.&lt;br /&gt;Ltd. to permit users to download e-books from secure Adobe software to more commonly used&lt;br /&gt;PDF computer files. He, and later his company, were charged with violating provisions under&lt;br /&gt;the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) in the United States. Both Skylarov and&lt;br /&gt;his company were eventually cleared of any wrongdoing because of jurisdictional issues.&lt;br /&gt;Signature 290&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Copyright Laws; DefCon, Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA); Elcomsoft&lt;br /&gt;Co. Ltd.; Portable Document Format (PDF).&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Schell, B.H., Dodge, J.L., with S.S. Moutsatsos. The Hacking of America:&lt;br /&gt;Who’s Doing It,Why, and How.Westport, CT: Quorum Books, 2002.&lt;br /&gt;SLIP/PPP or Serial Line IP/Point-to-Point Protocol (general term): Permits users dialup&lt;br /&gt;access to the Internet through a serial link.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Internet.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Internet Highway, LLC. Internet Terminology: SLIP/PPP. [Online, 1999.]&lt;br /&gt;Internet Highway, LLC.Website. http://www.ihwy.com/support/netterms.html.&lt;br /&gt;Smart Card (general term):A credit card–sized device (or sometimes smaller) that has a embedded&lt;br /&gt;computer chip.This chip not only provides storage functionality but also can run programs.&lt;br /&gt;Smart cards are used in a number of security-sensitive applications. One important application&lt;br /&gt;of Smart Cards is in wireless telecommunication, where Smart Cards are used as Subscriber&lt;br /&gt;Identification Modules (SIM).&lt;br /&gt;Another use is the health insurance card now employed in several countries around the world.&lt;br /&gt;The patient card contains a patient’s health history and a record of previous prescriptions. In&lt;br /&gt;addition to this data, a number of security algorithms are implemented on the card so that only&lt;br /&gt;properly authorized parties—doctors and/or nurses—can access and alter this data when they&lt;br /&gt;successfully establish their identity and authentication through the usage of a health professional’s&lt;br /&gt;version of the card.&lt;br /&gt;SMTP or Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (general term): Relates to how email is transmitted&lt;br /&gt;between hosts and users in a TCP/IP network. A mail program—such as Microsoft&lt;br /&gt;Outlook—sends an outgoing message to an SMTP server typically provided by the Internet&lt;br /&gt;Service Provider of the user.This SMTP server connects to an SMTP server at the email’s destination,&lt;br /&gt;where an SMTP transfer agent receives the message and puts it into the receiver’s&lt;br /&gt;mailbox.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Electronic Mail or Email; TCP/IP or Transmission Control Protocol/Internet&lt;br /&gt;Protocol.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Internet Highway, LLC. Internet Terminology: SMTP. [Online, Highway,&lt;br /&gt;1999.] Internet Highway, LLC.Website. http://www.ihwy.com/support/netterms.html.&lt;br /&gt;Smurf (general term):An exploit sending a ping to a broadcast address using a spoofed source&lt;br /&gt;address. Consequently, everyone on the target segment responds to the source address, flooding&lt;br /&gt;the targeted site with traffic.&lt;br /&gt;With this kind of attack, someone sends an IP ping (or “echo my message back to me”)&lt;br /&gt;request to some recipient Website. Actually, the ping packet states that it should be broadcast&lt;br /&gt;to more than one host within the recipient Website’s local network.The ping packet also indicates&lt;br /&gt;that the request is from another Website, the target site that is to receive the Denial of&lt;br /&gt;Service (DoS).The result is that many Ping replies will be flooding back to the spoofed host,&lt;br /&gt;and if the flood is severe enough, the spoofed host will no longer be able to distinguish real traffic&lt;br /&gt;or receive it.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Denial of Service (DoS); Exploit; Flooding; Internet Protocol (IP); Packet, Ping or&lt;br /&gt;Packet Internet Grouper.&lt;br /&gt;291 Smurf&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Graham, R. Hacking Lexicon. [Online, 2001.] Robert Graham Website.&lt;br /&gt;http://www.linuxsecurity.com/resource_files/documentation/hacking-dict.html; TechTarget.&lt;br /&gt;Denial of Service. [Online, May 16, 2001.] TechTarget Website. http://searchsecurity.techtarget&lt;br /&gt;.com/sDefinition/0,,sid14_gci213591,00.html.&lt;br /&gt;Snail Mail (general term): Regular posted mail (for which postage stamps are used).&lt;br /&gt;SneakerNet (general term): Jargon term for the method of transmitting electronic information&lt;br /&gt;by personally carrying it from one place to another on floppy disk or on some other removable&lt;br /&gt;medium, such as tapes or memory sticks.The idea is that someone is using his or her shoes (possibly&lt;br /&gt;sneakers) rather than the telecommunications network to quickly move data around.&lt;br /&gt;Sneakers of 1992 (general term):The 1992 film Sneakers depicted the adventures of a professional&lt;br /&gt;hacking team led by actor Robert Redford.The team’s mission was to go after a device that would&lt;br /&gt;break any code.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Code or Source Code.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Internet Movie Database, Inc. Sneakers (1992). [Online, May 20, 2005.]&lt;br /&gt;Internet Movie Database, Inc.Website. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0105435/.&lt;br /&gt;Sniffer Program or Packet Sniffer (general term):A computer program that analyzes data on&lt;br /&gt;a communication network to gather intelligence, such as detecting passwords of interest that are&lt;br /&gt;transmitted over the Internet. Sniffers are used by crackers on compromised systems to spy on&lt;br /&gt;network traffic and steal access information for even more systems.&lt;br /&gt;System administrators can detect whether a sniffer is running on their systems by frequently&lt;br /&gt;checking on the network interface settings. If a sniffer is running, the network interface card is&lt;br /&gt;set to a “promiscuous” mode, allowing it to read all traffic on the Internet.This setting is not the&lt;br /&gt;normal setting and therefore is quite easily detectable.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Administrator; Crackers; Ethernet; Internet; Network; Promiscous Mode Network&lt;br /&gt;Interface.&lt;br /&gt;Snooper (general term): A program that listens in on a network to gather intelligence.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Intelligence; Sniffer.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Pipkin, D.L. Halting the Hacker: A Practical Guide to Computer Security.&lt;br /&gt;Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2003.&lt;br /&gt;SNORT Network-Based IDS (general term): Popular, free of charge, pattern-based Intrusion&lt;br /&gt;Detection System specializing in the analysis of network traffic.With the incredible growth of the&lt;br /&gt;Internet has come a new aspect of network security, SNORT network-based IDS, or intrusion&lt;br /&gt;detection systems. As the Internet continues to grow, so does the potential for damage caused by&lt;br /&gt;crackers—which is why intrusion detection systems are so essential. In the recent past, solutions for&lt;br /&gt;overcoming intrusions have included firewall components such as packet filters and proxy firewalls,&lt;br /&gt;but today such solutions are not enough. Firewalls, for example, cannot detect back doors&lt;br /&gt;around the firewall.The security conditions are even worse if proxy firewalls are not being used at&lt;br /&gt;all.Moreover, current research suggests that more than half of all recorded breaches in industry, government,&lt;br /&gt;and educational computer systems have been caused by an insider legitimately behind the&lt;br /&gt;Smurf 292&lt;br /&gt;firewall. For all these reasons, companies have recently started deploying intrusion detection systems&lt;br /&gt;(IDS) such as SNORT as an additional part of a network’s security architecture.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Firewall; Internet; Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS); Packet.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Honeypots.net. Intrusion Detection Articles, Links and Whitepapers.&lt;br /&gt;Honeypot.net Website. http://www.honeypots.net/ids/links/.&lt;br /&gt;SoBigF Worm (general term): As of September 15, 2003, Symantec Security Response downgraded&lt;br /&gt;the threat of this worm to a Category 2 from a Category 4. More formally known as&lt;br /&gt;W32.Sobig.F@mm, this was a mass-mailing worm that sent itself to all the email addresses found&lt;br /&gt;in the files with extensions dbx, .eml, .hlp, .html, .htm, .mht, .txt and .wab.The worm used its&lt;br /&gt;own SMTP engine to propagate, and though it tried to create a copy of itself on reachable and&lt;br /&gt;unprotected network drives, it failed to do so because it had glitches in the code.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP);Worm.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Symantec Security Response. W32.Sobig.F@mm. [Online, July 28,&lt;br /&gt;2004.] Symantec Security Response Website. http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/&lt;br /&gt;venc/data/w32.sobig.f@mm.html.&lt;br /&gt;Social Engineering (general term):A deceptive process in which crackers “engineer” or design&lt;br /&gt;a social situation to trick others into allowing them access to an otherwise closed network, or&lt;br /&gt;into believing a reality that does not exist.To crack computer systems, crackers often employ&lt;br /&gt;their well-honed social engineering skills.A robust sample of social-engineering case studies can&lt;br /&gt;be found in Kevin Mitnick’s book The Art of Deception.&lt;br /&gt;Social engineering can also be used in noncyber-related crimes. A 2005 case involved a 39-&lt;br /&gt;year-old U.S.woman by the name of Anna Ayala, who filed a complaint to police in March saying&lt;br /&gt;that a human finger was in the chili bowl she purchased from a San Jose Wendy’s fast-food outlet.&lt;br /&gt;The police, believing that the complaint was a hoax after they investigated the claim,&lt;br /&gt;eventually discovered that the finger belonged to a man who lost his finger in an industrial accident&lt;br /&gt;in December 2004. He gave his finger to Anna’s husband, who gave it to Anna. Anna&lt;br /&gt;apparently “social engineered” a fake reality and was convicted of filing a false claim and of grand&lt;br /&gt;theft and sentenced to nine years in prison.The Wendy’s company offered a $100,000 reward for&lt;br /&gt;information regarding the claim, for it said that the crime cost it millions of dollars in sales.&lt;br /&gt;Apparently, the company had to lay off dozens of employees at the San Jose worksite because&lt;br /&gt;business there was harmed.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Crackers; Human Factor and Social Engineering; Mitnick, Kevin (a.k.a. Condor).&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Associated Press. Police Identify Source of Finger Found in Chili. The&lt;br /&gt;Globe and Mail, May 14, 2005, p.A2; Schell, B.H. and Martin, C. Contemporary World Issues Series:&lt;br /&gt;Cybercrime: A Reference Handbook. Santa Barbara, CA:ABC-CLIO, 2004.&lt;br /&gt;Social Engineering Techniques (general term): Include glancing over authorized users’ shoulders&lt;br /&gt;to see their password entries; recording authorized users’ login keystrokes on video cameras;&lt;br /&gt;searching for password notes under authorized users’ desktop pads; calling system operators and&lt;br /&gt;saying that one is an employee who forgot his or her password and asking for the legitimate&lt;br /&gt;password; going through trash cans and collecting loose pieces of paper with passwords on&lt;br /&gt;them; searching for authorized users’ passwords by reading email messages stored on company&lt;br /&gt;293 Social Engineering Techniques&lt;br /&gt;computers; and guessing different combinations of personally meaningful initials or birth dates&lt;br /&gt;of authorized users—their likely passwords.&lt;br /&gt;Though there were all sorts of high-tech conjectures about how Paris Hilton’s cell phone was&lt;br /&gt;exploited in February 2005, a piece appearing in The Washington Post online on May 18, 2005,&lt;br /&gt;indicated that the exploit may have relied on very basic social engineering techniques—&lt;br /&gt;combined with vulnerabilities in the Website of Hilton’s cell phone provider, T-Mobile&lt;br /&gt;International.A young cracker involved in the cell phone information heist told the reporter that&lt;br /&gt;he was part of an online group that succeeded in its crack attack only after one member&lt;br /&gt;tricked—using his social engineering techniques—a T-Mobile employee into releasing information&lt;br /&gt;not supposed to be in the public domain. Though protecting the minor’s identity, the&lt;br /&gt;reporter said that the young cracker provided him with evidence supporting the claim, including&lt;br /&gt;screen shots of what he maintained were internal T-Mobile computer network pages.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Electronic Mail or Email; Logging In; Password; Social Engineering Techniques.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Krebs, B. Paris Hilton Hack Started With Old-Fashioned Con. [Online,&lt;br /&gt;May 18, 2005.] The Washington Post Company Website. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/&lt;br /&gt;content/article/2005/05/19/AR2005051900711.html; Schell, B.H., Dodge, J.L., with S.S.&lt;br /&gt;Moutsatsos. The Hacking of America:Who’s Doing It,Why, and How.Westport, CT: Quorum Books,&lt;br /&gt;2002; Schell, B.H. and Martin,C. Contemporary World Issues Series: Cybercrime:A Reference Handbook.&lt;br /&gt;Santa Barbara, CA:ABC-CLIO, 2004.&lt;br /&gt;Social Security Number (SSN) (general term): From the beginning of the Social Security&lt;br /&gt;program in the United States in 1935 until the 1970s, the U.S. government issued Social Security&lt;br /&gt;numbers (SSNs) to applicants based on their stated identifying information. The government,&lt;br /&gt;however, did not ask for evidence verifying that the information given was indeed correct or&lt;br /&gt;legitimate.With an increased use of SSNs by both the government and private sectors, the SSN&lt;br /&gt;has become a target of greater abuse, particularly in cases of identity theft. Because of the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;government’s increased concerns about illegal aliens working in the United States, SSN identity&lt;br /&gt;fraud, and the potential abuse of public entitlement programs, in 2003 Congress legislated “evidence&lt;br /&gt;requirements”—such as rigorous verification of birth certificates or immigration&lt;br /&gt;documentation—for SSN issuing and for the replacement of already issued SSN cards. Even the&lt;br /&gt;procedures have been made more rigorous for assigning SSNs to U.S.-born persons aged 12 and&lt;br /&gt;older.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Identity Theft or Masquerading.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: SSA Policy Site. RM 00203.001 Evidence Required for an SSN Card.&lt;br /&gt;[Online, October 8, 2003.] SSA Policy Site. http://policy.ssa.gov/poms.nsf/lnx/0100203001.&lt;br /&gt;Socket (general term): Is roughly analogous to a port and is a communication endpoint for a&lt;br /&gt;TCP or UDP connection. One process is said to open a socket to listen for incoming connections,&lt;br /&gt;and a second process connects to a socket to establish a communication session.&lt;br /&gt;Sockets can also be used for interprocess communication on a single computer, and multiple&lt;br /&gt;sockets can be made to communicate with one another. Sockets are bidirectional, which means&lt;br /&gt;that both sides of the connection can send and receive information.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Port and Port Numbers; TCP/IP or Transmission Control Protocol/Internet&lt;br /&gt;Protocol; User Datagram Protocol (UDP).&lt;br /&gt;Social Engineering Techniques 294&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: About, Inc. Socket. [Online, 2004.] About, Inc.Website. http://compnet&lt;br /&gt;working.about.com/library/glossary/bldef-socket.htm.&lt;br /&gt;Software Piracy (legal term): Unauthorized copying of some purchased software. Most software&lt;br /&gt;programs purchased are licensed for use by just one user or at just one computer site.&lt;br /&gt;Moreover, when someone buys software, he or she is known as a “licensed user” rather than as&lt;br /&gt;an owner of the software.As a licensed user, an individual is permitted to make copies of the software&lt;br /&gt;program for back-up purposes only. It is a violation of copyright laws in North America,&lt;br /&gt;in particular, to freely distribute software copies.&lt;br /&gt;Because software piracy is all but impossible to halt entirely, software companies now launch&lt;br /&gt;legal suits against individuals violating software copyright laws.Years ago, software companies&lt;br /&gt;attempted to prevent software piracy by copy-protecting software, but this strategy was neither&lt;br /&gt;foolproof nor convenient for users. Software companies typically require registration at the time&lt;br /&gt;of software purchase in an attempt to clamp down on the problem.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Copyright Laws; Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA).&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Jupitermedia Corporation.What is Software Piracy? [Online, October 9,&lt;br /&gt;2003.] http://www.pcwebopedia.com/TERM/S/software_piracy.html.&lt;br /&gt;Solaris (general term): Sun Microsystems’ version of the UNIX operating system.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: UNIX.&lt;br /&gt;SonicWall Inc. (general term): In 2000 this provider of IT security products for high-speed&lt;br /&gt;access subscribers released its SonicWALL Network Anti-Virus tool, a virus-scanning software&lt;br /&gt;package.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Anti-Virus Software.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: SonicWALL, Inc. SonicWALL Network Anti-virus Innoculates Businesses&lt;br /&gt;Against Virus Outbreaks:The “ILOVEYOU”Virus Underscores the Need for Active Enforcement&lt;br /&gt;of Anti-Virus Policies. [Online, 2002.] SonicWALL, Inc.Website. http://www.sonicwall.com/&lt;br /&gt;General/DisplayDetails.asp?id=48.&lt;br /&gt;Sophos (general term): Anti-virus software developed for businesses and networks so that it&lt;br /&gt;can be administered and maintained from a single location, with version updates of the virusscanning&lt;br /&gt;engine delivered regularly. As soon as new viruses are discovered, virus definition&lt;br /&gt;updates can be downloaded from the Internet by users.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Anti-Virus Software; Internet; Malware;Virus.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Paul Smith Computer Services.VPOP3 and Sophos Anti-Virus. [Online,&lt;br /&gt;2004.] Paul Smith Computer Services Website. http://www.pscs.co.uk/products/vpop3/sophos&lt;br /&gt;.php.&lt;br /&gt;Source Route (general term): In network protocols, it lets the user specify the route a packet&lt;br /&gt;should take.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Network; Packet; Protocol.&lt;br /&gt;Spam (general term): Unsolicited,unwanted, impersonal email.A U.K.-based Spamhaus Project&lt;br /&gt;tracks the Internet’s spammers, gangs, and services, as well as provides spam protection for&lt;br /&gt;Internet networks. The Spamhaus Project team also partners with law enforcement agents to&lt;br /&gt;295 Spam&lt;br /&gt;identify and catch spammers worldwide.This group says that email can be regarded as “spam” if&lt;br /&gt;it has all three of the following attributes: (1) the receiver’s personal identity is irrelevant because&lt;br /&gt;the email message sent is actually applicable to multitudes of other receivers; (2) the receiver has&lt;br /&gt;not given explicit consent for the email to be sent; (3) the sending and receiving of the email&lt;br /&gt;message appears to the receiver to give a “disproportionate benefit” to the sender.&lt;br /&gt;Spam wastes the time and the resources of the receivers. Spam also frequently includes material&lt;br /&gt;that many receivers find offensive, such as the marketing of sexual enhancement devices or&lt;br /&gt;child pornography.&lt;br /&gt;In the United States, spam reportedly costs nearly $21.6 billion annually in lost productivity,&lt;br /&gt;according to the 2004 National Technology Readiness Survey (NTRS).The survey, completed&lt;br /&gt;annually, tracks U.S. consumers’ online opinions and behaviors. The loss estimate of more than&lt;br /&gt;$21 billion was based on U.S. users’ reports that they spend an average of three minutes per day&lt;br /&gt;deleting spam at work.With about 170 million U.S. adults online at work, that results in 22.9&lt;br /&gt;million lost hours a week, or $21.6 billion in lost productivity annually when the average wage&lt;br /&gt;is factored into the calculation.&lt;br /&gt;Early in 2005, Lycos Europe began offering computer users a weapon against spam-emitting&lt;br /&gt;servers.The weapon is actually a screensaver program that automatically visits the Website advertised&lt;br /&gt;in the spam.The idea behind this scheme is to have enough of these screensavers running&lt;br /&gt;to slow down the Website or make it inaccessible. Lycos Europe encouraged its 22 million users&lt;br /&gt;to download the screensaver for their own good, but, they affirmed, anyone who has a computer&lt;br /&gt;is welcome to download it.&lt;br /&gt;During the first week of February 2005, however, security experts warned that spam levels&lt;br /&gt;could increase drastically in future years because spammers have found a new way to deliver&lt;br /&gt;spam. Spamhaus said that a new piece of malware, a Trojan, has been created that gains control&lt;br /&gt;of a PC and then uses it to send spam through the mail server of that PC’s Internet Service&lt;br /&gt;Provider (ISP). Because the spam appears to come from the ISP, it is next to impossible for an&lt;br /&gt;anti-spam blacklist to stop it.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Child Pornography; Electronic Mail or Email; Internet; Spammers;Trojan.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Demon Spam-Filtering Service. Frequently Asked Questions. [Online,&lt;br /&gt;2004.] Demon Spam-Filtering Service Website. http://www.demon.nl/eng/products/&lt;br /&gt;services/spamfilterfaq1.html; Ilett, D. Spammers tricking ISPs Into Sending Junk Mail. [Online,&lt;br /&gt;February 2, 2005.] CNET Networks, Inc. Website. http://news.zdnet.co.uk/internet/&lt;br /&gt;0,39020369,39186364,00.htm; In Brief. Program Hits Spammers. The Globe and Mail, December&lt;br /&gt;2, 2004, p. B11; In Brief. Spam Wastes $22.9 Million Hours a Week, Survey Finds. The Globe and&lt;br /&gt;Mail, February 9, 2005, p. C8.&lt;br /&gt;Spammers (general term): Individuals such as online marketers who distribute spam. Email&lt;br /&gt;users receive spam for the same reason that people receive junk mail through regular mail:&lt;br /&gt;Marketers are trying to sell others their products or services. Because email is cheaper than regular&lt;br /&gt;mail, email users tend to get an abundance of spam. Spammers derive their mailing lists from&lt;br /&gt;many sources, including by scanning Usenet discussion groups, searching the Web for likely&lt;br /&gt;addresses, and guessing email addresses at random.&lt;br /&gt;Fighting spammers is a difficult battle at the best of times. During March and April 2005, two&lt;br /&gt;legal cases showed both successes and failures in this regard.&lt;br /&gt;Spam 296&lt;br /&gt;The March 2005 case involved a North Carolina woman charged and then released from&lt;br /&gt;spamming charges. Jessica DeGroot, aged 28, was dismissed of spamming charges under the new&lt;br /&gt;Viriginia Antispam law because the jury apparently got buried in a heap of technological evidence&lt;br /&gt;that it could not understand.The charged woman allegedly flooded tens of thousands of&lt;br /&gt;AOL email accounts with unsolicited bulk advertisements.This case fuels pessimism about stopping&lt;br /&gt;spammers despite such efforts as the passage of the CAN-SPAM Act, blacklists, and&lt;br /&gt;Bayesian filters that try to differentiate between legitimate mail and spam by applying statistics.&lt;br /&gt;The April 2005 case involved spammer Jeremy Jaynes of Raleigh, North Carolina, who went&lt;br /&gt;by the name Gaven Stubberfield and was described by prosecutors as being among the top 10&lt;br /&gt;spammers in the world. Jaynes was sentenced to nine years in prison for his spamming exploits.&lt;br /&gt;This is considered to be a landmark case because it was the United States’ first successful felony&lt;br /&gt;prosecution for transmitting spam over the Internet.&lt;br /&gt;The Virginia jury ruled that Jaynes should serve nine years for transmitting 10 million emails&lt;br /&gt;daily using 16 high-speed lines. Jaynes apparently earned as much as $750,000 a month on his&lt;br /&gt;spamming operation.The case is being appealed.&lt;br /&gt;To move ahead in the fight against spammers, Meng Weng Wong, founder of the email forwarding&lt;br /&gt;service Pobox.com, is asking enterprises to join a movement to support proposed new&lt;br /&gt;standards for email sender authentication. The new services proposed by Pobox.com will rate&lt;br /&gt;email messages against thousands of criteria and then send spammers away by treating all email&lt;br /&gt;as “guilty” until proven “innocent.”&lt;br /&gt;The proposed standards include the Sender Policy Framework (SPF) and Microsoft’s Sender&lt;br /&gt;ID Framework (SIDF). SPF is an SMTP extension rejecting messages when the “From” field&lt;br /&gt;domain sender names do not match authorized IP addresses for that domain. SIDF combines&lt;br /&gt;SPF with Microsoft’s Caller ID for email.&lt;br /&gt;The challenge is that SIDF and SPF will be successful only if a critical mass of enterprises agrees&lt;br /&gt;to be part of the movement by registering records of their domain names and IP addresses at sites&lt;br /&gt;such as Pobox.com. At this early stage of the movement, some companies, such as Microsoft,&lt;br /&gt;Amazon, and eBay, are in favor; others, such as Yahoo!, are against the movement for a variety of&lt;br /&gt;reasons. In June 2005, an industry working group lead by Yahoo! and Cisco announced a new&lt;br /&gt;standard for mail authentication named “DomainKeys Identified Mail,” which was subsequently&lt;br /&gt;submitted to IETF for consideration as a standard.Yahoo! is using the standard for their mail systems,&lt;br /&gt;and, as of March 2006, claims to process hundreds of millions of messages signed with&lt;br /&gt;DomainKeys per day. No commonly used standard has emerged yet.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: CAN-SPAM Act of 2003; Spam.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Associated Press. Spammer Sentenced to 9 Years in Prison in Landmark&lt;br /&gt;Case. The Globe and Mail,April 9, 2005, p. B7; Baard, M. In the Dark About Solutions for Spam?&lt;br /&gt;[Online, March 3, 2005.] TechTarget Website. http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/original&lt;br /&gt;Content/0,289142,sid14_gci1064501,00.html; Demon Spam-Filtering Service. Frequently&lt;br /&gt;Asked Questions. [Online, 2004.] Demon Spam-Filtering Service Website. http://www.demon&lt;br /&gt;.nl/eng/products/services/spamfilterfaq1.html. Jordan, S. Email Authentication Myths and&lt;br /&gt;Misconceptions. [Online, 2006]. Messaging News Website. http://www.messagingnews.com/&lt;br /&gt;magazine/2006/03/features/email_authentication_myths_misc.html.&lt;br /&gt;297 Spammers&lt;br /&gt;Spamming/Scrolling (general term): Sending unsolicited emails for commercial purposes,&lt;br /&gt;sometimes with the criminal intent to defraud.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Fraud; Spam.&lt;br /&gt;Spear Phishing (general term): Cyber attack that is targeted at a single organization. Usually,&lt;br /&gt;the attack is hidden in an email that seems to come from a trusted sender within the targeted&lt;br /&gt;organization.&lt;br /&gt;Special Oversight Panel on Terrorism (general term):A U.S. Congressional panel concerned&lt;br /&gt;with threats to the United States and its allies from weapons of mass destruction, including bioterrorism&lt;br /&gt;and cyberterrorism. In 2000, Dr. Dorothy Denning gave testimony before the panel saying&lt;br /&gt;that cyberspace is constantly under assault and vulnerable to cyberattacks against targeted individuals,&lt;br /&gt;companies, and governments—a point repeated by White Hat hackers for the past 20 years.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Denning, Dorothy;Terrorism;White Hats or Ethical Hackers or Samurai Hackers.&lt;br /&gt;Spider (general term):An automated program that reads Web pages from a Website and then follows&lt;br /&gt;the hypertext (HTTP) links to other pages. Spammers use spiders to sift through Web&lt;br /&gt;pages to look for (that is, harvest) email addresses.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Bot or Robot; Electronic Mail or Email; HTTP (HyperText Transfer Protocol);&lt;br /&gt;Spammers.&lt;br /&gt;Spoofing (general term): The cyberspace appropriation of an authentic user’s identity by&lt;br /&gt;nonauthentic users, causing fraud or attempted fraud, in some cases, and causing critical infrastructure&lt;br /&gt;breakdowns in other cases. Spoofing can also target nonuser-based entities. For instance,&lt;br /&gt;an IP address can be spoofed to appropriate the identity of a server and not a human (user).&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Cyberspace; Fraud; IP Address; Internet Protocol (IP).&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Schell, B.H. and Martin, C. Contemporary World Issues Series: Cybercrime:A&lt;br /&gt;Reference Handbook. Santa Barbara, CA:ABC-CLIO, 2004.&lt;br /&gt;Spyware (general term) Covert software that captures data about online users’ Internet surfing&lt;br /&gt;habits.Adware, a form of spyware, gathers information to target unsuspecting users with email&lt;br /&gt;pop-up ads or other marketing tools.&lt;br /&gt;System administrators are keenly aware that running their desktops while being logged on as&lt;br /&gt;an administrator can cause serious security problems. Because administrators have total system&lt;br /&gt;authority, any program beginning under this account can perform almost any activity. Recently,&lt;br /&gt;spyware pushers have developed means of adding their covert programs to the Windows Firewall’s&lt;br /&gt;list of so-called trusted applications. Although trusted applications generally transmit traffic out&lt;br /&gt;from the said computer, adding a registry subkey that references the application under the subkey&lt;br /&gt;storing trusted applications works only if someone is logged in as an administrator.Administrative&lt;br /&gt;accounts should be using sparingly and with caution.&lt;br /&gt;A white paper available from Symantec Security Response outlines various risks affiliated&lt;br /&gt;with spyware and adware, cites tests available for discovering spyware, and offers security strategies&lt;br /&gt;for dealing with these when discovered. The white paper is at http://enterprisesecurity&lt;br /&gt;.symantec.com/content.cfm?articleid=5667.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Electronic Mail or Email; Firewall; Symantec Corporation.&lt;br /&gt;Spamming/Scrolling 298&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Edwards, M.J.Windows Firewall:Another Good Reason Not to Login as&lt;br /&gt;an Administrator. [Online, February 22, 2005.] Penton Media, Inc. Website. http://list&lt;br /&gt;.windowsitpro.com/t?ctl=3E02:4FB69; Symantec. Symantec’s Anti-Spyware Approach. [Online,&lt;br /&gt;May 19, 2005.] Symantec Website. http://enterprisesecurity.symantec.com/content.cfm?&lt;br /&gt;articleid=5667;Won, S. and Avery, S. Computer Hackers Step Up e-Commerce Attacks. The&lt;br /&gt;Globe and Mail, September 20, 2004, p. B3.&lt;br /&gt;SQL Injection (general term):A security vulnerability occurring in an application’s database layer&lt;br /&gt;that is caused by the incorrect delimiting of variables embedded in SQL statements. It is an example&lt;br /&gt;of a broader class of vulnerabilities occurring whenever a programming or scripting language&lt;br /&gt;is embedded inside another.&lt;br /&gt;SSH (general term): A command used to remotely log in to a UNIX computer that uses&lt;br /&gt;encrypted communication and is therefore the protocol of choice for remote administration&lt;br /&gt;of both UNIX and Linux systems.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Linux; Protocol; UNIX.&lt;br /&gt;Stack frame (general term):A stack frame procedure, or heavyweight procedure, allocates space&lt;br /&gt;for and saves on the stack its caller’s context—information about the part of a program that&lt;br /&gt;invokes the procedure, so that this information can be reinstated when the procedure finishes&lt;br /&gt;executing. Such a procedure not only saves and restores registers but also makes standard calls to&lt;br /&gt;other procedures. The stack frame has both a fixed part (whose size is known at compile time)&lt;br /&gt;and an optional, variable part. If the latter is not present, certain optimizations can be completed.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Buffer Overflows.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Microsoft Corporation. 3.1.2 Stack Frame Procedure. [Online, 2004.]&lt;br /&gt;Microsoft Corporation Website. http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/&lt;br /&gt;en-us/csalpha98/html/3.1.2_stack_frame_procedure.asp.&lt;br /&gt;Stack Smashing (general term): Occurs when a cracker purposely overflows a buffer on stack&lt;br /&gt;to get access to forbidden regions of computer memory. A stack smash is based upon the attributes&lt;br /&gt;of common implementations of C and C++.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Buffer Overflows; Programming Lanugages C, C++, Perl, and Java.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Aleph One. Smashing The Stack For Fun And Profit. [Online, Nov 8,&lt;br /&gt;1996.] Phrack,V 9, # 49, 14 http://www.phrack.org/archives/phrack49.tar.gz .&lt;br /&gt;Stallman, Richard (person; 1953– ): In 1982, he founded the Free Software Foundation&lt;br /&gt;(FSF) and dedicated himself to producing high-quality, free software. He began the programming&lt;br /&gt;and implementation of a full clone of UNIX, written in C and available to the&lt;br /&gt;hacker community for free. He succeeded—with the help of a large and active programmer&lt;br /&gt;community—to develop most of the software environment of a typical UNIX system, but he&lt;br /&gt;had to wait for the Linux movement to gain momentum before a UNIX-like operating system&lt;br /&gt;kernel became as freely available as he (and like-minded others) had continuously demanded. In&lt;br /&gt;2002, a book written by Sam Williams entitled Free as in Freedom: Richard Stallman’s Crusade for&lt;br /&gt;Free Software, chronicles Stallman’s life, discusses his motivations for wanting free software, and&lt;br /&gt;gives insights into his highly creative hacker personality. Stallman’s personal home page can be&lt;br /&gt;found at http://www.stallman.org/.&lt;br /&gt;299 Stallman, Richard&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Free Software Foundation (FSF); Linux; UNIX.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Rothke, B. Stallman’s Crusade For Free Software. [Online, May 22,&lt;br /&gt;2005.] CMP Media LLC Website. http://www.unixreview.com/documents/s=2425/&lt;br /&gt;uni1017174098539/; Schell, B.H., Dodge, J.L., with S.S. Moutsatsos. The Hacking of America:&lt;br /&gt;Who’s Doing It,Why, and How.Westport, CT: Quorum Books, 2002.&lt;br /&gt;Start of Authority (SOA) (general term): Defines global parameters for a DNS zone—&lt;br /&gt;meaning a portion of the namespace on the Internet under a single administrative control—as&lt;br /&gt;defined in RFC 1035. Only one SOA record is permitted in a zone file. Considered to be not&lt;br /&gt;only the most critical but also the most complex record in the zone file, the SOA contains the&lt;br /&gt;root name of the zone, the TTL values, the class of record, and the primary or Master Domain&lt;br /&gt;Name Server for the zone.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Root.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Zytrax, Inc. Start of Authority Record (SOA). [Online, November 17,&lt;br /&gt;2004.] Zytrax, Inc.Website. http://www.zytrax.com/books/dns/ch8/soa.html.&lt;br /&gt;Stateful Inspection (general term): Also referred to as dynamic packet filtering. Check Point&lt;br /&gt;Software is credited with creating the term stateful inspection when it was used in the company’s&lt;br /&gt;1993 FireWall-1.Today, stateful inspection is generally known as firewall architecture working&lt;br /&gt;at the network layer. Different from static packet filtering, which looks at a packet based on the&lt;br /&gt;information in the packet header, stateful inspection tracks every connection traveling through&lt;br /&gt;all firewall network interfaces to make sure that they are valid.&lt;br /&gt;Moreover, a stateful inspection firewall looks at both the header information and the packet&lt;br /&gt;contents on all protocol layers including the application layer to ascertain more about the packet&lt;br /&gt;than merely its source and destination. A firewall with stateful inspection also monitors the connection&lt;br /&gt;state and puts the data together in a state table.Thus, filtering decisions are based not just&lt;br /&gt;on configured rules by the administrator (as is the case in static packet filtering) but also on&lt;br /&gt;context established by the packets that have previously passed through the firewall.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: CheckPoint Software Technologies Ltd.; Firewall; Packet; Packet Filters.&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Jupitermedia Corporation. What is Stateful Inspection? [Online,&lt;br /&gt;August 18, 2003.] Jupitermedia Corporation Website. http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/S/&lt;br /&gt;stateful_inspection.html.&lt;br /&gt;Stealth Scan (general term): Mechanism to perform reconnaissance on a network while&lt;br /&gt;remaining undetected. Uses SYN scan, FIN scan, or other techniques to prevent logging of a&lt;br /&gt;scan.&lt;br /&gt;See Also: Synchronize Packet (SYN); Synchronize Packet Flood (SYN Flood).&lt;br /&gt;Further Reading: Internet Security Systems. Port Scanning. [Online, 2004]. Internet&lt;br /&gt;Security Systems Website. http://www.iss.net/security_center/advice/Underground/Hacking/&lt;br /&gt;Methods/Technical/Port_Scan/.&lt;br /&gt;Steganography (general term): The practice of hiding information in e-pictures, MP3 music&lt;br /&gt;files, or any binary data format that can be changed without invalidating the data format as well&lt;br /&gt;as retain the appearance of being unaltered. Steganography is successful because it is based on the&lt;br /&gt;Stallman, Richard 300&lt;br /&gt;fact that digital images and MP3 music files are comprised of thousands of pieces of binary code&lt;br /&gt;instructing a computer to color a pixel or to produce a certain sound. Because of the large number&lt;br /&gt;of digital information pieces involved, a few can easily be changed to convey secret messages&lt;br /&gt;without having a significant impact on the overall effect produced for the normal eye or ear.The&lt;br /&gt;secret information tends to be stored in the least important parts of a digital image or MP3 tune.&lt;br /&gt;Consider the potential that steganography could have for terrorists trying to communicate&lt;br /&gt;with each other over the Internet. In a holiday e-picture, for example, doz
